Thread Starter.
Printable View
Thread Starter.
[QUOTE=Runnow] I am pretty comfortable on the streets around K ave but I would not recommend hitting the back streets on foot at night too often.
I went for a second round with Jackie. She is a slim red head who I have seen before mostly south of Lehigh. She has a cute face and a nice body but her fingers look like she has been smoking for a few years. She has some tattoos on her neck. I did not bother to read what they said. I have seen her out before anytime between 11am and 11pm. I told her that I do not do anything in the car or on the street so she called one of her girl friends with a house. I know some of you would never go into a house down here but I have never had a problem as long as I go with my instinct.[/QUOTE]Runnow,
Small world isn’t it. It seems like we have a mutual friend. She doesn’t know it, let’s keep it that way. Hope you don’t mine my borrowing your review of Jackie.
Cool! I don’t have to do a review on Jackie. I’ll just ditto Runnows’ review. My two encounters with Jackie were nearly the same as Runnows’. Right down to the hands.
Runnow, did you get to meet her roomie? Unfortunate that she was too out of it to be included in Jackie and my plans. I do believe Jackie has received mixed reviews on this forum. However, my time with Jackie was pleasant and rewarding. This only goes to prove that YMMV. Would I see Jackie a second time? I already have.
Hey Runnow, the last time I attempted to contact Jackie her roomie said she was not there. I was park right down the street and observed a nice looking, thin, fairly nicely dressed Black girl enter the building. She had the look of a SW. You wouldn’t know her, would you? A nice looking BSW is rare on the K.
[QUOTE=Jasman84] Anyway I had to warn you to stay away from red-haired Jackie. She is about a 13 on a SW scale but the personality is -6. It really sucks that bad, it was just terrible. Shes thin about 110 pounds, if that, cute face, hot body, walks with her best freind between lehigh and york on K. As the saying goes all that glitters isn't gold. I have never seen her beofre but she kept smiling at me so I decided to give it a shot. So she gets in and is nice at first, she says she has a room for 10 like most girls do. We get the small talk over with she says she's 23, and she looks every bit of it. So we get there and ofcourse she wants the money up front telling me she always gets the money up front, and I'm like I never give all the money up front. Well she kept fussing and carrying on about we can't do anything unless she has all of it upfront. So I already paid for the room and I was tired so I gave in and paid her upfront. I now realize my biggest mistake. Well after all this fuussing and her getting an attitude with me I am totally turned off from her so ofcourse I'm soft as cotton now. I try getting it up and nothing works, she then says after about 30 seconds (you would think 2 hours had passed) "If you can't get it up no refunds your loss" so I'm like you gotta be kidding me, she then gets up and puts her clothes back on and at the point so do I after being that disgusted with her and her terrible attitude. So it was a perfectly fine waste of 50 bucks. Don't make the same mistake I did, eventhough I'm sure your experienced vets won't, but for any other newbies on here like myself watch out for Jackie and never pay everything up front.[/QUOTE]Jasman84,
Is this the same girl? As always, YMMV
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Hortense]
Even the Supreme Court had trouble with this definition, but two components seem to jump out in the above arguments:
1) Multiple photos of the same woman, which might imply they are intended for sexual gratification rather than identification.
2) Nude photos of women's body parts.
[/QUOTE]
I am not suggesting that I have the answer. Something has to be said about intent and the eye of the beholder. I don't see my pictures as being porn (well, at least not hard porn). Porn is not my intention. There are guys out there that beat off to the Mona Lisa. If the Supreme Court cannot decide, what makes anyone think that a decision can be determined on this site?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Any good professional photographer will tell you that it is better to take as many shots, in as many poses as necessary to insure that you got the best possible picture. Often a pro photographer will bracket a pose, taking three different exposures of the same model in one position. This is done in accordance with the belief that it is better to take more and get the shot you want then to chance missing it by taking not enough pictures. I am not claiming to be a professional photographer, or even a good one. I do have a back ground as an amateur, and old habits die hard. So I tend to take to many pictures. I try to limit it to ten, however; I often go overboard, especially if my subject is interesting. What to do with the extra pics? Post them? Why not?
I know somebody is going to comment that 10 or 20 pictures of the same girl are too much. Why? After all no one is obligated to look at all of the pictures. There isn’t a charge for having them appear in here (and there seems to be an infinite amount of room).
This second set of pictures was taken in Jackie’s house. I wouldn’t recommend that anyone make it a habit of going to a SWs location. I still have enough ghetto in me to believe that I can hang out where I shouldn’t. Going to any location with a known SW is risky; going to her home is a big risk.
Again, let me state that Jackie is a good one, in my book. But, YMMV.
CookyJar
I do have contact information for Jackie. This information will only be given to Senior Members who post reviews. As other mongers seem to have had no problem meeting up with Jackie the fact that contact information will not be given out willy nilly should not bother anyone.
