Posting post names, addresses and photos of arrestees

[Admin]

Should members be permitted to post names, addresses and photos of arrestees?

[LordBlackAdder]

There can be advantages for the young woman who was arrested and thrown in gaol if someone she knows learns of her plight. Just over a year ago I read on here that a young woman I had befriended was arrested in a sweep and was locked up in gaol. I decided to write her there and received a reply that began with"I was really surpised to hear from you and happy as well! Yes I was arrested for the charges you read in the paper. "

I wound up coresponding with her for many months both while she was in gaol and in subsequent drug treatment. I helped her out with some money along the way since she had no family or friends who were not as messed up as she was to turn to. She needed funds to get things most of us not locked up take for granted. Drug treatment did not work out for her. I lost contact with her after she was released from drug treatment. In her letters she acted like she really wanted to turn her life around. From what I have since learned however she wound up in trouble and gaol again, I guess the allure of drugs is really high especially when you are constantly around others who do them. I am currently seeing a young woman on a regular basis whom I met in a similiar manner who attributes her getting off drugs without a drug treatment programme in part to avoid her friends who did them.

I would not however been able to make any positive effect on the woman who as arrested, however brief, had I not seen her name on here.

[IrishMale]

The names and addresses are a matter of public record so it does no additional harm to post them here. The only disadvantage would be if Jackson felt the information was taking space better used for something else.

[Crazy Jim Wood]

Man, I look at most of those mug shots, and I wouldn't fuck the chick with Lefty's dick.

But they are good for a few laughs.

And, I guess there is the added benefit of being able to date the chick while she is in jail without the fear of a pop-in.

As we all know, the only thing better than conjugal visit sex is fugitive sex.

CJW

[Edavle]

Guys, think of the purpose of this site. Does it really help? Are you going to contact them and ask how it happened? It can only cause problems.

Lay off.

PS: if you really want the names, google the original source.

[Horndog132]

http://dw.courts.wa.gov/

Search for a person
Name Search
Use this search to find people. If you enter a person's name, the search tool searches across court levels and returns a list of people that match the name you typed. You can then search cases which involve that person.
Licensed Health Facility Search
Use this search to find people with active Vulnerable Adult Protection orders. This information is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record. The official court record is maintained by the court of record. Copies of case file documents are not available at this website and will need to be obtained from the court of record.

Want to know if a SW has a criminal record in WA ... Theft,robbery, etc.

Sample:
Name Particpant Court Date Case Type Cause code
JW Defendant Spokane Ct. 9/9/93 Criminal Traffic
JW Defendant Grant Co. Ct 11/3/93 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant Grant Co. Ct 11/4/93 Infraction Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 7/10/01 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 4/25/02 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 11/21/02 Infraction Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 2/9/04 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 3/1/04 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 3/1/04 Criminal Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 3/1/04 Infraction Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 8/2/04 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 7/15/05 Infraction Non-Traffic
JW Defendant spokane ct. 8/22/05 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant Seattle Muni Ct. 10/12/05 Criminal Non-Traffic
JW Defendant Seattle Muni Ct. 2/22/06 Criminal Non-Traffic





Want to know if a sW is in King County Jail?

[Chuck Carr Jr]

I am guessing all the info and pics that are posted are available elsewhere. I often used newspaper and police websites to get info on towns I was visiting before I found this site. It is nice to have it all available in one place. I have also noticed many newspapers only allow free acces to their sites for a month after an article is published.

This is my opinion on the girls that are arrested. As far as guys go if I were unlucky enough to get busted I would want as little publicity as possible and see no use in having any guy's names or photos posted here. The girls names and photos give one an idea of what is / was available in a town.

[R Consultant]

Since this site is based on sharing information to one another. A well informed person is going to be a great asset to each one of us. There are so many publications that already print this stuff dailly/weekly anyway. We aren't sharing anything thats not already out there just harder to find for some people than others.

Happy Hunting..

[Renee Holly]

I was thinking if it had to do with violent crimes that show a potential for danger to hobbiest.

Otherwise, we all know what every one is up to don't we?

[Clark Kent]

Posting the pics of arrestees serves purposes on the website in relation to showing others who you refer to when you're describing a SW, and possibly someone who rips people off so you can see what the person looks like and avoid them. As far as posting the addresses and names, I don't see that the addresses serve any purpose so I always omit that, as well as their last names. True also, that if someone really wanted to find out that information about the posted person, all they'd have to do is go to the site where the pic was found and get the information from there. I also know of several posters from different cities that make weekly 'arrestee' posts showing all of the girls arrested for SW crimes. I wouldn't do that myself, but it serves a purpose, too, I imagine. But basically in the context of the poll, yes, pictures of those arrested should be continued to be allowed to be posted, full names and addresses I don't feel is necessary, but other than that I don't see anything wrong with it.

