Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[Member #5469]

Another of La Chic's selections. There are many fine pussies nominated as well, but you can't go far wrong with Pamela's.

Here is a reminder pic with Pamela spread wide. Awesome pic. Wish she was in Memphis!

[Supereloquent]

Another La Chic vote.

There are so many good ones, but Baby Cakes was awesome.

Here is a reminder pic.

[Supereloquent]

La Chic selection.

Aundrea seems to be a popular overall choice for many.

Here is a reminder pic.

[Supereloquent]

Oh my! That is the find of a lifetime!I have enjoyed many great finds, but Champagne is certainly among the BEST.

[Supereloquent]

Champagne shy in her panties, topless, nude. Doggie spread, kissing and sucking my cock.

[Supereloquent]

Here is a mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne. If you like these, there are a lot more to come.

[Old Woodie]

La Chic's choice. There were many fine nominees in this category. It all boils down to the ass shape that appeals to you best.

Here is a reminder pic of Tanika's ass. Oh yea she has the best ASS. MMMMMM MMMM Fine looking ASS

[SoonerGuy]

La Chic's choice. There were many fine nominees in this category. It all boils down to the ass shape that appeals to you best.

Here is a reminder pic of Tanika's ass. Oh she does have an awesome ass on her. Damn I love chocolate. Beautiful women.

Attached some photos of some fine Kansas chocolate ass for you Philly guys to enjoy hope you don't mind. These ladies are fine. If you ever come to Wichita, Ks. Let me know and I will set you up with one of these beauties if want.

Keep up the great work Sup.

[BruceBanner]

Here is a mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne. If you like these, there are a lot more to come.I enjoy looking at the pics you post. This Champagne is one of the cutest I've seen so far. Keep them coming!

[WhenWhen]

Supereloquent had. I hereby vote for my favorites in order:

1) Sparkles. Just beautiful. The only problem is the tattoo "Dave" on her tit. That isn't good for the long haul.

2) Tanika: great body. Will last a long time

3) Precious. Still innocent, should be awesome for years to come. Wher ehas she been lately?

4) Babycakes: dirty and cute at the same time.

5) Jen: skinny, but healthy. Could take her anyhwere. Bosy will hold up for a long time; beautiful face.

Just my two cents. Congrats on a great year, SE.

[Lanky43]

You're my hero, Homeboy

[Peach Skoal]

SuperE. The best so far. That damn ass spread pic is killing me.

Thank you for sharing.

Aloha

[Ho Hunter 328]

I have enjoyed many great finds, but Champagne is certainly among the BEST.Very nice. Can you put her on a bus and ship her up to Boston for a week or so? .

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

[Supereloquent]

Oh yea she has the best ASS. MMMMMM MMMM Fine looking ASSThere are many fine nominees for best ass, and Tanika certainly has a delectable one.

Here is another reminder pic.

[Supereloquent]

Oh she does have an awesome ass on her. Damn I love chocolate. Beautiful women.

Attached some photos of some fine Kansas chocolate ass for you Philly guys to enjoy hope you don't mind. These ladies are fine. If you ever come to Wichita, Ks. Let me know and I will set you up with one of these beauties if want.

Keep up the great work Sup. Thanks for sending us the pics of fine Kansas chocolate ass.

[Supereloquent]

I enjoy looking at the pics you post. This Champagne is one of the cutest I've seen so far. Keep them coming!I have many more pics of her yet to post. I hope you enjoy them.

[Supereloquent]

Supereloquent had. I hereby vote for my favorites in order:

1) Sparkles. Just beautiful. The only problem is the tattoo "Dave" on her tit. That isn't good for the long haul. We have discussed it and she regrets that one. So many young gals are blinded by their first love and think it is going to last forever. Hottie Nicole regrets her 'Rob" tramp stamp also.


2) Tanika: great body. Will last a long time YES!


3) Precious. Still innocent, should be awesome for years to come. Wher ehas she been lately? I like the innocent and shy type. What's the point of a sexually aggressive SW? It's not like you aren't getting any. LOL I haven't seen Precious around for a little while.


4) Babycakes: dirty and cute at the same time.I couldn't have said it better myself.


5) Jen: skinny, but healthy. Could take her anywhere. Body will hold up for a long time; beautiful face.Absolutely.


Just my two cents. Congrats on a great year, SE. Thank you for the kudos and thanks for voting. Here is a collage of your five "finalists."

[Supereloquent]

You're my hero, HomeboyI feel like Rudy. Remember that movie? I love a good sports flick.

Hollywood should do a movie about the K. It would be a LOT more interesting than the golf or fishing channels.:)

[Supereloquent]

SuperE. The best so far. That damn ass spread pic is killing me.

Thank you for sharing.

AlohaKomo mai. I think I have a few more pics of her like that forthcoming.

[Supereloquent]

Very nice. Can you put her on a bus and ship her up to Boston for a week or so? .

Stay safe, and happy hunting. If you could fund her trip and stay, and provide a supply of percs and roxys, I am sure she would be willing to do it.

[Supereloquent]

Sucking her finger, in her bra and panties, topless, showing her ass, nude, spread wide, licking my cock, with a mouthful of my cum.

[Supereloquent]

Here is a mosaic collage of the last set of ten pics I posted of her.

[Supereloquent]

As usual, it was a difficult selection to make. So, I thought I would give you amateur gynecologists a good view of her luscious pussy.

[Supereloquent]

Sure beats the deluge of pic's, recounting others conquested, posted here lately sure bored the sh*t out of me.

Nobody twisted your arm to open my thread, and look at my posted pics, Sprat. That didn't seem to stop you from being a coward and posting your poisonous comments about them in another thread. I would be careful on that one, if I were you. You apparently didn't get the Admin memo on the subject of criticism where I am concerned. I suggest you re-read it. I didn't come and rattle your cage. Stay the fuck away from mine.

You never were a fan, but envy seems to become you. The rock throwers here about pics, like you, always seem to be those who post no pics themselves. Try doing that instead of opening your fat yap. It would be a shame for us to mistake your big mouth for your ass. There would appear to be little difference between the emanations from both.

PS: Learn the difference between plural and possessive. Your third grade teacher would be very disappointed.

Here is my pic castle and your pic shack. Actually, you don't don't even deserve a shack. You are technically pic-homeless.

[Vbgent4u2c]

As usual, it was a difficult selection to make. So, I thought I would give you amateur gynecologists a good view of her luscious pussy.Damn dude. I love all your work but this chick is special.

Makes me want to drive up there and bring her home with me!

[Supereloquent]

OK. OK. Before I was so rudely interrupted: I had another favorite pic and pose from the last set of ten posted.

Don't look, Sprat, if my pics "bore the shit out of you." Others want to see and you are blocking the view. Tune your set to a different channel. Your taste and their tastes obviously differ. Perhaps you prefer to watch golf? LMAO

[Supereloquent]

Damn dude. I love all your work but this chick is special.

Makes me want to drive up there and bring her home with me! If all the SWs on the K looked like Champagne, the traffic on the Ave would be wall-to-wall mongers. :)

[Supereloquent]

I have already received dozens of PMs requesting contact information for Champagne. I don't want to appear snobbish, or uncooperative; however, I have already been fucked over by a local Senior Member of this Forum after sharing valuable contact information regarding a SW with him, and I have learned my lesson. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Here is a link to my report about this in case you missed it:

Getting Fucked Up the Ass by Kenbenz (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1098788&highlight=kenbenz#post1098788)

It is a shame that one bad apple destroys it for everyone else, but it is mongering reality. We report bad reviews here about SWs, and that aids us in avoiding trouble. It is just as important to avoid potential trouble in sharing information with people who can't be trusted to use it in your best interests.

[Vbgent4u2c]

Well, if anyone else ever finds her please let me know.

I hope the rest of the Philly mongers aren't going to let one ass prevent them from sharing a premium find.

And if any accomplished poster are ever in the VA Beach area shoot me a PM and I will hook you up.

[Member #1759]

That is one bad *****. She is beautiful. Thank you for sharing.

I am fairly new to the "K". I am surprised & grateful for the variety of WSW's. I have been to strolls all over the country & usually BSW's are the majority.

[Supereloquent]

That is one bad *****. She is beautiful. Thank you for sharing.It was my pleasure. There are more pics of her to follow.


I am fairly new to the "K". I am surprised & grateful for the variety of WSW's. I have been to strolls all over the country & usually BSW's are the majority.I don't know why, but WSWs seem to predominate the K and Broadway.

[Supereloquent]

I was watching on old movie (Blood & Wine: 1996) which features a young J Lo, and it struck me how uncanny the resemblance is between J Lo and Jen. What do you think?

[Supereloquent]

I always thought that Kat resembles Anne Heche.

[Supereloquent]

There are so many Nicoles on the K. It is no mystery why I nicked this Nicole: Christina Ricci Nicole.

[Supereloquent]

Sissy Spacek Nicole. Are there any more celebrity look-alikes on the Ave that anyone has noticed?

[XxATLxX]

I was watching on old movie (Blood & Wine: 1996) which features a young J Lo, and it struck me how uncanny the resemblance is between J Lo and Jen. What do you think?Looks nothing like her.

[Supereloquent]

Yesterday I saw the markedly stepped up LE presence on the Ave that everyone has been reporting. After one pass I was almost ready to just head home. Then I saw Anna, a tall thin blonde. That is the street name she uses. She blurted out her real name without thinking during our conversation, because she was enjoying telling me about her 15 minutes of fame. She didn't ask me not to reveal it, but I am keeping it quiet as a courtesy. Two guys were following her the night before last, and she was getting concerned that they were either thugs or LE. It turned out that they were reporters from the Daily News. They asked her a few questions about the Kensington Strangler. One of them was a staff photographer, and got a pic of Anna on the Ave from the rear that was published with the reporter's story in the Daily News on Thursday, December 9. Here is a link to the story and her pic:

Anna on the Stroll in the Daily News (http://www.philly.com/philly/gallery/20101209_Kensington_cringes_as__Strangler__reports_present_latest_bump_in_road.html)

Anna's pic from the back is the fourth pic in the 8 pic series shown in the article.

Anna said the scuttlebutt on the K was that LE had nabbed the Strangler that (Friday) morning.

Anyway, I remembered having a car date with her several months ago and it was fun. Anna says she doesn't do this much, and isn't addicted to drugs (although she admits she used to be.) She seems believable, not that it matters to me one way or the other. We all know how SWs tend to lie. But she was very emphatic about distinguishing herself from the druggies on the Ave, and she was adamantly against any face pics. I should bring a mask like Freak uses, but that is much more useful for photographing the goods on an indoor date. Anna gave me two terrific cups of BBBJ to start out my mongering day. We parked a good distance from the K because of all the LE there. It was pretty quiet for the first cup, but some guys started trying to get a big truck into a commercial garage about a block ahead of us, and you could see from the big smirks on their faces that they could see Anna's head bobbing up and down on me. I waved and they started to laugh. Anna wouldn't do CIM, let alone SW. That was OK by me because she was an experienced and accomplished cock sucker. She could easily DT me, even after gently ribbing me about my size. She did exactly as I instructed her, starting out with some dirty talk to get me excited. She said she wasn't much good at dirty talk, but she would gladly repeat what I asked her to say. She giggled like crazy when I requested that she sexily whisper to me that she was "Daddy's little cum piggie." Anna began just as I like it with long slow sloppy sucks until I was as hard as a rock. She then took me vigorously, slobbering and moaning. I was primed and I popped the cork in a hurry when busting my first nut. Then I lay back and enjoyed the second one for a good 20 minutes or so. Anna was embarrassed when she finished the second time and saw that we had accumulated a small and appreciative audience. A SW blushing? : maybe she was telling the truth about not doing this much after all, because the round of applause we got from the guys at the truck just made me smile and laugh, and she was cringing in her seat.

[Supereloquent]

After my car date with Anna yesterday I was not inclined to do anything more than maybe one more window shopping pass for a gem, and then head for home. The stroll was pretty deserted. There are almost always a few on the usual southern corners on the stroll, but it was empty. I saw HSW Kay leaning up against a building at an unusual corner. That was probably because LE was all over the usual hot spots. I hadn't seen her around in a while. Here is a link to my previous report on and pics of her:

Kay (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1029713&viewfull=1#post1029713)

Kay had been fun, but I was interested in trying someone new. I decided to stay north to get a second date because LE activity there was much lighter. The only LE north of Allegheny that I saw was a walking patrol of two. That was unusual in this cold weather. It is more typical in the summer, or for the warrant patrols making their sweeps of the Ave. However, I have noticed that foot patrols tend to be on the north end of the stroll, if anywhere. A cute little spinner that I hadn't seen before was trailing the foot patrol by about a block. But, I though better of picking her up in sight of those two LEOs with all this Strangler business going on. They could have radioed a squad car to be there in a nanosecond, even if I employed my usual discretion and caution, and directed her down a side street for a pick-up.

I was going to head home when I saw a cute thin WSW (maybe HSW; hard to tell exactly, and I didn't ask) with her medium-length red hair in dreadlocks. She was talking to someone on the Ave when I passed, but I stared and she gave me "the look." I circled the block and I must have gotten lucky because she was walking up the very street I was returning on to the K. She seemed to suspect I was undercover LE (I get that a LOT) when I stopped and rolled down my passenger side window. When Brittany got in she was nervous as a cat and pulled my hand over to feel her crotch and tits, and make sure I wasn't LE. She must have asked me that question 10 times and wanted to look right into my eyes as I gave the answer. That was a smart girl; even though LE is trained to lie, there is a reason that testimony is still given in person in a courtroom and not in a written statement; we speak volumes with our eyes and body language regarding our credibility. But, the girls should learn that this touchy-feelie thing might make them be more comfortable, but undercover LE can do that and still arrest you, and the touching thing is no defense. They can even make a direct offer for a sex act. The entrapment law has been changed in Philly. That might itself be a subject for discussion in the General Reports Thread, except that my two cents about it will have to come from here.

Brittany was even prettier up close than she had seemed from afar. She had a slightly exotic look and appeal. She said that she didn't do this often; I certainly don't remember reading any reports about her or pics of her in the Philly Forum. She dances at "Bottoms Up." She was obviously very street savvy without being arrogant about it. I was wishing I had more time for an indoor date because I had a sense that Brittany would be awesome for that. She would be time conscious though; that much I could tell without asking. I don't prefer that, but if a SW is good looking, sucks and fucks well, and is up for pics, then I can live with it. She could tell without asking that I knew what I was about, but she was still going to wheedle and bargain and see where my money boundaries were. I stood firm at my usual offer for a first-time with me, regardless if they look great: the usual Ave rate plus a tip if she was good. She tried to get more, and more of it up front. She was a skilled negotiator, but not pushy. I tried to get a few pics on the table, but she priced herself out of that possibility with me. She wanted as much for pics as I give a girl for an entire date indoors. I just didn't think it was worth it to get a few car pics, even if she flashed her tits, pussy and ass.

Brittany was competent when she got down to business. It wasn't the best BBBJ I ever had, but it was well above average. I have a feeling that this gal's highest and best use is for a good fuck. I was up for a second cup provided I could have a little rest, but she wanted almost as much for round two as round one, and I wasn't up for that. I would sooner find another girl for variety (which I wound up doing.)

Brittany is a tough negotiator, but she looks good, has a tight bod and would even be worth a premium offer for a good indoor FS session with pics. That will be my next plan with her. I even mentioned that to her and she gave me a very sexy smile and said,"Let's do that. I am a LOT of fun to FUCK!"

[Supereloquent]

I had finished car dates earlier yesterday with Anna and Brittany, and I was calling it a day and driving towards I-95. I noticed Janine walking towards the stroll on a back street. I stopped to ask her if she wanted "a ride." Her face brightened and she gave me a big smile. Even though she hadn't seen me for a long time, she instantly recognized me and was glad to see me, as I most certainly remembered, and was glad to see her.

I hadn't seen Janine around for quite a while. Out of courtesy to her, I won't mention the circumstances for that, which she shared with me. I had given her a good review on our first car date, and a so-so to bad review on our second date, which was indoors at the Neshaminy. I think she was feeling ill on our second date. It can happen. YMMV always applies even from date to date.

Janine has always had a positive attitude, but today it was especially so. Her BBBJ skills had always been good but not great; however, this time they WERE great. She was DTing me with ease and slobbering and moaning, and doing everything I like. I was wishing I had the time for an indoor date because she was in the perfect mood for it. The only downside is that she prefers not to have pics published and I have respected that request.

Anyway, Janine is a cutie, has improved her cock sucking skills tremendously, and she has a nice tight little fuckable spinner bod. Treat her right and she will most likely treat you the same.

[Supereloquent]

I can't get enough of good champagne, and this is GREAT Champagne!

Champagne's face; sucking on her finger; topless; with handcuffs; showing her ass; nude; dildoing herself while spread wide; licking and sucking my cock; with a mouthful of my cum.

[Supereloquent]

Here is a mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne.

[Supereloquent]

It is always difficult to pick a favorite from each set since there are so many good ones, but I thought you might like this one of Champagne spreading herself wide as she slides my big purple dildo inside her kitty.

[Gran Lenchote]

Supereloquent:

I'm mongering in El Paso TX, and let me tell you, on our best day, we MIGHT have 1% of the talent you frequent in Philly.

I've read your posts for a while now, and I just had to ask: why do so many people give you a hard time? What's their gripe, anyway? As far as I know no one HAS to read your thread. As for the Photo Gallery, when you post a billion pics of someone I'm not interested in, guess what: it's really pretty easy to page past them. Nothing you post helps me get any, but Philly is a forum I bookmark. Why? PICS, PICS, and did I mention PICS? Yours, Street Steve's, CookieJar's, hell it seems that you all have almost as many pic posters as we have available SWs.

Before anyone gives me any ACLU crap about free speech, I'd like to shoot that shit down. Yes, you can say anything your heart desires and Jackson allows. No, you don't have a right to kick someone in the teeth for your own personal aggrandizement. Civil discourse is predicated on the idea that we are all respectful of each others contributions.

Why anyone does anything is, of course, a tricky problem to analyze, as one can never be entirely sure of one's own motives, let alone the motives of others, but I'm going to put my two cents in. I've recently reread a few years worth of Philly posts so that I could make an informed analysis. Roughly speaking, your detractors can be broken down into a few categories.

Gripe Number 1: you've turned the forum into a porn site rather than a bulletin board. Response: so fucking what if you have? It's one forum out of all of them (and recently just one thread) , and until Jackson says to knock it off who are your detractors to say otherwise?

Gripe Number 2: too many nearly identical pics of the same girl. WTF? Skip them. Page down, folks, page down. Someone was bitching that it's hard to page through your pics on a mobile device. Really? Hard? Itty boo. Use that mobile device to call your Mommy and get her to bring you some comfort food you whiny little pisser.

Gripe number 3: I complained about you, and you were a jerk in your response. I suppose that this isn't really a separate category, since it requires Gripe 1 or 2, but you seem to get a lot of traffic of this type. In the interest of full disclosure, I sometimes find your replies make you look egotistical, but even if you were the biggest pecker on planet earth, I can't help but notice that people have brought this shit down on their own heads by not just leaving you alone to do your thing.

Secret Gripe Number 4: I would bet money that some of your detractors and you have a PM history in which they felt slighted and now they have an agenda. I get this idea from reading between the lines, but I stand by it. This maybe the dumbest category of all, since anyone with the emotional maturity of a 12 year old should be able to at least say to themselves: "well, fuck him, I'm never going to talk to him again" rather than saying "well, fuck him, now I'm going to go see if I can piss in his Cheerios".

Top Secret Gripe Number 5: CookieJar. Clearly Cookie has a great sense of humor and fucks with you just to get a rise out of you and your supporters. Cookie seems to be one of the good guys, but he just can't help himself. I have friends who are super sensitive about some subjects, and I occasionally poke them just to watch them go volcanic, so I can relate.

Taken as a whole, the most consistent thread among the haters is egomania. It's not about changing things-the haters don't use an approach that could ever possibly get you to change. It's not about information-they aren't telling us anything we don't know or couldn't figure out. I hate to go all Occam on the members, but egomania is by far the simplest explanation of 90% of the negative posts.

Why do I care? Curiosity, mostly, and since I have the opportunity, I figured, why not ask?

Who am I to take people to task? No one, really. Just a dumbshit with a keyboard and a thought or two.

Why should anyone give a crap what I think? No one should, except for SuperEloquent, and him only as a courtesy to a fellow monger. Either I'm making sense or I'm not. Anyone can do their own research, and see if they can still disagree with me.

Best Holiday Wishes,

Lencho

[Supereloquent]

Champagne would certainly not fit in the Low-Baller category; she is no MILF; she is way too tall and deliciously meaty to be a spinner; there is no way she is a Chubby; and, she doesn't exactly qualify for the Evening Gown competition unless as a write-in for her cute matched bra and panties.