I apologize in advance if any of my pictures, there content or quanitity offenses anyone. I also apologize if any thing that I've said offends anyone, that is never my intention.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=JNimble]Melissa caught my eye at the south end of the K and I looped around. At first, I wasn't sure if she was working, but she came right over when I passed her and pulled to the curb. She's about 5' 6" with reddish hair pulled back into a short ponytail. What caught my eye was that she had a pretty good body with GREAT tits. Nice combo!
First of all, she was about the nicest and most easy-going SWs I've ever met. She was truly pleasant, although a little slow talking which may have meant she was loaded on something.
We found a good spot for some privacy and negotiated 1/2 & 1/2 for $40 plus a tip if the service was good. The first half was great, but the second was so-so. She was pretty docile and there was a, let's say pungent, aroma wafting up from the playground. That pretty much killed the mood for me and all I wanted was to finish and get out.
Afterwards, I took her back to her neighborhood and dropped her off. As I mentioned, she's a sweet girl. I'd pick her up again for a BJ, although would probably pass for anything further.
Stay safe,
Jack[/QUOTE]JNimble's original report was made on 10/05/06.
Jack, Runnow and Davey - is this the same girl, I don't want to be bad mouthing the wrong Melissa.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A girls named Melissa has recently been reviewed in the Streetwalker Reports Thread. I am not sure whether this is the same girl. However the description seems to fit. Even the details about her personality seems to fit. I am sorry but I cannot comment on her talents as a provider. For reasons that I will explain later, I did not partake of her gifts.
I agree with all that has been said about Melissa (if this is the same girl). She is friendly, responsive, and cute as a button and an otherwise nice girl. But, at the risk of having another less then favorable review reported back to the girl, I must report that the odor reported in previous reviews has become over whelming. There is an air of uncleanliness about Melissa. This goes beyond not being fresh. Her outer coat, clothing, shirt, pants and her socks and sneakers were all filthy. You will note that Melissa choose to remove her socks before having her pictures taken, even the ones taken outside standing in the cold were taken bare footed. I cropped her sneakers out of the pictures, but you can take my word, they were a mess.
I sincerely liked Melissa. Without the odor, I’d have to believe that she would have been a great date. I’d also have to believe that the other mongers that reviewed Melissa must have gotten to her prior to her decline. This often happens. A girl starts off fresh and after a week or two out there on the streets she declines into a mess. Two or three weeks ago her boobies were probably perky, her body firm and her pussy fresh. That was then, this is now.
Would I stop again for Melissa? Actually, yes I would. That is provided she has cleaned up, taken a bath and changed clothing. (I have seen Melissa twice, on two different days, since these pictures were taken and she was in the same outfit.)
I hate posting a negative review. I don’t want to hamper a nice girl from doing her thing. Melissa has a great personality. Perhaps she has cleaned up and no longer deserves a negative report. Also, I know now that I am at risk of having my words printed out and shown to the provider. However, I believe this type of information should be passed on.
CookyJar
PS: Another reason I'd stop again for Melissa: You will notice that Melissa has what we black guys like to call, "A nice gap." This is a very desirable trait.
[QUOTE=Admin][blue]Gentlemen,
Beginning today, I will delete every report that isn't directly about sport fucking in Philadelphia.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.[/i]
Let's get back to the subject.
Thank You,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]I know that Christmas is more then two weeks away but I finished my shopping early and I was saving this for later, but. Darn it Jackson you've been such a good boy this year, I am giving you your present early. The rest of you will have to wait until next week.
Carrie was a lot of fun. One of the best times I’ve spent on a car date in a long time. She’s cooperative in every aspect. There were a couple of moments when I forgot who she was; it was almost like being on a real world date. It was like I was coaching my girlfriend into taking naked picture. Once we started giggling it was hard to stop.
After taking the pictures we decided to move to a better location. As we drove around looking for a little privacy, Carrie continued to act sexually playful, teasing and keeping me aroused. Jackson, don’t let a few stretch mark deter you, Carrie had a nice body to go along with her GFE personality. Pound for pound, dollar for dollar and all things being considered, Carrie was an excellent all around date. Of cause, as always, YMMV.
Heads up fellows the snitch cams are here. And they will be coming to a nieghborhood near you, soon.
Other then the mention of some traffic light cameras on the Blvd, I don't remember any advance notice on these spy in the skys. Beside these, I seen them on Broad St, near Erie Ave. They have a bright blue light on top and at night they are visable for miles.
They remind me of the cameras in that old movie. Not 1984, but the other one with the firemen.
I would not be surprized if they don't have less comspicuous models already planted about the city.
So there they are, be careful, Big Brother is watching.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar]I know that Christmas is more then two weeks away but I finished my shopping early and I was saving this for later, but. Darn it Jackson you've been such a good boy this year, I am giving you your present early. The rest of you will have to wait until next week.
Carrie was a lot of fun. One of the best times I’ve spent on a car date in a long time. She’s cooperative in every aspect. There were a couple of moments when I forgot who she was; it was almost like being on a real world date. It was like I was coaching my girlfriend into taking naked picture. Once we started giggling it was hard to stop.
