View Full Version : Sugarbabies?
RegulatorD
02-07-22, 18:34
A sugar baby with a couple of arrangements has the potential to make more money in two to four hours a week than they can working as a waitress, for Amazon, in retail, and a wide variety of other jobs. Certainly more than they'll make then doing at 0F which takes a lot of time and effort to build a following using a variety of social media plus customer service. Stripping might be faster money. Even that can be iffy. Sugaring with a longterm arrangement is a win.
Agree with below and entire post.Just a comment, I have meet tons of girl in healthcare on SA, STNA, LPNs, Nurses, Admin Support, just lots of medical workers, some married too. LOL.
WanderingAbout
02-07-22, 19:49
SugarSpice on SA is also HarlyQuinn on WYP. There are recent posts about her. Use search. Her pics are below.
https://members.seeking.com/member/147de34a-bd16-4592-85e9-db9625dc7870
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/rZy1ga285vp1pawAd9Pvjxbo
Todd Cincy
02-07-22, 21:23
https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7
This one has had at least two profiles since January.
I have a firm rule nowadays: I don't make plans with anyone without a videochat first. I've been catfished several times. I have also made inconveniently long drives for no call, no show girls. Therefore, I use the video chat to make sure that the pictures match the girl, and that I am dealing with someone who will likely be reliable.
I have contacted and been contacted by this girl from at least two of her profiles since the beginning of the year. Her phone number has also changed since January.
I have made four or five attempts to get her to get on the Seeking video chat. She should have no qualms about this, because she clearly shows her face in her profile. (I, on the other hand, do not show my face in my profile, and I would think that she would want to see me before making an appointment.).
At least four or five times now, she has bailed on the video chat, and has been very dodgy about when she might be able to actually get on her video cam to verify herself. She always tries to steer me towards scheduling an appointment. I'm like, you have time to meet somewhere, but you don't have five minutes to verify yourself on your video cam?
It could be that she's simply flaky. Or she could be a scammer I'm not sure what is going on. But there does seem to be something suspicious about this one. If anyone has any info, by all means let me know. Thanks.
OHprincess is Jessica, the infamous GPS Galla girl well reviewed on here and last talked about in post #6221 and #6218, must have two profiles as she is also on SA as BabygirlfromOH.
https://members.seeking.com/member/397e3106-6676-42dc-948a-579fb911a6ae
Siren96 300 ppm Open-minded Lives in NKY.
https://members.seeking.com/member/eb361818-a4b4-464c-9c3e-5f472b9ec61d
Sugarspice update. Still 500 ppH. Escort for sure. BBJ. No Cim. CFS. One goal score allowed then done.
https://members.seeking.com/member/147de34a-bd16-4592-85e9-db9625dc7870
FitnessFreak wants 700 ppm and is a total waste of time. You'll have a more informative conversation with your shoe.
https://members.seeking.com/member/003a91de-c7c9-4255-b92c-cf66ba27803f
Littlesweetheart Well reviewed professional SB is prego and almost to delivery date. Still working SA mostly pimping her online pics. If you can afford her. She does take it in the back.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f49f92d-8245-4a35-83f0-13537459bffbThe one in the pic what's her rate?
25% off their higher price for Valentines Day.
You think they'd rather have people subscribe for a term longer than a month at a lower price than jumping on and off for a month, as I only get a subscription when they run a special.
WanderingAbout
02-08-22, 20:12
Appeared to make plans to get together. Last minute change. Now a ghost. Anyone ever meet her in person recently? Have an arrangement with her at any time?
PM or post reply please
https://members.seeking.com/member/07f7eda3-9595-40ab-b85d-038fc170efa2
https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8
Any one met this one. I've talked to her quite a bit but she won't send an unblurred photo so I'm hesitant. Seems sweet but any info would be appreciated. Feel free to PM.
Tickle Jay
02-09-22, 05:30
25% off their higher price for Valentines Day.
You think they'd rather have people subscribe for a term longer than a month at a lower price than jumping on and off for a month, as I only get a subscription when they run a special.I have mine on hold for 60 days. Joined at a low rate. I think it'll be the same rate when I take it off hold.
She offers to Facetime prior to meeting. Take her up but do it on Seeking. That preserves anonymity for both sides. How can she refuse when she makes the offer in her profile?
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8
Any one met this one. I've talked to her quite a bit but she won't send an unblurred photo so I'm hesitant. Seems sweet but any info would be appreciated. Feel free to PM.
I didn't understand her refusal to send a picture while we were texting. It's not like you can't grab a screenshot while video chatting.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0f62ec15-5e33-4d86-98c0-3b4a0fa23cb8
Any one met this one. I've talked to her quite a bit but she won't send an unblurred photo so I'm hesitant. Seems sweet but any info would be appreciated. Feel free to PM.
JackOhLantern
02-09-22, 16:28
https://members.seeking.com/member/b955d6a2-41c2-47be-93e2-9e1e4bfe84f1
I actually met this one randomly outside of the site a few weeks ago, and she said she needs a sd, to which I replied, "okay". She is unfortunately not down for sexual relations, though. Guess her idea of mutually beneficial and mine are a little different.
RegulatorD
02-10-22, 12:20
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f3ca211-73ce-4544-ac97-63dcac1fc7c6
Anybody got anything on these one, coms have been sporadic. Wondering if she is worth any effort.
These are scammers who want to go straight to What'sApp or IG and cannot access Googlevoice or TextNow.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1c6c6642-124b-49b7-a3f7-69707204641f Veronica.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f1f46ab4-d58f-480e-bec8-7c510721891d CulturedBelle.
Tiaelle and Ginger_Winterling both seemed to try very hard to get me to use language suggesting sex for money. I blocked the the ginger one but became even more suspicious when Tiaelle started in on the same kind of thing. Neither was willing to go to text with me. Maybe I am just being a bit too paranoid but not taking the chance. Here is Tiaelle's link:
https://members.seeking.com/member/1c0ea44f-e614-4f0a-a1ba-4e57d85b9916
Anybody else chatting with them?
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b955d6a2-41c2-47be-93e2-9e1e4bfe84f1
I actually met this one randomly outside of the site a few weeks ago, and she said she needs a sd, to which I replied, "okay". She is unfortunately not down for sexual relations, though. Guess her idea of mutually beneficial and mine are a little different.Out of curiosity, what did she think she was bringing to the table? Did she assume that you were burdened with too much money, and she would be doing you a favor by relieving you of some of it?
JackOhLantern
02-10-22, 18:16
Out of curiosity, what did she think she was bringing to the table? Did she assume that you were burdened with too much money, and she would be doing you a favor by relieving you of some of it?Her exact text was "I've just had arrangements where's sex wasn't a requirement before yanno".
Her exact text was "I've just had arrangements where's sex wasn't a requirement before yanno".That's fine. But she still has to bring something into the relationship to make it "mutually beneficial". Key word is, "mutually". Is she a lawyer than can give legal advice, because that would be mutually beneficial. An accountant that can provide tax preparation services? Because if so, send her my way; my taxes for 2021 is a mess.
There are many ways other than sexual that a relationship can be mutually beneficial, but both parties still need to bring something to the table.
Does anyone know if you can get banned from Seeking by something you said over text? I mentioned a ppm amount and a girl freaked out and said she reported me. I didn't realize you can upload a picture when you report someone. If there is a picture of you in the text also can Seeking use that? It got me thinking. That could easily be photoshopped so I'm not sure if they would use that as proof of ban.
MattChavan23
02-11-22, 17:19
Does anyone know if you can get banned from Seeking by something you said over text? I mentioned a ppm amount and a girl freaked out and said she reported me. I didn't realize you can upload a picture when you report someone. If there is a picture of you in the text also can Seeking use that? It got me thinking. That could easily be photoshopped so I'm not sure if they would use that as proof of ban.She / He can take multiple snapshot of your text messages included with pics and upload and report. Lately seeking is quick to ban people's from what I read and I think they may have also included or induced bots and fake profiles on the site who provocate you to use banned terminology and then quick to ban. Hope it dosen't happen. Good luck.
Does anyone know if you can get banned from Seeking by something you said over text? I mentioned a ppm amount and a girl freaked out and said she reported me. I didn't realize you can upload a picture when you report someone. If there is a picture of you in the text also can Seeking use that? It got me thinking. That could easily be photoshopped so I'm not sure if they would use that as proof of ban.Seeking is a private company and they can ban anyone they want; reason not required.
If they feel you stepped out of line, they can ban you. If they feel that you crossed the line and whatever you said put them in legal jeopardy for not protecting the girl, they can ban you. If they don't like the user name you chose, they can ban you.
They can ban you for any rason. It's a privately owned platform.
Seeking is a private company and they can ban anyone they want; reason not required.
If they feel you stepped out of line, they can ban you. If they feel that you crossed the line and whatever you said put them in legal jeopardy for not protecting the girl, they can ban you. If they don't like the user name you chose, they can ban you.
They can ban you for any rason. It's a privately owned platform.Never been banned, but I'm not on the platform now. Anyone ever tried a chargeback on those fucks for banning you? I would.
Never been banned, but I'm not on the platform now. Anyone ever tried a chargeback on those fucks for banning you? I would.Before anyone going through the hassle of trying to get funds back using a chargeback, best take a look at the TOS for anything regarding about refunds or the forfeiting of membership fees. If there's nothing mentioned, then it's to your advantage since if it's not covered in the TOS, any ambiguity in a contract goes against the writer of the contract. But Seeking is a large company. I'm sure they had legal eagles write the TOS who most likely have put something in there for such an occasion. For all you know, you could already be entitled to a prorated refund; you only need to submit a request of some kind.
WanderingAbout
02-11-22, 22:38
Seeking is a private company and they can ban anyone they want; reason not required. If they feel you stepped out of line, they can ban you. If they feel that you crossed the line and whatever you said put them in legal jeopardy for not protecting the girl, they can ban you. If they don't like the user name you chose, they can ban you. They can ban you for any rason. It's a privately owned platform.If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.
Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account
And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.
These have always been my beliefs. So you are saying you should never get banned on Seeking for something you said on Whatsapp or Google Voice, right?
I would avoid the coded words on Seeking. If you were reported they could look at what you said and see it was a coded message.
If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.
Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account
And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.
Todd Cincy
02-12-22, 06:31
If you want to avoid getting banned have a general, civil conversation with your potential sugar baby for a bit then ask if they will text with you (use Textfree) or Whatsapp or Telegram or Signal or whatever app 'to discuss things further so you dont get into trouble on here (seeking)'. If the SB doesnt then ask to do a MnG to discuss.
Do not mention ppm or money of any kind or sex acts on Seeking. If you are inclined to do so alter your text at bit by substituting words or symbols and letters for numbers and vice-a-versa so Seekings system won't automatically flag you. Example: PPM becomes each get together or h at ngout. $300 become 3OO (capital o's and no $) etc. You get the idea. This wont stop a SB from reporting you but it will dodge the SA message scan for keywords that will flag your account
And there seems to be an usual number for profiles that randomly show up as of late where their first message is 'I'm available for hookup'. Just block them and move on unless you want to roll the dice. Could be real or something you didn't want. Up to you.These are all good points, but I take it a step further: I don't discuss any details in writing at all.
I only talk turkey when I'm actually talking: preferably via videochat, or at least on the phone. Or in person, depending on the circumstances.
I flat-out tell them (in writing): No conversation on the site is completely private, and I cannot discuss details here.
RegulatorD
02-12-22, 10:48
My additional thoughts, Been on the sites for years, keep it simple, get them off the SA app as soon as you can! Use a phone app / burner phone, or kik or snapchat, however snap can be traced back to social media with some work, Kik can not, BUT MAKE sure you turn off location tracking in KIK! I use a paid phone app, cause I can fully message, talk, share photos, videos etc, all while keeping my real number private. So many advantages to a private number app,. I can't count the number of times a girl has reached back out after our initial negotiations failed the first time, now my $. 5 or $$ offer is good to go! Love me sum SA!
WanderingAbout
02-12-22, 11:32
These have always been my beliefs. So you are saying you should never get banned on Seeking for something you said on Whatsapp or Google Voice, right? I would avoid the coded words on Seeking. If you were reported they could look at what you said and see it was a coded message.Don't know if your conversations off SA site will get you banned or not. Can't imagine they would. But, never say never. Seeking is most concerned about the trouble SA users can cause SA on their site should a higher authority put SA under scrutiny.
Agreed with avoiding use of code words. In prior post mentioned, as others did too, to go off site before discussing details with SB. However, for those people inclined to stay on SA and talk details code words may reduce getting banned (may).