However, she does qualify in all the other contest categories for voting:

Miss Congeniality; Best Face, Tits, Ass and Overall Face / Body; Best BJ, Fuck and FS; and of course, Overall SW of the Year 2010.

As I mentioned in the beginning of the contest, you are free to change your mind on voting right up to the contest deadline, midnight, December 31st.

Here is a reminder of all the contest categories and nominees:

Categories and Nominees for SW of the Year Contest 2010 (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1100988&viewfull=1#post1100988)

[Supereloquent]

Thank you for your thoughtful post, Gran Lenchote, and all the work and research you obviously put into it.


Supereloquent:

I'm mongering in El Paso TX, and let me tell you, on our best day, we MIGHT have 1% of the talent you frequent in Philly.

I have mongered in many cites across this country. I am sure there are a few cities where the local mongers would contend they have the best quality and variety of SW talent; however, IMHO, there are a few, if any, that come close to equaling what we have in the Philly area.


I've read your posts for a while now, and I just had to ask: why do so many people give you a hard time? What's their gripe, anyway?It's not really that there are that many gripers. It's just that the gripers are more vociferous in posting their nonsense than the far different perspective from the great multitude of more quiet supporters. I get dozens of PMs of congratulations and well wishes every day from all over the country. I have never gotten an angry PM even once since I have joined this website (of course now I will get one just so a griper can prove me wrong, LOL). The gripers prefer to be visible and post their poison for all to see. Griping in private seems to give them little satisfaction, because I can merely ignore it. The only negativity in a PM has come when I wouldn't give someone what he wanted, typically contact information. I have made my position on that matter pretty clear, but here is a link in case anyone missed it:

Getting Contact Information from Me (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1103234&viewfull=1#post1103234)

The griping has pretty much ceased since the Admin made a specific ruling about that nonsense. There were a few serial antagonists who seemed to have have a chip on their shoulder where I am concerned, and the Admin just got fed up with it. Here is the link to it:

Admin Comments on Criticism (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1089133&viewfull=1#post1089133)

I am glad, because I don't go rattling anyone else's cage and I don't appreciate it when they come and rattle mine. There apparently are still a few who didn't read the new ruling and continue to criticize. I don't mind some good-natured ribbing, but I am smart enough to distinguish between that and ill-intentioned criticism, which is now banned where I am concerned. I intend NOT to violate that in reverse by criticizing others, unless they attack me or a friend on the Board for what I believe are very misplaced and ugly agendas. That will be particularly the case where pic criticism is concerned. I have never criticized a pic anyone has ever posted in this Forum and I don't like it when others criticize pics, even when they aren't mine. These complaints usually come from members who have posted few if any pics themselves. My position on this is that; if you don't like the pics another has posted then post some of your own and demonstrate how it's done.


As far as I know no one HAS to read your thread. As for the Photo Gallery, when you post a billion pics of someone I'm not interested in, guess what: it's really pretty easy to page past them. I have made this same argument, but pic complaints have little or nothing to do with logic and everything to do with envy. That is the ugly but simple truth.


Nothing you post helps me get any, but Philly is a forum I bookmark. Why? PICS, PICS, and did I mention PICS? Hell, it seems that you all (in Philly: edited) have almost as many pic posters as we have available SWs.We have a pic gallery for many reasons; ID for the girls dated, and just to admire females sexily posed, naked, spread and showing us their cootchies, sucking, fucking, whatever floats your boat. However, some pic viewers think that their criteria for what should be shown should rule what others post. They should start their own pic gallery somewhere and administer it with their own rules.


Before anyone gives me any ACLU crap about free speech, I'd like to shoot that shit down. Yes, you can say anything your heart desires and Jackson allows. No, you don't have a right to kick someone in the teeth for your own personal aggrandizement. Civil discourse is predicated on the idea that we are all respectful of each others contributions."Free speech" is what complainers squeal about. They claim the right to their own opinions. But, there is a fine line between having your own opinion, and needlessly trampling on someone else. A classic, if extreme, example of that are all these nasty protests at the funerals and gravesites of those known or suspected of being gay. All of them are braying like donkeys about their "freedom of speech," while holding up lewd and insensitive signs and slogans of gay protest for the bereaved family and friends to see. I hope the Supreme Court rules to keep these silly assholes outside of a 1/2 mile zone of privacy from any funeral, funeral procession or internment ceremony. I guess you could say we have had our own such ruling here in a different context, as noted above.


Why anyone does anything is, of course, a tricky problem to analyze, as one can never be entirely sure of one's own motives, let alone the motives of others, but I'm going to put my two cents in. I've recently reread a few years worth of Philly posts so that I could make an informed analysis. Roughly speaking, your detractors can be broken down into a few categories.You really did some work on this and have some good insights!


Gripe Number 1: you've turned the forum into a porn site rather than a bulletin board. Response: so fucking what if you have? It's one forum out of all of them (and recently just one thread) , and until Jackson says to knock it off who are your detractors to say otherwise? I have not been insensitive to reasonable and well-intentioned suggestions. For example, I used to block my pics in groups of 40-60 and often more with and after a report. Some complained that this was just visual overload and I agreed. I started to group them 10 at a time (now with collages and a favorite) and spread over time so they could better be visually absorbed and appreciated. I had another valuable suggestion that I was bunching the photos in time sequence such that there were a lot of a similar type together. So, within each set of 10 posted I started to vary the type and poses, and even the time sequencing for visual variety. This change quite dramatically increased the number of views per pic in the gallery, so I suppose the change has been successful and well received.


Gripe Number 2: too many nearly identical pics of the same girl. WTF? Skip them. Page down, folks, page down. Someone was bitching that it's hard to page through your pics on a mobile device. Really? Hard? Itty boo. Use that mobile device to call your Mommy and get her to bring you some comfort food you whiny little pisser. I spit up my coffee on that one. Bravo! It takes a few mouse clicks to very rapidly navigate the pic gallery, and they don't have to open my thread if they don't want to see a lot of pics, because, guess what, there will be a lot of pics!

This was never about how difficult I made anyone's life in the Forum by posting so many pics. It was always about how I should either conform to someone else's idea of what I should be or do, OR, MUCH more likely, pure unadulterated ENVY!


Gripe number 3: I complained about you, and you were a jerk in your response. I suppose that this isn't really a separate category, since it requires Gripe 1 or 2, but you seem to get a lot of traffic of this type. In the interest of full disclosure, I sometimes find your replies make you look egotistical, but even if you were the biggest pecker on planet earth, I can't help but notice that people have brought this shit down on their own heads by not just leaving you alone to do your thing. Guilty as charged. I don't go looking for trouble, but, if it comes looking for me, I am surrounded by a mine field with machine gun towers and missile launchers. I don't suffer fools gladly, and I have no compunction about ripping someone a new one if I feel like it. I can be a bit of a narcissist, but that is no crime. I don't bully others and kick sand in their faces on the beach looking for a fight (well, I admit that I did so once, but many didn't see that I was just demonstrating how easy it is to be a horse's ass in here and attack). I just do my own thing and go my own way. Am I opinionated? You bet! Some may think insufferably so. But, my opinions are not in the faces of others unless they attack first. My thoughts are just that, what I think. You are free to express your thoughts as you choose too. Just don't do it while spitting in my face.


Secret Gripe Number 4: I would bet money that some of your detractors and you have a PM history in which they felt slighted and now they have an agenda. I get this idea from reading between the lines, but I stand by it. This maybe the dumbest category of all, since anyone with the emotional maturity of a 12 year old should be able to at least say to themselves: "well, fuck him, I'm never going to talk to him again" rather than saying "well, fuck him, now I'm going to go see if I can piss in his Cheerios".That is extremely perceptive of you. 99% of the time they feel slighted because I wouldn't give them contact info for one reason or another. I have previously explained my position in this regard. Some members seem to take this very personally like they are entitled to get this information. So they take the pissing contest public in some way. One guy went off the deep end about this and started making very serious public and private threats, which, of course, is a big no-no in the rules of this Forum. For this he was banned.

These 'encounters' always seem to have a similar pattern: some member PMs me and tells me how much he admires my work, etc., and wants some contact information. I explain my position and even send him a link to my reports on this. He tries to convince me that he isn't one of the bad guys and would never do what that jerk did to me and I shouldn't let one guy spoil it for everyone else. I still refuse. Then come all the insults: I think too much of myself; I am a jerk, whatever. This, of course, is WONDERFULLY INTELLIGENT psychology to get me to change my mind and he takes it public to show in one way or another what an ass he thinks I am, and tries his best to 'pee in my Cheerios. ' Childish?: yes. But I suppose it is just human nature and stuff we all learned in Kindergarten.


(Edited for reasons of Administrative censure.) Top Secret Gripe Number 5: Clearly a certain member has a great sense of humor and fucks with you just to get a rise out of you and your supporters. He seems to be one of the good guys, but he just can't help himself. I have friends who are super sensitive about some subjects, and I occasionally poke them just to watch them go volcanic, so I can relate. I normally have a lot to say about most things, but about this I only have two words; no comment.


Taken as a whole, the most consistent thread among the haters is egomania. It's not about changing things-the haters don't use an approach that could ever possibly get you to change. It's not about information-they aren't telling us anything we don't know or couldn't figure out. I hate to go all Occam on the members, but egomania is by far the simplest explanation of 90% of the negative posts. This is very prescient on your part and classic psychology. We hate most in others what we most hate in ourselves. Yes, I can come across as egotistical and a narcissist. Therefore, I draw criticism from the same. There is no mystery there. It isn't about changing me or explaining anything readers couldn't figure out or sharing information. It is about self-loathing. I am simply what their souls see in the mirror. They have a choice of torturing themselves or flogging me in writing. In either case they are exorcising their own demons.


Why do I care? Curiosity, mostly, and since I have the opportunity, I figured, why not ask?

Who am I to take people to task? No one, really. Just a dumbshit with a keyboard and a thought or two.

Why should anyone give a crap what I think? No one should, except for SuperEloquent, and him only as a courtesy to a fellow monger. Either I'm making sense or I'm not. Anyone can do their own research, and see if they can still disagree with me. You made perfect sense to me, even the part about my being a jerk and a narcissist on occasion, LOL. You did thorough research and you have keen insights (well, with a few exceptions I can't comment upon for Administrative reasons). Thank you for your diligent effort and well-reasoned opinions.


Best Holiday Wishes,

LenchoSame to you my friend.

[Supereloquent]

I mentioned several times now that I would prefer that voters post their selections here in my thread rather than PMing me, because it tends to fill up my mailbox. However, votes continue to come in by PM. I appreciate your interest in my contest and your votes, but I still would like that you make your preferences known here openly in my thread. I felt in a quandary over whether or not to even count the PM votes, but I started to count them initially and I don't want to squash interest in the contest, so I will continue to try to keep my mailbox clear and accept PM votes. But, I still wish that you would vote here openly in my thread.

I made an administrative decision that the overall winner of the contest cannot also be named for first place in any of the sub-contests. Also, a girl can only win in one contest category, the one she received the most votes for. I don't want just one girl to sweep many areas of the contest. The intention of having the sub-contest categories was to provide for as many different and varied winners as possible.

Just so you know the current status of the voting:

Best Low-Baller: Jennifer, with Kendra right on her ass

Best Spinner: Aundrea has a slight lead; Baby Cakes and Precious are right on her cute little "tail"

Miss Congeniality: It is a 4-way tie: Sexy Nicole, Staci, Cyndi and Tanya (who wouldn't want that "4-way" action?")

Best Chubby: Sabrina is tied with Elektra for the lead; Dolly is "cumming" up fast; maybe we should have an oil-covered wrestle-off for this category? I bet we could fill a small stadium for the event.

Best MILF: Mary Beth had an early stranglehold on this one, but Candace is now a solid contender. Maybe we should have a milk-off? LOL

Most Kinky: Justine leads, handcuffed and with a ball-gag in her pretty mouth; a few others trail in the distance, "restrained" by fewer votes

Evening Gown Competition: Jen had a strong start, but Tanika made a "strong move" from the "rear" and now has a commanding lead.

Best Face: First place tie between Kitty and Melissa, with a scattered group of pretty faces trailing them.

Best Tits: Big Tits Mandy leads; Alexus, Simone and Nikki are "bunched" together, tit to tit, in the pack right behind her.

Best Ass: Tanika is way out in front (or should I say "rear," LOL); Candace is the only one even slightly close "behind" her.

Best Pussy: Pamela has "opened up" a big early lead

Best Overall Face and Body: Candace holds first place and could win IF she gets more votes here than for Best MILF, or if Mary Beth wins that category; Sparkles is in the running as is Aundrea; the same condition holds true for Aundrea as for Candace: she will qualify to win in the specific sub-contest, if any, in which she gets the most votes.

Best BJ: Jen is "creaming" the competition.

Best Fuck: Hottie Nicole and Liz are in a dead "heat" for first place.

Best FS: Baby Cakes is in the lead by a "wide" margin with a scattered field behind her; if she wins Best Spinner and gets more votes cast for her there than here, then this category winner will be the second place contender; right now that would be Spinner Mandy.

Overall Best SW for 2010: early on, Aundrea had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead; however, there has been a recent virtual avalanche of PM voting for Champagne for the overall title as well as several other categories in the contest; as I explained, a girl can only win in one category of the contest, so the first award for a girl will go to the category where she received the most votes. If another girl exceeds her votes in that category then she is still eligible to win in another category where she has accumulated the most votes.

Here is a link to the pic collages for all the categories and nominees in the contest:

Categories and Nominees for SW of the Year Contest 2010 (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1100988&viewfull=1#post1100988)

[Supereloquent]

Champagne in her bra and panties; being shy; with handcuffs; topless; nude; fingering herself; licking and sucking my cock; with a mouthful of my cum.

[Supereloquent]

A mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne.

[Supereloquent]

I already showed a favorite pic of her wide spread and playing with my purple dildo, so I thought I would go for something different: Champagne playing with my handcuffs. Even though she was somewhat of a late entry, Champagne is already giving Justine a run for her money in my SW contest this year as Most Kinky, and she has passed Aundrea and is ahead in the Overall Category for THE SW of the Year, 2010.

Any girl can win, but only in one category: the category in which she gets the most votes.

[Spa Man 1]

I already showed a favorite pic of her wide spread and playing with my purple dildo, so I thought I would go for something different: Champagne playing with my handcuffs. Even though she was somewhat of a late entry, Champagne is already giving Justine a run for her money in my SW contest this year as Most Kinky, and she has passed Aundrea and is ahead in the Overall Category for THE SW of the Year. 2010.

Any girl can win, but only in one category: the category in which she gets the most votes. I would love to taste a glass of champagne, she is so hot!

[La Chic]

Overall Best SW for 2010: early on, Aundrea had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead; however, there has been a recent virtual avalanche of PM voting for Champagne for the overall title as well as several other categories in the contest; as I explained, a girl can only win in one category of the contest, so the first award for a girl will go to the category where she received the most votes. If another girl exceeds her votes in that category then she is still eligible to win in another category where she has accumulated the most votes.

Aundrea still has my vote for no other reason than she's been around all year. Champagne is new to the scene but is unquestionably a ranked contender. I can't wait (heavy salivation going on here) to sample her Christmas goodies. LOL.

La Chic

[Supereloquent]

I would love to taste a glass of champagne, she is so hot!Hot? When you touch Champagne's ass, you need to wet your finger first. That way you will hear a sharp hissing sound and see a steam cloud, rather then getting your finger burned! :)

[Supereloquent]

Overall Best SW for 2010: early on, Aundrea had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead; however, there has been a recent virtual avalanche of PM voting for Champagne for the overall title as well as several other categories in the contest; as I explained, a girl can only win in one category of the contest, so the first award for a girl will go to the category where she received the most votes. If another girl exceeds her votes in that category then she is still eligible to win in another category where she has accumulated the most votes.

Aundrea still has my vote for no other reason than she's been around all year. Champagne is new to the scene but is unquestionably a ranked contender. I can't wait (heavy salivation going on here) to sample her Christmas goodies. LOL.

La ChicWhat I hear you saying is to "dance with the girl that brung you," by sticking with your choices, and to reward longevity. As I have repeatedly emphasized, the criteria for selection in this contest are yours. There are no right or wrong reasons for voter selections. One of the objects behind my posting the preliminary results of the contest to date is to motivate members to think about the contest more, and to cast a vote. There is still a lot more contest voting time left. Sub-contest races which were well in hand by certain nominees at the beginning of the contest have tightened up, leads have exchanged and new contenders have rapidly emerged. Many of the categories are anyone's to win or lose, so, if you have any preferences, please join in the voting fun.

Here is a reminder pic of Aundrea, with Amber in my threesome with them, sucking on their fingers, and showing us an upside-down tramp stamp comparison.

Even on this reverse view you get a great look at Amber's ass, my personal favorite for the ass contest, being the ass-man that I am. I am frankly surprised she isn't in the lead in that contest, but everyone has different tastes, and there is certainly absolutely nothing wrong with the current contender in the lead for best ass: Tanika.

[Supereloquent]

Champagne sucking my finger; in her bra and panties; with handcuffs; showing her ass; nude with pacifier; fingering herself; licking my balls and my cock.

[Supereloquent]

Here is a mosaic collage of the last set of ten pics posted of Champagne.

[Supereloquent]

I really like my pacifier prop, so you knew that one of my favs would contain a shot of her sucking on it.

[Supereloquent]

JUST for the cock sucking pic lovers (and in the FACE of the cock sucking pic haters, LMAO)

[Supereloquent]

I tried to get my cock out of the way for this pic of Champagne sucking my balls, but, as you can see, there were certain "logistical" problems in this regard. :)

[David Hatcher]

One vote for Candace!


Here is a mosaic collage of the MILF Division candidates.

Top Row: Linda, Candace, Babs aka Lisa, Gabrielle.

Bottom Row: Angel, Camille, Mary Beth

[David Hatcher]

Hard to choose (baby cakes, nikki, precious) but Melissa gets my vote.


Here is a labeled mosaic collage of the previous set of SWs nominated for best cock sucker. 2010.

[R Consultant]

You have got to be Santa Claus- that is all I'm saying you bring gifts all year long! :}


I tried to get my cock out of the way for this pic of Champagne sucking my balls, but, as you can see, there were certain "logistical" problems in this regard. :)

[Supereloquent]

You have got to be Santa Claus- that is all I'm saying you bring gifts all year long! :}"And it shook when he laughed like a bowl full of jelly." I got a big kick out of your double entendre title.:)

If you are a real good boy, Santa will bring you more presents of very naughty girls throughout 2011.

[Supereloquent]

One vote for Candace!In the early voting it looked like Mary Beth was a shoe-in for best MILF. Now, votes for Candace, and especially PM votes have Mary Beth and Candace just a vote or so apart. This is a contest where just one vote will matter tremendously in most categories. Therefore, I appreciate your interest and your vote.

Here is a reminder pic of Candace. There aren't too many things better than a pretty MILF with a tongue piercing, and a mouthful of your cum dripping out like a waterfall.

[Supereloquent]

Hard to choose (baby cakes, nikki, precious) but Melissa gets my vote.Jen still has a substantial lead and many PM votes in this category; however, I thank you for your selection. Every vote counts.

Here is a reminder pic of Melissa cleaning my pipe.

[Giani]

What a find, and (as per usual) great set of pix.

My aside is due to her pinpoint pupils: a strong suggestion of use of heroin ("dogfood" on the street"). If she only snorts, then the risk is less. But if she is an IV-user, great caution is due.

Mongers know that many SWs work to meet drug needs. Drugs taken by mouth, nose or lungs pose little direct increased risk of STD for the monger, but IV-using SWs pose an HIV risk to both themselves and the monger, unless they are savvy enough to *always* use clean needles (right.). If your date has pinpoint pupils in anything less than bright light (how often are we active in bright light?) , use extra caution. If she also is nodding, shows low coherence or seriously slurs her speech, you should at least use great caution and protection, otherwise, shop around.

I have put together a collage of pinpoint pupils, some of your excellent pix, some others recognizable from other sources. [How do you like a pinpoint pupil where a nose should be!? ;-)]


In the early voting it looked like Mary Beth was a shoe-in for best MILF. Now, votes for Candace, and especially PM votes have Mary Beth and Candace just a vote or so apart. This is a contest where just one vote will matter tremendously in most categories. Therefore, I appreciate your interest and your vote.

Here is a reminder pic of Candace. There aren't too many things better than a pretty MILF with a tongue piercing, and a mouthful of your cum dripping out like a waterfall.

[Tominphilly]

I had a quick question, in a few of the pics you can see the flash reflecting in their eyes, wouldn't a camera flash cause the pupils to look like that as well? I'm no photography expert just throwing the question out there?


What a find, and (as per usual) great set of pix.

My aside is due to her pinpoint pupils: a strong suggestion of use of heroin ("dogfood" on the street"). If she only snorts, then the risk is less. But if she is an IV-user, great caution is due.