[Crazy Jim Wood]

I agree with Chuck Carr, Jr.

This doesn't apply only to arrestee information, but to Craigslist info and escort sites as well.

Since internet addresses change frequently, and sometimes pictures and postings are removed, I think keeping them here serves a purpose.

Plus, sometimes when one is travelling, a mongering opportunity arrives unexpectedly and it is convenient to come to the forum and find all the information here. Don't always have time to search the internet.

I think seeing an arrestee picture also pretty much confirms the woman is not a decoy and aids somewhat were someone looking for a woman discussed on the board whom one had never met before.

It also gives voyeurs an idea of the street quality.

Let's face it, we're here for our edification and gratification, not to protect the so-called privacy of public women.

Of course, if I were ever entrapped by Uncle Leo wouldn't want my photo and info posted here, but I hardly think anyone would want to post my info on this site -- hopefully no one on this site has any prurient interest in my info.

[Virile Vito]

Posting the pics of arrestees serves purposes on the website in relation to showing others who you refer to when you're describing a SW, and possibly someone who rips people off so you can see what the person looks like and avoid them. As far as posting the addresses and names, I don't see that the addresses serve any purpose so I always omit that, as well as their last names. True also, that if someone really wanted to find out that information about the posted person, all they'd have to do is go to the site where the pic was found and get the information from there. I also know of several posters from different cities that make weekly 'arrestee' posts showing all of the girls arrested for SW crimes. I wouldn't do that myself, but it serves a purpose, too, I imagine. But basically in the context of the poll, yes, pictures of those arrested should be continued to be allowed to be posted, full names and addresses I don't feel is necessary, but other than that I don't see anything wrong with it.

Unfortunately these legitimate reasons do not apply to guys arrested for soliciting w/o any other charges or customers and workers at AMPs. (Alot of times, this stuff is not posted delibrately to do somebody wrong, but by casually reposting stuff from other sites.) I do not see what useful purpose there is for permitting this info to be posted. Some people may be unaffected, some may be badly affected, but I don't see how it can do anybody any good. As others have said, if somebody really wants to know, they can find out from other sources.

If posting this info is not banned, maybe it should at least be restricted.

[Ralph]

While there are positives and engatives to having the pictures of the girla arrested up here. As I have notcied in the past all the pictures that get posted here no matter what the source get looked at by lots more guys than eveyr post anything. How many guys who vote that they dont want them here still look at them anuways? I have posted a couple I have found from the prison website of girls I have met and posted pictures I had taken of them on here. There area couple I still try to keep tabs on.

One other reason to post them is for the gys saaftey. I recall seeing posted pictures in various cities of at least two working women who killed guys. These are the ones I would defintely want to avoid. One killed an abusive boyfriend and the other killed a guy who picked her up by giving him a drug overdose. I recall some other guy commenting he had picked up the ID girl and got ripped off but compared to the dead guy he was lucky.

I also saw in a newspaper a few years back a picture of a SW who was arrested and had HIV, making her charges worst than other SWs arrested, said she ahd beena rrested for that before.

I would defintely welcome thist kind of inforamtion if I was out looking for a girl as both would be oens to avoid no matter how attractive they might be.

[Clark Kent]

I think this poll has some people confused, and after reading a few of the choices in the poll, I'm a bit confused myself. I thought what the question was asking is should members here be allowed to post names, addresses and photos of 'girls' arrested for prostitution related crimes, or even possibly an arrested tranny pic here and there. Then the choices on the poll make me think it's meaning arrested 'Johns' specifically. In that case, what person who visits this site would want to post pictures of fellow 'Johns' arrested for seeking SW's ? That's the type thing law enforcement agencies try to do as a 'shame' campaign to stop us anonymous 'Johns' from looking for sexual pleasures from SW. In the instance of posting pictures of SW's arrest photos, that's just helpful information for fellow mongers in the way of finding out if a girl might be a poor provider or violent, a thief, or even a transmitter of HIV. Posting a pic of a John who was arrested would serve no purpose here, unless in some instances like if the John was arrested for a violent, unwarranted assault of a known SW. In the confusion about what the poll is referring to, my vote is for pics of arrested SW's- yes, pics of arrested Johns- no, unless it's a very unusual circumstance. And like I said before, I only post pics of SW who have been reported to be trouble, or ones I've experienced myself as being trouble or a bad provider. I agree that just because someone is arrested for possession of some type of drug doesn't make them a prostitute, and that's why I don't really agree with the people that post their weekly lineup of arrestees unless it's known they were arrested for prostitution. Also, posting pics of a 'good' provider can sometimes cause problems for the provider in that it might bring unwanted attention to them, as well as making them more 'wanted' and, therefore, harder to find.

