Re: Thanks for all the support
[QUOTE=JohnnyBlazze]Jackson and Fellas,
...so I will continue to post.
Johnny B[/QUOTE]
Thank you. You have given me something to look for the next time I am out.
Nice pictures, Johnny B.
CookyJar
Why would he explain anything to you?
[QUOTE=Ed Norton]I was so happy to see you say this, CookyJar. It looks to make things less confusing when we discuss people here.
While we're on the subject, what happened on the recent occasion with [b]Erin[/b], whom Davey1965 just recognized from your post? We all appreciated the pictures you posted of her, and I'm sure there will be discussions to follow about her personality, technique, and sighting locations. But the name you used with the photos was [i]Elen!![/i]
Poor Mike 80 has had to resort to a description of "Cooky's 'Cherrry' (Julie)" in a followup post on Julie. I hope you can spare him and others from inventing another mouthful such as "Cooky's 'Elen' (Erin)" by confirming the name she gave you was also Erin.
Could you follow up on your quote above with the promised explanation? Thanks![/QUOTE]
This is a prime example of useless criticism from a poster who has raised it to an art form. Who are you to ask for anything from CJ? He owes you nothing, and you contribute nothing. Whether you favor or disfavor CJ, at least he comes across, unlike all his "critics" on this thread. Buncha fucking wastes of bandwidth. Go and do better yourself.
Given the crap CJ takes every time he goes to the trouble to post pics for all the chronic masturbators who gravitate towards them, he owes you no explanation or anything else. Whhaaaaah, he didn't give an accurate name. It's already been established she's a legit SW by Davey's later post. Go suck on your pacifier and take a nap, poor baby. Posting pics for this audience is literally casting pearls before swine. For the life of me I don't know why he bothers anymore.
It's like the old saying goes, "those who can't do, teach." Take a lesson from that and do something of use other than berate members whose posts don't meet your exacting standards. There's nothing more useless on this board then posts like yours.
Here ends the venting.
Give me good pics and reports over accurate names any day
[QUOTE=Ed Norton]Poor Mike 80 has had to resort to a description of "Cooky's 'Cherrry' (Julie)" in a followup post on Julie. I hope you can spare him and others from inventing another mouthful such as "Cooky's 'Elen' (Erin)" by confirming the name she gave you was also Erin.[/QUOTE]Ed, I'm willing to cut you a little slack because you actually do post some useful reports from time to time but please don't use me to criticize CJ. Cooky is the clear MVP of USASexGuide IMO. So he gets SW names wrong from time to time. I could care less. I'd much rather have his pics and reports attached to the wrong name than not have them at all.
BTW, on that topic, as I look at Cooky's shots of "Blondie/Shorty" from a few days ago, I'd say I'm about 90% sure this is 'my" Donna Marie from a few days earlier. I know before he posted his photos, I said that I doubted the girl he described was the one I picked up but after studying CJ's pics and given the area where a few of us have mentioned picking her up, I'm pretty sure this is her after all. For one thing what are the odds of multiple, petite WSWs running around Front with breasts like hers and the same favorite line about "Do you like big ones or small ones...because I've got both?"
I didn't fully unwrap her so I didn't see the tats and none of Cooky's photos is a straight-on shot of her eyes and smile. Besides her mismatched breasts her most distinctive feature were her clear, pretty blue eyes (-at least I think they were blue but, hey, we all forget). Keep up the great work, Cooky. As for Ed, c'mon man get with the program.