Mongers know that many SWs work to meet drug needs. Drugs taken by mouth, nose or lungs pose little direct increased risk of STD for the monger, but IV-using SWs pose an HIV risk to both themselves and the monger, unless they are savvy enough to *always* use clean needles (right.). If your date has pinpoint pupils in anything less than bright light (how often are we active in bright light?) , use extra caution. If she also is nodding, shows low coherence or seriously slurs her speech, you should at least use great caution and protection, otherwise, shop around.

I have put together a collage of pinpoint pupils, some of your excellent pix, some others recognizable from other sources. [How do you like a pinpoint pupil where a nose should be! . ]

[Supereloquent]

What a find [edit note:Champagne], and (as per usual) great set of pix.Thank you and it was my pleasure to show you. There are many more pics of Champagne to come.


My aside is due to her pinpoint pupils: a strong suggestion of use of heroin ("dogfood" on the street"). If she only snorts, then the risk is less. But if she is an IV-user, great caution is due.Heavy drug use is a grim reality on the stroll. I always assume the worst and try to be cautious regarding where I draw my line in the sand, safety-wise.

Pinpoint pupils can result from a downer opiate in many forms: opium, H, percs, roxys. It is a fact of life for SWs, especially those on the K. I was reminded privately by Giani, that stimulant drugs like those which are cocaine-based (crack, et. al.) and crystal meth, etc., cause the opposite condition: pupil dilation. Giani mentioned that he might be tempted to put together a collage of crack-user pupils, which can be a turn on for him personally (and ME), and has been a turn on since the days of the Roman orgies as a sign of arousal. That would be VERY welcome from this corner, Giani. Maybe next year I will have to add a "crack-pupil" category to my SW Contest? I always assume a girl is a user, no matter what she tells me. Regardless, she is engaging in risky sexual activity, as am I. Others can assume whatever level of risks they choose in this hobby. That is their business. I personally draw the line at covering myself where intercourse is involved.


Mongers know that many SWs work to meet drug needs. Drugs taken by mouth, nose or lungs pose little direct increased risk of STD for the monger, but IV-using SWs pose an HIV risk to both themselves and the monger, unless they are savvy enough to *always* use clean needles (right.). If your date has pinpoint pupils in anything less than bright light (how often are we active in bright light?) , use extra caution. If she also is nodding, shows low coherence or seriously slurs her speech, you should at least use great caution and protection, otherwise, shop around.Regardless whether a girl is an IV user or not, she can be exposing herself to mongers who are, and; therefore, to you. HIV is always a deadly threat and I try to give it an especially wide berth. While there are a few cases that the CDC says they have documented of oral transmission of HIV, the evidence is sketchy and relatively unproven, and the incidence is extremely low and highly unlikely. That doesn't mean it isn't possible, but the risk is very MUCH lower.


I have put together a collage of pinpoint pupils, some of your excellent pix, some others recognizable from other sources. [How do you like a pinpoint pupil where a nose should be!? ;-)]Firstly, congrats for learning a collage technique. I find this approach invaluable myself in the large pic attachment format available with the new software here. It is especially useful when making side-by-side comparisons of any sort as in: a quick visual overview of pic icons posted; viewing celebrity look-alikes on the stroll; comparing SWs side-by-side when someone has mistaken one for the other; or, directly comparing SWs for any reason, as in my SW of the Year Contest, and, your pinpoint pupil illustration.

Secondly, regarding the girls you pictured that I have dated, to illustrate pinpoint pupils. I know all of them are drug users either by what I have observed or heard from them. I really don't believe that either Candace or Champagne use needles. There wasn't a mark on their bodies that I noticed. Champagne admitted that she pops pills and Candace, true to her name, told me she was making a visit to the "candy man" after one of our dates. Melissa also mentioned using drugs, but was not specific. I don't want to accuse her of using needles, because her skin was relatively clear as well.

[Giani]

The way that camera "red-eye reduction" works is to give a preliminary flash. There is then a pause during which the pupils constrict, then another flash when the picture is taken. Red eye only happens when the pupils are dilated.

Most mongers will not use the red-eye because of the attention it attracts, especially when on a car date. But your are correct. If the monger is using red-eye reduction (not too likely unless the date is inside.) then pinpoint pupils are possible.

If you suspect IV drug use, confirmation comes from tracks (bruises at the elbow, back of the hand, top of the foot, etc) from bleeding at the site of injection. Even tho oral transmission is very unlikely, my preference would be not to have any contact with an IV user.


I had a quick question, in a few of the pics you can see the flash reflecting in their eyes, wouldn't a camera flash cause the pupils to look like that as well? I'm no photography expert just throwing the question out there?

[Supereloquent]

The way that camera "red-eye reduction" works is to give a preliminary flash. There is then a pause during which the pupils constrict, then another flash when the picture is taken. Red eye only happens when the pupils are dilated.As simple as my point and shoot camera is, I have a red eye reduction feature on it, but I rarely use it, and I almost never get any red eye effects. You tend to get this effect when the environment is very dark, because the light of the flash is reflecting from the retina, which is covered with tiny blood vessels. The more open the pupils are, the more red eye effect you get in your photos. Red eye is more pronounced in people with light eye color. It is also more pronounced in people with blond or light-red hair and in children. With the pinpoint pupils of opiate users, it is MUCH less of a problem. With crack users, the red eye effect would be much more evident.


Most mongers will not use the red-eye because of the attention it attracts, especially when on a car date. But your are correct. If the monger is using red-eye reduction (not too likely unless the date is inside.) then pinpoint pupils are possible.On car dates I don't use my flash for pics at all. During the day there is more than enough natural light for a pics, and at night you may as well just direct LE to you with an air raid siren. Even during the day the brilliance of a flash can be seen for a long distance. All of my flash pics are indoors. Even during the day indoors I let many of the lights on in the room. That tends to prevent stark shadows from the flash, and the extra lighting greatly reduces the chances of red eye in the photo.


If you suspect IV drug use, confirmation comes from tracks (bruises at the elbow, back of the hand, top of the foot, etc) from bleeding at the site of injection. Even tho oral transmission is very unlikely, my preference would be not to have any contact with an IV user.You forgot needle marks on the ass, which many SWs cover up with band-aides and tell you some whopper like they are insect bites (yeah, even in mid-winter, LOL). If you eliminate every SW on the stroll with any sign of needle marks you might have very few left. PLUS, how do you know they have any needle marks until you get them totally naked? You would have to do a thorough inspection of every single one of them indoors, never do a car date, and invest a lot of capital for room fees which wind up in refusals on your part.

I respect your caution, and you are most certainly free to do whatever you think is safe, but there are some practical limits IMHO to making sure there are absolutely no IV and / or HIV risks whatsoever. Even if a SW is not a needle user, she is likely exposed to mongers who are, or mongers who have exposed themselves to girls who are, or men or girls who are, down the line of contacts. You know how that goes: when you have sex with someone you are having sex with everyone they have had sex with, and everyone they have had sex with, ad infinitum.

[Supereloquent]

Champagne in her bra and panties; shy in her panties; topless with ball gag; topless with handcuffs; nude; nude with pacifier; dildoing herself; licking and sucking my cock

[Supereloquent]

A mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted.

[Supereloquent]

Got to love the ball gag pic!

[Supereloquent]

So many in this set! I can't pass up featuring the pacifier pic.

[Supereloquent]

I couldn't neglect you amateur gynecologists! Here is a clear view of Champagne sliding my purple "instrument' up her cunny.

[Vbgent4u2c]

A mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted.Awesome variety. What goes into your selection for the collages?

Those eyes are magnetic. Even if the pupils are drug induced.

Great job!

[Supereloquent]

And. Last, but certainly not least: Champagne licking my cock like an all day sucker!

[Giani]

I told SE I might put together a collage of effects of stimulants on eyes. Roman women knew the effect of dilated pupils on their beauty, and would use Bella donna (a poisonous plant) on their eyes to dilate them. See if you don't think the women in the collage have attractive eyes! Dilated eyes indicate arousal, and doesn't that look good to us.

I picked up a few images from the web to illustrate the effect, and that classic image of the hottie hitting the dipper.

Oh yeah--and one image of a girl with her eyes rolled back! Whew.

[Supereloquent]

Awesome variety.

Thank you.


What goes into your selection for the collages?That is a long story, with a continuing "paint-on-the-wall" analogy, which you will understand soon enough, so, here goes:

I used to just bunch all my pics together and post all of them at once after a report, sort of like throwing paint against a wall. Sometimes there might be 60-100 or more pics posted this way for one SW. I got many complaints for this, some rock throwers and assholes letting off steam to be sure, but some were reasonable people who suggested that so many pics together was "visual overload." I saw their point. So, I started to post pics just 10 at a time, allowing some time in between the posts, in order that they might be better absorbed and appreciated."Throwing my paint on the wall," then seemed to be much more like careful brush strokes. This seemed to dramatically increase the views per pic in the pic gallery. That was not necessarily my aim, but it was a good measure of the change being more successful and appealing to those looking at the pics either in the gallery or in my thread.

A member with fashion magazine expertise, and a professional eye for female beauty through photography, PMed me and suggested that a lot of my pics were of the same type, even in groups of 10, and it was not as eye catching and interesting as more variety in poses and types of pics might be. I resisted this thought at first (I can be stubborn, in case you didn't already know, LOL) , but I thought about trying this in deference to his professional experience and expertise in these matters. What this change would entail would be taking my pics out of time sequence order and placing them in groups specifically for the differences in what was being worn (or not worn) , poses, angles, use of props, distance of the camera to the subject, etc. In other words, to give each set of 10 a better VARIETY. Now my "paint on the wall" was not only more carefully applied, but with more attention to detail. This makes it more interesting to view each set of 10 not only as a batch of pics in the pic gallery, but also as pic icons to open when posted in my thread with each post, and clearly when combined together in a collage.

If the dramatic increase in views per pic of my stuff is any measure, both of my pic posting changes have been very well received.


Those eyes are magnetic. Even if the pupils are drug induced.

Great job! Champagne is a self-admitted popper of opium-derived pills (percs and roxys). An opiate is a downer and pinpoints the pupils, as Giani pointed out for us. However, I agree with you: the look on her face and in her eyes was alluring and magnetic, nonetheless.

[KantDelay]

And. Last, but certainly not least: Champagne licking my cock like an all day sucker!SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.

[Supereloquent]

I told SE I might put together a collage of effects of stimulants on eyes. Roman women knew the effect of dilated pupils on their beauty, and would use Bella donna (a poisonous plant) on their eyes to dilate them. See if you don't think the women in the collage have attractive eyes! Dilated eyes indicate arousal, and doesn't that look good to us.

I picked up a few images from the web to illustrate the effect, and that classic image of the hottie hitting the dipper.

Oh yeah-and one image of a girl with her eyes rolled back! Whew. All I can say is WOW, great stuff! I will have to agree that dilated eyes are an erotic appeal.

[Vbgent4u2c]

SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.Hey Kant,

Super's work is terrific.

I am going to be in Philly the middle of next month. If you are there the same time I am maybe we can coordinate our resources for some Champagne reconnaissance?

[Vbgent4u2c]

Thank you.

That is a long story, with a continuing "paint-on-the-wall" analogy, which you will understand soon enough, so, here goes:

I used to just bunch all my pics together and post all of them at once after a report, sort of like throwing paint against a wall. Sometimes there might be 60-100 or more pics posted this way for one SW. I got many complaints for this, some rock throwers and assholes letting off steam to be sure, but some were reasonable people who suggested that so many pics together was "visual overload." I saw their point. So, I started to post pics just 10 at a time, allowing some time in between the posts, in order that they might be better absorbed and appreciated."Throwing my paint on the wall," then seemed to be much more like careful brush strokes. This seemed to dramatically increase the views per pic in the pic gallery. That was not necessarily my aim, but it was a good measure of the change being more successful and appealing to those looking at the pics either in the gallery or in my thread.

A member with fashion magazine expertise, and a professional eye for female beauty through photography, PMed me and suggested that a lot of my pics were of the same type, even in groups of 10, and it was not as eye catching and interesting as more variety in poses and types of pics might be. I resisted this thought at first (I can be stubborn, in case you didn't already know, LOL) , but I thought about trying this in deference to his professional experience and expertise in these matters. What this change would entail would be taking my pics out of time sequence order and placing them in groups specifically for the differences in what was being worn (or not worn) , poses, angles, use of props, distance of the camera to the subject, etc. In other words, to give each set of 10 a better VARIETY. Now my "paint on the wall" was not only more carefully applied, but with more attention to detail. This makes it more interesting to view each set of 10 not only as a batch of pics in the pic gallery, but also as pic icons to open when posted in my thread with each post, and clearly when combined together in a collage.

If the dramatic increase in views per pic of my stuff is any measure, both of my pic posting changes have been very well received.

Champagne is a self-admitted popper of opium-derived pills (percs and roxys). An opiate is a downer and pinpoints the pupils, as Giani pointed out for us. However, I agree with you: the look on her face and in her eyes was alluring and magnetic. I agree. The changes are for the better. Definitely more artisic.

[Supereloquent]

SuperE. I admire all your work. Truly. This one drives me SO crazy. Great stuff. I could look at her pics all day. And the services you describe from her makes me want to drive three plus hours to find her. Thanks.

Thanks for your props.

Looks are not everything. I have slept with women who were 12s on a scale of 10, and it was like fucking a bored piece of cardboard. For me, everything starts with attitude. If a woman has a great 'tude then that covers a lot of other flaws she might possess. Assuming a given of impeccable hygiene, and a great attitude, everything else is gravy. Looks are an important "gravy" to be sure. After all, I hate to eat my turkey and mashed potatoes dry. Throw in some fresh beans, biscuits and cranberry sauce (sexual skills) and you have a feast worth remembering. Champagne had it all: CLEAN and WHOLESOME (a SW doesn't get any better) , a WONDERFUL and WARM personality, an absolutely GORGEOUS face and body, a love of FILTHY, DIRTY conversation, an erotic PLAYFULNESS capable of awakening the dead, and sexual abilities that are OFF THE HOOK!

[Supereloquent]

Cephlapod Love pointed out a little while ago that I had taken some better money shot pics of Candace than I posted for her in my money shot contest in September. I recently re-posted a good money shot of Candace as a reminder pic when someone voted for her a Best MILF, and Giani included this shot in his collage, which discussed pinpoint pupils. Whew! Talk about "connections."

ANYWAY, all this talk about money shots, including Dripper's mentioning it again some time ago (we all know how much Dripper adores money shots) , reminds me that I promised you a reprise of my money shot contest as a special division of the BJ competition. Jen's "waterfall of cum" pic won the initial money shot contest. This time I thought I would change it up a bit by re-introducing the nominees, but then narrow it down to MY 5 favorites from the total field of 19. You aren't limited by my biases in any way; you can vote for whomever you like. Awards will be presented to the top 5 places, so, if the voting is too light, my top 5 favorites may just be the winners.

This part of the contest will be a little different. Since money shots are near and dear to my heart, you can make up to 5 votes in priority order. Votes will be "weighted" by the place in which they are voted (a weight of 5 for your first place vote. 4 for your second place vote, etc.).

Here is the first group of 10 nominees for the money shot contest out of a total of 19. They are shown in no particular priority order. The number associated with each pic is the alphabetical order of the nominee.

[Supereloquent]

This is a mosaic collage of the first 10 nominees just posted.

[Supereloquent]

The second and final group of nine nominees.

[Supereloquent]

Mosaic collage of last group of nine nominees.

[Hammerin]

Mosaic collage of last group of nine nominees.They're all outstanding money shot pics, but Sparkles gets my vote.

[Supereloquent]

A collage of my 5 favorites, labeled in priority order.

[Supereloquent]

They're all outstanding money shot pics, but Sparkles gets my vote.Great! Sparkles was one of my top 5 favorites.

[Supereloquent]

I told SE I might put together a collage of effects of stimulants on eyes. Roman women knew the effect of dilated pupils on their beauty, and would use Bella donna (a poisonous plant) on their eyes to dilate them. See if you don't think the women in the collage have attractive eyes! Dilated eyes indicate arousal, and doesn't that look good to us.

I picked up a few images from the web to illustrate the effect, and that classic image of the hottie hitting the dipper.

Oh yeah-and one image of a girl with her eyes rolled back! Whew. I did a very cursory review of SW eyes from my own album of pics, and, surely enough, there were a bunch with dilated pupils. I have compared them to an eye illustration with one normal pupil and one dilated.

It will be interesting to review my entire collection, and also to take some close-up eye pics on future dates.

[Amp Guide]

I did a hot hard bodied spinner last summer. Girl was trouble but the small head thougth for the big one. She would get a 60 bag and sniff it up. Eyes would dialate like silver dollars. Pretty big and not attractive. She was so thin and such. Dam hard body but not worth the trouble on the snow. I always wonder if it got the best of her. She was a f in hottie. What an ass. But it was interesting to see the eyes change.

That is why I miss the Collage girls who were not into the drugs, just a good play for pay and they even enjoyed a good orgasm themselves.

Keep up the good posts you guys in this Fourm

[Giani]

Your posts of dates with "crack eyes" is right on the money. I have to say that the girl in the upper right of your 'dilated' collage has some of the hottest eyes I have ever seen. They not only say bedroom, but "push that big boy home!" For me, the eyes are in the upper echelon of sex organs, and are especially potent in being able to arouse.

Can you either give us the link to your original image post (of the upper right girl), or even better, reframe (at 646 x 646... wish the new software allowed higher resolution) and repost the picture to emphasize those eyes? My favorite quote from a butter-using provider was to call butter (crack) the "panties down" drug. You can imagine that quote stuck with me. She would attend the dipper just before taking care of business-intense.

The flood of compliments confirm our conclusion of the quality of your work. Your recent use of collage's raises it up a level. Good work, thanks from all of us droolers out here. But leave time away from the computer for 'other' activities, and take your camera!

Bravo.


I did a very cursory review of SW eyes from my own album of pics, and, surely enough, there were a bunch with dilated pupils. I have compared them to an eye illustration with one normal pupil and one dilated.

It will be interesting to review my entire collection, and also to take some close-up eye pics on future dates.

[Supereloquent]

I did a hot hard bodied spinner last summer. Girl was trouble but the small head thougtht for the big one.Been there, done that. LOL.


She would get a 60 bag and sniff it up. Eyes would dialate like silver dollars. Pretty big and not attractive. She was so thin and such.Usually, dilated eyes are very attractive, and a girl on a stimulant like coke would be a lot more fun than a girl on a downer like dogfood. (I used "horse" above only because it fit the line from the song, but the "snow" fits better in your particular case).


Dam hard body but not worth the trouble on the snow. I always wonder if it got the best of her. She was a f in hottie. What an ass. But it was interesting to see the eyes change.That may just have been her personality. I have known many coke or crack heads to just be off the wall normally, especially if they are younguns, but even more so when they are high. Read my report on "Little Bits," if you want an extreme example that I experienced. On our date her eyes were almost all pupil from recent crack hits.

"Little Bits" of Hell (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=842815#post842815)

Being with a girl high on a stimulant can be fun, but there can be such a thing as too high to enjoy, whether up or down the drug ladder.


That is why I miss the Collage girls who were not into the drugs, just a good play for pay and they even enjoyed a good orgasm themselves.Girls from the burbs or "working" their way through school, and looking to make some extra dough, are available on the Ave, but they tend to be in the minority. Whether we like it or not, the big driving force behind the number and variety of SWs on the K is the thriving drug business that surrounds the stroll.


Keep up the good posts you guys in this FourmI just have a one-word reply to that: Yeeeeeeeeeehawwwwwww!

[Supereloquent]

The EYES have it! (AND. We are amazed at your new level of posts.)Thank you for commenting positively on my number of posts. (Or, maybe you meant their improved quality? Thank you in either case). I do not seek some "number," like a score in a sports contest; I just have a lot to say, reports to make, and pics to post; it's my hobby and what I do. I recently blew right by 5000 pic attachments to my reports (including my NJ threads) without even noticing or mentioning it (until now) , and now I am rapidly approaching 6000. I suppose there are several reasons that I stopped celebrating 1000 pic anniversaries: they are coming so fast now that I hardly have time to blow out the candles on one cake before there is another; the total pic count is not really indicative of the number of original pic attachments when a good number are reprised (as for my contest) , collages, favorites, etc. It would be way too much trouble to just count the originals. Let's just say that there are a LOT, nonetheless.

Regarding quality: I have been having a great deal of fun with my contest, making collages and doing some extra things beyond merely reporting and photographically chronicling my exploits. So, I am happy that you are enjoying it.


Your posts of dates with "crack eyes" is right on the money. I have to say that the girl in the upper right of your 'dilated' collage has some of the hottest eyes I have ever seen. They not only say bedroom, but "push that big boy home!"The girl you referenced was Jaime and the pic of her eyes was from an overall pic of her "pushing the big boy home," as you very accurately characterized. I have attached the whole pic of Jaime "gobbling" her Thanksgiving dinner: ME!