[Mister Quick]

Someone recently PMed me about this poll. Recently did a relavent comment in the Rockford, IL board.

http://usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=627131&postcount=906

This is an editorial onn the subject that was recently in the Janesville, WI paper. Janesville has recently had a number of busts of dancers at strip clubs on prostitution charges for providing lap dances! Details can be found in the Wisconsin other areas board.

From the paper:


Why did we use the photos of the nine women arrested for prostitution at Screamina MeeMees last week?

More than one reader asked that question, and one even suggested it "bordered on criminal" for us to expose the women's photos and personal information.

First, let's deal with the addresses. We report the addresses of nearly everyone charged with a crime who makes it into the Gazette in a story or in the Public Record. It's our policy. It helps readers identify those who are accused, and it helps separate one John or Jane Doe from another. So we weren't being selective with the addresses; we followed our policy.

The photo question is more complex. We often use photos of people accused of crimes, but we don't always. Most of the time, it depends on the crime's severity - the more serious the crime, the more likely that we'll run a photo of the suspect.

Another issue is availability. We don't always have a photo to use. If we don't and we want to use a photo, we try hard to get one - through official sources or other channels. Sometimes, we strike out. It's that simple.

And finally, we look at the news value or perceived level of interest in a story to decide whether to use a photo or photos of the suspect or suspects. Granted, the prostitution charges are midemeanors, but the arrests were highly unusual. In fact, we don't think nine people had ever been arrested before in a prostitution sting such as this one. That raises the news value considerably.

And to be perfectly honest, we knew people would be interested in seeing the pictures. One of our goals is to be interesting, and this was a no-brainer. So we scrambled to get the pictures from law enforcement, and we ran what we got. One of the photos was not available from the cops, and that's why it didn't run. Only one man was charged, and his photo ran, too.

Was it fair to run the women's photos? Was it consistent? Was it ethical?

Nothing was inaccurate. The girls were charged in what we believe was the biggest prostitution bust in city history. The level of interest in the community clearly was high. Just check out the continuing string of comments on the story. It's been No. 1 on our Web site in terms of activity for a full week.

I was on vacation when the busts occurred. Other editors made the call to use the photos. I think I'd have made the same decision.

[Member #4914]

Never!

The privacy and respect of not only each others privacy here, but that of those who have been accused without undergoing trials yet or even those who get convicted, should not be shared by the media and on police websites, it's simply unethical. And by re-posting this info and link to it we give credence to those sites and sources, empowering the unethical tactics, and further shaming the accused, be it one of us, or one of the girls.

I was a so called victim of my public records being publicly posted, having been busted for mongering several years ago. It amounted to a misdemeanor offence; supervision with a court imposed fine & a car impound fee, all of which should not have gotten any more attention than that of a driving offence for which the penalty is identical. Instead the governments goal of destroying my family life and credibility with several friends who eventually found out, was and has been permanent and unrepairable.

So fuck you all very much for perpetuating the problem, and no, its not anyone's fucking business who gets busted for what or how, or what their names, address' or any other information that our stupid fucking government does not protect and respect.

[Crazy Jim Wood]

Here's the link to the lap dance busts:
http://www.nbc15.com/home/headlines/16781971.html

Several of the poor girls look like they're crying (understandable), one is smiling, and one's got a look on her face like "damn, here we go again".

I'm so happy that our tax dollars are hard at work making the world safe from over-exuberant lap dances.

[Phaelon]

Dos anyone else find it peculiar that they arrested so many women and only one man? Was he the only guy in the club except undercover LE and he got a lap dance from every single woman one after another until the bust? It's a really lame set of arrests to begin with but something doesn't compute. Who did that club owner piss off or fail to pay off?

[Seva Lurker]

Actually there isn't a choice for what I feel on the matter.

Is the poll asking if it is okay to post photos of the johns arrested too, or just the ladies?