My additional thoughts, Been on the sites for years, keep it simple, get them off the SA app as soon as you can! Use a phone app / burner phone, or kik or snapchat, however snap can be traced back to social media with some work, Kik can not, BUT MAKE sure you turn off location tracking in KIK! I use a paid phone app, cause I can fully message, talk, share photos, videos etc, all while keeping my real number private. So many advantages to a private number app,. I can't count the number of times a girl has reached back out after our initial negotiations failed the first time, now my $. 5 or $$ offer is good to go! Love me sum SA!I'm with you. As much money as guys pump into getting a SB / hooker and then they aren't willing to pay for a full burner app that keeps them anonymous. I never understand that thought process. I've tried a few, and personally a fan of MySudo. Not a paid endorsement. LOL. link:
Home - MySudo (https://mysudo.com/)
Before anyone going through the hassle of trying to get funds back using a chargeback, best take a look at the TOS for anything regarding about refunds or the forfeiting of membership fees. If there's nothing mentioned, then it's to your advantage since if it's not covered in the TOS, any ambiguity in a contract goes against the writer of the contract. But Seeking is a large company. I'm sure they had legal eagles write the TOS who most likely have put something in there for such an occasion. For all you know, you could already be entitled to a prorated refund; you only need to submit a request of some kind.It's not much of a hassle. Just go online or give your card company a call to start the process. Fortunately, it forces the company to either respond or eat it. It probably wouldn't work with a vanilla card, but I've never had a credit card company not side with me. I only mention it because I just did a chargeback for a legit issue, and the company ate it plus an additional fee from the bank. If it happens to them too often, their processing fees go up.
I think Seeking relies on the fact that most people aren't going to do it. That's why they're so quick with the ban hammer.
WanderingAbout
02-12-22, 21:08
Profiles second section is an interesting read. Tempting. Some things might be too good to be true.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f5ba8918-7133-459b-9be6-77b5d685c0ad
Profiles second section is an interesting read. Tempting. Some things might be too good to be true.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f5ba8918-7133-459b-9be6-77b5d685c0adOK! So tell me you want me to come back to Cincinnati without actually saying it. LOL.
I should just fly her hot little ass to Vegas.
Kiki: https://members.seeking.com/member/1bb80377-1566-4911-ae19-0607bd7dd035.
Spoke with her seems real and hot. But asking $700 for an physical benefits. Anybody interested I can share her number (for exchange though) I am not going to pay that much anyway.
ConfidentChick: https://members.seeking.com/member/35ebd3d1-7fca-443a-9e96-933c63a64f35.
Another fake says only online.
SpoiledBabe98: https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7.
Met her and she is good. Willing to share her info for an exchange. She constantly changes her number though.
Aprohodite: https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c.
Some stupid must have paid for just meet and greet (not sure if she is faking it). Asking $400 for just meet and greet. Hard pass.
Daisyduke004: https://members.seeking.com/member/ed6feec2-40dd-471b-a263-c0990204cec0.
She seems real but not good at response. Still need to get her digits.
Luvsky20: https://members.seeking.com/member/805f295c-6cf4-4438-88a9-9baa5e2beb4d.
Shared her snap with me but not responsive. She has been in seeking long time if anybody met her let me know. Seems high end though.
Exotiicbb: https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a.
Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.
Added some additional info.
BAM.
SpoiledBabe98: https://members.seeking.com/member/5456f1bb-a054-4bf2-aef0-c86257211af7.
She is also using the following profile. I am texting with her over voip. No PII; no offer yet. SexySavannah:
https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab
Aprohodite: https://members.seeking.com/member/7e052649-d2ee-41af-ae2e-bd280e01e93c.
Profile gone or has me blocked.
WanderingAbout
02-13-22, 15:19
Evecalliope asking for $600 ppm. Settles on $500. In past was asking for $400 and doing $300. Now you know her range. Looks like pictures. Nice yet hippie type valley girl sound like in demeanor. Has a live in BF Northside area.
https://members.seeking.com/member/58e04be3-f681-403e-96c7-23e2312f0116
SexySavannah asking for $300 ppm. She says CFS. Lives in Florence.
https://members.seeking.com/member/92cbc964-1507-4596-afbc-f54a5fc50cab
Rosie out of Dayton asking $400 ppm. She has quite the sob story she sent. Lost wallet. Money. Grandmas wedding ring. Etc. Certainly not drama free.
https://members.seeking.com/member/569e9d04-50f1-41bf-b65a-7f804445f238
Exotiicbb below is asking for $400 ppm. Lives in Avondale. Profiles hint her figure being average is stature. She is Rubenesque.
Exotiicbb: https://members.seeking.com/member/fc243300-060d-4f1a-976e-6feca8b0e80a.
Met her not great experience though but YMMV. DM me for info.
WanderingAbout
02-14-22, 09:15
We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.
Seekings attempt to project themselves as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.
Todd Cincy
02-14-22, 09:59
We launched in 2006 at Seeking, the premier dating website for sugar babies and sugar daddies. As times have changed, so have we. We welcome anyone looking for a premium online dating experience. Our continuing mission at Seeking is to help members find relationship success by providing a platform that encourages honesty between partners. Seeking members are sophisticated individuals who wish to date attractive and successful people in a way that goes beyond typical social dating traditions and trends.
Seeking's attempt to project itself as a sophisticated dating site for the elite and encourage honesty (amongst all the scammers) is like putting paint on a pig.If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.
I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.
At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.
Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.
Todd Cincy
02-14-22, 10:08
Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.
When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.
Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.
I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.
Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.
Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.
Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.
If you got the email, this all about Brandon Wade finding true love.
I remember back in the old days (circa 2011), it wasn't just seeking. There was also sugardaddyforme and sugardaddie-dot-com.
At the time, Seeking (then Seeking Arrangements) was the best of the bunch, and became the market leader.
Things have changed. I would say that Seeking's position is "ripe for disruption" as they say. It is rapidly becoming as pretentious as Match or eHarmony, and as scam-ridden as Ashley Madison or Friendfinder.
Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?
Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.
When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.
Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.
I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.
Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.I've been away from isurgardaddy for me for several months since it switched over to Seeking. Sucked because you could find some out there every once in a while. Good luck hunting.
MattChavan23
02-15-22, 02:53
Given that Seeking is become an increasingly unfriendly platform, this warrants a post of its own.
When I first got into sugar dating about 10 years ago, I started with sugar daddy for me. I had very good success on it.
Then seeking arrangements basically took over the market. All the girls left SugarDaddy for me, and went over to seeking.
I just looked on SugarDaddy for me. There does seem to be some profiles on there, but I'm not sure how legit they are.
Has anyone used sugar daddy for me in the recent past? It used to be a very good site. But this was, as I said, about 10 years ago.I had used SDM a year back. You are not losing anything as most chicks that are on SDM are on seeking as well. It's cheap at 59.99 and best thing about it is they have 3 day moneyback guarantee if you are unsatisfied customer and cancel before 3 days by emailing customer service. I was able to get few numbers and sent my snap to truckload of chicks before canceling right at 3 days mark and got my money back successfully. Unfortunately most chicks contacted were wayy too curvy and out of my league, so it didn't work and I never tried again. It has very limited selection and operates on similar platform like Tinder I. E. Swipe left and right crap and you deal with scammers and pic sellers there as well. I heard it works well in big cities but mid / small tier cities have very limited selection and most chicks don't even bother to check messages on there. Other good thing is it has location tracker, so it shows actual gps location I. E city / county of profile in case someone is faking location it's easy to figure out, from what I saw. Hope that helps.
Tickle Jay
02-15-22, 06:04
Although Seeking is changing I don't think it is all their fault. The government is cracking down on the language used on sites like this. The whole paying for sex is a big no no. Also credit card companies are having a bigger say on what sites can use their services. And Pornhub are 2 sites recently that were targeted.
Unfortunately Seeking is by far the best option right now. It will change even more as time goes on and they crack down on things more. All the dating sites are going through this. Try signing up for any of them and put "sugar baby" or "arrangement" in your profile and you get a lifetime ban by the end of the day.Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.
Newb question: it seems like all of the posts here focus on seeking arrangements. Does anyone here use secret benefits? I like the verified feature they have but is there a downside that site?The selection on SB was impressive at first. I worked to connect with a few before paying using their profile clues. I was getting nowhere.
Then a woman I knew sent me a message. I reached out to her directly and asked if she meant to write me there. She said she hadn't.
The site generates a lot of fake messages and photo access invitations so guys use up lots of credits. I decided not to put any money into that machine and closed my account.
I also got in contact with another woman from there. She'd given up on it a long time ago. The site made her appear active.
Maybe some are real, but I decided the value wasn't there for me.
Very true, and due to some of that govt bs, switter is closing, it was announced.Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.
"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".
Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down (https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb7vx/switter-the-twitter-for-sex-workers-is-shutting-down)
It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.
RegulatorD
02-15-22, 16:36
Of course its not as good as the old days, BUT there is still new talent to find, just more drama, scams, fake, on and on. Been on SA for years and I keep a nice stable of talent, a few I've known for years, and to me that's the key, and then every now in the then I zip back on for a month, and EVERYTIME I still find at least 1 or 2 and make it worth my time. If you think now you can just open an account and blast thru 10 girls in a month or whatever, not saying its impossible, but the probability is lower now, then say a few years ago.
Vinnie Kramer
02-15-22, 17:20
The way I ready the actual statement is that only Switter is shutting down.
I'll put the rest in Rants.
Tryst is closing too. Maybe that will help with the automatic $200 price bumps when they post ads there.
"In a statement on Monday, Assembly Foura collective of sex workers and technologists who run Switter, as well as advertising site Tryst would shut down permanently on March 14. ".
Switter, the Twitter for Sex Workers, Is Shutting Down (https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb7vx/switter-the-twitter-for-sex-workers-is-shutting-down)
WanderingAbout
02-16-22, 02:13
It appears that seeking is rebranding as a dating site but I don't see anything different. Everything looks the same as before.Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?19231-Arrangement-Reports
Just FYI there is a good bit of chatter in the Chicago Arrangements forum about Seeking's re-imaging attempt if you want to stroll over there for a look-see and not duplicate post info here. Nothing you don't already know.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?19231-Arrangement-ReportsWhat a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.
MattChavan23
02-17-22, 02:05
What a great opportunity for someone to start a site like the old "SA" would be a gold mine.Guys pussymarket is one othe world's oldest profession and its not going to go anywhere until mankind exists, it will change platforms / avenues / stores as change is always name of this game. In my last 15 years of mongering, I / we have seen several websites come and disappear but market is there and will exist. Where there is demand there will always be supply. Maybe in future, some smart dude (like myself, LOL) will figure out how to use Metaverse or any other verse to feel the tightness of pussy and warmth of mouth virtually before actually pounding and paying for it and will soon become the next American billionaire like Brandon W did,. Platform will change, business will still be there. Keep hunting guys, don't be discouraged and change with changing times.
What other sites are there for sugar babies besides:
WhatsYourPrice.
SecretBefefits.
I used to have success on tinder and ************* but both have so many fake profiles it's not worth the time.
Guys pussymarket is one othe world's oldest profession and its not going to go anywhere until mankind exists, it will change platforms / avenues / stores as change is always name of this game. In my last 15 years of mongering, I / we have seen several websites come and disappear but market is there and will exist. Where there is demand there will always be supply. Maybe in future, some smart dude (like myself, LOL) will figure out how to use Metaverse or any other verse to feel the tightness of pussy and warmth of mouth virtually before actually pounding and paying for it and will soon become the next American billionaire like Brandon W did,. Platform will change, business will still be there. Keep hunting guys, don't be discouraged and change with changing times.
And besides Seeking of course.
Here are some to watch for:
Says her name is Nancy and she lives near Akron.
https://members.seeking.com/member/fafd543e-e7a2-4202-8bfa-310685514131
Says her name is Renee. Number traces to Dawn. No PII. Has a flat tire, no spare, needs $57 to get it fixed. Fairfield.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f190e056-863e-432d-a128-00fc8462d943
Says her name is Taylor. Acts coy but later discloses she lives near Frankfurt but willing to drive to Cincinnati.
https://members.seeking.com/member/dad88ad5-9f8b-4e4a-8127-a89c173ab7a5
On WYP as Favor. Asks $7 dollars for a date. Actually a SCAMMER using pictures of Ivy LeBelle. Tried to get me to book a hotel room and send her the number. Would not videochat first. Lake Tahoe number.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/739YwOLk5gprLdV0GjyENdXv
So far, WYP has refunded me every credit I have spent on multiple scammers. I am not sure their business model is working. However, I am able to play a long time at low cost at this rate. Of course, I am not getting laid, so there's that to consider.
BAM.
WanderingAbout
02-19-22, 15:48
ClassyLover 35 Mixed.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2104d247-d9f3-41f3-91e8-f64decfbc6f4
This is a typical fake Chinese operated profile. These types of listings always have an age in the early to mid 30's. Ethnicity is either Asian or Mixed. Say they are independently wealthy. Own their own business. Trade on side in Crypto or FEx. Almost always are interested in a relationship and not sugaring. Below is the text from this profile. Other than the divorce intro its pretty typical posting for these fake profiles.
I got divorced in 2018 and have been busy with my career since my divorce, I own a company that manufactures medical devices and have invested in the field of cryptocurrency with good results, I love to travel and enjoy good food. I like to travel and enjoy good food. I usually keep a proper exercise at home so that I can stay healthy and energetic, and I often do yoga besides working at home on the computer. I am looking for long term emotional connection here and like mature and sincere gentlemen. We can travel together and enjoy a stress free life.
