8 photos
Here's some more info on Landry
I'm adding the information about the guy who attacked me escort here so that I don't clog up the Massage Parlor thread with this conversation. The links provided are for his arraignment video, police citation, criminal case file cover and photos of the SUV and the hammer. The information was already made public, so I'm not blocking out address or background information so that you can verify that it is the way the information appears at the court house. You can compare what he said to the judge in court to the fairytale he told the report and draw your own conclusions.
VIDEO:
[url]https://www.box.net/shared/frg7pcpagr9i5fy4sc89[/url]
Case information:
[url]https://www.box.net/shared/8qanvfq1xth9hd3g653v[/url]
Police citation:
[url]https://www.box.net/shared/pd0oapv05arkvv0ixzxc[/url]
Only 1 handle: for only 1 person.
[QUOTE=Jim True Blue;1272993]I had two PM, but none from your handle of Kyowa. So y[u]ou have more than one handle?[/u] Two or maybe three?[/QUOTE]No!
"Kyowa" is the only handle\identity I use on this board! Maybe I've screwed the puppy somehow when I've tried to p' m' you? According to the "track messages" on my "notifications" it says it was "sent 8/30" so I don't know whether the prob' is in my outbound or your inbox!
T' Y'
A K
What happened at the hearing on 9/8
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle;1271916]One of the My1501 former employees facing charges is headed to court on 9/8. She, along with at least one of the other defendants, are involved in plea negotiations. The negotiations involve, in part, proffers by the defendants discussing the specifics of what occurred at the establishment. Details that have yet to be made public are forthcoming. The information sought by LEO involves the owners of My1501 and their affiliates. A decision has been made regarding whether they will be charged, and will be made public soon. LEO is aware of the new location that the My1501 defendants (and others who were not charged) are working, and are keeping tabs on the defendants and their former co-workers (at least those that are identifiable.) Be careful where you receive service over the next few weeks particularly if this service involves those associated with the charged defendants.[/QUOTE]Does anybody know what happened at the hearing on Thursday? Also wasn't there a hearing a couple of weeks ago for another one of the employees? Does anybody know what happened there?
It seems pretty straightforward to me.
I certainly do not have the full history on this as several of you do, but the issue with the ABE company seems pretty clear to me. I watched both the courtroom arraignment video and the televised interview of the defendant, and from what I can tell there does seem to be a discrepancy in the defendant's statements. When he appeared in court for arraignment on September 5th, he told the personnel in court that he was guilty after being advised of the charges and assertions made against him. He obviously knew what was being stated and agreed that the statements were truthful. From a factual and legal standpoint, that means he admitted to causing the escort pain when he grabbed her bosom, biting her when she fought him off and to striking at least two other people who came to her aid during the altercation. He did not say anything about going there for sexual activity as he was not charged with solicitation or from what appears in the police citation any sexual offenses. He also said he was intoxicated at the time.
The televised interview tells a much different story however. During the television interview, he claims that he went there for sex and offered the escort $20 when she refused to provide such. As to why he would grab her bosom, hurt and bite her in the process of allegedly just trying to "get his money back," that seems to be a better question for him to answer given his admission that it occurred. If he was going there for sex, it seems that trying to push the escort to the floor would be consistent with that intent. All of these assertions seem contrived given his statement in the courtroom that he was intoxicated at the time. It also appears that he began to tell the attorney present in the courtroom (sitting near him at the glass presentation window) that he didn't know exactly what happened just before his comments to the court. If that is so, how then does he go into detail with the reporter during the televised interview? More puzzling still, why would he admit to be guilty of anything if, as he claimed in the interview, he was simply trying to get his money back? It seems a bit contrived to be perfectly candid.
From what I gather, the service of this company seems to be disliked by several customers posting on this board. If service is the problem, that's certainly one mater. Whether the escorts were defending themselves or attacking this defendant is quite another, in my opinion. Looking at the size and shape of the defendant as reflected in the citation and the videos (both the courtroom appearance and in comparison to the reporter,) I would have a hard time believing his story that they attacked him. Unless this company had a history of assaultive behavior toward customers, it seems that the defendant's statement to the judge in the courtroom is the more likely version of what occurred. I may be in the minority here, but I have to go with the escort's version of what happened in this case. It would be bad public relations to develop a reputation for attacking clients for money. I'd be willing to go out on a limb and suggest that the defendant gave his televised interview before the company was asked to make a comment. That may explain how this matter became public in any case. Given the date and time stamp on the courtroom video in comparison to the time of the news cast, I would assume this to be the case. The people running this company would be in a better position to answer that question certainly.
We are licensed and legal.
[QUOTE=Mbwrink;1274781]Its a good thing your not running legitimate business because you would fail at it since you rarely have any idea of customer satisfaction or repeat business thats why so many of you spend time changing names, numbers nad locations. Actually what he should have done is call the police and accused you of solicitation of sex and got his money back that way and let you deal with the legal hastles.[/QUOTE]We are a licensed bureau, and actually have done pretty well so far. What happened to you in your experience with escorts is unfortunate, but certainly not typical. I tell people here all the time that if you can find better for less, you should definitely go for it. Landry couldn't call the police because he was the one asking for sex (and being told no) and did respond violently. But I hear what you guys are saying and will just leave it at that.