Photo Submissions

[Doombringer321]

Dear Jackson.

I believe that in order to encourage member of the USA section to post more pictures, I humbly suggest that in every state of the union you should put a Photo section just like the WSG section in every country, perhaps with these new areas we will encourage more interest in the US section as well as increase the volume of pictures posted in the US section since I believe that area is lacking in the USA section.


Thank you for the USA section may all mongers keep on Banging.

Peace out.

[Robux]

If memory serves me, when posting photos was enabled on the old WSG site traffic soared. Mongering certainly isn't a textual experience. Writing about mongering is like dancing about architecture. Photos have certainly enhanced my enjoyment of this board. Any privacy issues are easily handled through photo editing of identifying features.

Robux

[Daddy Lows]

Photos bring on more interest. FOr those who are fearful of identification, just use photoshop or whatever generic program to cover any identifying areas of the photos. Come on now. As for each state having a photo gallery, that would seem the most logical method but I kind of like one gallery for the whole US and then if people want to include the pics with their reports, they could always link the US StreetWalker Photo gallery to their reports. Besides, there aren't so many photos in the US posted anyways.

My $.02.

Peace

[Pay Pal]

Why do we need a photo section now? Can't we just upload a pic with each post and wouldn't that be the best place for the photo? I think the photo gallerys should be disabled. That is no more uploads to a photo gallery section and instead everyone add their attachment with the post. The old photo should still be available for viewing of course.

[DropFrame]

While having a separate Photo Section would seem like a good idea, I tend to think it brings people to the website that are NOT hobbyists.

Posting photos in individual forums with reports next to them requires a person be a bit more interested in the hobby in a particular area instead of just logging in and looking at all the photo sections and leaving.

Also makes it harder for other sites to link to photos generically.

[Acaryu]

The new photo gallery tool is awesome. Why dont you provide the same for the world and Argentina boards? I would look at them everyday.

[bluishballs]

Can the pictures be separated into sections, like petite, blonde, asian, black for viewer convenience?

And can we vote on the pictures, so that when people browse the pictures section, they can go straight to the highest rated pics?

It'll also help the girls who are advertising their pics.

[Nico]

There's enough photos already. There's too many morons posting photos from CL saying "look this girls hot I want to date her". The photo section should be kept to photos taken by mongers who actually visited the ladies.

[Little Tony II]

I agree with Nico. There are rules for this section that NOT MANY FOLLOW!!

Tony

[Ricky Raccoon]

I disagree with Nico. We should have more and more pictures. However, they should be YOUR pictures taken by YOU. It counts as your picture if you took the picture. Pictures from other sites should be banned; the person posting the picture should be given a warning initially, then banned if they do it again. Simple. I think this offence is called plagiarism.......

Ricky

[TexasMonger]

I like the way the new site works. But where did the photos go? I see the links but no photos. When I clik on link, I only get a blank window. Any other monger having the same problem?

Please report,

TM

[Best Tx Monger]

This is kinda a sensitive issueto speak of. I strongly feel and believe that a photo along with a great report goes a long way.

I disagree in having a voting system for photos. I think that would encourage the wrong type of 'folks' visiting the website. This is kind of a hidden jewel for me and would for this to become a rating site.

In addition, I would not mind seeing a monger get 3 post credit for adding a photo. I find a report, attached with a photo much more effective then ten reporst with no photo. But then again, this would open the flood gates to the comic section and so forth and that would not be justifiable.

We are talking about rigid boundaries here !!

-007

[Benchseats Rock]

There's enough photos already. There's too many morons posting photos from CL saying "look this girls hot I want to date her". The photo section should be kept to photos taken by mongers who actually visited the ladies.


I only say "look this girl is hot I want to fuck her" when you post pics Nico. Well, you and Aamco and Cooky Jar. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery n'est pas?

[Ho Lala]

I think also that pics with a report is a plus.

But we see too many photos that should not be there. We should have pictures related to a report.

Stay safe

Ho Lala

[Big Red50]

I have a pointed question for learned Senior Members

Should we post CL photo re-prints for CL reviews?

There are members, whom do not think we should post CL re-printed photos.

