May be difficult at best.
Denials will be fruitful only if law enforcement can't identify services rendered through other means. The situation at present is:
1. Cooperating witnesses.
2. Client list (limited to the media-reported 400 or so clients if accurate)
And.
3. Computer records of services rendered.
There is also the issue of these money-drop envelopes alluded to in earlier media reports. These envelopes bore written information about the girl being paid, the client she saw (may not be correct names of course) and the date of the service. I have heard from at least one source that some of the envelopes identified the service rendered. I'm awaiting confirmation about the service information from an additional source, so I wouldn't run with this just yet.
A prudent man might wait to see what information law enforcement possesses before making any statement.
Sound advice, with a caveat.
[QUOTE=Dcc1231;1271139]I don't see the client list going anywhere. I never made it to 1501, I wanted to, glad I didn't now. Just becuase your name is on a list of clients doen't mean you did anything illegal while there. Plenty of men went there and got bad massages and nothing else. If you are contacted by LEO just don't admit anything. They will say they have "evidence" against you, tell them you know that they are lying because "that never happened" and I am sure they will back down.[/QUOTE]Better to say nothing at all, denial or otherwise. It's not prudent to deny something unless and until you know what evidence they have prior to making the denial. In most cases, saying nothing cannot be used against you in court. Denying something which may later be proven false is, legally-speaking, categorically worse.