We post photos of the ladies as they stroll or even perform with no problem. Yet we question the morality of posting photos of the ladies after they have been arrested.

I have no problem with photos of the ladies in any situation. I do have concerns about posting other personal information such as full name, address and such; even if it is a matter of public record, here.

[Das Ubersoldat]

"Yes, why not? I don't think that it makes any difference."
And lets face it, it won't make a difference. The info has already been posted in the local Podunk Gazette, it can do no harm for it to be reposted here.

"Yes, I think that the news value outweighs their individual privacy."
Not sure how newsworthy it is to show the arrests of providers, and potentialy clients. But at least we do know one thing: we can identify the providers once they are back out working, and not have to worry about them being part of Uncle LEOs family.

"Yes, I think that these people deserve to be publicly exposed."
They were caught, but I don't feel that they deserve it. Nevertheless, the deed has been done, so might as well repost the info here.

"Yes, I like to see the photos of people arrested for vice "crimes"."
OK, now that is just plain mean.

"No, it's just not a morally correct thing to do."
Not morally correct? Um, you are here because you are looking for a sex provider. Where is your moral compass pointing when you do that? Pot to kettle, you are black!

"No, it's just further abusing these unfortunate people."
It is a matter of public record. It may be embarrasing, but not abusive. Besides, the plavers know the rules and consequences before they play the game.

"No, I think that it's an NGO anti-mongering scare tactic." & "No, I think that it's a Law Enforcement scare tactic."
Scare tactic or not, it will not stop prostitution. Sex sells, and everybody is buying. It has been that way for a few thousand years, I see no change in sight.

[Phat Bastard]

I think a lot of you would change your minds if it were your names being posted.

At least I hope you'd be smart enough to change your minds.

[Monger Jim]

Here the rule is, Innocent until proven guilty.

Reposting here would only repeat an accusation, all changes, once the verdicts are in. (Besides, I am on this Forum to find pleasure and avoid trouble, not to run-up posting counts by repackaging booking photos or chat.)

Up until 10 years ago, I would have agreed that "arrested" equals "guilty."

Having been arrested or charged by power-flexing cops on two different times, with charges dropped each time, I have personally seen the "guilt by implication or intimidation" brought to us ... by our own public servents.

[Mister Quick]

I recently quiered Jackson as to wether the poll was refeering to pictures of girls arrested, guys arrested or both.

My question:

You should clarify the question of the poll. Are you asking about the girls arrested or guys or both.

His reply:


Hi,

I don't see the difference. For example, how could it be okay to embarass and expose the girls but not okay to embarass and expose the guys?

Thanks,

JacksonI do not think that the reason for posting the pictures or any other information on police activities here is to embarass anyone or intimidate them into not going out to pick up girls. Face it if you are on here the worst it might do is avoid areas where LEO has been arresting lots of people. such as the strip club in Janesville, WI where they have been making arrests based on guys getting lap dances!

I have posted a fair number of pictures of girls arrested. Although I have had equal access to the pictures of guys arrested I have not posted them. I think the only exception to this was of a transvestite who I posted as a warning of who not to pick up. If one guy avoided picking it up then I think that picture served its purpose.

I have scanned this site's photo gallery and seen lots of other people posting mugshots. Like me none of them seem to be posting any pictures of the guys arrested. I think the reason for this is a simple one. Guys who use this board want to look at pictures of girls, not other guys. There are no pictues of guys who are on craigslist. There are no pictures of guys by themselves in a state of undress (there are some couples pictures). I think thse would be banned since they are of a homosexual nature.

Since pictures of guys have not been posted, I do not think if mugshots were to become allowed (My understanding is at present they are not but it is a not well enforced rule) no one would start putting up pictures of guys, although more pictures of girls might start appearing.

Others on here have stated the advantages of having this info posted. It appears as if at least one of the girls arrested has benefited from these postings. Das Ubersoldat has given excellent arguements for and against each of the answers to the poll question.

If we are not wanting to embarrass people, the photos I think are the worst offenders would be those of girls who just happen to be out on the street in an area known for prostitution. I have seen a few of these posted with a caption like: " I saw this girl, she is hot, dont know if she is a SW"

[VinceVon]

You do realized that this forum is indexed by Google.

If you get busted, a Google search of your name would take you here.

Imagine your mother or wife deciding to Google the name of her sweet sweet son or hubby, and finding out your arrest via a post here. And also if your screename here was posted with your real name about the arrest, she now can read your 100 posts about all your experiences mongering.