After taking the pictures we decided to move to a better location. As we drove around looking for a little privacy, Carrie continued to act sexually playful, teasing and keeping me aroused. Jackson, don’t let a few stretch mark deter you, Carrie had a nice body to go along with her GFE personality. Pound for pound, dollar for dollar and all things being considered, Carrie was an excellent all around date. Of cause, as always, YMMV.[/QUOTE]WoW !! I'm impressed. Great pics. I've dated Carrie quite a while ago and totally forgot about her. Haven't seen her in ages. Although I do have to say that last time I saw her she was a bit more groomed. Guess I'd have to do the CVS stop for a cheap razor and a travel size shaving cream (total damage about 2.50) and leave her in the Patio Bathroom for a bit. LOL
Think I'm gonna ask Santa for a small digital camera that I can fit in my
shirt pocket and get into the swing of things taking pics. My old faithfull 1.0 meg camera died and don't want to take out the Rebel XT on the ave.
Nice seeing that after all this time though she still looks pretty good. Too many of these girls literally deteriorate overnight.
This is one of those occasions when a picture is worth a thousand words. I did a name search in both the General and Streetwalker Threads and came up with a number of references to a girl named Angie. However, many of the references did not contain a review and those that did were vague and varied. Now that there is a picture to go with a name, it would help if the members who have dated this Angie would chime in to clear things up.
This Angie, the one I dated, was definitely my type of girl. I am going to go out on a limb and say; the impression I got was that she’d been around for awhile. Yet, she came off fresh as a daisy. That is; she’s a pro but you’d never know it from her personality. She took care of the formalities first, made the deal and then got down to business. Don’t get me wrong; after the prelims were done she was straight GFE.
Angie’s body is soft, no jiggle, no flab, just easy to the touch. Get this! Her breath was minty. No, I didn’t kiss her, but; I was close enough to smell a hint of mint. The hair around her pussy was light and furry, the kind you wouldn’t mind sticking your face in. (No, I didn’t do that either.) What I did do I enjoyed and would gladly do again.
From the reviews that I read that described a girl similar in appearance; I’ve concluded that not everyone is going to agree with my assessment of Angie. This just goes to prove, like always, YMMV.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Phillyewe]There is no need to clear things up. Angie has been around for a long time and she is well-documented. There have always been pictures to go with her name, for example, please RTFF.
Also please note that the reports give specifics on what type of sex the reviewer had with her, what she charges, her technique, where she was found, and when she was out. In other words, information that is helpful to men seeking women for sex.[/QUOTE]Really great research. Sorry I didn't go further back. I only checked 2006.
There were reports of a bleached Blonde Angie, a Angie with long dark hair and a heavy Angie. Many of the references were in a list and copies of other list. Time did not allow me to go thought all of the post that mentioned a girl named Angie.
I am sorry that I cannot give out more info then I do. But, if you've been reading the current post you know that I was recently burned for information post on this thread. I will provide information that is helpful to men seeking women for sex, to certain members by PM. For the most part, regulars like Angie are easy enough to find.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Skrit]Nice girl all the same. Agreed. Treat her nice, she treats you nice. Saw her today. Said I saw her pics, thinking she would like that.
But Cookiejar treated her like a piece of shit! She said he told her he would not put her pics on the internet. I said you sure? She said yeah. So he puts 10 pics on the internet. I guess you pay $30 per pic you get to lie? I say bullshit. You need to apologize CJ. I told her I would ask the moderator to delete the pics.[/QUOTE]Here we go again. Except, this time I don't believe a word. I don't have to lie. There are plenty of girls willing to have their pictures shown on the internet. Angie is a regular and knew her picture had been shown before.
Are you out of your mine? $30 buck per picture? Come on? That's $300 for a set of ten. Do you really believe that I gave Jackie $780 dallors for the 26 pictures I posted of her. I post two sometime three girls a week. Do the math. My name is CookyJar, not Bill Gates.
This from a guy who counts I's, rants about rants, but has never posted a review. (I still cannot believe you counted my I's.) Sorry I don't believe a word you said.
CookyJar
Wasn't sure who was telling the truth so since I see her just about every day I asked her. Angie told me that not only was Cookie a very nice guy but she is suppossed to see him again sometime this week. She told me she hasn't discussed those pics with anyone since they were taken. Hope this puts that to rest! Keep up the good work my man. She not only didn't care that they were posted she said she hopes to see him soon.
T
P. I talked to her today at 3:15 pm
Wow - a new Streetwalker Photos Thread, how cool.
CookyJar
Merry Christmas and A Happy New Years
From Christine and CookyJar
Good Luck and Good Hunting in the New Year
B4N
Hmm, let me see. Who should I believe. A senior member with 200+ posts or someone with 11 posts with an apparent axe to grind. Skrit, you may want to think about what you are posting before attacking a senior member who has been one of the most prolific contributors (if not the most prolific) in the Philly forum. Oh wait, maybe you obtained your information from the only streetwalker out there who tells the truth! That must be it. Silly me! Skrit, either you are naive, or you are dishonest in your report. You should be thanking cookyjar for his reports, instead of spreading be. S. On this board. Get a clue. Thank you cookyjar for your continued, valuable contributions.