-
[QUOTE=Originalwook; 1204571]Pictures look too good for a "soccer mom" and given the fact that she wants too much personal info and a photo I'd upon my arrival makes me hesitant. Now, if she wants to be fair and provide me with her personal info ahead of time and show me her photo I'd as well, then I might reconsider.
Tineye turns up nothing with the pics and no phone number is provided so that is a dead end as well. I smell another Lia Nice so I would pass.[/QUOTE]These usually turn out to be an attempt to get you to join a site for 'age verification'. Either info phishing or they'll charge 5$ membership in order to get her contact info.
Simple rule: if the phone number is hard to get, just avoid.
-
Says who?
[QUOTE=Sirlixalot; 1204629]These usually turn out to be an attempt to get you to join a site for 'age verification'. Either info phishing or they'll charge 5$ membership in order to get her contact info.
Simple rule: if the phone number is hard to get, just avoid. [/QUOTE]Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."
If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake.
-
[QUOTE=Deviousdog;1204541]no BBBJ or multipops. For $$$? Pass.[/QUOTE]WTF? No BBBJ / cumdodger for $$$. The enhanced screening is not a big deal but the limts.
-
Options.
[QUOTE=Longhairngotee; 1204797]Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."
If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake. [/QUOTE]Seen her before. She is a nice lady, but not worth the donation she asks for. She was reffered to me by another provider named Miranda who has done doubles with her. Again, nice lady but not worth the donation in my opinion. If you are going to spend that kinda money, I would suggest Harley cruise (yes she is still around to regulars) or Taylar Lake. You get more bang for your buck.
-
[QUOTE=Longhairngotee; 1204797]Why do you make this comment about phishing and age verification? The ad has contact info, an email address. Many providers don't give out phone numbers until after an appointment has been made. Her legitimacy was also established. Below Lokillo says he has seen her. As Deviousdog said in his post, she is reviewed on T*R (numerous times) and has good reports, although I would agree her services don't warrant her fee. As for her appearance the most recent reviewer says "She was very much like her pictures. Pretty face, and a very lean and fit figure, with large breasts and slim, shapely legs that looked great beneath the short nightie she was wearing."
If her screening is too intrusive and her rate too high, one can move on. There's no reason to suggest she's fake. [/QUOTE]I for one would never offer any personal information to a provider. There was a thread on another discussion board where an escort basically admitted that she would use the personal information she had on a previous client to black mail him. She had his personal phone number, real name, place of employment and job phone number. She said that she would call his work and tell everyone that he consorted with hookers. Now granted, that is an extreme case but it is all the reason that I need to back away from "intrusive" screening by a provider.
-
[QUOTE=Originalwook;1204901]I for one would never offer any personal information to a provider. There was a thread on another discussion board where an escort basically admitted that she would use the personal information she had on a previous client to black mail him. She had his personal phone number, real name, place of employment and job phone number. She said that she would call his work and tell everyone that he consorted with hookers. Now granted, that is an extreme case but it is all the reason that I need to back away from "intrusive" screening by a provider.[/QUOTE]OW, I completely respect your view on giving up personal info, but the guy I was responding to seemed to imply that the lady in question is fake or a scam. That's a lot different than him just saying her screening is too invasive. Good hunting and and best wishes.
-
[QUOTE=Longhairngotee;1205125]OW, I completely respect your view on giving up personal info, but the guy I was responding to seemed to imply that the lady in question is fake or a scam. That's a lot different than him just saying her screening is too invasive. Good hunting and and best wishes.[/QUOTE]I had my doubts about her as well. Too many gray areas for me but as others have come forth to confirm that she is for real then she must be.
-
Ivy
Is Ivy still in business? I tried, last week, and she left me hanging by the tennis courts. Still no answer, not going to press it. Too bad too, she had some good reviews.
-
Ivy
[QUOTE=Tmans59; 1208231]Is Ivy still in business?[/QUOTE]Which Ivy?
-
Ivy
[QUOTE=Fuzzyface61;1208458]Which Ivy?[/QUOTE]This one I guess:
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/beautiful-and-classy-blond-25/4897693[/url]
BP ad is recent, but I gave up on her a while back, very difficult girl to get a hold of.
-
Ivy
[QUOTE=Deviousdog;1208893]BP ad is recent, but I gave up on her a while back, very difficult girl to get a hold of.[/QUOTE]Yep, she posted an ad message on another board within the last 18 hours, so I can only guess she considers herself to be active.
-
Ivy
[QUOTE=Deviousdog; 1208893]This one I guess:
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/beautiful-and-classy-blond-25/4897693[/url]
BP ad is recent, but I gave up on her a while back, very difficult girl to get a hold of. [/QUOTE]It's been a little while but she is worth the effort.
-
Ivy
IIRC, it has been reported here that she is better at returning texts than voicemails.
-
Ivy and Cost
[QUOTE=Jasper123;1209862]IIRC, it has been reported here that she is better at returning texts than voicemails.[/QUOTE]She looks hot, but very pricey.
-
Discreet Meets
EXTREMELY fucking disappointed with this service tonight. In town for a few days on business, called and set up an appointment for 8 PM with Vanessa at my hotel near the airport. At 8:20 I called them again, and just figured she was running a little late.
Finally got a hold of someone around 9, she told me she would contact Vanessa to see what happened and I would be called back within 5 minutes. Another 30 goes by and still no word. Now 10 pm, night is ruined, can't get a hold of another provider of good quality, and completely pissed the fuck off. At the very least, if she wasnt coming for WHATEVER reason I should have been given a call informing me so I didn't sit on my ass waiting around.
Completely unprofessional considering the rave reviews I've seen of this service. I won't be wasting my time with these people again.