I read that review and remember the "surprise" ending
[QUOTE=Flagrant;5527839]I find TER useful, but I'm kind of soured on their customer service. I post reviews under my old name (popeyemadison). The only way to really get any value out of it is to write a review yourself so that you get VIP access for 14 days or whatever it is. Then you can see all the details. They fucked up this review of mine for Loyal by hiding the fact that she ripped me off in the Juicy Details section:
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/loyal-review-by-popeyemadison-2293062[/URL]
That's not what I submitted originally. They purposefully tucked the most salient fact about my review into the paid section. And then defended it by saying it's a paid service. Well, guess what, TER? Fuck you. I'll never pay for your service. LOL.
Here's the juicy details:
Which I also posted to in the ripoff reports when it happened.
Anyway, this girl is now calling herself Melissa:
[URL]https://madison.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/beautiful-cant-be-more-descrip/160548115296[/URL]
The number is 608-xxx-0470.
I would avoid.[/QUOTE]Some reviewers have been adding a line in the public section that previews the direction of the "paid" section of the review without getting explicit. For example, something as innocuous as, "However, not all appeared as it first seemed" would have clued me to stay away if I were someone without access to the paid section. And, no, I've never paid them either. I do find TER useful, though, as a point of comparison. And if you find a couple of reviewers there who match your previous provider experiences, it can be helpful in deciding whether to see someone the first time that they've already reviewed.
TER "photo accurate?"
[QUOTE=HeywoodJablow;5528897]I thought they usually ended the free portion with "would / would not repeat..[/QUOTE]To me, one of the most useful references in the free section of TER is the "Is Photo Accurate?" question? If the answer is "No" then it's a bait and switch, or else a woman who's using 20 year old photos of herself.
STG had a posting by a girl going by "Bailey" recently. The photos looked good, and the fact that she charged more than the others made me think that she may be a quality provider. Then I checked TER and saw that the photos aren't legitimate, which told me that it's not worth any further investigation.