For me, the eyes are in the upper echelon of sex organs, and are especially potent in being able to arouse.If anything I am a face and an ass man. I am attracted to a cute and pretty face and the eyes are an important part of that: so expressive.


Can you either give us the link to your original image post (of the upper right girl), or even better, reframe (at 646 x 646... wish the new software allowed higher resolution) and repost the picture to emphasize those eyes?

I did exactly as you asked and re-posted the original 640 by 480 pic of Jaime (you can't post 640 by 640 here), as I noted above.


My favorite quote from a butter-using provider was to call butter (crack) the "panties down" drug. You can imagine that quote stuck with me. She would attend the dipper just before taking care of business-intense.The "panties-down drug," I LOVE it! The butter helps to "slide" them off. :)


The flood of compliments confirm our conclusion of the quality of your work. Your recent use of collage's raises it up a level. Good work, thanks from all of us droolers out here.Thank you. What was once a horrendously complicated task to create a collage has been made extremely simple for me by an additional piece of pic software. Now it is very easy and fun, so I am glad it is also appreciated.


But leave time away from the computer for 'other' activities, and take your camera!

Bravo. This time of year the LE presence tends to be higher normally in Kenzo because of Christmas shopping and it is extra high because of this high profile Strangler business. So, it doesn't pay to be too visible and do too much trolling. However, I am still window shopping on the stroll and keeping my "eyes" peeled for gems.

[Supereloquent]

Hit the ave from Harrisburg yesterday at 7pm and found- nothing It was completely (almost) deserted. I saw 1 or 2 girls out-total. I did see two TV vans doing live reports and a large LE presence which probably didn't help. Hope this is not a trend. I just noticed your post, but I thought it was worth some commentary.

7 PM is normally a prime time to go trolling under normal circumstances. It is after the rush hour, so you avoid the commuter mongers, and the evening girls are waking up from their naps and anxious to make some dough for their wake-up hits.

However, these are not "normal" circumstances. It is the Christmas season and LE presence is higher than it usually is in Kenzo to watch over the shoppers. Then there are the two criminals being sought by LEOs on the Ave, one of them being the now notorious Kensington Strangler. So, LE is out in force more than ever, and they are particularly watching the hot SW corners. Add to that the cold weather. SWs are well aware of the stepped up LE presence. With that and frigid weather they may only be inclined to do what is barely necessary to feed their habits, most especially if they have outstanding warrants. Also, be looking for them at some indoor haunts where they can dash in or even linger if permitted, and keep warm, like Martins, the laundromat, the DDs, McDs, other fast food joints, etc.

You didn't say how many passes you made on the stroll while still coming up empty. However, the K isn't like a vending machine. It can be hit or miss on the most pleasant day of spring or summer, or chock-full of possibilities. I have struck gold on occasion on my first pass, and I have made 7 to 10 loops before finding what I wanted. Sometimes the big fish are biting like mad, and sometimes you have to be patient.

[Supereloquent]

I agree. The changes are for the better. Definitely more artisic.Leonardo da Vinci is a name you probably all have heard. He was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived.

I would aspire to be the kind of monger Leonardo would have been, had he been interested in our hobby. Maybe he did dabble as a monger too, but the times in which he lived frowned upon anything but total discretion in such endeavors. There is a hint of playfulness in this regard reflected in the ambiguous and subtle smile on his famous painting: "Mona Lisa." What he was not permitted to express directly, some say he did very cleverly indirectly in art such as this. :)

Today, of course, and especially on this website, we are not constrained by the nit-picky hang-ups of bygone eras, even though we do get some commentary from time to time that seems like a throwback to morality from the 50s. But that's all it is: a flapping of gums about outdated standards and nothing more. I can't be positive, but Leonardo was definitely a free-thinking rebel, and I would surmise it very likely that Mona Lisa just might be sucking on a cock if Leonardo painted his famous masterpiece today. Her mouth seems incredibly ripe for one.

[YoHimBeBrother]

SuperE,

Keep up the good work.


I couldn't neglect you amateur gynecologists! Here is a clear view of Champagne sliding my purple "instrument' up her cunny.

[Supereloquent]

SuperE,

Keep up the good work. When you say "keep UP the good work." Do you mean: mongering, finding gems, taking pics, keeping my member "up," or all four? LOL :)

[La Chic]

Okay SuperE, here goes:

5. Maddie. B movie horror porn like "Hairy Twatter" and my fav,"Throbbin Hood, Prince of Beaves."

4. Jessica. Yummy, yummy, I've got cum in my tummy.

3. Candace. Slurpee surprise.

2. Jen. Classic.

1. Leigh. Her face and hand gesture says it all.

La Chic

[Supereloquent]

I did exactly as you asked and re-posted the original 640 by 480 pic of Jaime (you can't post 640 by 640 here), as I noted above.The limitation of the OLD software was a 640 by 480 resolution (I think). I was mistaken in saying you can't post 640 by 640, because apparently you can. I have been reducing the resolution of my posted pics more than required ever since the new software was installed. Maybe I should re-post them all? LMAO :)

[Supereloquent]

I missed two quotation marks and an attribution, and a rock thrower was cowardly enough to hide in another thread to throw his rock at it. And, he has the cahones to accuse ME of not having integrity? You get 60 minutes with this new software to edit a post. Mine tend to be on the long side, not to mention that I often write several long reports in succession. Much has the potential to be missed. If I bothered to correct all the mistakes of others who post in my thread alone, it would be a full time job. For example, there were numerous errors by the rock thrower in question: "their writing style?" Learn to combine a plural object with a plural subject. If you state a separate thought within a sentence: separate it from the rest of the sentence with a semi-colon and not a comma! Learn when to use commas in a sentence to separate whole thoughts; you tend to miss that a LOT! Learn to separate conjunction phrases from the sentence with commas (in fact, just study comma use, period; your command of punctuation SUCKS!). Learn to SPELL Leonardo da Vinci (NOT Leonardo di Vinci, DUH!). "Born 500 years too soon?:" this should have been connected to the sentence with a colon; it is NOT a complete thought.

I may have missed two quotation marks and an attribution, but I didn't lift my entire post from another source. The vast majority of it was creatively my own. Most importantly, I wrote it using good English!

I also didn't accuse you of having no integrity just because your English is piss poor. Your agenda was not to correct; it was to attack. There is a wide gulf between pointing out oversights and character assassination.

[Member #4581]

I missed two quotation marks and an attribution, and a rock thrower was cowardly enough to hide in another thread to throw his rock at it. And, he has the cahones to accuse ME of not having integrity? You get 60 minutes with this new software to edit a post. Mine tend to be on the long side, not to mention that I often write several long reports in succession. Much has the potential to be missed. If I bothered to correct all the mistakes of others who post in my thread alone, it would be a full time job. For example, there were numerous errors by the rock thrower in question:"their writing style?" Learn to have a plural object with a plural subject. If you state a separate thought within a sentence: separate it from the rest of the sentence with a semi-colon and not a comma! Learn when to use commas in a sentence to separate whole thoughts; you tend to miss that a LOT! Learn to separate conjunctions from the sentence with commas (in fact, just study comma use, period; your command of punctuation SUCKS!). Learn to SPELL Leonardo the Vinci (NOT Leonardo di Vinci, DUH!)"Born 500 years too soon? :" this should have been connected to the sentence with a colon; it is NOT a complete thought.

I may have missed two quotation marks and an attribution, but I didn't lift my entire post from another source. The vast majority of it was creatively my own. Most importantly, I wrote it using good English! Hey SE, no one likes a sniper and they usually get what they deserve. This is just a suggestion as you have helped me out several times over the last 6 months. Whenever I write something for here or my local paper I generally go to my word processor and write it and spell check it there first. Then I copy and paste to my post here. Keep up the good work, thanks for your tips and I hope that POS gets pulled over after some stem queen has stuffed all of her sjunk in his car.

[Supereloquent]

Hey SE, no one likes a sniper and they usually get what they deserve. This is just a suggestion as you have helped me out several times over the last 6 months. Whenever I write something for here or my local paper I generally go to my word processor and write it and spell check it there first. Then I copy and paste to my post here. Keep up the good work, thanks for your tips and I hope that POS gets pulled over after some stem queen has stuffed all of her sjunk in his car.You make an excellent suggestion; however, sometimes I don't know before I start a post that I might feel inspired to do several, and I am a fast typist. The upside is that I can finish long posts quickly. The downside is that I don't always catch the oversights. However, I seem to have far fewer than this guy did.

Even if you use a word processor, and do all the corrections before pasting the post here, there are several self-correcting mechanisms in the new software that can make certain errors unavoidable if you don't know about them. For example, the software automatically assumes you meant "I'd" and not "ID" when you use that acronym. It corrects "da" to "the" (as in "da Vinci" to "the Vinci"). You will note that it did that in your quotation of my post before I had a chance to change it.

I have never attacked anyone for the picky shit that this guy did, and CERTAINLY NOT to make the leap from noting an oversight to a brazen accusation of having no integrity. However, if someone wants to come at me with this or any other crap, then I will give it right back in spades. He had enough grammatical errors in his post to make a third grader be ashamed.

[Pcpc1688]

Thank you for your thoughtful post, Gran Lenchote, and all the work and research you obviously put into it.

I have mongered in many cites across this country. I am sure there are a few cities where the local mongers would contend they have the best quality and variety of SW talent; however, IMHO, there are a few, if any, that come close to equaling what we have in the Philly area.

It's not really that there are that many gripers. It's just that the gripers are more vociferous in posting their nonsense than the far different perspective from the great multitude of more quiet supporters. I get dozens of PMs of congratulations and well wishes every day from all over the country. I have never gotten an angry PM even once since I have joined this website (of course now I will get one just so a griper can prove me wrong, LOL). The gripers prefer to be visible and post their poison for all to see. Griping in private seems to give them little satisfaction, because I can merely ignore it. The only negativity in a PM has come when I wouldn't give someone what he wanted, typically contact information. I have made my position on that matter pretty clear, but here is a link in case anyone missed it:

Getting Contact Information from Me (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1103234&viewfull=1#post1103234)

The griping has pretty much ceased since the Admin made a specific ruling about that nonsense. There were a few serial antagonists who seemed to have have a chip on their shoulder where I am concerned, and the Admin just got fed up with it. Here is the link to it:

Admin Comments on Criticism (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1089133&viewfull=1#post1089133)

I am glad, because I don't go rattling anyone else's cage and I don't appreciate it when they come and rattle mine. There apparently are still a few who didn't read the new ruling and continue to criticize. I don't mind some good-natured ribbing, but I am smart enough to distinguish between that and ill-intentioned criticism, which is now banned where I am concerned. I intend NOT to violate that in reverse by criticizing others, unless they attack me or a friend on the Board for what I believe are very misplaced and ugly agendas. That will be particularly the case where pic criticism is concerned. I have never criticized a pic anyone has ever posted in this Forum and I don't like it when others criticize pics, even when they aren't mine. These complaints usually come from members who have posted few if any pics themselves. My position on this is that; if you don't like the pics another has posted then post some of your own and demonstrate how it's done.

I have made this same argument, but pic complaints have little or nothing to do with logic and everything to do with envy. That is the ugly but simple truth.

We have a pic gallery for many reasons; I'd for the girls dated, and just to admire females sexily posed, naked, spread and showing us their cootchies, sucking, fucking, whatever floats your boat. However, some pic viewers think that their criteria for what should be shown should rule what others post. They should start their own pic gallery somewhere and administer it with their own rules.

"Free speech" is what complainers squeal about. They claim the right to their own opinions. But, there is a fine line between having your own opinion, and needlessly trampling on someone else. A classic, if extreme, example of that are all these nasty protests at the funerals and gravesites of those known or suspected of being gay. All of them are braying like donkeys about their "freedom of speech," while holding up lewd and insensitive signs and slogans of gay protest for the bereaved family and friends to see. I hope the Supreme Court rules to keep these silly assholes outside of a 1/2 mile zone of privacy from any funeral, funeral procession or internment ceremony. I guess you could say we have had our own such ruling here in a different context, as noted above.

You really did some work on this and have some good insights!

I have not been insensitive to reasonable and well-intentioned suggestions. For example, I used to block my pics in groups of 40-60 and often more with and after a report. Some complained that this was just visual overload and I agreed. I started to group them 10 at a time (now with collages and a favorite) and spread over time so they could better be visually absorbed and appreciated. I had another valuable suggestion that I was bunching the photos in time sequence such that there were a lot of a similar type together. So, within each set of 10 posted I started to vary the type and poses, and even the time sequencing for visual variety. This change quite dramatically increased the number of views per pic in the gallery, so I suppose the change has been successful and well received.

I spit up my coffee on that one. Bravo! It takes a few mouse clicks to very rapidly navigate the pic gallery, and they don't have to open my thread if they don't want to see a lot of pics, because, guess what, there will be a lot of pics!

This was never about how difficult I made anyone's life in the Forum by posting so many pics. It was always about how I should either conform to someone else's idea of what I should be or do, OR, MUCH more likely, pure unadulterated ENVY!

Guilty as charged. I don't go looking for trouble, but, if it comes looking for me, I am surrounded by a mine field with machine gun towers and missile launchers. I don't suffer fools gladly, and I have no compunction about ripping someone a new one if I feel like it. I can be a bit of a narcissist, but that is no crime. I don't bully others and kick sand in their faces on the beach looking for a fight (well, I admit that I did so once, but many didn't see that I was just demonstrating how easy it is to be a horse's ass in here and attack). I just do my own thing and go my own way. Am I opinionated? You bet! Some may think insufferably so. But, my opinions are not in the faces of others unless they attack first. My thoughts are just that, what I think. You are free to express your thoughts as you choose too. Just don't do it while spitting in my face.

That is extremely perceptive of you. 99% of the time they feel slighted because I wouldn't give them contact info for one reason or another. I have previously explained my position in this regard. Some members seem to take this very personally like they are entitled to get this information. So they take the pissing contest public in some way. One guy went off the deep end about this and started making very serious public and private threats, which, of course, is a big no-no in the rules of this Forum. For this he was banned.

These 'encounters' always seem to have a similar pattern: some member PMs me and tells me how much he admires my work, etc, and wants some contact information. I explain my position and even send him a link to my reports on this. He tries to convince me that he isn't one of the bad guys and would never do what that jerk did to me and I shouldn't let one guy spoil it for everyone else. I still refuse. Then come all the insults: I think too much of myself; I am a jerk, whatever. This, of course, is WONDERFULLY INTELLIGENT psychology to get me to change my mind and he takes it public to show in one way or another what an ass he thinks I am, and tries his best to 'pee in my Cheerios. ' Childish? : yes. But I suppose it is just human nature and stuff we all learned in Kindergarten.

I normally have a lot to say about most things, but about this I only have two words; no comment.

This is very prescient on your part and classic psychology. We hate most in others what we most hate in ourselves. Yes, I can come across as egotistical and a narcissist. Therefore, I draw criticism from the same. There is no mystery there. It isn't about changing me or explaining anything readers couldn't figure out or sharing information. It is about self-loathing. I am simply what their souls see in the mirror. They have a choice of torturing themselves or flogging me in writing. In either case they are exorcising their own demons.

You made perfect sense to me, even the part about my being a jerk and a narcissist on occasion, LOL. You did thorough research and you have keen insights (well, with a few exceptions I can't comment upon for Administrative reasons). Thank you for your diligent effort and well-reasoned opinions.

Same to you my friend. Not to mention that Super along with myself and many others here have donated time and resourses to this hobby.

PC out

[Supereloquent]

In her bra and panties; topless; with ball gag; doggie view; spread with pacifier; licking and sucking my cock

[Supereloquent]

Collage of the last ten pics posted.

[Supereloquent]

Too many good ones in this set! ; here is one of her ass. It reminds me that I had both holes with that view! :)

[Supereloquent]

Got to love the shot in the mirror with a view of her perky tits as well as her back tat.

[Supereloquent]

Cutesy pic!

[Seva Lurker]

Got to love the shot in the mirror with a view of her perky tits as well as her back tat.Is it me or is the tat on her shoulder really reversed?

[Supereloquent]

Is it me or is the tat on her shoulder really reversed?The short answer: yes, it is reversed.

There is a long answer, but it would bore the crap out of 99% of you. :)

[Supereloquent]

In her bra and panties; topless; with a pacifier; with handcuffs; in the mirror; flexible spread; licking and sucking my cock

[Supereloquent]

A mosaic collage of the last set of ten pics posted.

[Supereloquent]

Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.

[Supereloquent]

Champagne is cute as a button and here she has a "button" in her mouth to emphasize the point!

[Supereloquent]

Or, is she doing MY thing? :) Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.

[Supereloquent]

Okay SuperE, here goes:

5. Maddie. B movie horror porn like "Hairy Twatter" and my fav,"Throbbin Hood, Prince of Beaves."

4. Jessica. Yummy, yummy, I've got cum in my tummy.

3. Candace. Slurpee surprise.

2. Jen. Classic.

1. Leigh. Her face and hand gesture says it all.

La ChicIt isn't always how much or how messy or how drooly the cum is. There are many subtle things to enjoy, depending on what you like.

Thank you for your continued attention to my contest and your thoughtful and annotated considerations when you vote.

[Vbgent4u2c]

I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.

I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions?

Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.


Leonardo the Vinci is a name you probably all have heard. He was an Italian polymath: painter, sculptor, architect, musician, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor, anatomist, geologist, cartographer, botanist and writer. Leonardo has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man, a man whose unquenchable curiosity was equaled only by his powers of invention. He is widely considered to be one of the greatest painters of all time and perhaps the most diversely talented person ever to have lived.

I would aspire to be the kind of monger Leonardo would have been, had he been interested in our hobby. Maybe he did dabble as a monger too, but the times in which he lived frowned upon anything but total discretion in such endeavors. There is a hint of playfulness in this regard reflected in the ambiguous and subtle smile on his famous painting: "Mona Lisa." What he was not permitted to express directly, some say he did very cleverly indirectly in art such as this. .

Today, of course, and especially on this website, we are not constrained by the nit-picky hang-ups of bygone eras, even though we do get some commentary from time to time that seems like a throwback to morality from the 50s. But that's all it is: a flapping of gums about outdated standards and nothing more. I can't be positive, but Leonardo was definitely a free-thinking rebel, and I would surmise it very likely that Mona Lisa just might be sucking on a cock if Leonardo painted his famous masterpiece today. Her mouth seems incredibly ripe for one.

[XxATLxX]

Wish I could get my hands on her. She is definitely a BBFS candidate.

[Supereloquent]

I totally agree. I wish I could print out some of your collages (especially Champagne's) , frame them and hang them on my wall at home, work or both. But something tells me it would not go over well with others.I know a monger who lives in the Philly burbs who does exactly that. He takes photos of SWs, and prints his pics in large format, and displays them in frames on his walls. He brings SWs to his home (something I wouldn't do, but to each his own) , and, in addition to knowing this already, I have heard from several SWs who found it interesting and intriguing that he does this.


I should however print them and put them in a vault or deposit box. Maybe in 500 years or so SE's work will be worth millions? Artists tend not to be appreciated in their lifetimes. Van Gogh's work was spurned. He only ever managed to sell one painting out of the 900 or so that he painted, for 400 francs (about $80) :

The Red Vineyard (http://www.vangoghgallery.com/catalog/Painting/466/Red-Vineyard,-The.html)

Now, of course, he is considered to be one of the best and most recognized painter of all time and his work is worth incalculable millions.

I am not saying I am a Van Gogh. I am just making a point. Anything is possible.


Your analogy to The Mona Lisa is excellent! In addition to her smile. Take a close look at her eyes. They tell it all.I always thought the Mona Lisa had that "come fuck me" look. Of course, I tend to think a lot of women are saying "fuck me" with their eyes, :)

[The P Hunter]

Again, so many good ones to choose just one fav, so I will choose several. But this one would have to be at the top of my list.FINALLY an anal pic of her! This one is a definate hottie! Thanks for these pics

[Spa Man 1]

Or, is she doing MY thing? :) Last but certainly not least is my favorite cock sucking pic from the last set.Come on, let's see champagne get fucked.

[Brrr99]

Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.

[Vamp]

SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).

[Supereloquent]

SE, sorry if I didn't read properly and is already in your reports. I would like to know if Champagne provide Greek? (just to get the fantasy of that wonderful, great ass being worked).Here is my report:

My Date with Champagne (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1102518&viewfull=1#post1102518)

You tell me. :)

[Supereloquent]

Come on, let's see champagne get fucked. Nawwwwww.... I am having too much fun while fucking to be setting up a remote camera for photos. It is a LOT easier with a BJ.

[Supereloquent]

Nice find SuperE, I want to see this one splattered in cum.Thanks for the props. HOWEVER, people in hell want ice water too. I don't do requests, and, even if I did, it would be some trick to do so AFTER the date is over.

