Drewsky66
11-15-17, 04:14
I think warnings about std's should be allowed. Posting a public link is nearly impossible unless the provider openly admitted to it, on some form of public forum.
Granted, we are more likely to heed the post more, if the post comes from a senior member than someone with only 2 posts.
I feel more often than not, the members intention has been to warn others, than attempt at hurting an escort's business. Allowing the post would at least give members the chance to choose to believe the member who posted the warning. We know there will always be a"Knight" who chimes in, but that's expected if the warning is for a popular lady on the board. The rule probably won't change but it's the only one I disagree with. I just think it's a policy that can change.
Granted, we are more likely to heed the post more, if the post comes from a senior member than someone with only 2 posts.
I feel more often than not, the members intention has been to warn others, than attempt at hurting an escort's business. Allowing the post would at least give members the chance to choose to believe the member who posted the warning. We know there will always be a"Knight" who chimes in, but that's expected if the warning is for a popular lady on the board. The rule probably won't change but it's the only one I disagree with. I just think it's a policy that can change.