Objectively speaking, there are more cases of STDs per capita in the US than in Europe. I guess the Europeans must have more circumcised men than the US.
[QUOTE=JHobby;4518535]Objectively speaking, circumcised cock is better hygiene wise. And there is a statistical evidence that circumcised guys are less likely to get hiv significantly than one who has foreskin (you could check the CDC for this). So if you're engaging in higher risk activity like BBFS, I suppose the girls would like to take all the advantages they could get to minimize theirs.
Aesthetically and mechanically, I suppose it's just smoother and more pleasant to work with.
Circumcision is a rite of passage for men from where I come from, but in hindsight I don't mind the temporary pain knowing that it leads to better sexual prospects when I got older.[/QUOTE]