I rarely, if ever, do facials. It just isn't my thing. But never say never. I have "dabbled" in that on occasion. I like money shots with my cum in and streaming from their mouths, but, sometimes it just feels too good to interrupt for photos, and I prefer to have her swallow.

[Supereloquent]

Let me preface my remarks by saying two things:

1. Forth Ryte has always seemed to me to be one of the good guys. He has further seemed to be one of the more intelligent and level-headed good guys, so, my commentary, wherever it disagrees with him, in no way reflects animosity. It is just a healthily different perspective and point of view, although I do agree with much of what he had to say.

2. There are some downsides to only being able to post in your own thread, but the danger of being "off-topic" isn't one of them. Just about anything for me is "on-topic" unless I start babbling in tongues or typing the phone directory. I make an honest attempt to stick to the purposes of this Forum; if I stray from that from time to time I hope you would forgive a slight detour, given that my main highway is littered with useful information.


What goes on in this forum. Especially this Philly forum that is so busy and so populated with prolific sex addicts. Is sometimes just an opportunity to discuss what the poster wants to discuss. And so long as it relates. However remotely. To sex with women it should be 'on topic. 'You have NO argument from me on that one.


For some men, sex with a woman is wham-bam-thank-you-Ma'am. For others, it is seduction. The hunt, the dance, the pleasure. Some want more detail, other just want the essential facts. Some want to see pictures of just the girl with no part of the man, others want to see the girl actively engaged in the sex act. Variety, gentlemen, is what makes this and everything we do in life more interesting. Variety in our discussions should be tolerated and even encouraged. Jumping on someone just because YOU weren't interested in what he had to say or jumping on someone just because YOU didn't like the poses in his pictures or the language that he used, just seems awfully small minded to me.It couldn't have been said much better: vive la differece.


Some posts are two lines long and others are quite lurid and eloquent. At least one poster here prides himself on his eloquence so what in the world was wrong with one monger discussing the topic of 'eloquence'? JEEZ! Leave the guy alone if that's what he wanted to discuss in the context of the posts on this forum.Here is where we disagree. It is one thing to "discuss" or even dispute the topic of "eloquence." It is one thing to point out an oversight, like missing an attribution. It is quite ANOTHER thing to use either of these two subjects as a weapon to attack, to ascribe malevolent motivations and to impugn "integrity." If you are a student of World War II and Operation Market-Garden, that was a bridge WAY too far.

I don't need to plagiarize the work of others to "impress" anyone about my writing abilities. My vast body of work here speaks for itself as to whether I am capable of "erudition" or not. If I were to pick a spot to do that it certainly wouldn't be Wikipedia, as if that was a place nobody could easily find! That source was a quick and dirty way of getting my facts straight. However, you try making well over 2000 posts without any errors or oversights, like missing an attribution. A simple interrupting telephone call or unexpected social or business guest can make editing impossible with the new software, which allows a 60 minute window. I miss the old 24 hour window. Even with 24 hours, many mambers made more mistakes in one post than I have since I became a member here, and now they make even more (as did the attacker in question as a prime example). No amount of editing time will be enough, however, for someone with the grammar skills of a third grader.

Should the guy who vilified me have been left alone to make the leap from "discussion" to obviously hostile and vindictive presumptions? I think not, and several others clearly agreed. If you want to make rash and spiteful assumptions, and use them to jump down somebody's throat, and denounce both his talent and his character, then you had better be prepared for like treatment.

[Supereloquent]

I was making a commentary in my last post about how difficult it was to edit within a 60 minute window, and I noticed a typo wherein I had mistyped "member" as "mamber," but the editing window was already closed. How I long for the old 24 hour hour editing window! It has to be hell on new members. You might not even see your post published before the editing window has already expired!

[Supereloquent]

FINALLY an anal pic of her! This one is a definate hottie! Thanks for these picsYou are more than welcome for the pics of Champagne.

I knew there were amateur gynecologists in here. The view count on a pic seems to go WAY up when a girl's legs are spread wide for an unobstructed view of her cootchie. And, I haven't seen many complaints about the same. There seem to be far fewer amateur proctologists, although there are some, like you, to be sure. In that "area" the opinions seem to have greater divergence, similar to the majority / minority differences of opinion about BJ pics. In the "end" we all like what we like for the reasons we like it.

Some mongers love to see and to fuck a SW's asshole, and others prefer neither, and some most especially would sooner NOT see them posted here. These preferences never much influenced what I decide to photograph and post. No matter what the request, pro or con, I just tend to do my own thing and go my own way. But, if the anal pic is your cup of tea, take it the way you like it, straight up or with plenty of milk and sugar, like the English prefer to drink it. :)

[Supereloquent]

I was always fascinated with numbers. It intrigued me that when you jump out of an airplane, there was a terminal velocity (122 mph), beyond which you could fall no faster, after initially accelerating at 32 feet per second / per second, because of the wind resistance of the atmosphere.

In here there is no natural physical resistance of any kind, except perhaps the speed of the internet. Virtually limitless acceleration and speed is possible. I have taken note of my own acceleration and speed. Data available with the new software on this website allows one to look at the views of each thread and measure these things. I made an interesting observation. The "speed" of views on my main thread here is 30,000 to 50,000 views per month faster than any other in the ENTIRE Forum, and it continues to accelerate.

I can't begin to speculate why this is so. There are probably as many different reasons as there are viewers. The numbers I presented, however, are kind of like a "Nielsen rating" for my thread. I think back to when Howard Stern was on public radio, and would do interestingly outrageous things. His Nielsen ratings went through the roof until he was the number one disk jockey in the country as an infamous "shock-jock." I don't pretend I am another Howard Stern, but something about his Nielsen surveys stuck with me: the average radio listener at the time he took the number one slot listened to a radio show for eighteen minutes. The average Howard Stern fan listened for an hour and twenty minutes. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Those who hated Howard Stern listened to him for an average of two and a half hours. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Whether there is a common "thread" here I can't say, but something is drawing members to read and look at my stuff. All I CAN say is thank you, and I hope whatever reasons you have for doing that I can maintain and accelerate.

[Harley32]

I was always fascinated with numbers. It intrigued me that when you jump out of an airplane, there was a terminal velocity (122 mph) , beyond which you could fall no faster, after initially accelerating at 32 feet per second / per second, because of the wind resistance of the atmosphere.

In here there is no natural physical resistance of any kind, except perhaps the speed of the internet. Virtually limitless acceleration and speed is possible. I have taken note of my own acceleration and speed. Data available with the new software on this website allows one to look at the views of each thread and measure these things. I made an interesting observation. The "speed" of views on my main thread here is 30, 000 to 50, 000 views per month faster than any other in the entire Forum, and it continues to accelerate.

I can't begin to speculate why this is so. There are probably as many different reasons as there are viewers. The numbers I presented, however, are kind of like a "Nielsen rating" for my thread. I think back to when Howard Stern was on public radio and would do interestingly outrageous things. His Nielsen ratings went through the roof until he was the number one disk jockey in the country as an infamous "shock-jock." I don't pretend I am another Howard Stern, but something about his Nielsen surveys stuck with me: the average radio listener at the time he took the number one slot listened to a radio show for eighteen minutes. The average Howard Stern fan listened for an hour and twenty minutes. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Those who hated Howard Stern listened to him for an average of two and a half hours. The most common answer they gave as to why they did this was: "We want to see what he will say next." Whether there is a common "thread" here I can't say, but something is drawing members to read and look at my stuff. All I can say is thank you, and I hope whatever reasons you have for doing that I can maintain and accelerate. Like Howard, you have discovered the secret to ratings: NAKED WOMEN! One only has to look at the recent reports listing to see that the Philly thread is unlike any other thread in the country. Most cities have photos that number in the hundreds but Philly has thousands from you and CJ and many on the Streetwalker forum as well. It's an old saying that Sex Sells and it can be extrapolated that even more sex sells even better.

[Supereloquent]

Wish I could get my hands on her. She is definitely a BBFS candidate.I don't do BBFS even with a civvie, but whatever floats your boat!

[Fbtom]

....However, the K isn't like a vending machine. It can be hit or miss on the most pleasant day of spring or summer, or chock-full of possibilities. I have struck gold on occasion on my first pass, and I have made 7 to 10 loops before finding what I wanted. Sometimes the big fish are biting like mad, and sometimes you have to be patient.This is so true! The best times and finds that I have were when I took it slow and deliberate. I have only experienced the "big fish are biting like mad" one time of all of my visits.

What is laughable is the horny dogs who race around Philly streets like it is a Monaco Grand Prix event. I'd hate to be walking when these dummies are out!

I've given up fighting with the forum's auto corrections. Not that I'm dumb or lazy, just tired of dealing with it.

[Supereloquent]

Like Howard, you have discovered the secret to ratings: NAKED WOMEN! One only has to look at the recent reports listing to see that the Philly thread is unlike any other thread in the country. Most cities have photos that number in the hundreds but Philly has thousands... It's an old saying that Sex Sells and it can be extrapolated that even more sex sells even better.The Philly Forum overall has many pic posts of naked women, but I don't think that is the sole explanation to the popularity of MY particular thread as measured by the speed and acceleration of thread views. I was referring to my thread alone, which has a higher speed and acceleration of views not only nationwide, but also among any and all other threads in the very popular Philly Forum itself.

You may be right that sex sells. But this whole website is dedicated to that. Perhaps my detractors and those who complain about me are all wet. The popularity measures, as I previously explained them, don't lie. Despite the fact that a few members gripe about cock pics, I tend to show a lot of them and the explanation for my relative popularity could be that simple. But, I also show a wide variety of date reports, other types of pics and general commentary. As I said, I don't pretend to know the answer. But, the phenomenon clearly exists. Whatever is going on here to attract readership, members are looking in at a higher rate than any other thread in the Forum. I am NOT claiming hero-worship status. As I pointed out in the Howard Stern research, those who hated him listened for almost twice as long as his fans, and more than 8 times longer than the average radio listener, and all for the VERY SAME reasons. Whether I want to admit it or not, there is something to be said both for specific appeal as well as raising controversy. Both can draw a crowd. However, I would like to think that thoughtful writing, providing useful information and good pic contributions have an awful lot to do with it. :)

[Darrell2]

Here is the third group of 9 nominees. There is one more group of eight to follow.That Rachel has some amazing big areolas. I'd love to see how big they get.

[Supereloquent]

In Ohio, we have had a few 'cage rattlers' who brag about BBFS. These guys seek attention, and get a smidgen by proclaiming their ignorance about BBFS. Jackson suggested ignoring their inflammatory posts. Mongers in the know recognize their fatally flawed ignorance. I agree: let them float away in their own boat.It would appear that both risk and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Some guys think that skydiving out of an airplane is a thrill. I wouldn't do it for a million dollars. Some guys prefer spinners, and some love chubs, and some want MILFs, and some will only settle for a cover girl. I tend to like the whole spectrum if the attitude and skills are there.

What we mongers do many non-mongers would characterize as extremely risky behavior, bordering on the insane. We troll in relatively dangerous neighborhoods, and pick up girls very likely to be drug-addicted, diseased and often armed with some sort of weapon (who can blame them with all the crazies out there, especially now this Kensington Strangler). So, we would probably be ostracized by non-mongers, and often are, even in this Forum, by those who consider themselves higher-class "hobbyists" with better self-proclaimed taste. This is especially true when the pic (s) of the girl aren't Playboy quality. We know, of course, that many of the internet girls and escorts of these same "hobbyists" were or are plying their trade on the streets of Kenzo or Broadway.

Regarding BBFS, what can I say? We are all entitled to assume our own risks. In fact, the right to do that and write about it without criticism is protected by the rules of this Forum. Apparently there are are many mongers who wish to do this and are willing to pay a SW a premium for the privilege. My SW information sources consistently tell me that 75-80% of their customers want to have BBFS. I would think that with all the info we have today about HIV, that such an activity would be something that most would want to avoid. But, then again, I am a scaredy-cat when it comes to jumping out of airplanes.

[Supereloquent]

That Rachel has some amazing big areolas. I'd love to see how big they get.Different strokes for different folks: that phrase has an especially interesting twist of double entendre for our mongering hobby.

Puffy nipples are my first choice, closely followed by perky little pink eraser niblets. However, if you like big areolae, Rachel had the biggest I ever saw on a SW date. Plus, she had the absolutely cutest face and the tightest little fuckable spinner body.

Here is another reminder pic of Rachel's nips.

[Supereloquent]

This is so true! The best times and finds that I have were when I took it slow and deliberate. I have only experienced the "big fish are biting like mad" one time of all of my visits.I have often wondered whether there are many great finds at once on the K and I just missed that fact because I took advantage of the first one I found. Because I usually try to get as far from the Ave as possible once I have made a pick-up.

However, it never fails that, when I am definitely finished a day of mongering, and either am completely out of steam from previous dates and / or I have time pressure to be somewhere important: I see a number of pretty, fetching young 'thangs' new to my eyes if I decide to make one final window-shopping pass. It is like sweet torture.


What is laughable is the horny dogs who race around Philly streets like it is a Monaco Grand Prix event. I'd hate to be walking when these dummies are out! There would appear to be no shortage of knuckleheads roaming Kenzo. I think that if you had to pass a basic IQ test to become a monger, the ratio of mongers to girls would fall to something like 1:100.


I've given up fighting with the forum's auto corrections. Not that I'm dumb or lazy, just tired of dealing with it.There are a few auto corrections here that really annoy me. I don't understand why some long quotations, especially the direct quotation of dialogue (which I tend to use frequently), have my double quotations transformed to single quotations. Spacing is often altered for some reason, based on some odd logic. Sentences and phrases, and numbers and phrases with commas sometimes develop small canyons between them that you didn't place there. You can't single-space the distance between paragraphs, which is awkward when you have a number of one-liners that you want to single space. Certain words (nawwwww, yeeeehawww) become links for some strange reason. The acronym "ID" becomes "I'd," like the writer didn't know the difference (I had to go back and correct this one, for example). AND, last but not least: why can't we place smiley faces in the first draft without having to come back and edit / add them? :)

[Supereloquent]

In her bra and panties; with handcuffs; topless and sucking her finger; topless with ball gag; spread wide and sucking on a pacifier; fingering herself doggie; licking my cock.

[Supereloquent]

A mosaic collage of the last ten pics posted of Champagne.

[Supereloquent]

Damn! There were so many great shots of champagne in that last batch. There was something for everyone. Here is one for the ass lovers: Champagne fingering herself with a doggie view.

[Supereloquent]

There were just too many good pis in the last batch to select just one. Here is one for the amateur gynecologists: Champagne spread wide and sucking on her "binkie."

[Supereloquent]

There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.

[Supereloquent]

There were several good kinky pics too in the last batch, but here is a favorite: Champagne ball-gagged.

[Snoop Deville]

There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.Now stop it. I'm coming up there to spank your hand. Step back from the computer please! I love all of Champagne pics. Not a bad one in the bunch. She is very fuckable so please stop; Stop the teasing everytime I see her pics I get get hard. You do excellent work that I can't wait to see the next chick. Keep up the the good work!

[Supereloquent]

Last, but certainly not least: I couldn't resist a favorite pic of Champagne licking my cock.

[Supereloquent]

Now stop it. I'm coming up there to spank your hand. Step back from the computer please! I love all of Champagne pics. Not a bad one in the bunch. She is very fuckable so please stop; Stop the teasing everytime I see her pics I get get hard. You do excellent work that I can't wait to see the next chick. Keep up the the good work!Thank you for your props and your humor. I am laughing as I eat my Kung Pao chicken, pork fried rice, and spring rolls, and trying not to spill any on my keyboard.

I don't know that I can ever find a SW better than Champagne. She was perfect in innumerable ways. Some guys would "keep" a girl like Champagne, like Prohibition Era gangster Nucky Thompson did in Boardwalk Empire, which just concluded its first season on HBO. A monger actually wrote to me and told me he would do that very thing with a gal like Champagne, at least for several months. I like a terrific SW like Champagne as much as the next guy, but I also like variety. I always thought that was one of the benefits of mongering. You get to fuck a different girl every day if you want. Having eggs benedict for breakfast every morning is elegant, but sooner or later even an extravagance like that gets boring, and you long for some plain old cereal and milk.

You mentioned "spanking" and that also made me smile. Champagne, in addition to her many other charms and qualities, was adorably kinky and liked to be erotically spanked, especially while handcuffed or restrained, with a gag in her mouth, and being done doggie or having her ass fucked.

You get hard when looking at Champagne? At the end of Dennis Miller's last stand-up show he made a funny point about how to tell if your 13 year old son is actually gay, in case you had any doubts. I say show him these pics of Champagne. If you don't see an immediate bulge in his pants, then you have your answer.

[Moe52]

Last, but certainly not least: I couldn't resist a favorite pic of Champagne licking my cock.I need to get a hold of this cutie soon.

[Supereloquent]

I need to get a hold of this cutie soon.You and about 99,999 other members! :)

[Supereloquent]

The past week, I've been out scouting the frozen providers, but really haven't been swooping down to pick any up, due to the uncertainty of them being a decoy or not. I'll do my best to provide a description. If anyone has any ideas on who they are, if they were a good date or not lately, or where they've been, that'd be awesome to know for my next visit:You are right to be cautious when they are bundled up. It is very difficult to tell even the ones you know, let alone decoy possibilities, with all the LE attention on the stroll for holiday shopping and this Kensington Strangler.


Blonde MILF with BSW by the Bull dealership. Northern end. I see these two out there quite frequently. I searched the pic postings, and half of me wants to think that the blonde MILF is "big tits mandy" that SuperE reported on. She does have giant juggs, but the face is very weathered compared to the pics in his spread. The BSW looks like SuperE's Precious, but again, the face is very weathered and old looking. Can someone confirm or deny that these are those girls?I have never known Big Tits Mandy to hang out anywhere else but at the south end of the K. That doesn't mean she couldn't have changed locations for the cold weather, but I doubt it. The WSW MILF you describe sounds like Jeannie. She has big tits too which would even be noticeable under heavy clothing. Jeannie definitely is a regular in the area you describe. She is no prize looker and has some fat issues, but she does have an amazing set of tatas. She also loves to take it up the ass if you are into anal.

The BSW you mention could be Precious because she can be found in that area when she is out, and she normally likes to be with one or two others. But, you wouldn't mistake Precious for a MILF.


Ashley. A very hot blonde working the same area as the two above. Thin, tight jeans with lots of lip gloss. Kinda big forehead. I saw her get into a couple cars, but not sure if they were ULE or one of us. She seemed almost too good to be true.Check my report and pics of Ashley, a thin blonde spinner. That is the area where you can usually find her.

My Dates with and Pics of Ashley (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1056492&viewfull=1#post1056492)


Sabrina. Of SuperE pic fame. I saw her a few months ago, did a relatively ok date, but she's been MIA for a while.I saw her recently, not as on a date, but on the street. She used to hang on the north end, but then she moved dead center to the Allegheny area. I noticed her this time again on the north end.


Curly Hair Nicole. I saw her out a few months back as well, and she's been MIA as well.I don't know which Nicole you mean. Check my index as I have reported on quite a few of them and taken pics of all of them.

[Supereloquent]

For some reason it posted twice.

All I have to add is to READ my fucking posts, and then MAYBE you might have a chance of getting it right, instead of pulling your envious opinions from a warm dark place.

[Davey1965]

I knew there was a clique in here when I joined. I don't fit in it and don't care to. I don't kiss the asses of other mongers in here, although there are few good guys who are not full of envious venom. I just get great SW ass, write about it and take pics of it. I don't bother any of you, but a few of you seem to have your panties in a bunch where I am concerned.No there wasn't any clique. Just a bunch of guys giving honest reports and occasional photos that they girls said it was OK to post. That and random street shots to help mongers identify girls with reviews to either tell them she is good or bad. Envious venom. I think not. Seems like your just trying desperately to protect your Ego now.


I didn't twist any of your arms to open my thread; it is VERY easy just to ignore me. But envy is a VERY powerful emotion.It's hard not to open when you have girls asking you if it's true that their pictures got posted when they are in tears. So yes it's almost a duty to open and see who your are trying to screw over next. Not all girls care but some do and have reason too. Unfortunately life on the ave is hard and they lack better judgement for a few bucks to a guy who they believe and thought they could trust.


Davey1965 is the one who has taken a vacation and he should have stayed there."Outstanding" posters worthy of "praise" don't throw rocks. I don't. But I will throw back any rocks tossed in my direction twice as hard. "Catch!"Yes I did and now I am back and watching you close. And don't jinx yourself talking about rock throwing, as there are more than a few girls out there who have talked about throwing rocks at your pickup truck if they ever spotted you driving and knew they could get away with it.

[Supereloquent]

"One should examine oneself for a very long time before thinking of condemning others." Moliere.


