-
Luna at SAG
I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.
-
[QUOTE=Discreetmale68;4507612]I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.[/QUOTE]No, the pictures don't even look close. She was great BBFS action, possibly one of the youngest K-girls I had the pleasure of creaming inside.
-
Jenny at Sexy Angels
Got to catch Jenny at Sexy Angels on one of her first days here in LA. Pictures are accurate, though she is slightly more tan in person. Natural and slender body, cute face, and this is one of the rare cases where the provider is actually under 30. Great service with extensive menu, though rimming was not offered or requested. I will say that this is the first time in a long time where I am already planning to repeat. I have not seen Nina yet, but the agency appears to be the real deal. Recommended.
-
[QUOTE=Alex60;4507129]Gents -- does anyone have any intel on Kitty from January's Girls? I'm interested in whether she looks like her pics, and how her service was. (And her stats say 34 C, but the pics. Hmmm.).
Thanks in advance![/QUOTE]Have link for January's girls?
-
Post the site
[QUOTE=Alex60;4507129]Gents -- does anyone have any intel on Kitty from January's Girls? I'm interested in whether she looks like her pics, and how her service was. (And her stats say 34 C, but the pics. Hmmm.).
Thanks in advance![/QUOTE]Post the site so we can see pics of who you're talking about. Girls move around so much these days and many use overlapping or similar names.
-
Poof! Gone
[QUOTE=Discreetmale68;4507612]I wonder if it's the same Luna they had a couple of years ago. She was about 5. 3 very cute looking in early 20's for sure. I remember her P2 P and kaegel skills were really good. Someone actually describes her as college girl gone bad. But was one of the best I thought.[/QUOTE]Not even 24 hours, there is no "Luna" on sweetasiangem com.
-
January's girls Kitty
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/kitty-escort-los-angeles-453015[/URL]
I haven't contacted January yet. If pic is not stolen then Kitty was the girl in the pic I saw a couple years ago. She was natural B cup then, very tight pussy. I still remember her so she was better than average for me.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4508643]Have link for January's girls?[/QUOTE]
-
Sinvee
I saw her before in LA before she came back to SAG. She can pass for late 20. I thought she was the girl in the pic, but pic is better and more glammed up. I still thought she was attractive enough and even recommended her in OC.
[QUOTE=TomKeen;4507030]Ad mentioned she's like 20 years old, did you think that was accurate or moreso "can pass for 20-21"?[/QUOTE]
-
Roxi?
I thought she was still in the East. You don't give last 4 digits so I have no clue. Not like I ask all bookers what their name are and they also lie too.
[QUOTE=ThePartyGuy;4498445]So I don't save booker #s. But occasionally I get texts about new rosters, etc. I just got 1 recently and since they sometimes change #s, I honestly don't know if I booked or who I booked with said booker. This booker text saying she was a new booker by the name of Tina. She provided pics of some girls: Sugar, Sharon, Hannah, Coco, and Sua. Can anyone confirm if this booker is legit? What made me wonder was the fact that the 2 pics used for Sugar are pics that were used for Roxi. When I asked if she went by a different name cause the pics looked familiar, she said she is new and just came from Korea. Anyone know if this is the Roxi that is being spoken about just using a new name and new booker?[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4508957][URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/kitty-escort-los-angeles-453015[/URL]
I haven't contacted January yet. If pic is not stolen then Kitty was the girl in the pic I saw a couple years ago. She was natural B cup then, very tight pussy. I still remember her so she was better than average for me.[/QUOTE]OKay, thanks. After googling the # in the them. Saw this site.
[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL]
-
Here's site for Kitty
[QUOTE=Humyiy;4508815]Post the site so we can see pics of who you're talking about. Girls move around so much these days and many use overlapping or similar names.[/QUOTE]Sorry I didn't post the site for Kitty. Here it is:
[URL]http://january.escorts.biz/kitty78/[/URL]
-
Sinvee
God damn this kgirl got ass!
Unfortunately she cannot twerk her massive ass of hers and lacks in service.
Oh well back again in search for Janet like booty and skills.
-
She's curvy and has that Asian American body type and looks as well.
Definitely alternative for monger who got bored of typical fob.
She got a tight body as well. Love fking her not smooth shaved kitty, it is just so amateur.
[QUOTE=KingNoctis;4509275]God damn this kgirl got ass!
Unfortunately she cannot twerk her massive ass of hers and lacks in service.
Oh well back again in search for Janet like booty and skills.[/QUOTE]
-
Not gone
I know both Luna they were talking about. The one at SAG is one of the Bay girls that keep changing names and move around a lot. I think she is in OC now.
[QUOTE=Humyiy;4508816]Not even 24 hours, there is no "Luna" on sweetasiangem com.[/QUOTE]
-
KTE Nana
Has anyone taken the plunge?
Both my former ATFs were from this agency but I'm hesitant on this one!
Share some details if anyone has seen her.