What other sites are there for sugar babies besides:
WhatsYourPrice.
SecretBefefits.
I used to have success on tinder and ************* but both have so many fake profiles it's not worth the time.Sometimes you can find ladies on Tinder who are also on Seeking.
UnoMas2022
02-19-22, 19:04
Sometimes you can find ladies on Tinder who are also on Seeking.Sugar Daddy Meet has worked for me. I have three Dayton area UTRs from that site. Beware the catfishers and the CashAppers and the fakes, but if you're looking for a non-pro with low expectations it's fishing in a barrel.
ClassyLover 35 Mixed.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2104d247-d9f3-41f3-91e8-f64decfbc6f4
This is a typical fake Chinese operated profile. These types of listings always have an age in the early to mid 30's. Ethnicity is either Asian or Mixed. Say they are independently wealthy. Own their own business. Trade on side in Crypto or FEx. Almost always are interested in a relationship and not sugaring. Below is the text from this profile. Other than the divorce intro its pretty typical posting for these fake profiles.
I got divorced in 2018 and have been busy with my career since my divorce, I own a company that manufactures medical devices and have invested in the field of cryptocurrency with good results, I love to travel and enjoy good food. I like to travel and enjoy good food. I usually keep a proper exercise at home so that I can stay healthy and energetic, and I often do yoga besides working at home on the computer. I am looking for long term emotional connection here and like mature and sincere gentlemen. We can travel together and enjoy a stress free life.There are a lot of dead giveaways beyond this:
1) Girl is whiter than snow in the pic but claims to be "mixed" or Asian.
2) Proliferation of a variation of the same name, I once got faved 7 x all in one evening by various "Heiress" names from all over the country.
3) "I just moved here to _ and its a city 300 miles away but they show as being in Cincy.
4) They seem to all have a maximum height of 4' 11"
My take from a lot of this is that either the scammer bots have gotten really good at making fake profiles or this is part of Seeking's business model just as it was with Ashley Madison.
Todd Cincy
02-20-22, 15:42
There are a lot of dead giveaways beyond this:
1) Girl is whiter than snow in the pic but claims to be "mixed" or Asian.
2) Proliferation of a variation of the same name, I once got faved 7 x all in one evening by various "Heiress" names from all over the country.
3) "I just moved here to _ and its a city 300 miles away but they show as being in Cincy.
4) They seem to all have a maximum height of 4' 11"
My take from a lot of this is that either the scammer bots have gotten really good at making fake profiles or this is part of Seeking's business model just as it was with Ashley Madison.I've noticed a lot of them, too. This seems to be just the latest version of scam on Seeking.
Fortunately, this one is so glaringly obvious, it's easy to recognize. The pics are always staged, and the background never looks like Ohio. The women in the pics have a particular "look" that tends to predominate among commercial models in China.
I love Asian women, but I've long since resigned myself to the fact that there aren't a lot of them in the Cincinnati area, and only a handful of them show up on Seeking. (In 10 years of sugaring, I've met exactly 7 legit Asian women from Seeking; and I actively seek them out.) So when an Asian profile turns up on the site, I give it more than a usual amount of scrutiny.
And if the profile language doesn't sound natural, I immediately hide the profile to get it out of my feed. (The latest raft of fake Chinese profiles all mention bitcoin, LOL.).
I don't think that whoever is behind this is going to gain much from it, and it will likely be short-lived.
WanderingAbout
02-20-22, 17:22
MaeDior is back on SA. Wants 500 ppm. She is into FinDom and Paypigs. Previous reports posted on here of bad temper.
https://members.seeking.com/member/817d8699-00bc-4d31-b07d-09c4f03029bb
AbbyHawaii also back on SA. Also wants 500 ppm. Previous profile pics were fake. The ones posted now are real. Sister of MaeDior.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d38d865d-a1bf-438d-80c2-e095cc658964
Passed on both. Drama and message attitude. YMMV.
WanderingAbout
02-20-22, 20:51
Fake. Says just moved to Chicago. Listing Cincinnati for safety reasons. Won't post a private pic showing who this person is. That private pic would prob be fake too. Just don't bother unless you have time to waste.
https://members.seeking.com/member/9d4fb32e-9e71-4f16-a40d-0bcc42dae9c8
This is an interesting report. Since others have said SDM is a dry hole, can you say more about your process? Perhaps you could post some pictures of your successes? Without giving too much away? In the past, I dismissed reports like yours due to poor personal experience. Now, though, with Seeking at risk of changing its nature, I think it is time to branch out and start exploring how to be successful on other sites. We need backups and alternatives. The need carries mounting weight as Seeking regularly increases its price while decreasing its value. It is hard for me to believe all the other sites are just giving up and abandoning the market completely to Seeking. Especially if Seeking is abandoning the market also.
Thanks much in advance!
BAM.
Sugar Daddy Meet has worked for me. I have three Dayton area UTRs from that site. Beware the catfishers and the CashAppers and the fakes, but if you're looking for a non-pro with low expectations it's fishing in a barrel.
WanderingAbout
02-20-22, 23:16
Something a little different for this forum.
Anyone ever catfish their current Sugar Baby after she tells you she is not seeing anyone else, says she is not on any sugar websites, and you see her active on Seeking or Secret Benefits?
If yes, how did you mess with her? What was the end result?
JackOhLantern
02-21-22, 09:49
This is an interesting report. Since others have said SDM is a dry hole, can you say more about your process? Perhaps you could post some pictures of your successes? Without giving too much away? In the past, I dismissed reports like yours due to poor personal experience. Now, though, with Seeking at risk of changing its nature, I think it is time to branch out and start exploring how to be successful on other sites. We need backups and alternatives. The need carries mounting weight as Seeking regularly increases its price while decreasing its value. It is hard for me to believe all the other sites are just giving up and abandoning the market completely to Seeking. Especially if Seeking is abandoning the market also..The site is terribly painful to navigate, and the number of prospects compared to SA is tiny. Their logo says since 2007 - they should have spent some time and $ working on the site!
LikeMike1963
02-21-22, 12:08
Yuuuuppp. Years ago. Suspected something going on. Using my back up profile on SEEKING I reached out her (yes I paid for 2 profiles at the time) . Used fake pics. Had an additional burner number (I still have 2 burner numbers). Set up a lunch meet. Waited in parking lot until I saw her go in. I had instructed her form the fake profile to wait in the lobby for me. I walked in and said heyyyy. "LacY' . Looking for "Bob" . She said. Wellll guess this is over. I said "YuP'. She left and I had a nice lunch. LOL.
Something a little different for this forum.
Anyone ever catfish their current Sugar Baby after she tells you she is not seeing anyone else, says she is not on any sugar websites, and you see her active on Seeking or Secret Benefits?
If yes, how did you mess with her? What was the end result?
WanderingAbout
02-21-22, 17:00
SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.
Yuuuuppp. Years ago. Suspected something going on. Using my back up profile on SEEKING I reached out her (yes I paid for 2 profiles at the time) . Used fake pics. Had an additional burner number (I still have 2 burner numbers). Set up a lunch meet. Waited in parking lot until I saw her go in. I had instructed her form the fake profile to wait in the lobby for me. I walked in and said heyyyy. "LacY' . Looking for "Bob" . She said. Wellll guess this is over. I said "YuP'. She left and I had a nice lunch. LOL.
Todd Cincy
02-22-22, 07:09
And if you expect otherwise, then you should probably be on eHarmony, and not Seeking.
If you're handing a woman cash to be with you, she's not your girlfriend, plain and simple. Any expectations to the contrary are going to result in heartbreak and disappointment.
I recently took up with a very young, very hot SB whom I *know* is seeing another member of this board. When I asked her if she was already seeing anyone else, she looked me in the eye and said "no".
I find that 98% of the SBs I meet, even if they've been on the site for 2 years, assure me that I am not only their *only* guy at present, I am the only guy they have *ever* gone beyond the MnG stage with.
It's just a part of the game. Just like the many married SDs who withhold that information.
Get this, and get this good: SBs are not girlfriends you pay, SBs are escorts with whom you have a more informal, relaxed relationship.
And escorts, by nature, are communal women, free agents. So are SBs.
SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.That's funny and probably felt pretty good. I just don't have the time or energy for that shit. If it bugged me that she lied, I'd just block her and move on. Let her wonder what happened. It cost you $100 and a few hours of your time for that feeling, when it takes less than an afternoon to just move on to the next one.
And if you expect otherwise, then you should probably be on eHarmony, and not Seeking.
If you're handing a woman cash to be with you, she's not your girlfriend, plain and simple. Any expectations to the contrary are going to result in heartbreak and disappointment.
I recently took up with a very young, very hot SB whom I *know* is seeing another member of this board. When I asked her if she was already seeing anyone else, she looked me in the eye and said "no".
I find that 98% of the SBs I meet, even if they've been on the site for 2 years, assure me that I am not only their *only* guy at present, I am the only guy they have *ever* gone beyond the MnG stage with.
It's just a part of the game. Just like the many married SDs who withhold that information.
Get this, and get this good: SBs are not girlfriends you pay, SBs are escorts with whom you have a more informal, relaxed relationship.
And escorts, by nature, are communal women, free agents. So are SBs.Well said Todd, especially the last two lines. I have a SB that treats me like her boyfriend. She cooks for me, treats me real well, etc. And pursues me more than I pursue her. Nonetheless, I don't know if I am her only SD and I really don't care. The escorts I see are there to give me variety because I get bored with the same SB after awhile.
TroublePlay
02-22-22, 13:10
Well said Todd, especially the last two lines. I have a SB that treats me like her boyfriend. She cooks for me, treats me real well, etc. And pursues me more than I pursue her. Nonetheless, I don't know if I am her only SD and I really don't care. The escorts I see are there to give me variety because I get bored with the same SB after awhile."I get bored with the same SB after awhile. ".
Ain't it the truth. There is an old saying - "Show me a beautiful woman and I'll show you some guy who's tired of fucking her. ".
Or how about this one - "Man has five essential needs: Food, water, sleep, pussy, and strange pussy. ".
Beachesnole02
02-22-22, 13:20
"I get bored with the same SB after awhile. ".
Ain't it the truth. There is an old saying - "Show me a beautiful woman and I'll show you some guy who's tired of fucking her. ".
Or how about this one - "Man has five essential needs: Food, water, sleep, pussy, and strange pussy. ".It is simple, I am addicted to "more". Be it alcohol, money, pussy, adrenilin rushes. Anything that changes how I feel at a particular momemt, I want more.
Anyone else notice that there seems to be a lot more 30+ year olds on the site recently?
MattChavan23
02-22-22, 15:20
SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.IMHO, and no offense to anyone. I actually feel bad for that SB. I feel it was quite an overkill (like a jilted lover taking revenge story). My biggest concern is if the hotel mgmt called uncle LEO, which they do, that chick can get in legal trouble for prostution / trespassing etc. Which IMHO is bad karma and can come back haunting us. What if chick snitches at us or its a trap / sting?
And what did she do wrong she was playing the same game like we all do play everyday. I lie my ass off to SBs all the time, how many posters on here have actually 10 mil income that we all post on SA. Haha. This game is great when it's played at hobby level but can be trouble when it gets to infatuation. I have disagreements all the time and I gave few bad words, block and ghost and " Next please". LOL. That's it.
Guy's this is free country and every man / woman has right to chose the pussy / dicks (or as many pussies / dicks) they desire provided it's consensual and its level playing field ffor all without any discrimination. Lying, is allowed and must be understood. We are not courts / judges etc.
I play this game as quick roller-coaster ride for the thrill and arderline rush that I miss in my regular life. But we should be aware whoever buys the ticket gets to ride as well.
SB promised she was exclusive. Is any SB? Didn't really care one way or the other. Fine to see other SD's. Just don't lie about was only ask. Prime SA account was disabled. Back up profile with catfish info and pic was active. SB popped up on SA. Coughed up the membership fee. Pinged her. Bingo. Replied. She asked for 100 less than what she was getting each week. Wanted discreet. Was open to meeting at hotel downtown. Gave her second burner number. Texted a bit. Set up private meet. Day of meetup told her got room. When she arrived at hotel to text for room number. She did. Gave her a room number. She said coming up. Waited until she text saying she knocked on the door and the guy that answered had no idea who she was or what was going on. Told her oops I transposed the last two digits of the room number. Sent her to another room near the first on same floor and blocked her on burner and main phone. Called hotel main desk from burner. Said there was some girl on my floor knocking on doors looking for a date can you check it out? Dont know what happened next to her. Never talked to her again.Well if you don't care that they see others then why even ask if you already know the answer. This is some major big ego but small d*ck energy. What a waste of time. Kinda seems more like your feelings were hurt. Lmao.
Todd Cincy
02-23-22, 09:34
Anyone else notice that there seems to be a lot more 30+ year olds on the site recently?Yes, I've noticed it.
Part of this, I think, is the aging of the Millennial generation (aka "Generation Why Not?) I had my initial successes on Seeking in the early 2010's. With women born in the 1980's. The oldest members of that cohort are now pushing 40.