Just a bunch of guys giving honest reports and occasional photos that they girls said it was OK to post. I don't remember that being the pic policy here. Where exactly is it in the rules? I can quote posters in the Philly area threads who have admitted that the girl asked them not to post and they posted pics anyway. I don't care personally what anyone's pic policy is; however, I don't remember ANYone jumping on them for that. I have my own pic policy and I have stated it previously many times. It is none of YOUR business what I decide to do in this regard. Neither you nor any other member determines pic policy here. You aren't the boss or regulator of my pic policy. They are big girls. They stand on the corner and sell their bodies and fill themselves with drugs. If you want to be the self-proclaimed "pic protector" of girls you fuck and who suck your cock for money, then I think that is pretty hypocritical. Set up a soup kitchen or a SW shelter, or why don't you go after their pimps and suppliers? I think they are much bigger and badder targets than someone who PAYS them to take some pics. Or go after the mongers who pay them for sex like a good little crusader. Why not indeed: because it is a LOT easier to throw an envious rock at me in here.


That and random street shots to help mongers identify girls with reviews to either tell them she is good or bad."Random" street shots are by definition normally taken without a girl's permission. They might even be innocent civvies. I have seen you personally identify a number of SWs this way, even when posted by others. Talk about hypocrisy!


It's hard not to open when you have girls asking you if it's true that their pictures got posted when they are in tears.Uh Huh. You mean like all the random street shots that were identified on here by YOU?


Yes I did and now I am back and watching you close.Get a life. You have done a LOT worse than you have accused me of doing. Perhaps you should be watching yourself!

PS: How did you get from complaining about Champagne to this bullshit? Are you wearing your panties a few sizes too tight?

[Giani]

Rancorous exchanges are an occasional diversionary feature of these (and all boards). Egos on both sides, for what ever reason, get inflamed, and flame throwing ensues. (All posters who have been around for a while, especially those who have achieved a certain level of recognition / notoriety on the board, can be targets of complaints and attacks over the years, including yours truly. My past reaction and the resulting elevated blood pressure and anger quotient consumed me for a little while. But these are hardly the moments of which I am most proud.

To Davey: Let it be... If you must respond, take it to PM instead making a public display of your hostility. Public attacks intended to humiliate only lead to escalation and increased acrimony. The board does NOT benefit from these attacks.

SE: let your work speak for you. Don't rise to the bait. Deep breath and step away. Clearly your pix are your own, not ripped off. Let others respond if they must, but even defenses by others fan the flames.

Both of you have long records of valuable contributions to the boards. We are grateful for them. But these rancorous exchanges often lead to MAD (mutually assured destruction), where no one comes out looking good.

Giani

[Malodr]

I mentioned several times now that I would prefer that voters post their selections here in my thread rather than PMing me, because it tends to fill up my mailbox. However, votes continue to come in by PM. I appreciate your interest in my contest and your votes, but I still would like that you make your preferences known here openly in my thread. I felt in a quandary over whether or not to even count the PM votes, but I started to count them initially and I don't want to squash interest in the contest, so I will continue to try to keep my mailbox clear and accept PM votes. But, I still wish that you would vote here openly in my thread.

I made an administrative decision that the overall winner of the contest cannot also be named for first place in any of the sub-contests. Also, a girl can only win in one contest category, the one she received the most votes for. I don't want just one girl to sweep many areas of the contest. The intention of having the sub-contest categories was to provide for as many different and varied winners as possible.

Just so you know the current status of the voting:

Best Low-Baller: Jennifer, with Kendra right on her ass.

Best Spinner: Aundrea has a slight lead; Baby Cakes and Precious are right on her cute little "tail"

Miss Congeniality: It is a 4-way tie: Sexy Nicole, Staci, Cyndi and Tanya (who wouldn't want that "4-way" action?")

Best Chubby: Sabrina is tied with Elektra for the lead; Dolly is "cumming" up fast; maybe we should have an oil-covered wrestle-off for this category? I bet we could fill a small stadium for the event.

Best MILF: Mary Beth had an early stranglehold on this one, but Candace is now a solid contender. Maybe we should have a milk-off? LOL.

Most Kinky: Justine leads, handcuffed and with a ball-gag in her pretty mouth; a few others trail in the distance,"restrained" by fewer votes.

Evening Gown Competition: Jen had a strong start, but Tanika made a "strong move" from the "rear" and now has a commanding lead.

Best Face: First place tie between Kitty and Melissa, with a scattered group of pretty faces trailing them.

Best Tits: Big Tits Mandy leads; Alexus, Simone and Nikki are "bunched" together, tit to tit, in the pack right behind her.

Best Ass: Tanika is way out in front (or should I say "rear," LOL) ; Candace is the only one even slightly close "behind" her.

Best Pussy: Pamela has "opened up" a big early lead.

Best Overall Face and Body: Candace holds first place and could win IF she gets more votes here than for Best MILF, or if Mary Beth wins that category; Sparkles is in the running as is Aundrea; the same condition holds true for Aundrea as for Candace: she will qualify to win in the specific sub-contest, if any, in which she gets the most votes.

Best BJ: Jen is "creaming" the competition.

Best Fuck: Hottie Nicole and Liz are in a dead "heat" for first place.

Best FS: Baby Cakes is in the lead by a "wide" margin with a scattered field behind her; if she wins Best Spinner and gets more votes cast for her there than here, then this category winner will be the second place contender; right now that would be Spinner Mandy.

Overall Best SW for 2010: early on, Aundrea had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead; however, there has been a recent virtual avalanche of PM voting for Champagne for the overall title as well as several other categories in the contest; as I explained, a girl can only win in one category of the contest, so the first award for a girl will go to the category where she received the most votes. If another girl exceeds her votes in that category then she is still eligible to win in another category where she has accumulated the most votes.

Here is a link to the pic collages for all the categories and nominees in the contest:

Categories and Nominees for SW of the Year Contest 2010 (http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1100988&viewfull=1#post1100988)

What an awesome year!

[Malodr]

La Chic voted for one of my favorites in this category.

Here is a reminder pic. I don't think that I saw her before. Very nice.

[Supereloquent]

1. SWs lie. We all know they are drug-addicted and / or have ulterior motives.

2. SWs tell the gospel truth if it is a nasty rumor YOU want to spread, ESPECIALLY about a monger you don't like or are envious of.

3. This is a website ABOUT SWs and FOR mongers.

4. The exception to commandment #3 is when YOU want to gossip over the back fence like a little old lady in accordance with commandment #2.

5. It is OK to have a SW fuck you and suck your, cock but never publish pics you have paid her for.

6. The exception to commandment #5 are random pics taken on the street. Since you didn't pay for them it is perfectly OK to publish them and identify the girl.

7. If a SW cries to you about random street pics of her that were taken and identified, tell her it is tough shit. If she cries to you about pics paid for by another, by all means believe everything she says in accordance with commandment #2. Commandment #1 only applies when YOU want it to. Isn't that handy?

8. Good members here don't throw rocks.

9. The exception to commandment #8 is when you have a "good reason" to throw rocks. What is a good reason? Here's the best part of this commandment: anything you want it to be!

10."Forbear to judge, for we are sinners all." William Shakespeare, Henry VI

[Member # 2552]

SuperE may rub people the wrong way, treat people the wrong way, etc, but at least he doesn't fall in love with prostitutes to the point where he is posting possible information about another monger on a forum meant to help mongers. Sounds like a lot of guys are jealous that he stealing your fictional girlfriends.

Not to mention you put the forum at risk when you post information like that. If that guy who's information was posted wanted to cause trouble for the guy who posted it and this forum he would be able to do so. Good thing Jackson deleted it.

Maybe the Philly board should be made into a SW-worship site so guys can post how dedicated they are to the SW they want to protect from big bad evil guys like SuperE who are doing the same thing as the so called heroes. There are plenty of sites for people of the masochistic persuasion or those who want to worship, idolize, be dominated by, or be submissive to women. Some of you guys are not mongers and should go check those sites out.

The only people who should be exposed are bad providers, people who seek to hurt / harm / expose mongers, and stings / scams / crap. Mongers being mongers, whether you like their style, female-preferences, level of honesty to women, etc should not be targets. Unbelievable that so many are happy about this.

[Waldo57]

He was a wild and crazy grandpa!

[R Consultant]

I really hope any guy on this board really takes note on the idea of falling in love with a hooker its never a good idea. These ladies are great actresses and will pretend to be anything you want them to be. Most of these ladies have had a hard life and they have had to survive by any means possible. Its so easy to fall for a girl who is everything you want.

Most of them will lie and cheat on you as soon as something better comes their way. I know this section of SE thread is out of control but I can tell you most of us need to remember we are the ones that work together and keep everyone out of harms way.

For what is worth and I have learned many lessons over this hobby. Keep the fictional life where it belongs- out on the street and hold your friends and family close to you. It is not worth the cutting of each others throat over a woman. It's not worth it.

My favorite little bit of Led Z, to keep me away from getting to involved with a hooker!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbMPgqsGhI

Happy Hunting.


SuperE may rub people the wrong way, treat people the wrong way, etc, but at least he doesn't fall in love with prostitutes to the point where he is posting possible information about another monger on a forum meant to help mongers. Sounds like a lot of guys are jealous that he stealing your fictional girlfriends.

Not to mention you put the forum at risk when you post information like that. If that guy who's information was posted wanted to cause trouble for the guy who posted it and this forum he would be able to do so. Good thing Jackson deleted it.

Maybe the Philly board should be made into a SW-worship site so guys can post how dedicated they are to the SW they want to protect from big bad evil guys like SuperE who are doing the same thing as the so called heroes. There are plenty of sites for people of the masochistic persuasion or those who want to worship, idolize, be dominated by, or be submissive to women. Some of you guys are not mongers and should go check those sites out.

The only people who should be exposed are bad providers, people who seek to hurt / harm / expose mongers, and stings / scams / crap. Mongers being mongers, whether you like their style, female-preferences, level of honesty to women, etc should not be targets. Unbelievable that so many are happy about this.

[La Chic]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?5976-Supereloquent-s-Reports-Philadelphia&p=1110341&viewfull=1#post1110341

A point well made R Consultant. The Philly forum has gone completely dead since the SuperE incident. It's not enough that we have to deal with the Kensington Strangler, Uncle LEO (and now the Feds) , the girls, the streets of Kensington and the various miscreants that inhabited the Ave, now we have to worry if we are going to be outed. I hope it all goes away soon and we can get back to business. Happy Holidays Guys. Let's start the New Year right and get back on track.

La Chic

[Davey1965]

SuperE may rub people the wrong way, treat people the wrong way, etc, but at least he doesn't fall in love with prostitutes to the point where he is posting possible information about another monger on a forum meant to help mongers. Sounds like a lot of guys are jealous that he stealing your fictional girlfriends.

Not to mention you put the forum at risk when you post information like that. If that guy who's information was posted wanted to cause trouble for the guy who posted it and this forum he would be able to do so. Good thing Jackson deleted it.

Maybe the Philly board should be made into a SW-worship site so guys can post how dedicated they are to the SW they want to protect from big bad evil guys like SuperE who are doing the same thing as the so called heroes. There are plenty of sites for people of the masochistic persuasion or those who want to worship, idolize, be dominated by, or be submissive to women. Some of you guys are not mongers and should go check those sites out.

The only people who should be exposed are bad providers, people who seek to hurt / harm / expose mongers, and stings / scams / crap. Mongers being mongers, whether you like their style, female-preferences, level of honesty to women, etc should not be targets. Unbelievable that so many are happy about this. Nothing that was posted had anything to do with a monger falling in love with a SW'er. Not with myself or Dark Phoenix. You said that the only people who should be exposed are bad providers, people who seek to hurt / harm / expose mongers, and stings / scams / crap. But it is OK to expose a SW'er, lie, scam and possibly even screw up her life just because they are on the streets with an addiction and in a hopeless situation? If that's you take on this than go back to what ever board you post on and continue sticking your head up your ass.

[Davey1965]

I really hope any guy on this board really takes note on the idea of falling in love with a hooker its never a good idea. These ladies are great actresses and will pretend to be anything you want them to be. Most of these ladies have had a hard life and they have had to survive by any means possible. Its so easy to fall for a girl who is everything you want.

Most of them will lie and cheat on you as soon as something better comes their way. I know this section of SE thread is out of control but I can tell you most of us need to remember we are the ones that work together and keep everyone out of harms way.

For what is worth and I have learned many lessons over this hobby. Keep the fictional life where it belongs- out on the street and hold your friends and family close to you. It is not worth the cutting of each others throat over a woman. It's not worth it.

My favorite little bit of Led Z, to keep me away from getting to involved with a hooker!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbMPgqsGhI

Happy Hunting. R Consultant. I've read many of your posts in the past and do have a level of respect for you as a poster. But please do not continue to hijack this thread following up on a post from a new member who knows nothing of the situation of the phila streets or many of the girls who have fallen prey to SuperEgo. Nobody here was protecting any particular girl, just many.

[Member # 2552]

What we have here is a,"Big Man."

Some of you think of these girls as subhumans. You think of these girls as trash, your private purchased by the hour slaves. You think that you can do whatever you want with them because they don't bleed, they don't feel and they don't meet your own personal criteria of decency. You believe you can treat them like female dogs, because you have a few dollars in your pocket. You feel this way because of your own low self esteem. You need to be able to look down on these girls so that you can feel like a big man. They are living, breathing people, not better and not worse than you or anybody else.

Some of us see these women for what they truly are. They are people just like you and I, trying to make their way through this crap heap we call life, the best way they can.

If Supereloquent was (as Davey is implying) outing women and putting their lives in jeopardy, then one might say,"What's good for the goose is also good for the gander."

CookyJarWhat he have here is an "overly sensitive guy who's nerve I must have struck". Please point out where I said anything about the women being subhuman or that I think they should be mistreated? Please point out where I have put a woman down? You do a pretty good impression of Dr. Phil, but I don't need the therapy. My head is squarely in reality and apparently my own ass as well I guess (thanks Davey).

I just think that these guys who fall in love with SWs have committed a major foul on SuperE and I am expressing my opinion. Usually I don't talk bad about a person's sexual preference because I don't care what other guys are into, but in this case I must because it is part of the problem. You guys who want to be dominated by and submissive to women supported a major breach of good behavior among mongers. Trying to impress and score points with the SWs of your choice so maybe they will realize how truly nice guys you are. Maybe once they realize this they will want to clean up their act and live with you happily ever after and show you how much they appreciate the love you have for them? It didn't work in high school for you or any other time in life and it won't work now for you guys who think like this. And you are not actually nice guys. You are just guys trying to use a different angle to get what you want.

The guys acting gleeful because somebody who may or may not be SuperE had his info posted because he hurt some women's feelings are suckers. This is the age of Facebook. Anyone who has their photo taken knows it could end up anywhere. SWs depending on a promise from a random monger not to post their info is just as stupid as mongers trusting SWs when it comes to personal security, well being, and not telling someone. Having permission to post a photo also doesn't remove the exploitation of the situation. Most of these women who give permission to have their photos taken and posted probably would not do it if they didn't need the money you were offering.

I think it is funny that some of you guys think that you are morally superior to SuperE. Nobody on this board is self-less and truly trying to help the women. If it makes you guys feel better about yourselves to think that what you are doing is OK but what "those other guys" do is bad, so be it, but it is a bunch of crap. You have a financial upperhand on these women and you take advantage of it to get whatever it is you are looking for whether it is sex, emotional validation, a listening ear, etc.

All of you are exploiting these women. You are taking advantage of the harsh realities of capitalist society where there are a lot more people at the bottom than at the top. You can try to spin it anyway you want, but you are exploiting them. If you didn't want to have sex with them they would be like the millions of other people you ignore and don't help in life. If you didn't have enough money and the SWs didn't have a need, the vast majority of these women would not be dealing with any of you guys.

And I have read the Philly forums a lot and there are plenty of guys who "fall in love" with SWs who post. Isn't Davey one of those guys who puts money on the books for girls at the jail / prison? Why don't you or anyone who does the same thing put money on the books for random guys you meet on the streets of Philadelphia? Why not put some money on the books for a women you find completely sexually unappealing? Oh yeah, that's right, you guys do things like that because you care about them as human beings, not because you are attracted to them, want to have sex with them regularly, want them to like you, or any selfish reason like that. You do it to get what you want from them. I am not saying mongering and what anyone does is right or wrong, moral or immoral, I am simply calling it as I see it, but spare me the BS that SuperE is doing something so much different from the rest of you.

[Jicarlo]

I personally don't care who started it but we need to stop it. I don't care if a girl knew or didn't know someone would post her pic or not. Everyone knows pics aren't private ask John Edwards and Paris Hilton if you take them they will get out. I like super e reports as well as Cooky j stuff and any other monger who posts a good report with pics. When pics were taken, I don't care. If a person like taking BJ pics, there preference. Or weather a guy goes bareback, eats a girl, anal or moves her into his home makes me no difference. I don't understand what someone said about him paying some for pics? I thought we all do that and I don't see anyone in as less of a man for doing it. Some guys like to suck women toes and some like to be dressed up wearing a diaper and spanked, strange! Not my cup of tea but if your happy I'm happy for you. Let's get back to quality reporting and drop the beef.

And I still think precious should be SW of the year!

And I have no problem with no one on this board

[Street Steve]

Trying to impress and score points with the SWs of your choice so maybe they will realize how truly nice guys you are. Maybe once they realize this they will want to clean up their act and live with you happily ever after and show you how much they appreciate the love you have for them? It didn't work in high school for you or any other time in life and it won't work now for you guys who think like this. And you are not actually nice guys. You are just guys trying to use a different angle to get what you want.


Having permission to post a photo also doesn't remove the exploitation of the situation. Most of these women who give permission to have their photos taken and posted probably would not do it if they didn't need the money you were offering. This is a very good point, Member 2552.


I think it is funny that some of you guys think that you are morally superior to SuperE. Nobody on this board is self-less and truly trying to help the women. If it makes you guys feel better about yourselves to think that what you are doing is OK but what "those other guys" do is bad, so be it, but it is a bunch of crap. You have a financial upperhand on these women and you take advantage of it to get whatever it is you are looking for whether it is sex, emotional validation, a listening ear, etc.

All of you are exploiting these women. You are taking advantage of the harsh realities of capitalist society where there are a lot more people at the bottom than at the top. You can try to spin it anyway you want, but you are exploiting them. If you didn't want to have sex with them they would be like the millions of other people you ignore and don't help in life. If you didn't have enough money and the SWs didn't have a need, the vast majority of these women would not be dealing with any of you guys. You are so right, You, Me, Davey, all of us are social outcasts. Great post. I could not have said it better.

Street

[Mike Sweeney]

Hell CJ, Even Super would get a kick out of that one.

[Waldo57]

Cookyjar, you have it wrong. I loved supereloquent. I was just jealous of him because his penis is much larger than mine. I'm only 4 inches and he was HUGE. When I grow old in my 60s, I hope to like you and Supereloquent. My two Heros.

[JerryGarcia]

He was able to come at least 6-7 times in a row. Also that he was able to make opiate-addicted SW's come multiple times and beg to be "daddy's little cum piggie" over and over again.

Having known many a heroin-addicted female in my time, I find the ability to make them have an orgasm as being nothing less than miraculous.

Yes, indeed. We will all miss SuperEloquent and his brand of fiction on this board.

[JerryGarcia]

Having gotten into a few flame wars with him, it just seemed that there was no point in challenging him. While I greatly respect your efforts to "tweak" him on a regular basis, Cooky-I just gave up and stopped even reading his thread the past few months. The whole situation had become played out.

Now we can all go back to reality and offering legitimate stories and advice as to what actually takes place in Kensington on the streets, not the embellished fiction that was the product of this person's mind........

Or, we can all drive around searching the side streets for Champagne and Justine.......

[Jicarlo]

This guy seem to cut through a lot of bull and get to the point. No disrespect to anyone. I personally wouldn't let no SW sit there and fill me head with some shit about been done wrong by a monger and some pictures. Like I was told in the beginning of this adventure "they all lie" and I believe it. Were letting what a SW say come between us as mongers. Score one for them. Let's get back to quality reporting. I just terminated my membership on another website because all the guys on that website catered to the over priced girls in my area. And when they take over they might as well be called your wives.

[CookyJar]

They say that Supereloquent owns one half of this whole town

With political connections to spread his wealth around

Born into society a banker's only child

He had everything a man could want power, grace and style


The papers print his picture almost everywhere he goes

Supereloquent at the opera, Supereloquent at a show

And the rumor of his parties and the orgies on his yacht

Oh he surely must be happy with everything he's got


He freely gave to charity, he had the common touch

And they were grateful for his patronage and they thanked him very much

So my mind was filled with wonder when the evening headlines read,

" Supereloquent went home last night and put a bullet through his head."


(Dark Phoenix may have pulled the trigger, but it was Supereloquent who supplied the ammo.)

With everything he had going for him, the question remains, why did he have to lie? Why would someone take a picture in January and then lie and say he took it in July. I am not looking for a big debate. I am asking a simple question. Saying that it doesn't matter or that you don't care, does not answer the question. Why would a guy with everything going for him need to lie to a bunch of assholes on a crummy SW porn site?

