-
As far as I can tell
[QUOTE=Joseph Alley;1551392]It is interesting how this has turned out. I keep warning about being so quick to offer details to regular members who might even be LE on the Board trying to take down these girls whom we should be protecting. Now I am seeing Regular members responding saying "It's not me." Why was this info given so quickly to regular members?[/QUOTE]Hi JA,
I believe only myself and one other member responded saying that it was not us that mentioned the board to this girl and we are both trusted senior members IMHO.
Fever
-
That's the point: It wasn't given out to regular members; only seniors. So much for the "seniors only" system. SSG, correct me if I am wrong, but did you not give the info only to other seniors?
[QUOTE=Joseph Alley;1551392]It is interesting how this has turned out. I keep warning about being so quick to offer details to regular members who might even be LE on the Board trying to take down these girls whom we should be protecting. Now I am seeing Regular members responding saying "It's not me." Why was this info given so quickly to regular members?[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=BillyPilgrim;1551470]That's the point: It wasn't given out to regular members; only seniors. So much for the "seniors only" system. SSG, correct me if I am wrong, but did you not give the info only to other seniors?[/QUOTE]Well,
If it was only given to Seniors it should be easy to figure out who it was. Regulars forgive me if my judged wrongly. It is just inconceivable that a Senior would be so idiot and insensitive. I asked for the contact info but never got a response. Now I am glad. The point is though guys, let us be more sensitive what is posted and how we deal with these ladies.
-
[QUOTE=Joseph Alley; 1551585]Well,
If it was only given to Seniors it should be easy to figure out who it was. Regulars forgive me if my judged wrongly. It is just inconceivable that a Senior would be so idiot and insensitive. I asked for the contact info but never got a response. Now I am glad. The point is though guys, let us be more sensitive what is posted and how we deal with these ladies.[/QUOTE]Ra-aight, like asking them if it's ok to do a review on them here before actually doing it. This is a semi-open forum. One doesn't have to do much to acquire the membership with USG or for that matter the seniority. I personally don't care if anyone tells any of the women that I reviewed here that you're calling them because you saw their reviews on USG since every one of them knows about this site, glad to use it, and even often use it as a point of reference.
Some women (semi-pros) I know however don't want me to give out their numbers to my friends, meaning people I [U]personally[/U] Know and hang out with, let alone review them here or even PM them around as UTRs. If you stick to that premise you're guaranteed to have no issues about your reviews. There are some who want to be reviewed, there are others who only want to be passed around as UTRs, and then there are those who want neither. Those women have different circumstances, different types of lives, so let's be sensitive to their wishes and have them decide if they mind having a review here or not. Obviously one's got to use one's own judgement, like I probably would in generally apply a bit looser standard to Streetwalkers (still wouldn't put their pictures out before asking them though) or to those who already have facial shots on backpage or the like and especially to some sort of negative / warning reviews. If she was good however, I'd say one should give her courtesy of asking her if it's ok before reviewing her or UTRing her around.
Unfortunately I myself never got a chance to get in touch with Tasha, although was planning to once initial rush would die down a bit. Still speaking of SSG: since Tasha is not her real name, there is really no harm done so I think in many ways it's all [I]much ado about nothing[/I], on both Tasha's part and on ours.
-
[QUOTE=Nrlmus;1551635]Still speaking of SSG: since Tasha is not her real name, there is really no harm done so I think in many ways it's all [I]much ado about nothing[/I], on both Tasha's part and on ours.[/QUOTE]To add, I think it would be nice if the next person that sees Tasha tried to impose this point on her. I mean how many people live in Hyde Park who fit the description [I]"pretty black girl in the early-to-mid 20s"[/I]? You'd probably get at least couple of thousand that fall under that, in fact likely much more. On the other hand, she would get a lot of business from here, and as I recall SSG saying that the minute people began calling her (due to SSG's report mind you) she instantly doubled her price. That supply-and-demand thingy, huh? Works every time.
-
Thanks but no thanks!
[QUOTE=Nrlmus;1551849]To add, I think it would be nice if the next person that sees Tasha tried to impose this point on her. I mean how many people live in Hyde Park who fit the description [I]"pretty black girl in the early-to-mid 20s"[/I]? You'd probably get at least couple of thousand that fall under that, in fact likely much more. On the other hand, she would get a lot of business from here, and as I recall SSG saying that the minute people began calling her (due to SSG's report mind you) she instantly doubled her price. That supply-and-demand thingy, huh? Works every time.[/QUOTE]This whole thing sucks! Thanks for the PM SSG. Sounds like she's trouble
But anyway I was looking in CLCE and found this ad.
Facial tonight. W4m.
-
I love that do you I can host you must travel email me pic for pic be patient for the response I am real put your age in the subject
-
I'm not sure about the pic for pic thing but other than that it might be worth checking out.
We'll see.
THp
-
Vicki in winthrop
Anyone know what happened to Vicki in Winthrop? She was not much to look at but gave me one of the best BJS ever. She lived close to the water with lesbian gf.