By contrast (being a Gen Xer myself), I don't think that Gen X women would have had much interest in Seeking, even if it had been available in the early 1990's, when Gen X was young. Gen X men were far more willing to jump through hoops than their Millennial cohorts ever were. (Some of you older guys will recall 'The Rules' book from circa 1995, which was basically about the hard-to-get femininity of that era.) If Gen X women had been on some 1990's version of Seeking, they would have all wanted $2 K ppms.
The Millennials may have ruined MTV; but they gave us the sugar baby. Bless them for that. That never would have happened under Gen X, IMO.
Also, I suspect that Seeking is trying to market itself in different venues to more mature women. The rebranding seems to be an effort to move beyond college girls looking for a few hundred $ for textbooks.
Although I have no interest in the overweight, worn-out middle age escorts that the guys in the escorts threads constantly rave about, I don't dismiss the 35-year-old woman who is fit and attractive.
The question is: How many attractive 35 year old women are going to be interested in doing PPMs at an affordable rate?
I've found many of the 30-something women to be much easier to engage, but harder to seal the deal with.
TroublePlay
02-23-22, 10:12
You are a Gen Xer? Yes, of course you like the young ones. I always thought your taste in young SBs and young providers was a matter of taste, (and it is, of course.) I am a Baby Boomer so anywhere from 10-25 years older than you.
I have a different perspective in my mid 60's.
Yes, the fit 30 something has reached their sexual peak and are brought to orgasm more easily and more often than the young uns, in my experience. If fit, they are still hot enough. And they have significant more experience and are hornier than their younger counterparts. Again, my experience, perhaps not yours.
I had an SB who was 30 who was doing ppms. Very hot and horny. Great in bed. I dumped her after the second time she ghosted me and I was out a hotel room. I thought we would likely get back together but she moved to Florida.
Don't get me wrong, I still love a hot 25 year old. Just love the 30 somethings a bit more.
Yes, I've noticed it.
Part of this, I think, is the aging of the Millennial generation (aka "Generation Why Not?) I had my initial successes on Seeking in the early 2010's. With women born in the 1980's. The oldest members of that cohort are now pushing 40.
By contrast (being a Gen Xer myself), I don't think that Gen X women would have had much interest in Seeking, even if it had been available in the early 1990's, when Gen X was young. Gen X men were far more willing to jump through hoops than their Millennial cohorts ever were. (Some of you older guys will recall 'The Rules' book from circa 1995, which was basically about the hard-to-get femininity of that era.) If Gen X women had been on some 1990's version of Seeking, they would have all wanted $2 K ppms.
The Millennials may have ruined MTV; but they gave us the sugar baby. Bless them for that. That never would have happened under Gen X, IMO.
Also, I suspect that Seeking is trying to market itself in different venues to more mature women. The rebranding seems to be an effort to move beyond college girls looking for a few hundred $ for textbooks.
Although I have no interest in the overweight, worn-out middle age escorts that the guys in the escorts threads constantly rave about, I don't dismiss the 35-year-old woman who is fit and attractive.
The question is: How many attractive 35 year old women are going to be interested in doing PPMs at an affordable rate?
I've found many of the 30-something women to be much easier to engage, but harder to seal the deal with.
Todd Cincy
02-23-22, 11:18
I'll officially enter my mid-50's this years, so yes, about 10 years young than you.
I meet plenty of 30-something women in real life who are attractive enough. The problem is that the average 35-year-old escort is a lot rougher than the 35-year-old trophy wife that you meet in Hyde Park, Kenwood, or Anderson Township.
I don't mess much with the very young ones (18 to 20), as I agree they're often more trouble than they're worth. For me, the range is from 21 to 32, with 22 to 26 being the sweet spot.
You are a Gen Xer? Yes, of course you like the young ones. I always thought your taste in young SBs and young providers was a matter of taste, (and it is, of course.) I am a Baby Boomer so anywhere from 10-25 years older than you.
I have a different perspective in my mid 60's.
Yes, the fit 30 something has reached their sexual peak and are brought to orgasm more easily and more often than the young uns, in my experience. If fit, they are still hot enough. And they have significant more experience and are hornier than their younger counterparts. Again, my experience, perhaps not yours.
I had an SB who was 30 who was doing ppms. Very hot and horny. Great in bed. I dumped her after the second time she ghosted me and I was out a hotel room. I thought we would likely get back together but she moved to Florida.
Don't get me wrong, I still love a hot 25 year old. Just love the 30 somethings a bit more.
JackOhLantern
02-23-22, 12:33
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/efbb39ac-8bbf-4926-ba68-3f5f8ebf98fb
Wanted to do a dinner mng with a friend along so she felt safe, didn't ask for a fee for that. Said she was open to more if she felt comfortable. Then, the texts start coming about how her car got hit, rent was due, yada yada yada. You know the rest.
That's a problem with the 30-somethings, they ask for way too much money. They usually upsell with their pictures and in this area of the country, they have kids. I've found a few where it was more about being taken out and having good conversation and good sex.
I've talked with 30-somethings in the past and some use Seeking because it costs the guys $100+/ month so they know they have some money to spend. Less drama to deal with than sites like POF and OkCupid. I will be curious as more women come to Seeking to date. Will PPM not be brought up anymore since they will in many cases think of that as prostitution? (when they sign up now it says to never discuss PPM) I am trying to figure out the new angle to use in the future.
Yes, I've noticed it.
Part of this, I think, is the aging of the Millennial generation (aka "Generation Why Not?) I had my initial successes on Seeking in the early 2010's. With women born in the 1980's. The oldest members of that cohort are now pushing 40.
By contrast (being a Gen Xer myself), I don't think that Gen X women would have had much interest in Seeking, even if it had been available in the early 1990's, when Gen X was young. Gen X men were far more willing to jump through hoops than their Millennial cohorts ever were. (Some of you older guys will recall 'The Rules' book from circa 1995, which was basically about the hard-to-get femininity of that era.) If Gen X women had been on some 1990's version of Seeking, they would have all wanted $2 K ppms.
The Millennials may have ruined MTV; but they gave us the sugar baby. Bless them for that. That never would have happened under Gen X, IMO.
Also, I suspect that Seeking is trying to market itself in different venues to more mature women. The rebranding seems to be an effort to move beyond college girls looking for a few hundred $ for textbooks.
Although I have no interest in the overweight, worn-out middle age escorts that the guys in the escorts threads constantly rave about, I don't dismiss the 35-year-old woman who is fit and attractive.
She was easier on me. Just sent me a message saying "I don't do sex for money. " Thanks for letting me know!
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/efbb39ac-8bbf-4926-ba68-3f5f8ebf98fb
Wanted to do a dinner mng with a friend along so she felt safe, didn't ask for a fee for that. Said she was open to more if she felt comfortable. Then, the texts start coming about how her car got hit, rent was due, yada yada yada. You know the rest.
Talks a good game until you get off site. Then she can never meet. Eventually sent me the following:
"For one don't get smart with me! Have a great night now I have most definitely changed my mind I don't do disrespect ass men and I also have been really sick so goodbye".
Poor girl is obviously feeling under the weather. Cut her some slack guys!
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/244c85ff-d761-4de1-ba8c-89fa12641b01
SixtyNineX10
02-24-22, 14:09
Just wondering if anyone has partaken? A little skinny for me, but that's better than the alternative.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2d7a5818-87d3-4c1c-b16f-e9f1329bbf4a
This is an odd profile. She has been on the site for almost two years now. She comes and goes. Originally she said she never meets. Then she accepted an offer but immediately ghosted. More recently, she accepted a re-approach but then ghosted again. About four days ago came back asking me if I could meet the following day. I gave her a six hour window and she picked a time. Since then she has ghosted again. I like her pictures but it feels like she is engaged in some kind of game. Another member reported seeing last year in the spring. At that time, she was no longer slim meaning her pictures are old. She was still solid. He saw her twice then she ghosted him.
BAM.
Just wondering if anyone has partaken? A little skinny for me, but that's better than the alternative.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2d7a5818-87d3-4c1c-b16f-e9f1329bbf4a
SixtyNineX10
02-25-22, 10:54
Sounds like the typical SB. LOL. And if she has some meat on her bones now, that works for me. I will report if I make any progress with her. Thanks.
This one has been stringing me along for a long time but never able to get her to a meeting. Given her profile design, I just assumed she was a scammer but she keeps popping back up to chat and never engages in any typical scammer behavior. Has anyone else interacted with her or even met her?
Bam.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
Hot looking pictures. She claims to work 76-100 hours a week. I've done hours like that and they are impossible to sustain for more than a week or two. Accepted and offer from me but asked for a down payment prior to any public meeting. I have demurred. Anyone else chatting with her?
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/bbae3b23-afe4-480f-ac41-0e578a349d8e
UnoMas2022
02-26-22, 05:58
This is an interesting report. Since others have said SDM is a dry hole, can you say more about your process? Perhaps you could post some pictures of your successes? Without giving too much away? In the past, I dismissed reports like yours due to poor personal experience. Now, though, with Seeking at risk of changing its nature, I think it is time to branch out and start exploring how to be successful on other sites. We need backups and alternatives. The need carries mounting weight as Seeking regularly increases its price while decreasing its value. It is hard for me to believe all the other sites are just giving up and abandoning the market completely to Seeking. Especially if Seeking is abandoning the market also.
Thanks much in advance!
BAM.I have a premium membership with SDM, it was worth it. It's still way cheaper than the other sites and it's not pay-per-interaction, it's all unlimited.
Process involves:
1. Making an interesting profile. CHOOSE A USERNAME THAT YOU HAVE NEVER USED ANYWHERE ELSE!! That is important because if you google a username, the other places you have used it may come up. If you google my USASG handle, all my posts come up, for instance. My SDM profile photo does not show my face, I put an emoji over it. My profile also has Private Photos, so if I get an interested girl that I want to share my face picture with, I can click "Share Private Photo" and she alone can see the hidden photos then.
2. Waiting for the Likes and Winks to come in. SDM does not have any bots that spam likes or messages yet, it's all genuine interactions.
3. Looking at the list of incoming interactions and picking the ones that seem my type. I have been on SDM for one month now, and I have message history with about 400 women. Out of those 400, I have had phone or text conversations with about 75 and developed 8 into real, physical casual relationships / part-time SBs. I tell them that I only am looking for occasional meetups, like every couple of weeks. They love that idea. I usually pay between 60 and 200 dollars per meet, plus meals, hotel and any expenses and we usually hang out for 6-12 hours and fuck at least once.
4. Clicking on Like for the ones that seem interesting and then messaging them.
- 4 a. DO NOT USE YOUR PERSONAL CELL PHONE NUMBER FOR ANYTHING, EVER! Use a texting app like Google Voice. You cannot protect yourself enough these days.
- 4 b. My first message through SDM always has a compliment, my phone number and a request for them to text me. That moves the conversation off of the site and gives me a lot more control. It's also possible to just call them *67 (caller I'd block) and voice verify that they are female if I need to, once I have their number. Sorts out all the catfish and the scammers. I had one catfish in Dayton that was supposedly an 18 yo Latina. It was her brother, actually.
5. Starting a friendly text conversation and asking them about their day, their work, their likes and what their home situation is. I've had everything from 18 year olds living at home who don't have a job to a 28 year old military wife with two kids who wanted to cheat on her Navy husband who has been deployed for more than 10 months. I do not sleep with cheaters so I turned her down. It is a total mixed bag of who you'll meet.
6. In that text conversation, ask them if they have found a good sugar daddy yet.
- 6 a. Some have already had them in the past, so ask for details about their past arrangements and what the benefits were, then ask if they had a physical aspect to their arrangement and that that is what you are looking for.
- 6 b. If they are new to the game, you can emphasize that you would have looked for a woman on a traditional dating site, but that your circumstances, work schedule or whatever have been a killer for romance.
Either way, emphasize that you are looking for a casual relationship, or a friends with benefits type relationship. This sorts out all the picture senders, the long-distance girls, the fakes and the "platonic only" shit. Honestly, what woman signs up to a Sugar Baby service and then expects to avoid fucking the guys? Anyway, I digress. Offering "friends with benefits" is a good way to avoid making it a negotiation up front. Hell, the girl might even forget to ask for help and just end up wanting to hang out for the fun of it. That happened to me with a very sweet plus-sized Latina, she was just horny and wanted to get a guy to sleep with, regardless of support.
7. NEVER send any money in advance, unless you are forcing it on them as a way to create an obligation. I always say that I do not send electronic payments because they are all tracked and reported, and it would create a potential tax liability for the recipient in the future. I say "no good SD ever sends electronic payments, the IRS can come back later and ask you to pay tax on it". This puts it clearly into a cash-only mode.
8. Always offer to do a meet-and-greet for free at a nice restaurant. Don't splurge at this point, pick something where you have $15-20 entrees and don't order any drinks. Pay for everything. As a surprise, offer to cover her fuel costs at the end of the meal, always make it a $20 bill even if she says no. Treat her like a rich boyfriend, that's the goal here anyway. If she won't offer to meet for free, she's not worth working with. She can go be a ho or an escort for all I care, this type of thing is different, I'm looking for real girls who are non-pros.