Sound fun to you?

[Sexmoron]

You do realized that this forum is indexed by Google.

If you get busted, a Google search of your name would take you here.

Imagine your mother or wife deciding to Google the name of her sweet sweet son or hubby, and finding out your arrest via a post here. And also if your screename here was posted with your real name about the arrest, she now can read your 100 posts about all your experiences mongering.

Sound fun to you?

It emphasizes the hypocrisy and double standards within our society. Once you are personally tainted by the system maybe you'll begin to take it to the voting booth.

We've all seen the madame who "supposedly" committed suicide. We've seen how much the Washington bastards who make the laws also protect theirselves from it.

But most people are happy to look the other way until it finally hits home. Bring it all to the forefront.

[Mister Quick]

You do realized that this forum is indexed by Google.

If you get busted, a Google search of your name would take you here.

Imagine your mother or wife deciding to Google the name of her sweet sweet son or hubby, and finding out your arrest via a post here. And also if your screename here was posted with your real name about the arrest, she now can read your 100 posts about all your experiences mongering.

Sound fun to you?It looks like this poll is over. The yes votes seem to have won over the no votes by a small margin. I am wondering if this has effected the policy about thsi on the board in anyway?

The only way someone could match up a screen name to a real name would be if someone reevaled it here by saying that was me in the article about the arrest or equally stupid by posting an arrest report and filling in some of the missing details. Both instances would show stupidy.

Also google does search the police websites and newspapers, however newspaper articles do tend to only be around for a limited period of time.

[Bigboi47]

The info is public anyway so posting it here is not going to do nay more harm.

[Shy Zone Guy]

I think the answer is very simple, YES. The purpose of this site is for hobyists to be able to post reviews of thier experiences so that others can learn from their mistakes. A picture of a house or provider who got raided and busted is very useful for every one else to know to avoid that area.

As far as posting pictures of guys vs gals, the majority of the members (not all but most) are guys, straight guys. So it does not good to show pictures of guys, the only benefit of showing guys mug shots would be to the providers but once your mug shot of a guy is posted that generally puts him out of the game, which is again not the purpose of this site.

SZG

[Leggeddog]

Yes I would like to see them posted, as a hobbist I would like to know who's who and it would make my decision making easier. If they are arrested then it's a no. "A pic is worth a thousand words"

[Same Old Al Z]

Are we talking about SWs? Or mongers who got arrested?

[Admin]

Are we talking about SWs? Or mongers who got arrested?Hi Same Old Al Z,

What difference does that make?

You can't possibly be suggesting that it's okay to participate in the public embarrassment of the working girls, but it's not okay to embarrass the customers.

Personally, I think that some guys have some sort of "humiliation" fetish wherein they enjoy seeing the girls "degraded" by the publication of their mug shots.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Bill Bradsky]

Mug shots are published in the media to discourage prostitution using public humiliation. If you want to discourage prostitution then post arrest photos here.

[Clark Kent]

Jackson, I was just wondering, I assumed this poll was to gauge the members opinions as to whether we could continue to post mug shots of various SW. The poll was concluded, which was in favor of continuing to post mug shots, and nothing else was said. It doesn't clearly state in the rules whether mug shots are allowed or not, and alot of us have always used mug shots as a way of showing other forum members who we might be talking about. I received a PM today from a member who seemed concerned with my posting 'a lot' of booking photos and him wishing I would read the rules. I have not posted 'a lot' of mug shots. I do however, on occasion use them as reference. They can be helpful especially if some SW is robbing mongers, or even if there's rumor said SW has HIV or some other STD in letting others see who they are. Sometimes mug shots are the only visual aid we might have in showing who a said SW is. I have looked back over the rules, and there is no actual rule that states 'mug shots' themselves cannot be posted. I did find through doing a search for forum posts of the member who PM'ed me a thread where the mug shot discussion was ongoing, and saw where you made a direct comment just a week or so ago that mug shot photos were not allowed. This is fine, and if you do not want them posted I will no longer post them. I'm just wondering though, what was the purpose in the poll, as I assumed it was asking our opinion on if we should continue to post them, and by it passing with a 'yes' vote, that we could ? If mug shots aren't allowed, it might be a good idea to actually say in the rules that 'mug shots' or 'arrest photos' aren't allowed. With mug shots basically going hand in hand with the SW trade, it is definitely something that needs to be mentioned directly so others won't be confused as to whether they're allowed or not.

