Step 1. Type "rubmaps lexington" into Google.
Step 2. Click on the first link.
Step 3. Look at the first result.
Step 4. Accept that parlors which ACTIVELY POST THEMSELVES ON CRAIGSLIST ARE NOT ANONYMOUS IN ANY WAY.
Step 5. Move on with life, knowing you aren't in any way in control of who the police bust, or don't bust.
The notion that because a place gives a better HJ than another results in it being busted is bizarre to me. Also, the "cryptic" stuff doesn't stop anything, it just slows people down and causes confusion. An INVESTIGATOR would investigate until those cryptic codes made sense. We should all know that, because the site turns us into investigators because of the insistence of some to continue being obtuse. It reminds me of when I wanted to experience Providence. I ended up just googling for some places, and found a list of literally every place that has been there (possibly under prior ownership) on a web blog that outs all the parlors and calls for reforms.
So a website dedicated to ending the operation of the mp's was more informative than these forums. Sad.
For a more on-topic questions... doesn't some of the Lexington locations share ownership? Could that mean an improvement in others, or some related in other towns? If anyone knows the inter-relations, please give a heads up.
[QUOTE=ChuckyMack; 1893238][url]http://lexington.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/alleged-massage-parlor-prostitutes-arrested-after-investigation[/url]
This place was stung once already last year. I understand that posting here doesn't tell Leo anything they don't already know but it's nice to have another reliable go-to for a while. Our sharing of general info doesn't tell them where us mongers are going but getting super specific makes it easier for them to decide when a place needs a visit. I feel that being a little cryptic or phonetic with descriptions helps prevent search engines from hitting on providers. Or links to CL or BP ads provide all the info needed without spelling out city state and zip.[/QUOTE]