9. At the meet-and-greet, ask a ton of questions, and offer very little about yourself. You want her to remain curious about you. Ask what she likes to do in the bedroom, if you have privacy. If not, don't be a creep. Ask later.
10. Have a hotel in mind if the meet-and-greet goes really well. Only if it goes well and she's attracted to you, ask what she has to do after this. Always make sure to get a 2-queen or a 2-double room. That's a good tool to mention, so she can sleep in peace, haha. DON'T GET A MOTEL, get a hotel. You're a rich boyfriend, remember? No brands with a number or a color in them, ok? Go for a Marriott or a Hilton or something.
- 10 a. If she can drink (over 21), offer to go out somewhere for drinks. If she says yes, tell her that to avoid any buzzed driving or drunk driving, you have a room nearby where you can sleep it off or just chill afterward.
- 10 b. If she's not old enough to drink in public, ask her if she likes to drink. If she says yes, tell her that to avoid any issues, you have a room nearby where you can drink in private. We can crash afterward.
11. Always offer to continue the conversation later, if she seems in anyway uncomfortable. If you have a bad vibe about you, she won't put out. Actually, she may try to film you, take your photo or call her friends. Be a nice dude, okay? This site is for Casanovas, not Zeus's.
12. At the meet-and-greet, discuss what you can offer her to support her situation. It's not all about the money. If she thinks it is, don't pursue her. SDs can offer support, advice, mentorship, loans, practical help and lots of other important manly or fatherly roles. This is a relationship with give and take and at the end of it, a friendship, really. Friends taking care of friends.
13. Have fun with your new SB. Take her dancing, to a movie, to a park, to a show, to the museum. If she's shy, offer to meet a hotel and just go to the pool or spa. Get a couples massage somewhere. Don't be 100% about sex, and she'll put out way more when you do have fun.
I may have missed some stuff, but that's my process. I'm enjoying the fruits of my labors not only in Dayton but in a few other places where my work takes me.
Big Pussy Sal
02-26-22, 12:58
Noob here. SDM is the sugardaddymeet or the sugardaddymatch app??
WanderingAbout
02-26-22, 13:10
Noob here. SDM is the sugardaddymeet or the sugardaddymatch app??SDM is Sugar Daddy Meet in regards to discussion you are asking about. See post #6312 in this thread.
RockaBillyRiot
02-26-22, 14:59
I don't understand the complaints. Nearly 10 years on, whenever I buy a subscription to SA I find several hot 18 to 30 year olds who are willing to make a dream come true for $$ to $$.
JackOhLantern
02-26-22, 16:17
https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97
I've been seeing her off and on for a couple of years. She's actually 20, not 24. Most spectacular ass I've ever had the pleasure of experiencing. She's really attractive and cool. Highly recommend.
UnoMas2022
02-26-22, 23:58
https://members.seeking.com/member/5db8d072-1b84-414a-9a43-32c88abd3d97
I've been seeing her off and on for a couple of years. She's actually 20, not 24. Most spectacular ass I've ever had the pleasure of experiencing. She's really attractive and cool. Highly recommend.Standing arrangement weekly or ppm? Can you share the damage? Don't want to start a bidding war haha.
Thanks for the great info! Are those all the girls you have met in person?
I have a premium membership with SDM, it was worth it. It's still way cheaper than the other sites and it's not pay-per-interaction, it's all unlimited.
Process involves:
1. Making an interesting profile. CHOOSE A USERNAME THAT YOU HAVE NEVER USED ANYWHERE ELSE!! That is important because if you google a username, the other places you have used it may come up. If you google my USASG handle, all my posts come up, for instance. My SDM profile photo does not show my face, I put an emoji over it. My profile also has Private Photos, so if I get an interested girl that I want to share my face picture with, I can click "Share Private Photo" and she alone can see the hidden photos then.
I may have missed some stuff, but that's my process. I'm enjoying the fruits of my labors not only in Dayton but in a few other places where my work takes me.
RegulatorD
02-27-22, 09:15
I don't understand the complaints. Nearly 10 years on, whenever I buy a subscription to SA I find several hot 18 to 30 year olds who are willing to make a dream come true for $$ to $$.Preach the SA word to the flock.
JackOhLantern
02-27-22, 12:50
Standing arrangement weekly or ppm? Can you share the damage? Don't want to start a bidding war haha.Ppm - 400.
UnoMas2022
02-27-22, 15:12
Thanks for the great info! Are those all the girls you have met in person?Yes those are my current part-time SBs. I put them all on part-time so that I can rotate through them. Some are in Ohio and others are in other states, where I have to go for work.
Thanks for the detailed response. Those tips are probably applicable to any site. However, there were a few insights I had not considered. You may regret being so forthcoming if a ton of guys from here now flood the site and worsen your odds. In any case, well done and happy hunting!
BAM.
I have a premium membership with SDM, it was worth it. It's still way cheaper than the other sites and it's not pay-per-interaction, it's all unlimited.
Process involves:
1. Making an interesting profile. CHOOSE A USERNAME THAT YOU HAVE NEVER USED ANYWHERE ELSE!! That is important because if you google a username, the other places you have used it may come up. If you google my USASG handle, all my posts come up, for instance. My SDM profile photo does not show my face, I put an emoji over it. My profile also has Private Photos, so if I get an interested girl that I want to share my face picture with, I can click "Share Private Photo" and she alone can see the hidden photos then.
2. Waiting for the Likes and Winks to come in. SDM does not have any bots that spam likes or messages yet, it's all genuine interactions.
TheWolverineJP
02-28-22, 13:05
She strung me along as well. Messaging here and there but never finishing a conversation or committing to meet. I finally called her out on it and she asked me why I thought that. LOL.
This one has been stringing me along for a long time but never able to get her to a meeting. Given her profile design, I just assumed she was a scammer but she keeps popping back up to chat and never engages in any typical scammer behavior. Has anyone else interacted with her or even met her?
Bam.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
It seems like Seeking has way more volume than SugarDaddyMeet unfortunately. There are usually only 1-3 girls online most of the time for 50 miles around Cincy on SDM (and the same girls). Seeking has around 50 girls online as of late.
JackOhLantern
02-28-22, 16:44
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5d86790-75e2-42d7-a48d-63b66625e5e6
Straight to kik or snapchat, wants to start by selling content.
JackOhLantern
03-01-22, 16:50
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5d86790-75e2-42d7-a48d-63b66625e5e6
Straight to kik or snapchat, wants to start by selling content.Same nonsense:
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f51b6d1-739b-43d5-a4a8-af392056f817
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5d86790-75e2-42d7-a48d-63b66625e5e6
Straight to kik or snapchat, wants to start by selling content.I had the same experience with her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/988507d1-6bc0-42a2-8786-8446c0795691
If you want to have fun this one completely flips out at anything remotely hinting as "transactional".
Cincyfunguy
03-02-22, 21:43
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5d86790-75e2-42d7-a48d-63b66625e5e6
Straight to kik or snapchat, wants to start by selling content.Yep, same experience, adding that she promises it could lead to meeting and potentially something more. Yeah right, oldest trick in the book.
Tickle Jay
03-03-22, 07:18
On SA first contact wants Venmo for video chat.
WanderingAbout
03-03-22, 17:29
The number of contacts from Ukrainian SB profiles has seemingly up-ticked now surpassing the volume of inbox messages from Valenzuela and the fake asian profiles.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c70a8a55-a449-4a1d-9b41-d54a6b5c99f0
https://members.seeking.com/member/2b93ce90-af24-49c9-b3f4-dcd1747a1462
I do not usually do a data dump on info but activity has been hot and heavy lately. I noticed lots of 30-40-50 year old women signing up. I don't want them to feel neglected so I am chatting them up on an AM basis I. E. no allowance hookups. The others were time-wasters for me. YMMV and, if it does, I would love*to know how you did it and how it went. Please comment if you know them. As always, PII when found is available to contributing seniors only.
Jamie is DynamicRocker, 3 strikes: doughy, dull and Nando1. Just don't.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d7c846a1-c1a7-4c1b-9bab-ca569b83065e
Princess4 youDaddy, dtf, 300 ppm, will host, BBW when the clothes come off, big mistake on my part, one and done.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a2a205e2-c693-465f-b4a2-87c65f5c98ca
Theearthdragon, thicker than pics, not sure what she wants, not dtf but hints, cannot host, smart but pretty arrogant, suggesting no allowance hookup but no success. Yet.
https://members.seeking.com/member/8831d0d9-4b62-416f-95e0-c63c82c2d73b
Angelbaby669, pics are misleading but she is cute, will meet for token amount but is a rinser who also is promoting her OF site. No sex but promises maybe, says she lives in a schoolbus she is modifying, not so: I have her PII and that of her SO who is also on her OF, when I called her on teasing, she blocked my number but not my profile, no car always has her SO/BF drive her. he will wait in the car. I talked to him. I think he is pushing her to do the deed but she resists. She sometimes dances at Cheeks on the weekend, he drives her there and back.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e5b4ccba-a23a-4f1c-ab38-63cf58d92aba
Princesslex02, will meet but no sex, lots of different excuses but seems to have no problem on her OF feed, pics are accurate but flat as a board, not really a student but hustling as a waitress, dancer, OF performer, etc. Live in BF, no family anywhere around here, smart, some PII available.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f1caf691-42d3-48c6-ae11-438e2b77472a
Sweetestbaby22 Caroline, matches pics, wants $$ to meet or videochat, not serious.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0755df8c-447e-4d85-99db-f5cf6c1cf3ed
Persephone: No sex dating HOT private pic.
https://members.seeking.com/member/559c37a4-66ec-43c6-b487-ed1e22d459dc#x.
Blonde_babe, on site since 2017 but never meets, will videochat, not as hot in person, no sex, needs to get to know you, etc, also Nando1, in Oxford.
https://members.seeking.com/member/676ddc35-fdda-4b3f-8d6f-4dca6f43a891
Anyone having better success?
BAM.
JackOhLantern
03-03-22, 23:07
https://members.seeking.com/member/7281e8ff-c784-449b-9232-4caa9306c554
"I seek for NSA FWB SD but I will love to start by sharing my nudes for just little $."
I got the same message this morning. She is gone. She got the nuke treatment for some reason. Even her messages are gone.
Bam.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7281e8ff-c784-449b-9232-4caa9306c554
"I seek for NSA FWB SD but I will love to start by sharing my nudes for just little $."
Another odd profile. Poor English gave the impression of a scammer but she has been on since 10-18. Ignored my initial approach and an allowance offer until a few days ago. Answered with "I am too busy for all that. " I asked her what kind of arrangement would for her. She answered with "Well I do zero intimacy. A really chill laid back one. Someone that's not needy Bc I'm busy. " For a busy woman, she spends a lot of time on the site.
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ba9dd211-f401-4dc3-a3bf-33a7f18c68c9
JackOhLantern
03-07-22, 17:28
https://members.seeking.com/member/27a55993-cc96-4e0a-b560-516540155e65
Any intel? First message was that she wants to get together tonight. Always makes me a little skeptical.
WanderingAbout
03-07-22, 21:45
Queen20 has had a profile on Seeking since June 2021. Just recently appeared amongst the Cincinnati listings. Maybe she is new to this area. Don't know. You can add this info to your skeptic bucket if you want or not. YMMV.
https://members.seeking.com/member/27a55993-cc96-4e0a-b560-516540155e65 Any intel? First message was that she wants to get together tonight. Always makes me a little skeptical.
I would also be skeptical of such a message. First, it's feels like a pro move which is not what I seek. Second, if it's not a pro, it's a scammer. Third, if it's not a pro or a scammer, it's someone who is desperate which always means drama. Three strikes. However, in fairness, my notes show I did chat with her about 7-8 months ago. I also sent a re-approach about four months ago. That means she has been in our area from the beginning of her profile. She apparently is not a regular visitor.
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/27a55993-cc96-4e0a-b560-516540155e65
Any intel? First message was that she wants to get together tonight. Always makes me a little skeptical.
I have adopted a work process that allows me to capture my scammer and time-waster results as they occur. Since I have the time to work through lot of profiles at a time, I am happy to share my results as a community service. Does this make me a vigilante and this a Committee of Vigilance?
HotMermaid, flirted with me asked me to go offsite. Gave my GV number. She said no and proposed What'sApp or Telegram. I offered help to get an anonymous GV or TN app. I even suggested using a VPN. I suggested. Short video chat on the site. She blocked me before I could capture a link to her profile.