CookyJar.

PS: The lyrics were borrowed from Paul Simon; who paraphrased them from Arlington Robinson.

[Malodr]

They say that Supereloquent owns one half of this whole town

With political connections to spread his wealth around

Born into society a banker's only child

He had everything a man could want power, grace and style.

The papers print his picture almost everywhere he goes

Supereloquent at the opera, Supereloquent at a show

And the rumor of his parties and the orgies on his yacht

Oh he surely must be happy with everything he's got

He freely gave to charity, he had the common touch

And they were grateful for his patronage and they thanked him very much

So my mind was filled with wonder when the evening headlines read,

" Supereloquent went home last night and put a bullet through his head."

(Dark Phoenix may have pulled the trigger, but it was Supereloquent who supplied the ammo.)

With everything he had going for him, the question remains, why did he have to lie? Why would someone take a picture in January and then lie and say he took it in July. I am not looking for a big debate. I am asking a simple question. Saying that it doesn't matter or that you don't care, does not answer the question. Why would a guy with everything going for him need to lie to a bunch of assholes on a crummy SW porn site?

CookyJar.

PS: The lyrics were borrowed from Paul Simon; who paraphrased them from Arlington Robinson. Why are you posting in his section now?

[Member #1174]

Why are you posting in his section now?Why not? The man can post wherever he wants.

[Malodr]

Why not? The man can post wherever he wants.I thought Jackson set them up each with their own section and told them not to post in each others? I may be wrong.

[Permanent Wood]

2552. Great post and particularly this part.


Anyone who has their photo taken knows it could end up anywhere. SWs depending on a promise from a random monger not to post their info is just as stupid as mongers trusting SWs when it comes to personal security, well being, and not telling someone.And more sound reasoning:


This guy seem to cut through a lot of bull and get to the point. No disrespect to anyone. I personally wouldn't let no SW sit there and fill me head with some shit about been done wrong by a monger and some pictures. Like I was told in the beginning of this adventure "they all lie" and I believe it. Were letting what a SW say come between us as mongers. Score one for them. Let's get back to quality reporting. I just terminated my membership on another website because all the guys on that website catered to the over priced girls in my area. And when they take over they might as well be called your wives.SuperE's thread is one of the few I read outside my region, and for a reason, he definitely stands out from the crowd in his contributions to the forum. People seem to scrutinize over what he posts, instead, they should be finding their own SW and posting their own experiences -- readers will gravitate to where they want on their own.

Members who post what they think is someone's personal info based on what a SW said or for ANY reason have done the un-thinkable and are SW pussy-whipped.

If everyone just followed the fuckin' rules, things would run more smoothly.

Tree no leaves, maybe it's fucking DEAD, who gives a rat's ass anyway.

[CookyJar]

SuperE's thread is one of the few I read outside my region...That's just it. You live in East J-blip. Of cause you don't give a fuck.

If this is supposed to be a forum for helping a bunch of dumb fucks like me find ladies to fuck. What good is out dated information? If the members constantly lie, how can you trust anything their say. Of cause you don't care, you are from out of town. You are not the one putting yourself on the line patrolling in a wild intercity jungle for a girl who may never have been there in the first place. Sure! What do you care?

Why should you be mad, you weren't the one being lied too for no reason? To you it is just good old porn, lots of pretty pictures to whack off too. To us buttheads, living in the Philadelphia area, it was a bunch of lies. I don't know how it is where you come from; I am old school, and I believe a liar is a liar and it does not matter whether they are male or female.

Just stop and think about it for one minute. Lying is one of the worse things you can do to another human being. If you'll lie, you'll cheat and it you'll cheat. You don't love sweet Jesus.

I know the girls lie. They have every reason in their drugged-out world to lie. I expect them to lie. They'll lie behind your back and they'll lie in your face. Also, I am no fool, I know that guys lie. I have said it many times: It is the guys from this site that worry me the most when I am out mongering. Now listen to this. Open your fucking ears and listen. What pissed me off about Supereloquent is that he had no reason to lie. The guy had everything. He had his own thread, he was popular, he could out spell, out grammar and according to him out fuck every fucking body. Like Richard Cory, he had everything, so why lie. He wasn't lying for the drugs or the money and he lied to me while looking me straight in the eye. Why? But, of cause, you don't care. Right!

CookyJar

[Pkgman]

2552.

If everyone just followed the fuckin' rules, things would run more smoothly.

Tree no leaves, maybe it's fucking DEAD, who gives a rat's ass anyway.The rules work both fucking ways. For some reason he had many passes for violating the same very rules that you are fucking talking about. And really why the fuck do you care?

[Pkgman]

I think most are missing the point here.

Yes it's not right to out the guy even though he is an asshole, lair, despicable, self centered, egotistical prick.

Blatant violations have occurred and have been reported throughout SE's posting history, way back when he was posting in mutiple cities with false posts. He's been called out many times by senior members and that's why he got his own thread. If you noticed he could only report in his thread and no others, but that didn't stop him from harrassing members that posted in other Philadelphia threads that were at most time not even remotely critical of him or his post. The guy was and is just a fucking asshole.

I still believe outing him is wrong, but hey how many times does a guy like him get a pass.

Just my opinion.

[CookyJar]

I thought Jackson set them up each with their own section and told them not to post in each others? I may be wrong.

You're wrong!!!

[Mike Sweeney]

As they say down this way,"Have at it boys"

[Member #1759]

I almost wrote something in this thread in support of SuperE. SuperE contributed, but what good is the info it contains lies / misinformation. People lie all the time. Some big lies, some small.

My x-stepdaughter was a pathological liar. She would lie about the strangest things! Some people are actually that demented, they start believing the lies they tell.

Some folks lie to get ahead, some lie in hopes their peers will accept them, some lie because the truth is just too painful.

One thing is for sure, you can only suppress the truth for so long before the truth eventually surfaces.

Happy Holidays to everyone.

Be safe.


Just stop and think about it for one minute. Lying is one of the worse things you can do to another human being. If you'll lie, you'll cheat and it you'll cheat. You don't love sweet Jesus.

I know the girls lie. They have every reason in their drugged-out world to lie. I expect them to lie. They'll lie behind your back and they'll lie in your face. Also, I am no fool, I know that guys lie. I have said it many times: It is the guys from this site that worry me the most when I am out mongering. Now listen to this. Open your fucking ears and listen. What pissed me off about Supereloquent is that he had no reason to lie. The guy had everything. He had his own thread, he was popular, he could out spell, out grammar and according to him out fuck every fucking body. Like Richard Cory, he had everything, so why lie. He wasn't lying for the drugs or the money and he lied to me while looking me straight in the eye. Why? But, of cause, you don't care. Right!

CookyJar

[Trashed201]

What he have here is an "overly sensitive guy who's nerve I must have struck". Please point out where I said anything about the women being subhuman or that I think they should be mistreated? Please point out where I have put a woman down? You do a pretty good impression of Dr. Phil, but I don't need the therapy. My head is squarely in reality and apparently my own ass as well I guess (thanks Davey).

I just think that these guys who fall in love with SWs have committed a major foul on SuperE and I am expressing my opinion. Usually I don't talk bad about a person's sexual preference because I don't care what other guys are into, but in this case I must because it is part of the problem. You guys who want to be dominated by and submissive to women supported a major breach of good behavior among mongers. Trying to impress and score points with the SWs of your choice so maybe they will realize how truly nice guys you are. Maybe once they realize this they will want to clean up their act and live with you happily ever after and show you how much they appreciate the love you have for them? It didn't work in high school for you or any other time in life and it won't work now for you guys who think like this. And you are not actually nice guys. You are just guys trying to use a different angle to get what you want.

The guys acting gleeful because somebody who may or may not be SuperE had his info posted because he hurt some women's feelings are suckers. This is the age of Facebook. Anyone who has their photo taken knows it could end up anywhere. SWs depending on a promise from a random monger not to post their info is just as stupid as mongers trusting SWs when it comes to personal security, well being, and not telling someone. Having permission to post a photo also doesn't remove the exploitation of the situation. Most of these women who give permission to have their photos taken and posted probably would not do it if they didn't need the money you were offering.

I think it is funny that some of you guys think that you are morally superior to SuperE. Nobody on this board is self-less and truly trying to help the women. If it makes you guys feel better about yourselves to think that what you are doing is OK but what "those other guys" do is bad, so be it, but it is a bunch of crap. You have a financial upperhand on these women and you take advantage of it to get whatever it is you are looking for whether it is sex, emotional validation, a listening ear, etc.

All of you are exploiting these women. You are taking advantage of the harsh realities of capitalist society where there are a lot more people at the bottom than at the top. You can try to spin it anyway you want, but you are exploiting them. If you didn't want to have sex with them they would be like the millions of other people you ignore and don't help in life. If you didn't have enough money and the SWs didn't have a need, the vast majority of these women would not be dealing with any of you guys.

And I have read the Philly forums a lot and there are plenty of guys who "fall in love" with SWs who post. Isn't Davey one of those guys who puts money on the books for girls at the jail / prison? Why don't you or anyone who does the same thing put money on the books for random guys you meet on the streets of Philadelphia? Why not put some money on the books for a women you find completely sexually unappealing? Oh yeah, that's right, you guys do things like that because you care about them as human beings, not because you are attracted to them, want to have sex with them regularly, want them to like you, or any selfish reason like that. You do it to get what you want from them. I am not saying mongering and what anyone does is right or wrong, moral or immoral, I am simply calling it as I see it, but spare me the BS that SuperE is doing something so much different from the rest of you. I wasn't going to comment about this disgraceful sordid witch hunt till you posted, however your dead on correct and I couldn't resist giving you the proper props! Thanks for not staying away. Hopefully you'll stick around. Next to the legendary Super yours is the most intelligent and accurate post to date! Hell of a job telling it the way it is!

[Malodr]

That's just it. You live in East J-blip. Of cause you don't give a fuck.

If this is supposed to be a forum for helping a bunch of dumb fucks like me find ladies to fuck. What good is out dated information? If the members constantly lie, how can you trust anything their say. Of cause you don't care, you are from out of town. You are not the one putting yourself on the line patrolling in a wild intercity jungle for a girl who may never have been there in the first place. Sure! What do you care?

Why should you be mad, you weren't the one being lied too for no reason? To you it is just good old porn, lots of pretty pictures to whack off too. To us buttheads, living in the Philadelphia area, it was a bunch of lies. I don't know how it is where you come from; I am old school, and I believe a liar is a liar and it does not matter whether they are male or female.

Just stop and think about it for one minute. Lying is one of the worse things you can do to another human being. If you'll lie, you'll cheat and it you'll cheat. You don't love sweet Jesus.

I know the girls lie. They have every reason in their drugged-out world to lie. I expect them to lie. They'll lie behind your back and they'll lie in your face. Also, I am no fool, I know that guys lie. I have said it many times: It is the guys from this site that worry me the most when I am out mongering. Now listen to this. Open your fucking ears and listen. What pissed me off about Supereloquent is that he had no reason to lie. The guy had everything. He had his own thread, he was popular, he could out spell, out grammar and according to him out fuck every fucking body. Like Richard Cory, he had everything, so why lie. He wasn't lying for the drugs or the money and he lied to me while looking me straight in the eye. Why? But, of cause, you don't care. Right!

CookyJarSo now there are no more pictures and just a bunch of guys bashing him.

[CookyJar]

So now there are no more pictures and just a bunch of guys bashing him.Go to Google. Com. Click on 'Images, ' Type in 'Porn. ' That should make you happy. Enjoy!

CookyJar

[Lunatic2]

Go to Google. Com. Click on 'Images, ' Type in 'Porn. ' That should make you happy. Enjoy!

CookyJarUsually just a spectator in this forum, you guys have some great stuff, but I have to ask, what the hell happened to SuperE?

[CookyJar]

Gran Lenchote's comment were originally posted and buried in the middle of my 'Best of 2010, ' pictures. I moved it over here so that it could get the exposure it deserves.


Happy Holidays CookyJar.

Let me see if I have this straight. Philadelphia had a poster with 2300+ posts, thousands of pics, and no local love at all. Then one of you kind gentlemen outs this guy, a bunch of people step up to piss on his grave, and then you all live happily ever after? Fuck-and-A you guys don't fuck around! Since you personally seem to be dealing with your loss so well, CookyJar, I was hoping you could shed some light for me. I got to think there is at least one lesson to be learned here.

Potential Lesson: Don't be an Asshole! To put it bluntly, how much of SE's destruction came because he was an asshole? Do you think that DP and Davey nuked SE off because of moral and ethical objections to his behavior, or did they do him in 'cause he was a humorless bastard whom the Admin put off limits to regular criticism? Frankly, it would be pretty arrogant of his outers to think that SE's interaction with SW was explotative, but thiers, was not. Really? It's a morally ambigous game, and we all know that. Regardless, outing breaks a fundamental trust, and is irreconcilable with this mode of civil discourse.

Potential Lesson: Think global, fuck local! Since there has been no hue and no cry, I can only observe that SE supporters are either absent, or laying low. How is the local pulse? Relieved? Rid of a jerk? Or perhaps on some level, concerned? Who's next to be destroyed? Perhaps one's own moral purity is insufficient for some highly ethical members and so one's fate hangs in the balance. Does anyone else find SE's total lack of response, unnatural? Taking this without some sort of response seems unlikely.

Potential Lesson: Golden Eggs and Admin-too much? Do you think the Admin contributed to the problem by making SE sacred? If he could have been criticized, perhaps the aggrieved parties could have expressed themselves less dramatically? If SE was an advertisers cash cow, I guess I can see his protected status, but to his neighbors, it must have grated. Here is this lying, cheating sack of crap, I imagine one of you thinking, and he's getting all this special treatment. How it must have eaten at some, gnawing away until a tipping point was reached, and viola, fratricide.

Potential Lesson: Mind your own fucking business! If most of the readership had been locals, would the dynamic have changed enough that SE could have been dealt with less destructively? If we outsiders had not turned your thread into our entertainment stream, perhaps. Maybe SE could have been ignored or blocked or damn near anything but what happened.

Anyway, just thought I would ask, the worse that can happen is this post never see's the light of day. Oh wait, I guess something worse could happen.

LenchoDavey and Dark Phoenix are both well respected in the Philadelphia Forum. Even though he may have been provoked, Dark Phoenix's actions are not defensible. It should also be understood that Dark Phoenix acted alone.

CookyJar

[Waldo57]

Usually just a spectator in this forum, you guys have some great stuff, but I have to ask, what the hell happened to SuperE?Supereloquent's identity and photo was revealed by one of the forum members because he would not stop posting his constant penis pics. Personally I had nothing against the elderly gentleman and I was actually impressed with his distinguished Ivy league school education. He was quite a writer but mediocre photographer and not quite as talanted as Cookyjar. However, Superloquent will always be a legend and is like the Ben Franklin of Kensington.

[Sprat]

Usually just a spectator in this forum, you guys have some great stuff, but I have to ask, what the hell happened to SuperE?Who cares, good riddance.

I for one got tired of looking at his cock (how gay) , fake pictures and stories.

[StormRanger]

I thought Jackson set them up each with their own section and told them not to post in each others? I may be wrong.
You're wrong!!!Ouch,"CookieJar The Honest" caught in a blatant LIE! Why would you do this? You have everything going for you, why would you lie about this? I just don't understand, and now you have no credibility.

See where it says "You may not post in each other's designated threads"? Remember these rules that you have blantanly and continuously broken. ? Wow, what an ego to not see the hipocracy. SuperE rubbed some (or many) people the wrong way, but you just wouldn't stop stirring things up with him. I saw many times recently where you broke the rules and attacked and he kept his cool.


Davey and Dark Phoenix are both well respected in the Philadelphia Forum.Benedict Arnold was also well respected until he showed his true colors.

SE / CJ ceasefire info from Jackson

Originally Posted by Admin.


To: Supereloquent, Cookyjar, and all aliases.

Effective immediately, you are both prohibited from referring to each other in any of your reports.

This means that.

- You may not address or reference each other in any report.

- You may not quote each other in any report.

- You may not post in each other's designated threads.

- You may not mention, either directly or by reference, each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

- You may not post your opinions regarding each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

Violate this restriction one time, and I'll ban the perpetrator (and all of his aliases) without comment.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Sincerely,

Jackson

[StormRanger]

His cock was not large. Just took pictures from an angle that embellished it's size. Not unlike his stories.

His "conquest stories" pretty much screamed out loud."HEY LOOK AT ME, PORN ADDICTS NATIONWIDE,

FAWN OVER MY "WORK" AND MAKE ME FEEL IMPORTANT." So pathetic.

For those out of town folks who miss him, invite him to post in your respective fora, or better yet, check out keezmovies. Com, pornhub. Com, tube8. Com or many other free video porn sites to get your fill of free porn. Quit cluttering the Philly board with your sympathetic eulogies for SuperEgo. You are either too chicken so you have to use an allias, or you don't even have posts on the forum. So which is it?

[CookyJar]

Ouch,"CookieJar The Honest" caught in a blatant LIE! Why would you do this? You have everything going for you, why would you lie about this? I just don't understand, and now you have no credibility.

See where it says "You may not post in each other's designated threads"? Remember these rules that you have blantanly and continuously broken. ? Wow, what an ego to not see the hipocracy. SuperE rubbed some (or many) people the wrong way, but you just wouldn't stop stirring things up with him. I saw many times recently where you broke the rules and attacked and he kept his cool.

StormRanger,

I do not expect you to understand this – it's a gentlemen's agreement.


I don't know why Jackson chooses to intervene right at this point. I have much respect for the Admin, his is a tough job. However, I think his solution is way too harsh. I don't want to be banned, but there is no way that I am going to be able to keep to the restrictions as currently set by Jackson. I hope he will give me some leeway.

I am a grown man. I can control myself. There is no need to send me to the 'Time-out corner. '

SuperEloquent and I walk the same streets, date many of the same women and many of our encounters verify each other's post. Telling us not to mention each other's name or comment on each other's post is very similar to a punishment I would give my kids when their arguing got on my nerves.

I know how to play nice. I will honor the underlying essence of Jackson's restrictions and hope that he will forgive me for not following them to the letter. SuperEloquent's choice to keep these restrictions to the letter is his own.

CookyJar

I know I got pretty close to the line once or twice. I have tried hard to keep to the essence of Jackson's restrictions.

Some of what I have recently posted will read like Superelouent bashing. It is not meant to be bashing. I was attempting to show why some Philadelphia members did not like Superelouent and what may have prompted Dark Phoenix to take such harsh action.

CookyJar.

PS: There were a number of things that SuperEloquent and I agreed on. One was, "You cannot please everybody."

[Giani]

As one who has appreciated these boards not only the informational posts on my local boards, but also the images from around the US. I have especially enjoyed SEs pix. (Don't YOU enjoy perusing the Photo Gallery"? And NO, it is NOT the same as surfing porn sites. These are presented as real experiences, posted by one's fellow mongers.)

I cannot fathom the complaints I hear against SE except as a pissing contest out of posting jealousy. This virulent exchange of attacks has exacted serious collateral damage on the entire board. There is evidence of more "super egos" than just SE here. CJ, DarkPhoenix and Davey have damaged themselves with their malicious posts. I still hope to hear from Jackson that outing of any mongers not only will be immediately deleted, but the posters of such personal info about other mongers will be banned from the board. It is despicable.

I am completely fed up with the continuing sniping which continues, even after SE has taken a hiatus. LET IT GO. To coin a phrase, SHEEEESH.

StormRanger reprinted a post from Jackson which bears reposting AGAIN. It is astonishing that its essence has been completely ignored in the current melee. Comon' "SuperSenior" members, you owe it to the board to stop this self immolation. Below, again, are the words of wisdom from Jackson. "Let's get back to the subject!":

"To: Supereloquent, Cookyjar, and all aliases.

Effective immediately, you are both prohibited from referring to each other in any of your reports.

This means that.

- You may not address or reference each other in any report.

- You may not quote each other in any report.

- You may not post in each other's designated threads.

- You may not mention, either directly or by reference, each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

- You may not post your opinions regarding each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

Violate this restriction one time, and I'll ban the perpetrator (and all of his aliases) without comment.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Sincerely,

Jackson"

[Gareth]

Although there's usually a multitude of meltdowns and hissy fits when I post an opinion (although everyone else does without that reaction) , I have to say this girl is terrific and it's what we're meant to be finding and, if possible, sharing. No filthy socks, no perma-stained ass, no track marks, no Auschwitz limbs. Well done.


There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.

[JerryGarcia]

As one who has appreciated these boards not only the informational posts on my local boards, but also the images from around the US. I have especially enjoyed SEs pix. (Don't YOU enjoy perusing the Photo Gallery"? And NO, it is NOT the same as surfing porn sites. These are presented as real experiences, posted by one's fellow mongers.)The point is that SE posted many fictional accounts and embellished stories, as well as pics of girls who are not or who have never been SW's. Whenever anyone dared to question him in his thread or on other threads, his response was venomous and unrelenting. Keep in mind that those who challenged him were doing so based on FACTUAL evidence-such as the infamous "tan lines" controversy or the dates of pictures.