-
[QUOTE=Stressed Out;1550883]This is one reason that we have our small brotherhood of guys that we talk / pm with. We get shit for doing it. Senior privilages. You don't help out the newbies and all that BS but this is exactly why we don't[/QUOTE]My old friend SO. Ill concur with you on this. Only sharing with trusted senior members is generally a good rule of thumb. However I will provide a warning to this forum that SM's shouldn't be given automatic "trusted" status. Back in the day. I tried to pay my dues on this board and others by posting almost every experience I had. As PW Herman reminds newbies "you got to give a little to get a little". Perfect. I posted a series of intel on ladies and slowly but surely some of the ladies I mentioned started hammering me for giving out info about them. Why? Well it seems guys on this board would call up a lady and say "my friend Skiboz (at the time my email and handle were the same) said that you did BBBJ's for an $80 tip. Can I schedule?"
What idiot says that?
Ok. Lesson learned. I'll only share UTR intel with trusted seniors. That should solve the problem right? Nope. I had one guy go to a girl and said "I thought you did x act for $x money?" She said "no. Why would you think that?" This rocket scientist decided to open up his smartphone, navigate to USASG and show her my Private Message. Well - I guess it didn't take her too long to read my message and figure out it was me. So I was banished. I gave out her info to a handful of what I thought was truly trusted sm's and to this day I can't figure out who ratted.
Trusted & Senior Member doesn't automatically go hand in hand. I've stopped posting much on this forum, but rather share / trade info to guys that over the years have proven their discretion. My advice (although probably not very popular) is don't share intel on UTR's blindly regardless of Senior status. If you haven't shared intel with them in the past. Be cautious and understand the risk. We all like to think we have a brotherhood here and that we will live up to the "Monger's Code". Unfortunately some SM's are just as selfish and dumb as some newbies are. And- some newbies are more trustworthy than some SM's. So truly "trusted" is the key word here and in my opinion more qualifying than "Senior Member".
-
Echo echo echo
[QUOTE=Ski Boz; 1553419]My old friend SO. Ill concur with you on this. Only sharing with trusted senior members is generally a good rule of thumb. However I will provide a warning to this forum that SM's shouldn't be given automatic "trusted" status. Back in the day. I tried to pay my dues on this board and others by posting almost every experience I had. As PW Herman reminds newbies "you got to give a little to get a little". Perfect. I posted a series of intel on ladies and slowly but surely some of the ladies I mentioned started hammering me for giving out info about them. Why? Well it seems guys on this board would call up a lady and say "my friend Skiboz (at the time my email and handle were the same) said that you did BBBJ's for an $80 tip. Can I schedule?"
What idiot says that?
Ok. Lesson learned. I'll only share UTR intel with trusted seniors. That should solve the problem right? Nope. I had one guy go to a girl and said "I thought you did x act for $x money?" She said "no. Why would you think that?" This rocket scientist decided to open up his smartphone, navigate to USASG and show her my Private Message. Well. I guess it didn't take her too long to read my message and figure out it was me. So I was banished. I gave out her info to a handful of what I thought was truly trusted sm's and to this day I can't figure out who ratted.
Trusted & Senior Member doesn't automatically go hand in hand. I've stopped posting much on this forum, but rather share / trade info to guys that over the years have proven their discretion. My advice (although probably not very popular) is don't share intel on UTR's blindly regardless of Senior status. If you haven't shared intel with them in the past. Be cautious and understand the risk. We all like to think we have a brotherhood here and that we will live up to the "Monger's Code". Unfortunately some SM's are just as selfish and dumb as some newbies are. And- some newbies are more trustworthy than some SM's. So truly "trusted" is the key word here and in my opinion more qualifying than "Senior Member".[/QUOTE]I could not have said it better. Like you, I gave info to "trusted" SM's who were dumber than a box of rocks when it came to handling that info. Yup, Coast Hog aka Ocean Rover told me this or that. Geezus. WTF.
So the circle of trusted SM's who got UTR info got a lot smaller and stays that way today.
So it's not newbie vs SM. It's simply trusted vs all others
-
[QUOTE=Coast Hog; 1553469]I could not have said it better. Like you, I gave info to "trusted" SM's who were dumber than a box of rocks when it came to handling that info. Yup, Coast Hog aka Ocean Rover told me this or that. Geezus. WTF.
So the circle of trusted SM's who got UTR info got a lot smaller and stays that way today.
So it's not newbie vs SM. It's simply trusted vs all others[/QUOTE]I could not agree with you all more! I may not post as often on the forum anymore since I only prefer to see UTR girls and or girls from the old Centennial but in the past I have shared some info whom I had thought were to be trusted senior members only to have some guys fck it up for the rest of us. I reached out to nrlmus a while ago wanting to start a private known senior members circle of trust but seemed to be too much work.
Do you think this would be something that some of you guys maybe interested in doing? If so send me a PM.