FemineCollege, wants online only, claims to have friend who has an arrangement with no sex. Seems real and nice but no sex. May learn to promise more than she will deliver.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4eb1a71e-434b-4b65-beba-78ce029093af
HazelLyze34/44, agrees to meet but cancels at the last minute, happened twice to me with loud apologies. AM (no allowance) candidate only. Moving on.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7a5cf319-36b7-4590-81bd-6d61e694dc94
Blonde4ThBeatles, since 7-20, told me she is only on Seeking to find a husband. "I am not a prostitute I want a husband" Hot pictures keep me checking.
https://members.seeking.com/member/bfedb50f-21d8-4dce-806f-867ec10bbe92
Curiosityincinci: On the site since 11-16. I have made several passes at her and she sometimes answers but more often not. I have some of her PII. Has anyone else gotten her to engage?
https://members.seeking.com/member/5252e601-9754-49c9-ba26-a621742ce09c
Luisa, taking me directly to text, using two numbers, claims her name is Angela. Was all ready to go until I suggested a 5 minute video chat on seeking. Shut me down after that. The scammers seem to know a VC is a sign they have been made. He is using pictures from porn star Jane Wilde: https://www.twpornstars.com/p/32601355 Shares additional pics of her by text. We never got to the money request.
https://members.seeking.com/member/37e030ef-2439-4b58-b260-fb830427f09e
Urlittledolll has been reported on before, very mixed comments. Turned me down saying she never sees married guys. Can that be true? I have some PII for contributing seniors.
https://members.seeking.com/member/07f7eda3-9595-40ab-b85d-038fc170efa2
Stormi J, on the site since 2-26-20, Tried multiple approaches, no joy. Wants $650/ meet.
https://members.seeking.com/member/84846173-8364-434d-a301-23c88fe6e1df
Has anybody had any different results?
BAM.
JackOhLantern
03-08-22, 00:27
I have adopted a work process that allows me to capture my scammer and time-waster results as they occur. Since I have the time to work through lot of profiles at a time, I am happy to share my results as a community service. Does this make me a vigilante and this a Committee of Vigilance?
HotMermaid, flirted with me asked me to go offsite. Gave my GV number. She said no and proposed What'sApp or Telegram. I offered help to get an anonymous GV or TN app. I even suggested using a VPN. I suggested. Short video chat on the site. She blocked me before I could capture a link to her profile.
FemineCollege, wants online only, claims to have friend who has an arrangement with no sex. Seems real and nice but no sex. May learn to promise more than she will deliver.I apparently saw Stormi J at some point, because she messaged me a few months ago asking if I'd like to see her again. A: If I don't remember her, it must not have been anything to write home about. B: No way in hell I paid 650.400 max.
WanderingAbout
03-08-22, 15:15
LadyStarlight has been on SA before under different names. Asking 500 ppm. Plump Asian. Pic below. Lives in West Chester area. Passed on meeting.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5f2757d1-7685-4a20-a505-91261118ef44
Littlesweetheart pops on and off SA. Keeps messaging online not offline. But goes no further. She is 8 months prego now so profile pics are the before.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f49f92d-8245-4a35-83f0-13537459bffb
Kattt777 400 ppm DTF. Very pretty. Big ass if you like that. She was on SA in past and was doing doubles with a friend.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9131a0d6fa4203d5
NataliaL985 500 ppm DTF Submissive Pics are real Can't host
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/67114615488ffb54
0LOVEGIRL0 wants no less than 1600 per month. Open minded. Communication offline sucks.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/5a2c06efa4053de8
Prettybrat123 400 ppm. Doesn't have to be discreet. Waitress at a popular restaurant. DTF after a date or two.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/e73ee427891b375f
SpicyMarg platonic. Expensive just to talk. Not worth your time.
https://members.seeking.com/member/bb174a2e-2de2-4092-ad82-2cb5a55f4178
Persephone platonic. Another pay me to talk to me girl. Not worth your time.
https://members.seeking.com/member/559c37a4-66ec-43c6-b487-ed1e22d459dc
Joycek08 platonic. And yet another pay me to talk to me girl. Not worth your time. She is on SA too.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9646a642a35f4c89
RegulatorD
03-09-22, 08:17
https://members.seeking.com/member/c2e778ad-ebe8-4a2d-be05-4af9cf156c01
This one has been on the site for awhile it appears, anyone have any info, I can't tell if she has a fat stomach or not. LOL, thanks in advance.
There are some warning signs with her. This profile started in 10-21 and she says she had an earlier one. She claims to have deleted the old one but they all say that after they get banned. She just popped up in our area with highly distinctive pictures. The number of pics suggests not a foreign scammer; they don't put that much effort into a profile. However, she says she is an "Entertainer" which is often a euphemism for stripper. Hair extensions and many tattoos all hint at a ghetto attitude. Ask her to video chat and if all goes well maybe you can get her to stand up and show her figure. Good luck!
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c2e778ad-ebe8-4a2d-be05-4af9cf156c01
This one has been on the site for awhile it appears, anyone have any info, I can't tell if she has a fat stomach or not. LOL, thanks in advance.
I am sure this has been asked many times here but at the risk of being asked to use the search option just want to know what's more effective SB or SA?
SB.
10 credits for each conversation which roughly means 6 $ gets me to start conversation with 10 babies. Now even if the hit-miss ratio is 1:10, I don't mid these odds. Especially if I can meet a UTR.
SA.
4 $ a day (for a month). Assuming I meet at least 2 decent UTRs this is not bad (if I cancel my auto renewal).
Any guidance will be really great.
JackOhLantern
03-09-22, 22:36
I am sure this has been asked many times here but at the risk of being asked to use the search option just want to know what's more effective SB or SA?
SB.
10 credits for each conversation which roughly means 6 $ gets me to start conversation with 10 babies. Now even if the hit-miss ratio is 1:10, I don't mid these odds. Especially if I can meet a UTR.
SA.
4 $ a day (for a month). Assuming I meet at least 2 decent UTRs this is not bad (if I cancel my auto renewal).
Any guidance will be really great.I haven't met one person from SB. Most of them aren't real. I've met a shit ton from SA. Case closed.
WanderingAbout
03-09-22, 23:25
SA wins. One flat rate per month. Unlimited messaging locally, nationally, internationally, No upselling. No nickel and dimming you out of credits to boost a message, to see a private picture, to see if a message is read. And yes, more information is available to you by using search.
I am sure this has been asked many times here but at the risk of being asked to use the search option just want to know what's more effective SB or SA? Any guidance will be really great.
Kyfordboy85
03-10-22, 15:23
There are some warning signs with her. This profile started in 10-21 and she says she had an earlier one. She claims to have deleted the old one but they all say that after they get banned. She just popped up in our area with highly distinctive pictures. The number of pics suggests not a foreign scammer; they don't put that much effort into a profile. However, she says she is an "Entertainer" which is often a euphemism for stripper. Hair extensions and many tattoos all hint at a ghetto attitude. Ask her to video chat and if all goes well maybe you can get her to stand up and show her figure. Good luck!
BAM.I can confirm she's legit met her Tuesday in the nky area she was easy to communicate with covered in tats and pierced all over was a very good time.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e4002c74-4939-4ce4-b09b-d8fddf3d92a2
Anyone have information to share on her? I've been chatting with her but I'm getting a scammer vibe.
IsitinGood
03-11-22, 09:48
I started with USA classifieds but didn't like the quality so loved to p411 and Eros. Now the quality there is pushing and exceeding four digits. Fortunately the smart ones on here have this thread chocked full of info so I will be a sugar daddy soon! One I am still fuzzy on some of the abbreviations, BAM and PII?
https://members.seeking.com/member/e4002c74-4939-4ce4-b09b-d8fddf3d92a2
Anyone have information to share on her? I've been chatting with her but I'm getting a scammer vibe.I had a hotel meet scheduled but she ran into family problems so asked to delay the time to an hour that didn't work for me. After rescheduling for the next day she was insistent that the hotel needed to be right by her. Then stated she'd offered me a big discount (3 from 5) and it wasn't worth her time if she had to drive (I hate overpaying for hotels and always use the hot deal or Priceline one of 3 and wouldn't budge from doing it my way).
Our conversations were all pleasant, even the dismissive one. I think she's had a tough life from what she told me and I was actually out nothing but conversation time so no damage done.
In a way I was actually glad. She looks good but I'm an eye person and I felt something was off there, plus the straight to hotel.
But she was never anything but pleasant and I wouldn't let my assessment hold you back.
Pleasuresallmine has me blocked which either means attitude or scammer. Proceed with caution.
I am texting with five separate POTs who are all 19 or claiming to be older but are actually 19: Jasminared, arixxanna, PrettyLove, abby34 abby and abgirly1205. They all claim to be dtf and at a normal rate. I normally prefer older but they were easy to engage. I have PII on most of them. Something doesn't feel right. Most women in the under 21 cohort are all nervous about sex. Some of these are nonchalant about it. Almost pro feel. I welcome any comments.
Below is my list of scammers and time-wasters:
LusciousRunner, made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Very odd communications. Either a scammer or an attitude problem.
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd4
ClassyDancer, repeat profile? Or just a different scammer using the same stolen pics? In any case, these are pictures of IG model, Morgan Avery. Scamfu is weak with this one.
https://members.seeking.com/member/35e1ed3d-86cc-4ccb-8ef5-31c382db20a4
Abgirly1205, Abigail, goes to school an hour away from Cinti, says she lives here and commutes there, not sure about sex, wants 400/ wk for chatting, IG shows pics in Cinti.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ea28286e-365a-4e63-bf8b-a2ba293253e3
PrettyLove is Maddie. Accepted my offer and agreed to shift to text. Okay with intimacy after the first several meetings, When I said, fine but no allowance until we go private, she ghosted. No full body pics. UD, roommate, no car.
https://members.seeking.com/member/462860df-4c7c-4723-8b4a-aa9db3691119
Diamonte_1111, Another online only wannabe. Claims to attend college in New York. Saw the Callikoa videos. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ab2891b4-227f-46c5-b518-b0238e6c660d
Headgiver2000, this is her second profile, taking me straight to snap (where we are already friends from her 1st profile.) I don't recall if we ever interacted on snap. If she had tried to push a premium I would have just deleted her. I don't think we ever got that far. Is anyone else chatting with her?
https://members.seeking.com/member/4a9f9829-fe26-4467-9a9b-fa9c7fd70c8d
Hayley is Sugaree73,25/26, Cinti, athletic / avg+, 5'0", 5'1", Hispanic, repeat profile!, agreed 300-400/ wk," voip Hamilton,* 513-912-* * * *(8236).
Had a baby 2-8-22. Has custody of 2 siblings, in a hotel in Sharonville.
"No sex unless I feel like I can trust you and know I'm not getting fooled. And I don't jump straight into that to begin with really. And I'd like to wait a few months anyways after having my son. " Also on SB with better pics:
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/8378bed5e26aafc4;
https://members.seeking.com/member/a0f18713-4f0b-4b74-8d53-e98b58239a60
SurprisedBelle, using the same number as former nikkiluxe (banned) Led with his number, voip,*.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ccdcb2ef-760e-4c64-8726-15731e94ec17
That's it for now.
BAM
WanderingAbout
03-12-22, 09:36
Cc855, who stands 5'10", which is pretty tall for a girl, looks to be pant packing something. Profile doesn't say Trans. Not going to spend credits to find out. Pic below. Could be wrong.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/c2da8478e8c7c734
Joycek08 is platonic, time waster, wants M&G money. Don't waste your credits on talking to her or replying to her spam messages. She has been on SA too. Same deal there.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/9646a642a35f4c89
LatinaLuz has moved over to SB. Must have run thru the SD market on SA LOL. She's been on SA a long time under various names. Not worth the price of admission which is steep.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/887c83a31ef1a746
Lexxi513 has big attitude. Also has been on SA. Wants $500 for allowance gift.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/e29d7733ffbc6361
She is on both SA and Tryst. If you decide to see her, do not offer more than her 200/ ppm rate on Tryst.
BAM.
https://tryst.link/escort/alexaluv22
https://members.seeking.com/member/9c3f1bd0-6646-416b-83a8-22c47902ac9e
Pleasuresallmine has me blocked which either means attitude or scammer. Proceed with caution.
I am texting with five separate POTs who are all 19 or claiming to be older but are actually 19: Jasminared, arixxanna, PrettyLove, abby34 abby and abgirly1205. They all claim to be dtf and at a normal rate. I normally prefer older but they were easy to engage. I have PII on most of them. Something doesn't feel right. Most women in the under 21 cohort are all nervous about sex. Some of these are nonchalant about it. Almost pro feel. I welcome any comments.
Below is my list of scammers and time-wasters:
LusciousRunner, made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Very odd communications. Either a scammer or an attitude problem.