I have also reprinted the USG Rules-Photo Guidelines, yes I do RTFF Bench.

What’s allowed.

The following types of photographs are acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs taken by you of women in any state of dress or undress.
•Photographs taken by you documenting your travels, including photos of hotels, restaurants, cuisine, street scenes, beach scenes, night clubs and tourist attractions.
•Photographs of escorts copied from escort websites.
•Reports accompanying photographs should identify the city, country and approximate date of the photograph.

What’s Not Allowed

The following types of photographs ARE NOT acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs copied from other websites, unless you are the original photographer.

PLEASE NOTE: Given the difficulties in verifying photos suspected to have been copied from other websites, said photos will not be investigated unless I am contacted by the webmaster directly.

If you suspect that another forum member is posting photographs copied from other websites, you are encouraged to challenge them in The Forum.

End of USG Rules-Photo Guidelines

Big Red Comments:

CL Photos are of escorts copied from escort websites and are clearly allowed. These CL providers change their names so often you need a photo to identify them. Since I don’t have the balls to take and post photos of myself and SW’s, all I post are photos of providers, I have seen or want to see.

Like to hear from other members,

Just trying to play by the rules

Big Red

[Benchseats Rock]

I have a pointed question for learned Senior Members
Should we post CL photo re-prints for CL reviews?
There are members, whom do not think we should post CL re-printed photos.
I have also reprinted the USG Rules-Photo Guidelines, yes I do RTFF Bench.


Reviews without pictures is like sex with a condom. Not quite as good as it could be. Of course we should post CL pics - the girls are so full of shit that we need to see what they're advertising and hold them to it - or warn our brethren if they're cruising towards a raw deal.

[A John]

The same reason we post on MP providers. Wherever were going we're getting what we pay for. No one likes to throw money away. It's a rare occasion I feel like TOFTT. Personally I don't like throwing money away. Photographs and reviews alike are always helpful.

Happy Hunting
AJ

[Wallie]

They seem to be within the bounds as specified in the USASG Photo Guidelines. Although CL isn't technically an Escort Site, many of the ladies use the same photos on CL as they do on Escort Sites.

Additionally, as the posts on CL become difficult to find fairly rapidly, or are flagged as Spam and disappear from CL altogether, any photos included in the original CL ad are, therefore, helpful.

I also think that, if the ad is short, a copy/paste of the text of the original ad is appropriate as well. Or, as suggested by Harpo2u in this post: http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=493133&postcount=432 making a PDF of the ad and attaching it to a report is good as well.

Wallie

[Big Red50]

I have a pointed question for learned Senior Members

Should we post CL photo re-prints for CL reviews?

There are members, whom do not think we should post CL re-printed photos.

I have also reprinted the USG Rules-Photo Guidelines, yes I do RTFF Bench.

What’s allowed.

The following types of photographs are acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs taken by you of women in any state of dress or undress.
•Photographs taken by you documenting your travels, including photos of hotels, restaurants, cuisine, street scenes, beach scenes, night clubs and tourist attractions.
•Photographs of escorts copied from escort websites.
•Reports accompanying photographs should identify the city, country and approximate date of the photograph.

What’s Not Allowed

The following types of photographs ARE NOT acceptable for publication in the Forum:
•Photographs copied from other websites, unless you are the original photographer.

PLEASE NOTE: Given the difficulties in verifying photos suspected to have been copied from other websites, said photos will not be investigated unless I am contacted by the webmaster directly.

If you suspect that another forum member is posting photographs copied from other websites, you are encouraged to challenge them in The Forum.

End of USG Rules-Photo Guidelines

Big Red Comments:

CL Photos are of escorts copied from escort websites and are clearly allowed. These CL providers change their names so often you need a photo to identify them. Since I don’t have the balls to take and post photos of myself and SW’s, all I post are photos of providers, I have seen or want to see.

Like to hear from other members,

Just trying to play by the rules

Big Red

I posted this same question on Site Administration-Comment on Site Rules.

I have reprinted Jackson's response from 1/7/07


Hi Big Red,

You are correct. Photos of escorts copied from their ads are perfectly acceptable for posting in the USASG Forum.

Thanks,

Jackson