What you also fail to realize is that he was very likely posting under other screen names in support of himself-as well as having a following of sycophants who worshiped his writings as if they were gospel. What good is it if somebody embellishes stories and posts fake pics of girls who don't exist in the SW world?

There is no jealousy involved-those who seek the truth and question something which they know is false are not exhibiting envy or ego. I love the pics of actual girls that appear on this site, but I, like most everyone-was sick and annoyed with dozens of excessive dick pics where the dick was the central focus of the frame, not the girl.

This person has had run ins on other boards in the past, and was a highly controversial poster on this board for the past few years. While he contributed some real intel at times, there were many occasions on which he simply engaged in vicious attacks on fellow members who dared comment or criticize anything he wrote or posted.

Let's get real-nobody comes 6-7 times in one afternoon, and SW's who are opiate-addicted rarely are capable of orgasm. So, when somebody makes outrageous claims, it is not a function of jealousy to question such claims.

Enough said-I respect that you are a valuable and long-term contributor to this website. I just don't agree with your take on this matter. I do not agree with the analogy that this has turned into a pissing contest--the thread has become somewhat of a post-mortem for the once-famous SuperEloquent.

[Seva Lurker]

For a thread of a 'retired' contributor, there is still a lot of rancor being presented.

I have no personal animosity toward SE, though I will admit his ego and temper were a bit much sometimes.

Those who didn't like him did not have to read his posts. First, they were limited to here and secondly, there is an 'ignore' feature.

Regardless of one's feelings towards SE, the actions of Dark Phoenix are totally reprehensible. To intentionally expose someone because you don't like them or what they've said about you is wrong. I've already expressed my opinion on what should happen to DP (or anyone who intentionally exposes another members identity).

I think the best thing Jackson could do to this thread is lock it so there are no more posts allowed here.

It's time to get back to the intent of the USASG, finding women who'll play for pay.

[Malodr]

You're wrong!!!I was right!

[JerryGarcia]

For a thread of a 'retired' contributor, there is still a lot of rancor being presented.

I have no personal animosity toward SE, though I will admit his ego and temper were a bit much sometimes. I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.

As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.

While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.

Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".

FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked.

[StormRanger]

I was right!Damn right you were! And as expected, CookieJar just can't admit it. He lied and is sticking with this "Gentleman's Agreement" excuse when Jackson's words speak for themselves. The admin rules were specific.

I edited out some of what Jackson wrote for brevity, but I see now that shouldn't have done that. Here I will post the full text (from this summer) and you can all judge for yourselves if this was just a "Gentleman's Agreement" with Admin, or if it was a DIRECTIVE to be obeyed. I think it is pretty clear that CookieJar is lying about it, but that is just MHO. I've grown accustomed to this from him, and it only bothers me in the context that he is being hypocritical about it by attacking someone else about supposed lies. Many of the issues here would have been avoided if CookieJar had put SuperE on ignore and vice versa.

Also MHO, if you don't like the majority of someones posts and they piss you off. Put them on 'ignore' or STFU please. I'm going to take my own advice here and STFU about CookieJar now unless I'm specifically asked or challenged about it. Cookie, I love your reports on SW's and your pics. You are awesome, I just think that you are wrong on this issue. Sorry I turned this into a rant.


To: Supereloquent, Cookyjar, and all aliases.

I don't know anything about whatever problem you have with each other and I don't care. However.

It has become apparent that these pointless exchanges between Supereloquent (and all of his aliases) and Cookyjar will not stop without my intervention. Therefor, I am unilaterally instituting a permanent ceasefire, as follows:

Effective immediately, you are both prohibited from referring to each other in any of your reports. How is this in any way vague?


This means that.

- You may not address or reference each other in any report.

- You may not quote each other in any report.

- You may not post in each other's designated threads.

- You may not mention, either directly or by reference, each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

- You man not post your opinions regarding each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in. These are rules, not an agreement.


Violate this restriction one time, and I'll ban the perpetrator (and all of his aliases) without comment.Here are the consequences of breaking the rules. For whatever reason, Admin didn't do it.


Persuant to this cease fire, I have cleaned up this thread by deleting all posts that are now in violation of this ceasefire. This cleanup process is not perfect, and it's possible that I may have inadvertently deleted a few otherwise legitimate posts. If you find that your own report was also deleted, please don't take it personally.

Whatever the bullshit is, it stops now.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Sincerely,

Jackson

[Shamgodlou]

Maybe SE got arrested.


I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.

As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.

While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.

Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".

FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked.

[StormRanger]

I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.Another nice tactic: infer that whoever disagrees is just another SuperE alias. Maybe you are just a Dark Phoenix alias. Maybe we are all either CookieJar or SuperE aliases.


he created a lot of enemies and hatred around hereMostly those that chose to be offended or were envious. If you are a hateful person, you will find something to hate.


any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.Anyone of us could figure out who the more active mongers are if we talk to the right SW's, research some license plate numbers, etc. The point is that I DON'T WANT TO KNOW who any of you are! You shouldn't want to know who other mongers are. It's a trust thing, you wouldn't understand, LOL jk. Just a play on the "It's a Jeep thing" sticker.

SuperE haters seem to all be writing "Dark Phoenix was wrong, but" What BUT? I don't care how much someone pisses off someone else on here, there is no excuse for outing another monger. That's all. We already knew all the gripes against SuperE, so if you didn't like him you were always free to "ignore". But few, if any, did. Just like Howard Stern haters that listened to him every day LOL.

[Shamgodlou]

Mostly those that chose to be offended or were envious. If you are a hateful person, you will find something to hate.

I disagree I just think that SE wasnt that nice of a guy.

[Seva Lurker]

I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.Fine, but he is NOT posting as Supereloquent.


As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.If you look at the posts between my post commenting on the "rancor" and this one, you will see what I mean. The in fighting continues. Not only on this thread, but in others as well. The antics are causing a well respected monger to cease posting.


While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.True. Finding out who a person is is one thing. PUBLICLY POSTING it is something else.


Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".I agree.


FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked.AMEN.

[Giani]

These acrimonious exchanges can only be destructive to the USASG.

Perhaps all of us who have been around for a while have been occasionallly sucked into incidents of flaming. I plead guilty in past years to being seduced into picking up the flaming gauntlet, and engaging in flame throwing contests. (Fortunately not so much recently.) But these flamings are my least proud moments. The resulting immolations cause significant "collateral damage."

I for one, continue to be grateful for and appreciate the board especially for its informational posts. I also have enjoyed posts which contain pix taking by the poster of his 'dates'. Mind you, I have no tolerance for posters ripping off pix and posting them as their own or fabricated totally from fantasy (think Amishmade), but I have not seen any implication that is the situation here. The repost of your response last summer to infighting seems right on, but in need of reinforcement. Not looking to get anyone kicked off the board at this point, but SOME regulation needs to be applied where violations are occurring.

The longer this melee continues, the greater the negative effect on the board.

Would you care to step in and remind us to get back to what the board is about? I do NOT think I am missing the point.

Giani

P. S. What is with posters who pose as experts, but have less than a handful of posts? What can be done about cleansing the board of destructive posts from alias-bearers who do not have the courage to post in their 'real' names. I suggest that any brand new poster who posts nothing but rancorous posts be warned, then eliminated.

[Freaklikdat]

These acrimonious exchanges can only be destructive to the USASG.

Perhaps all of us who have been around for a while have been occasionallly sucked into incidents of flaming. I plead guilty in past years to being seduced into picking up the flaming gauntlet, and engaging in flame throwing contests. (Fortunately not so much recently.) But these flamings are my least proud moments. The resulting immolations cause significant "collateral damage."

I for one, continue to be grateful for and appreciate the board especially for its informational posts. I also have enjoyed posts which contain pix taking by the poster of his 'dates'. Mind you, I have no tolerance for posters ripping off pix and posting them as their own or fabricated totally from fantasy (think Amishmade) , but I have not seen any implication that is the situation here. The repost of your response last summer to infighting seems right on, but in need of reinforcement. Not looking to get anyone kicked off the board at this point, but SOME regulation needs to be applied where violations are occurring.

The longer this melee continues, the greater the negative effect on the board.

Would you care to step in and remind us to get back to what the board is about? I do NOT think I am missing the point.

Giani.

P. S. What is with posters who pose as experts, but have less than a handful of posts? What can be done about cleansing the board of destructive posts from alias-bearers who do not have the courage to post in their 'real' names. I suggest that any brand new poster who posts nothing but rancorous posts be warned, then eliminated. Okay already with your BS complaining on what really is a matter in the PHILLY Forum! Eventhough I was Shocked but not really surprised by what happened I just kept my mouth shut about the ongoing events surrounding a great contributor to the philly mongering scene. USASG as a whole is not & will not be affected because of what's going on in our Philly forum so stop crying.

[Malodr]

Damn right you were! And as expected, CookieJar just can't admit it. He lied and is sticking with this "Gentleman's Agreement" excuse when Jackson's words speak for themselves. The admin rules were specific.

I edited out some of what Jackson wrote for brevity, but I see now that shouldn't have done that. Here I will post the full text (from this summer) and you can all judge for yourselves if this was just a "Gentleman's Agreement" with Admin, or if it was a DIRECTIVE to be obeyed. I think it is pretty clear that CookieJar is lying about it, but that is just MHO. I've grown accustomed to this from him, and it only bothers me in the context that he is being hypocritical about it by attacking someone else about supposed lies. Many of the issues here would have been avoided if CookieJar had put SuperE on ignore and vice versa.

Also MHO, if you don't like the majority of someones posts and they piss you off. Put them on 'ignore' or STFU please. I'm going to take my own advice here and STFU about CookieJar now unless I'm specifically asked or challenged about it. Cookie, I love your reports on SW's and your pics. You are awesome, I just think that you are wrong on this issue. Sorry I turned this into a rant.

How is this in any way vague?

These are rules, not an agreement.

Here are the consequences of breaking the rules. For whatever reason, Admin didn't do it. And because of him, we have lost a great contributor.

[Harley32]

Dark Phoenix,

As I'm sure everyone is aware, there is a composite likeness of a young black / hispanic man who is the primary suspect in the Kensington stranglings. There is also an m. O. The attacker has been using. A walking monger who lures SWs into vacant parking lots for either drugs or sex. To imply in any way that SuperE fits that profile is complete and total bullshit.

What YOU did was inexcusable and the ongoing posts trying to justify it are as well. Unfortunately, you have now taken your attack to an even higher extreme. Not only have you outed a fellow monger publicly, you have now accused him of being the Kensington strangler. So it wasn't enough to put his family life and job at risk, you now are pointing LE in his direction. And just for the record, the last attack was on the 15th. 5 days before your post.

There were things I didn't like about what SuperE posted or how he said it. I can even agree that he deserved to be taken down a peg or 2. The attack that took place was out of all proportion to any misdeeds real or perceived.

I agree with those who call for Jackson to lock this thread to further posts.

[Gran Lenchote]

Dark Phoenix:

Thanks for coming on to let us know what you were thinking. You didn't have to do that, and it says a lot about your character that you did so. You broke a taboo that's as strong as they come.

I freely admit that I read the Philly threads for a vicarious thrill. I'm sorry if that offends any of the locals. Honestly, I also enjoyed the tension between SE and several other posters. I posted over here once because I didn't understand what the dynamic was that drove most of that tension. I'm still not sure I do. Ego, mostly, I guess. SE's issues. The out-of-towners? Beats me. Maybe we did make a circus out of your lives. Maybe. But maybe Philly put on a show and we all just came to see it.

People may think you fell (or feel) for a girl SE screwed by posting her pic because your original reason given for wiping out SE was, in a nutshell, that he was wrecking the girls lives with his posts. You have clearly moved away from this position as your main objection to SE. An objection so strong that mere aversion was unsatisfactory. You have come up with an interesting defense, to be sure, but. . .

You're saying you outed SE as a public service?

Because, what, someone was going to rush over to the police with this hot lead? Really? How is US knowing who SE is going to stop a serial killer? That doesn't even make sense. You don't out someone if you think they're a sociopath, you call the cops! You didn't have to tell the membership ANYTHING about the guy's real name! Why wasn't it on the news? Why didn't you go to the police and denounce this guy? You're not sure? Well, duh, then why tell us who he is? What, was telling us more of an FYI, Brotherhood of Mongers and all, just to give us the scoop, so to speak?

SE might very well be your Psycho. I don't know, but "nobody's been attacked since the membership discovered SE's name" is pretty lame. Look, if you think SE is a serial killer, you got to take that shit to a higher authority than this board!

As for your attempt to absolve Davey, noble as it is, it falls short. Davey may not have had anything to do with you outing SE, but he definitely re-posted your message expressly for the purpose of making sure SE got outed. CookyJar then confirmed the info so as to be certain to finish him off. I'm afraid, however, you're going to be allowed to fall on your sword.

I said you couldn't possibly believe your own rap, but, hey, maybe you can. Maybe the conflation of a nut-job on the street and a nut-job on the board was too much for you to keep separate. I don't particularly like calling you a liar, but your reasons given fail utterly to explain your actions. Perhaps you are confused? Perhaps, upon further reflection, some new insight will come?

Maybe that's just the way it is in Philly. It's not like us out-of-towners should be telling you your business. But still, you hate to see things go down like this. Mostly, 'cause, at the end of the day, you hate to think that someone in your circle would detest you so much that they would try to publicly disgrace you. That's the kind of shit that could happen to anyone, you know? It's the only reason your motives matter Dark Phoenix. If all it adds up to is "I fucking hate this fucking fucker, and now I'm going to fuck him good" then that's the kind of bullshit logic any asshole anywhere can use. Today it's you burning SE, but tomorrow?

I'm sorry man, but your rationale doesn't make near as much sense as a much simpler one: you hate SE. Here was this dirt bag who was faking half his shit, making trouble for the girls, treating them like shit. And because he's generating hits, Admin makes him off limits, so now there's no clean, legitimate way to expose him. Of course, the whole time SE's being a douche about the whole thing, and something just snapped. In an instant age SE was gone in just a few keystrokes. It sounds like a good portion of Philly posters hate SE.

Lencho.

PS: "Is it wrong to post a girls picture without permission" is a fair question. There are people on both sides of this argument. NONE of them deserve to be outed by you or anyone else for their position on this issue."Is it OK to take advantage of a girl, and to what degree" is another. NOBODY here deserves to be outed by you or anyone else for their position on this issue.

[Johnboy]

And because of him, we have lost a great contributor.I have not commented on the SE deal because honestly I am neutral on my feelings towards his reports. I know for a fact that some of his encouters were current and basically factual because I have picked up the same girl days later with the same results. I say basically factual because, unless your a complete moron, you could tell it was obviously a fantasy version of what really took place. I really think things should have been handled differently, however his ego and arrogance were getting out of control to the point that it seems his goal was ultimate control of the Philly forum. I wish this guy Malodr would stop treating Cookie like he was the reason this happened. All you do is put SE on a pedestal like he was the greatest person in the world and come off sounding like you're blowing him behind closed doors. You are doing exactly what he wanted everyone to do, Envy and Worship him. Regardless of the events that took place the Philly section will go on as it always has. I personally feel that Street Steve's comment that he will not post anymore has more to do with how SE was outed than anger over the outing. I could be wrong about this, but not posting is protest is not getting anywhere fast. I think everyone saw this coming whether you liked SE or not. Yes, you could ignore him, but his presence was still known. He was restricted to his own thread but would still pluck posts from other threads and bash them just the same. If he had mellowed a little with his ego and not been so in your face, I think everyone could have overlooked the embellished reports and questionable pictures.

JB

[Jicarlo]

Damn you read my mind! While some people are fighting for the honor of a SW she is somewhere getting high or stucking another john's dick and have forgot all about this bull. I personally wouldn't even have posted what a SW told me. But the real question is this.

You pick up a girl for sex and the best thing you could think to talk about was the previous guy who's dick she sucked?

Maybe it's just me I know these girls have probably fucked before I picked her up but I'll just like to believe that at the very least I was the first that day. Now that's just me.

[Rito1]

I for one miss all the pics that you post. Hopefully you will return to posting. I see that you were on today@3am So I know you will read this and everything else that is being posted. There are alot of people that wants you to return.

[Zaphod II]

I have not commented on the SE deal because honestly I am neutral on my feelings towards his reports. I know for a fact that some of his encouters were current and basically factual because I have picked up the same girl days later with the same results. I say basically factual because, unless your a complete moron, you could tell it was obviously a fantasy version of what really took place. I really think things should have been handled differently, however his ego and arrogance were getting out of control to the point that it seems his goal was ultimate control of the Philly forum. I wish this guy Malodr would stop treating Cookie like he was the reason this happened. All you do is put SE on a pedestal like he was the greatest person in the world and come off sounding like you're blowing him behind closed doors. You are doing exactly what he wanted everyone to do, Envy and Worship him. Regardless of the events that took place the Philly section will go on as it always has. I personally feel that Street Steve's comment that he will not post anymore has more to do with how SE was outed than anger over the outing. I could be wrong about this, but not posting is protest is not getting anywhere fast. I think everyone saw this coming whether you liked SE or not. Yes, you could ignore him, but his presence was still known. He was restricted to his own thread but would still pluck posts from other threads and bash them just the same. If he had mellowed a little with his ego and not been so in your face, I think everyone could have overlooked the embellished reports and questionable pictures.

JBAnd just for the record, I would be just as happy if this entire thread were deleted.

Happy New Year.

Z

[Giani]

I miss SE's posts. I am hoping that he will resume his posting. Failing that, perhaps someone willl post pix to replace SE's?

I have defended SE's civil rights against those who would violate his privacy. I continue to do so. Reviewing the whole episode, we might ask "Is there a MORAL error?" It is an interesting question for a board such as this.

What IS the question?

Did he engage with fems who were NOT SWs? [Sooo...]

Did he pay them for the pix? [WHAT??? Who would ever PAY a girl for such services...]

Did his post ever elaborate beyond the precise details of the encounter? [No idea--really don't care that much within reason.]

Did he irritate some with his arrogance? [May I say... what is your point? Have YOU ever been arrogant?]

Do any of these questions have anything with posting on this board?

Personally, I hope that he resumes his posting of pix and dialogs. Also, I think it would be fabulous if those who have faulted him would make posts of such high quality that we would forget this episode. The whole board would benefit.

Giani

[Johnboy]

This thread has served no purpose other than venting about SE since the incident. The only people keeping it alive are the out of towners who are pissed that the picture gallery is not full of new images every day as was the case prior to SE's outing. I personally, as well as most Philly area members, feel this thread should be locked. Nothing is going to come out of it other than flaming, etc. Which Jackson will only have to deal with later. I think it is obvious SE is not returning, so this thread no longer serves a purpose. The out of towners who are pissed mostly had nothing to gain from his reports except porn viewing anyway, and those that do get information can go to the other threads like all the locals. I vote to lock this thread and end this bickering now so we can all get back to the purpose Jackson set this forum up to do-find women for sex. Everyone who is with me please chime in so Jackson hears us! The rest of the porn loving out of towners, please return to your own threads and gripe there.

JB

[Philly Guy]

This thread has served no purpose other than venting about SE since the incident. The only people keeping it alive are the out of towners who are pissed that the picture gallery is not full of new images every day as was the case prior to SE's outing. I personally, as well as most Philly area members, feel this thread should be locked. Nothing is going to come out of it other than flaming, etc. Which Jackson will only have to deal with later. I think it is obvious SE is not returning, so this thread no longer serves a purpose. The out of towners who are pissed mostly had nothing to gain from his reports except porn viewing anyway, and those that do get information can go to the other threads like all the locals. I vote to lock this thread and end this bickering now so we can all get back to the purpose Jackson set this forum up to do-find women for sex. Everyone who is with me please chime in so Jackson hears us! The rest of the porn loving out of towners, please return to your own threads and gripe there.

JBWell said and I support locking this thread.

[Mrkuyamandla]

LAzydude.

You are not from Philadelphia so STFUDA. Super wrecked the ave and out of towners like you cheered him on. Start doing some work and posting girls nude from your home town. I'd say the majority of people think what happened to him was wrong and we lost a major contributor. I'm from Philadelphia, but you don't need to be from here to have an opinion.

I don't think SE's the friendliest guy either, but makes no sense for you to pounce on an out of towner who liked the pictures he posted. If you didn't like them, you could have ignored this thread altogether.

How exactly did he ruin Kensington?

People here are saps for SWs and told them they say nude photos of them on the internet and they got upset, right? These girls posed for a few bucks and they know photos can end up any place. They just cared about money at the time and that's related to drug addiction, not the trust of a John.

Blame the guys who told the girls, not like they found them on the internet themselves.

[Admin]

Well said and I support locking this thread.Thread closed by Admin