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd4
ClassyDancer, repeat profile? Or just a different scammer using the same stolen pics? In any case, these are pictures of IG model, Morgan Avery. Scamfu is weak with this one.
https://members.seeking.com/member/35e1ed3d-86cc-4ccb-8ef5-31c382db20a4
Abgirly1205, Abigail, goes to school an hour away from Cinti, says she lives here and commutes there, not sure about sex, wants 400/ wk for chatting, IG shows pics in Cinti.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ea28286e-365a-4e63-bf8b-a2ba293253e3
PrettyLove is Maddie. Accepted my offer and agreed to shift to text. Okay with intimacy after the first several meetings, When I said, fine but no allowance until we go private, she ghosted. No full body pics. UD, roommate, no car.
https://members.seeking.com/member/462860df-4c7c-4723-8b4a-aa9db3691119
Diamonte_1111, Another online only wannabe. Claims to attend college in New York. Saw the Callikoa videos. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ab2891b4-227f-46c5-b518-b0238e6c660d
Headgiver2000, this is her second profile, taking me straight to snap (where we are already friends from her 1st profile.) I don't recall if we ever interacted on snap. If she had tried to push a premium I would have just deleted her. I don't think we ever got that far. Is anyone else chatting with her?
https://members.seeking.com/member/4a9f9829-fe26-4467-9a9b-fa9c7fd70c8d
Hayley is Sugaree73,25/26, Cinti, athletic / avg+, 5'0", 5'1", Hispanic, repeat profile!, agreed 300-400/ wk," voip Hamilton,* 513-912-* * * *(8236).
Had a baby 2-8-22. Has custody of 2 siblings, in a hotel in Sharonville.
"No sex unless I feel like I can trust you and know I'm not getting fooled. And I don't jump straight into that to begin with really. And I'd like to wait a few months anyways after having my son. " Also on SB with better pics:
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/8378bed5e26aafc4;
https://members.seeking.com/member/a0f18713-4f0b-4b74-8d53-e98b58239a60
SurprisedBelle, using the same number as former nikkiluxe (banned) Led with his number, voip,*.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ccdcb2ef-760e-4c64-8726-15731e94ec17
That's it for now.
BAMDo you have a part time job that pays money? You obviously put so much time into gathering and sharing these intel, I am starting to think this is your full time job and everything is a side hustle. The board is lucky to have you.
For the last few weeks, I have been laid up with the nastiest cold I have encountered in years. It gives me multiple hours a day to explore the boards. I also have gotten very efficient at screening and processing.
However, I also have a part-time consulting business that keeps me as busy as I choose to be.
BAM.
Do you have a part time job that pays money? You obviously put so much time into gathering and sharing these intel, I am starting to think this is your full time job and everything is a side hustle. The board is lucky to have you.
Here is my latest collection.
Strong woman: I wish I were wrong about this one. I love the pictures. But the profile age does not match the pictures. And, language be all wrong for any Cincinnati city any person.
https://members.seeking.com/member/53461fa3-ccec-4f7e-91eb-8109766b757c
00sandra: another obvious scammer. Using obvious pictures of a pron star: https://www.twpornstars.com/PaigeOwensXXX?page=3.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c2914a96-084a-4fe2-bd70-f604913b913b
InnocentModel: This looks like our 3rd crypto profile in the same day. Anybody disagree?
https://members.seeking.com/member/ae32c2dc-99f4-4d63-afa0-13d8c972a1e4
TemptingQueen: Another Asian based scammer. Crypto anyone? Taking me to What'sApp.
https://members.seeking.com/member/cafdd5d6-5a88-498e-8242-38a5d1b106b1
Classic Asian scammer (even though profile does not say Asian.) I asked her to video chat. She answered: "My video is not very convenient, I'm still in the car. Now heading to the place of residence. "
https://members.seeking.com/member/8054c879-d686-4caf-a8f4-cf7eb12b8bc9
Phoenix155555 is pheo? Wants to start with a picture arrangement to show I am serious. Offers to go straight to text. Multiple scammer warning signs. Blocked me when I warned it would not work. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/df0decdc-f8ae-4e39-a466-e4130ea8db90
I welcome any contrary evidence as all the pictures are pretty nice (but really not expecting any.).
Happy searching!
BAM.
Hot looking pictures. She claims to work 76-100 hours a week. I've done hours like that and they are impossible to sustain for more than a week or two. Accepted and offer from me but asked for a down payment prior to any public meeting. I have demurred. Anyone else chatting with her?
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/bbae3b23-afe4-480f-ac41-0e578a349d8eI found her social through pic reverse searches. She is legit. Wether she is a real sb, I don't know. I like her insta. The work stuff kept me away. I don't like it when they are that busy.
IsitinGood
03-17-22, 19:13
It seems like once you call them out the profile disappears. Probably the greatest confirmation that they are indeed scammers. Keep up the good work, a lot of guys appreciate it!
Here is my latest collection.
Strong woman: I wish I were wrong about this one. I love the pictures. But the profile age does not match the pictures. And, language be all wrong for any Cincinnati city any person.
https://members.seeking.com/member/53461fa3-ccec-4f7e-91eb-8109766b757c
00sandra: another obvious scammer. Using obvious pictures of a pron star: https://www.twpornstars.com/PaigeOwensXXX?page=3.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c2914a96-084a-4fe2-bd70-f604913b913b
InnocentModel: This looks like our 3rd crypto profile in the same day. Anybody disagree?
https://members.seeking.com/member/ae32c2dc-99f4-4d63-afa0-13d8c972a1e4
TemptingQueen: Another Asian based scammer. Crypto anyone? Taking me to What'sApp.
https://members.seeking.com/member/cafdd5d6-5a88-498e-8242-38a5d1b106b1
Classic Asian scammer (even though profile does not say Asian.) I asked her to video chat. She answered: "My video is not very convenient, I'm still in the car. Now heading to the place of residence. "
https://members.seeking.com/member/8054c879-d686-4caf-a8f4-cf7eb12b8bc9
Phoenix155555 is pheo? Wants to start with a picture arrangement to show I am serious. Offers to go straight to text. Multiple scammer warning signs. Blocked me when I warned it would not work. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/df0decdc-f8ae-4e39-a466-e4130ea8db90
I welcome any contrary evidence as all the pictures are pretty nice (but really not expecting any.).
Happy searching!
BAM.
MattChavan23
03-18-22, 01:04
It seems like once you call them out the profile disappears. Probably the greatest confirmation that they are indeed scammers. Keep up the good work, a lot of guys appreciate it!
You can betcha most of this ghosts will come back with their new 25th or 30th profile by eob tommorow and our dear friend Bam Bam will have to get back to work again and do the poilcework again and then repeat again. Russian scammers working overtime too from call-center or hack center. If you think they are gone, they are never gone, they just comming back with additional reinforcement, we have to be alert. If they surrender and bendover in rare cases we just pay 250 per pound and let them walk away ..I just let my membership lapse. Too much drama for mee to handle
WanderingAbout
03-18-22, 14:05
Offers threesome for 250 each with friend who has similar figure as Khloemarie15. Can't host. FYI. No other info available.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/a4a69949b18f5ad0
I agree that if caught by Seeking and banned they will just re-emerge in a day or so. For that reason, I report them here but never report them on the site. I prefer they stay active on the site using the same profile so I can easily keep track of them. I doubt very much that seeking checks my posts and uses them to ban profiles. More likely they violate the TOS, get caught when someone checks them or gets reported by some other dude on the site. Here are my most recent finds:
only love, Classic crypto scammer profile: model hot pic, mid 30's age, flowery language. "I hope to find someone here who can understand and respect each other, raise our own children, and spend the rest of our lives together. "
https://members.seeking.com/member/e19431cb-7562-4c76-869d-4a72597ffb12
rrlbe, second profile, Anyone know why she was kicked off on the first profile? In any case, the profile pics are very fuzzy copies which is never a good sign.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5987dbf3-061a-4df3-a286-cc02fb0ef5b1
PhotogenicChick, this is her third profile, I chatted with her on WYP first a few years ago when I had some free credits. She later moved to Seeking. I do not recall that profile name. In any case, at the time I had her PII. Her social media photos are much less attractive than the ones posted. Also, at that time she was married, active with her husband on SM and putting single on her profile. She was living just north of Oxford at that time. The impression I have is as a time-waster.
She has put up two profiles in the last 24 hours and both were immediately taken down. Sorry, no link. I will save a picture next time as she has a very distinctive look.
BAM.
You can betcha most of this ghosts will come back with their new 25th or 30th profile by eob tommorow and our dear friend Bam Bam will have to get back to work again and do the poilcework again and then repeat again. Russian scammers working overtime too from call-center or hack center. If you think they are gone, they are never gone, they just comming back with additional reinforcement, we have to be alert. If they surrender and bendover in rare cases we just pay 250 per pound and let them walk away ..I just let my membership lapse. Too much drama for mee to handle
WanderingAbout
03-18-22, 17:55
PhotogenicChick, this is her third profile, I chatted with her on WYP first a few years ago when I had some free credits. She later moved to Seeking. I do not recall that profile name. In any case, at the time I had her PII. Her social media photos are much less attractive than the ones posted. Also, at that time she was married, active with her husband on SM and putting single on her profile. She was living just north of Oxford at that time. The impression I have is as a time-waster. She has put up two profiles in the last 24 hours and both were immediately taken down. Sorry, no link. I will save a picture next time as she has a very distinctive look. BAM.There are two PhotogenicChick profiles with same name. Here are the links FYI.
https://members.seeking.com/member/dea9e29c-c1f9-4532-9eb7-8ca59d60d546
And.
https://members.seeking.com/member/aee8560f-ef3b-4e9b-aed4-c7c8ff982916
There are two PhotogenicChick profiles with same name. Here are the links FYI.
https://members.seeking.com/member/dea9e29c-c1f9-4532-9eb7-8ca59d60d546
And.
https://members.seeking.com/member/aee8560f-ef3b-4e9b-aed4-c7c8ff982916The one at the first link immediately blocked me. I checked she is the one from Oxford with two kids and husband. The one at the second link looks suspicious to me.
BAM.
Been talking to her off and on for a while but can't seem to get anywhere.
Anyone successful with this one?
https://members.seeking.com/member/eac7c946-eae0-4585-b064-c7a9ba736075
Been talking to her off and on for a while but can't seem to get anywhere.
Anyone successful with this one?
https://members.seeking.com/member/eac7c946-eae0-4585-b064-c7a9ba736075I was also chatting but she apparently decided to block me.
BAM.
I was also chatting but she apparently decided to block me.
BAM.Look as if she deactivated her account.
There are some warning signs with her. This profile started in 10-21 and she says she had an earlier one. She claims to have deleted the old one but they all say that after they get banned. She just popped up in our area with highly distinctive pictures. The number of pics suggests not a foreign scammer; they don't put that much effort into a profile. However, she says she is an "Entertainer" which is often a euphemism for stripper. Hair extensions and many tattoos all hint at a ghetto attitude. Ask her to video chat and if all goes well maybe you can get her to stand up and show her figure. Good luck!
BAM.I think she is GPS at 500/ hr.
Look as if she deactivated her account.She's blocked you.
I think she is GPS at 500/ hr.How hot is she? If she's hot, $500 may be the market rate these days. If she's fugly, then yeah, GPS. I don't have a Seeking account but if you share a photo, I could offer up my opinion on The Nut value of an hour with her.
Tickle Jay
03-20-22, 05:08
I did nor favorite. I just looked at her page and immediately got the pics and video pitch.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e12a3a15-23cd-48d7-9e72-d8093b95e2d5
Kyfordboy85
03-20-22, 12:51
How hot is she? If she's hot, $500 may be the market rate these days. If she's fugly, then yeah, GPS. I don't have a Seeking account but if you share a photo, I could offer up my opinion on The Nut value of an hour with her.Don't know what gps stands for not doing know how to post a pic here LOL, I seen her for wayy less then 500 she's sexy super sweet and a good time.
Don't know what gps stands for not doing know how to post a pic here LOL, I seen her for wayy less then 500 she's sexy super sweet and a good time.Golden Pussy Syndrome.
I should have trademarked that when I first used it on the large canine board back in 2006.
Kyfordboy85
03-20-22, 23:01
Golden Pussy Syndrome.
I should have trademarked that when I first used it on the large canine board back in 2006.Nice as I've said before I've had several girls start out wanting 500 ppm and needed meeting for way way less it's all about timing and negotiating. Got beanie to negotiate and talk some got it some don't I guess.
Tickle Jay
03-21-22, 04:58
Curious if anyone has had connection with this one. Had multiple accounts, but says she's met a few people. Gave me her text after two months of back and forth.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3fd47882-1488-49e6-b82e-5ab715da30ab
JackOhLantern
03-21-22, 10:33
https://members.seeking.com/member/6e24f94b-c386-4832-97e6-52441b06a9f5
Straight to text, agrees to meet but only if you cashapp "her" money for gas and makeup.
Beware! She haas been heavily reviewed and not in a good way. I will DM some info.
BAM.