[Renee Holly]

As you would have them do unto you. Or is it Do unto others as they have and are doing unto you?

Well I think I made my point or at least I will.

[Bankheadleroy]

Mug shots are published in the media to discourage prostitution using public humiliation. If you want to discourage prostitution then post arrest photos here.If there were an applause smiley, sir, you'd get three of them in succession for this.

[Bastion550]

When did we go from a society of Law and due process to a society of Public Opinion?

Simply because someone is arrested does not mean that society should have the right to ridicule or demean that person. If however we are talking about violent or statutory acts then I can say that society does have a right to know and protect itself.

[Sir Loin]

I think yes, even though the poll is closed

How about some of us that are return customers? Wanting to find a SW that we deemed our fav. It'd be nice to know to stop looking for her and stop frequenting the area she works from once she's been arrested

I don't feel it does any good posting the pics of the guys, who cares about them? Correct me if I'm wrong, but alot of us have never seen each other before, the amount of mongerers is more than the amount of providers, do they really care to see our pictures if they're arrested? Does anybody? They just enjoy the business from the many mongerers they provide service to so why should they care about some unlucky smuck that got nabbed?

And yea some of us have a humiliation fetish, some pick up SW just to degrade them, they have a wife or gf or good luck w/ women, but would rather the no strings attached PLUS the fact that they can degrade the woman (ejaculate on their face, talk down/dirty to them, walk out after banging the girl) Most women especially a gf or wife wouldn't put up w/ that degradation, so alot of men find this appealing when picking up a SW.

[Renee Holly]

It would please me to see them humiliated ONLY if they voted yes on this poll. Some of the reports here are very degrading to the women not SW that they report on.

Don't tell me it is not so. I read where the one guy thought it was the cats' pajamas that he shot a load in her mouth after getting her down to 10$ and then aw gee she spit it out on the carpet of his car.

Well now that the poll is closed the we hater Renee er's will wait anxiously to see my picture posted here.

I would like to see the afore mentioned monger have his name lic and pic posted and his missdeed listed on a site this site should give equal time.

[Jcbt1]

One positive thing I see in it, is, if you meet up with them then you at least know they aren't undercover LEO's. JMO

[xion149]

Mug shots are published in the media to discourage prostitution using public humiliation. If you want to discourage prostitution then post arrest photos here.Bill sums it up nicely. I'm disappointed I found this too late to vote.

You guys voting yes must be new at this internet thing.

When it comes to personal info on the internet, LESS = MORE.

If you don't think so, here's a simple activity you can try:

1. Google your username, and see what pops up.

2. Oh my, see how your posts on a prostitution forum have been convenient indexed AND cached by Google (meaning they stay around ~3 years, even if you delete the original post)

3. Ever used that same username anywhere else? Maybe AIM? Work, or college email?

4. Watch your friends google you, connect the dots and have fun explaining it to them.

If you really care about johns getting arrested, read the local police blotter.
You aren't doing them any favors by posting pics.

If you really care about hoes getting arrested, I sense you have some painful lessons to learn.

You aren't doing them any favors by posting pics. Especially ugly mug shots.

[Nojames]

If LE wish to post our faces in public after a crime. Why not post the faces of LE in public so we all know who is doing all the dirty work? There are more important issues to worry about over SW.

[Saylor]

When did we go from a society of Law and due process to a society of Public Opinion?

Simply because someone is arrested does not mean that society should have the right to ridicule or demean that person. If however we are talking about violent or statutory acts then I can say that society does have a right to know and protect itself.And for the same reason. In this country everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Shaming people who have been arrested but not convicted is unfair, especially for nonviolent crimes.

[ABella]

I have mixed feelings about this as an escort. But I must say that I understand it from both sides. No, I wouldn't want everyone to know about my legal issues. . But I do understand that if it is hobby related, that it may be critical in keeping the mongers safe from uncle LEO.

I've indeed heard stories about providers turning against their clients and doing the unthinkable. (Feeding info to our unfavorable Uncle LEO). The thing of it is, the reasoning most people read and follow this site is so they can cover their ass from getting popped by the fuzz. That being said, I believe no real names should absolutely ever be used. But I also think that as long as the arrest is hobby related, and no government names are used, then peoplease should be made aware. It's not like the provider can't go change her name. But when meeting a NEW provider,(and or "old" provider with a new name) you always take a LEO risk anyway. "I'd rather the fire burn a 1/4th of the crop then burning out the ENTIRE field! Just my little 2 cents LOL.