-
[QUOTE=Coast Hog; 1553469]I could not have said it better. Like you, I gave info to "trusted" SM's who were dumber than a box of rocks when it came to handling that info. Yup, Coast Hog aka Ocean Rover told me this or that. Geezus. WTF.
So the circle of trusted SM's who got UTR info got a lot smaller and stays that way today.
So it's not newbie vs SM. It's simply trusted vs all others[/QUOTE]When I provide someone I don't really know with the UTR info it's not the senior status that I personally pay most attention to, although it does play a significant part in my consideration. I literally left click on their username, choose View Forum Posts and skim through what they've already posted. Kind of create for myself a psychological profile of a brother-monger based on their forum history. Sometimes after 10 postings you can conclude that this person is ok and trustworthy and sometimes not. Once I decided not to provide a senior with over 250 messages to his name with the UTR info. Then there were people upset at me, PMing me that how dare I think that they are crazy! Of course PMs like that only validated my initial weariness and I would instantly slot them into that particular category of people.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts seniority is not that hard to acquire on this forum so it doesn't guarantee anything. When an unfamiliar member messages, you first and foremost has to use your own judgement and I think the best way one can make an educated guess is to skim through a monger's posts and if you get an inkling that something is off, or even if a member is a senior member but only due to having a lot of questions and comments but no reviews, I'd suggest to be weary and at the very least ask for references and actually check them. I personally no longer provide info [I]to those I'm [U]un[/U]familiar with [/I]who have no reviews that I would consider valid. Whether it's fare or not is irrelevant. I remember how when I first started posting on this forum one senior member refused to provide me with info on some reviewed UTR. Then I was a bit angry but now of course I view this from a different angle. Safety first mi amigos, safety first.
-
[QUOTE=Coast Hog;1553469]So the circle of trusted SM's who got UTR info got a lot smaller and stays that way today.[/QUOTE]CH. I completely forgot that you're previously OceanRover. Glad to re-make that connection. You were one of my first "trusted" friends from many years back on this and especially the other board.
It's truly unfortunate that our circles have become smaller and smaller over the years. I've been on another paid review site for over 10 years, CLR before it died for 6, and this board for about 5. And I've learned that cliques are inevitable. Mostly out of necessity. Imagine how much pussy we could all collectively be getting right now. If everyone held up their end of the bargain in our collective? If everyone would go out TOFTT every once and awhile, report back to the board, have some common sense when acting on board reviews, and keep their mouth shut about this board. Instead we rightfully hoard and whisper our findings with smaller and smaller groups of friends. It's truly a sad day when there's a hot / fun girl out there that I don't get to bang because my circle doesn't intersect with another groups circle.
Gianni. If you're looking to be a part of a group. You can't go wrong people like Coast, SO, PW Herman, Natebost, Norm or LBJ on your roster. I'd start there. Although they're not necessarily in my circle. These guys are solid.
-
[QUOTE=Nrlmus;1553606]Once I decided not to provide a senior with over 250 messages to his name with the UTR info. Then there were people upset at me, PMing me that how dare I think that they are crazy! Of course PMs like that only validated my initial weariness and I would instantly slot them into that particular category of people.[/QUOTE]Nrlmus. Not sure who was angry with you, but you're completely correct. There are way too many guys on here that share nothing but rather just provide color commentary here or there and rack up their post count and then demand senior status intel. You've shared intel with me in the past and it was 100% solid. So I'm glad I made the cut.
-
[QUOTE=Gianni Versace; 1553555]I could not agree with you all more! I may not post as often on the forum anymore since I only prefer to see UTR girls and or girls from the old Centennial but in the past I have shared some info whom I had thought were to be trusted senior members only to have some guys fck it up for the rest of us. I reached out to nrlmus a while ago wanting to start a private known senior members circle of trust but seemed to be too much work.
Do you think this would be something that some of you guys maybe interested in doing? If so send me a PM.[/QUOTE]Gianni, amigo, don't worry about the list. If I have a UTR to share, rest assured you'd be on my list. If you have UTR to share and you want to share her with me (or whoever else) , just share it. If you don't want her to be reviewed on the open forum, just say so. If you just want to share her with me but don't want me to UTR her around, say so too and it shall be done. Trust me if I have certain wishes in regards to this or that provider that I decide to share with you I'd spell them out before sharing as well. I remember who you hooked me up with very well and if I get a chance to return the favor, I won't hesitate.
As for trusted seniors I'd like to add to the list the likes of Shakhtar, Yellowfever and of course SouthShoreGuy. We shared some in the past and hopefully shall share some in the future.
-
Thank you Ski Boz. Of course it was mostly newbies. I remember how one with zero reviews and couple of requests reacted with [I]Thank you for thinking I'm psychologically unstable, you shit! [/I] As I said in earlier post there was even one senior with over 250 messages. I don't remember exactly who it was now but I do remember myself humming in amazement as I was skimming through his scores of posting trying to find at least one review.