Curious if anyone has had connection with this one. Had multiple accounts, but says she's met a few people. Gave me her text after two months of back and forth.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3fd47882-1488-49e6-b82e-5ab715da30ab
Here is my latest list:
DaddiesAngel4 lyf: chatted off and on. Finally engaged only to decide she was platonic. Updated her profile to make that clear.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ca44cd9b-68e6-4cae-af14-5c5e6edc063a
InnocentVixen: I had a long chat with this one. No sex arrangements only.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e2f2ab01-3749-4f57-abcd-370bbc406539
PhotgenicChick: This chick is real! And she is serious. She chased me down. She needs to consider a different profile name.
https://members.seeking.com/member/aee8560f-ef3b-4e9b-aed4-c7c8ff982916
Princessqueen66, takes you straight to SNAP and tries to sell pics and vids, using Jessica Davidson (jessdavidson996) Send her a chat if that's your thing.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b959c771-f5b3-42f6-a25a-255d542a5a48
Dreamyeyes, no sex; no meetings, "I have two other arrangements with some long distance people that I don't have to meet in person. So that is why my account is still up." Am I too cynical? Yes, yes, I think I am.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2bc63eb1-9d15-45ac-81c9-5a3a39437c90
DynamicNerd, all the classic tells of a crypto scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d8957489-b9a7-45de-9d96-8673b6af4533
TannyB is using pictures of Sabrina Nichole: https://mobile.twitter.com/onelastaco, Sabrina!: https://www.instagram.com/onelasttaco/; Texan in LA! https://onlyfans.com/sabrinanichole; This woman has been catfished a thousand times. There are articles about her. A poor choice.
https://members.seeking.com/member/bd8084c1-3672-4bed-a88e-7ebe08115e1e
TheSuccubuss: Declined my offer. I get a GPS vibe. Cute though! Seems to bounce between Cinti and Columbus, Wants multiple thousands per month!
https://members.seeking.com/member/9886b833-1a3b-4b35-9a5c-e91572edee9d
BAM.
Here are two new ones I picked up today:
Annia: feels like a scammer. Today's login is from UAE. Could be just a VPN artifact but use caution.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a49d56a7-ffd9-455d-9065-c5d93ec84d51
SugarBerryBabe, pics and name trace to California pic seller. I think she is just trolling around the country for her OF: https://mobile.twitter.com/sugarberrybabe1;.
https://onlyfans.com/sugarberrybabe/; https://linktr.ee/sugarberrybabe;.
https://members.seeking.com/member/640e087e-299f-4b11-a342-26ea089e74f4
BAM.
New profile, massive GPS, last time around she was looking for her own personal stock broker.
Eldenring.
https://members.seeking.com/member/292666dd-cfb9-4a3c-bf99-8b8fb5b99df9
Gillete9112
03-22-22, 21:31
Offers threesome for 250 each with friend who has similar figure as Khloemarie15. Can't host. FYI. No other info available.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/a4a69949b18f5ad0Don't waste time on her. Took my money and ran.
Beware! She haas been heavily reviewed and not in a good way. I will DM some info.
BAM.Doesn't she get all crazy on guys?
Doesn't she get all crazy on guys?A very few reported low-cost fun. Others reported BSC. YMMV.
BAM.
New profile, massive GPS, last time around she was looking for her own personal stock broker.
Eldenring.
https://members.seeking.com/member/292666dd-cfb9-4a3c-bf99-8b8fb5b99df9I must have made a bad impression; she has me blocked. Sigh.
BAM.
Browneeyedbeauty: Pictures are misleading. Heavy girl. Multiple profiles. I met her; I did not repeat, I have her PII. If anyone is contemplating a date, send me an email. You likely want to avoid.
https://members.seeking.com/member/84b59470-cfc5-455a-a688-d40b08e930f8
The Lost Traveler: classic tells of a TGTBT crypto scammer. I will try to confirm but be forewarned.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e9dbd2c0-ae71-483d-b29a-a72ca15f6b70
Lilypad: I have reported on her in the past. She recently resurfaced and is reaching out to old contacts. She will never meet and is a complete time-waster. I have wished her onwards.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
Phoenix15: Nice, shy girl. A bit too young for me. Wants online only. I am sending her to OF. She also has some attitude for a HS chick!
https://members.seeking.com/member/38a63064-a90e-407f-907c-352ff120b018
AdorableQueen: "I know my worth. " GPS. Jealous husband! No texting but willing to video chat for a fee. Claims to have had SD's in the past. When asked how she managed meetings, she said they were mostly video chats. I am starting to get skeptical. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7c07e808-c1f8-4016-a1b4-f7ab38811f70
InnocentHottie: "Open your eyes, daddy!" The tagline conveys a lot. GPS and wants an allowance at the MnG. She is kinda confused in her ask but it sounds like $1000 a week for three meetings per week. Anything more than three meetings triggers a second grand. I tend to be verbose but she beats me on steroids!
https://members.seeking.com/member/eee548f6-bd39-403b-a782-7c06fc38d3d5
Bhadbbie, Morgan, Clifton / Reading, talks a good game by text but turns very shy in person, NO SEX! Cute but just a tease. Brought a girlfriend as chaperone.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/MVr93jPpAxVB6LW5RdDOxW4n
SeductiveCutie:, a little heavier than my normal preference. Definitely dtf but, alas, I am too old for her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/47594e1f-aea7-42b7-a099-01dce3a7bcfb
Some people have wondered why I am offering so much info. I have always kept a pretty good record of all the ones I need to avoid. I am still doing that. Now, I also copy-paste the record into a post here. I also have data on the ones I am chasing but I only rarely share that info and then only privately.
BAM.
Browneeyedbeauty: Pictures are misleading. Heavy girl. Multiple profiles. I met her; I did not repeat, I have her PII. If anyone is contemplating a date, send me an email. You likely want to avoid.
https://members.seeking.com/member/84b59470-cfc5-455a-a688-d40b08e930f8
The Lost Traveler: classic tells of a TGTBT crypto scammer. I will try to confirm but be forewarned.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e9dbd2c0-ae71-483d-b29a-a72ca15f6b70
Lilypad: I have reported on her in the past. She recently resurfaced and is reaching out to old contacts. She will never meet and is a complete time-waster. I have wished her onwards.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
Phoenix15: Nice, shy girl. A bit too young for me. Wants online only. I am sending her to OF. She also has some attitude for a HS chick!
https://members.seeking.com/member/38a63064-a90e-407f-907c-352ff120b018
AdorableQueen: "I know my worth. " GPS. Jealous husband! No texting but willing to video chat for a fee. Claims to have had SD's in the past. When asked how she managed meetings, she said they were mostly video chats. I am starting to get skeptical. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7c07e808-c1f8-4016-a1b4-f7ab38811f70
InnocentHottie: "Open your eyes, daddy!" The tagline conveys a lot. GPS and wants an allowance at the MnG. She is kinda confused in her ask but it sounds like $1000 a week for three meetings per week. Anything more than three meetings triggers a second grand. I tend to be verbose but she beats me on steroids!
https://members.seeking.com/member/eee548f6-bd39-403b-a782-7c06fc38d3d5
Bhadbbie, Morgan, Clifton / Reading, talks a good game by text but turns very shy in person, NO SEX! Cute but just a tease. Brought a girlfriend as chaperone.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/MVr93jPpAxVB6LW5RdDOxW4n
SeductiveCutie:, a little heavier than my normal preference. Definitely dtf but, alas, I am too old for her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/47594e1f-aea7-42b7-a099-01dce3a7bcfb
Some people have wondered why I am offering so much info. I have always kept a pretty good record of all the ones I need to avoid. I am still doing that. Now, I also copy-paste the record into a post here. I also have data on the ones I am chasing but I only rarely share that info and then only privately.
BAM.Thanks for the info, al lot of these young chicks have big attitudes. I think number one and the last one don't look too heavy for me may try!!
AlanDodson
03-24-22, 14:11
I know her in real life. I have never interacted with her in any mongering sense, but I do know she has a live in BF who is extremely jealous with multiple felonies. Definitely not the type who would be down with her doing this kind of thing so if you meet up with her I'd make sure its on neutral ground and not at her place.
Browneeyedbeauty: Pictures are misleading. Heavy girl. Multiple profiles. I met her; I did not repeat, I have her PII. If anyone is contemplating a date, send me an email. You likely want to avoid.
https://members.seeking.com/member/84b59470-cfc5-455a-a688-d40b08e930f8
The Lost Traveler: classic tells of a TGTBT crypto scammer. I will try to confirm but be forewarned.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e9dbd2c0-ae71-483d-b29a-a72ca15f6b70
Lilypad: I have reported on her in the past. She recently resurfaced and is reaching out to old contacts. She will never meet and is a complete time-waster. I have wished her onwards.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
Phoenix15: Nice, shy girl. A bit too young for me. Wants online only. I am sending her to OF. She also has some attitude for a HS chick!..
Anyone else notice how much older the girls are on Seeking lately? Seems like 60% or more are 30 or older and almost 90% are over 25. I understand why there are more older ones since it is being marketed as a dating site now, but where are all the younger girls? It seems like it's the same amount of girls showing green as always, but way older now. Before maybe 1 in 10 were 30 or older and half were under 25.
Tickle Jay
03-25-22, 04:58
Doesn't she get all crazy on guys?My paid subscription is up in two weeks. Don't know if I'll renew. It's fun to flirt, but too many GPS.
Anyone else notice how much older the girls are on Seeking lately? Seems like 60% or more are 30 or older and almost 90% are over 25. I understand why there are more older ones since it is being marketed as a dating site now, but where are all the younger girls? It seems like it's the same amount of girls showing green as always, but way older now. Before maybe 1 in 10 were 30 or older and half were under 25.A lot of the younger ones are selling pics etc LOL.
Pasture Finder
03-25-22, 17:43
I remember when lists like this had numbers for each SB. Now they reflect how the actual site is. A bunch of ladies trying to find a way to get something for existing.
Cincinnati has the worst crop of ladies. The good ones make a few thousand and get the fuck out of here. And it shows.
I travel and meet amazing women that remind me of how things felt 4+ years ago.
I only keep my account active to find ladies when I travel. I can't handle another Cincinnati meet that starts off with "I still have a few Covid pounds on me". As if it can't be mentioned prior to meeting.
Browneeyedbeauty: Pictures are misleading. Heavy girl. Multiple profiles. I met her; I did not repeat, I have her PII. If anyone is contemplating a date, send me an email. You likely want to avoid.
https://members.seeking.com/member/84b59470-cfc5-455a-a688-d40b08e930f8
The Lost Traveler: classic tells of a TGTBT crypto scammer. I will try to confirm but be forewarned.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e9dbd2c0-ae71-483d-b29a-a72ca15f6b70
Lilypad: I have reported on her in the past. She recently resurfaced and is reaching out to old contacts. She will never meet and is a complete time-waster. I have wished her onwards.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d61a281a-3961-4314-9ec1-d2eca80c1f3c
Phoenix15: Nice, shy girl. A bit too young for me. Wants online only. I am sending her to OF. She also has some attitude for a HS chick!
https://members.seeking.com/member/38a63064-a90e-407f-907c-352ff120b018
AdorableQueen: "I know my worth. " GPS. Jealous husband! No texting but willing to video chat for a fee. Claims to have had SD's in the past. When asked how she managed meetings, she said they were mostly video chats. I am starting to get skeptical. *.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7c07e808-c1f8-4016-a1b4-f7ab38811f70
InnocentHottie: "Open your eyes, daddy!" The tagline conveys a lot. GPS and wants an allowance at the MnG. She is kinda confused in her ask but it sounds like $1000 a week for three meetings per week. Anything more than three meetings triggers a second grand. I tend to be verbose but she beats me on steroids!
https://members.seeking.com/member/eee548f6-bd39-403b-a782-7c06fc38d3d5
Bhadbbie, Morgan, Clifton / Reading, talks a good game by text but turns very shy in person, NO SEX! Cute but just a tease. Brought a girlfriend as chaperone.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/MVr93jPpAxVB6LW5RdDOxW4n
SeductiveCutie:, a little heavier than my normal preference. Definitely dtf but, alas, I am too old for her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/47594e1f-aea7-42b7-a099-01dce3a7bcfb
Some people have wondered why I am offering so much info. I have always kept a pretty good record of all the ones I need to avoid. I am still doing that. Now, I also copy-paste the record into a post here. I also have data on the ones I am chasing but I only rarely share that info and then only privately.
BAM.
I remember when lists like this had numbers for each SB. Now they reflect how the actual site is. A bunch of ladies trying to find a way to get something for existing.
I can't handle another Cincinnati meet that starts off with "I still have a few Covid pounds on me". As if it can't be mentioned prior to meeting.
I suggest you always require a short video chat on the site prior to agreeing to meet. You can ask her to stand and spin. There is only one viable excuse for not doing a VC for a short period. It's free, anonymous and easy.
BAM.
I know her in real life. I have never interacted with her in any mongering sense, but I do know she has a live in BF who is extremely jealous with multiple felonies. Definitely not the type who would be down with her doing this kind of thing so if you meet up with her I'd make sure its on neutral ground and not at her place.I have all of her social media (and there's lots.) There is zero indication of a boyfriend. The only pictures of males with her are her dog and her dad. She is exclusively hanging with other women. I have no dog in the fight since she already turned me down. However, you wouldn't be cock-blocking would you? Trying to scare away competition? That's a black mark on you if true.
BAM.
I have all of her social media (and there's lots.) There is zero indication of a boyfriend. The only pictures of males with her are her dog and her dad. She is exclusively hanging with other women. I have no dog in the fight since she already turned me down. However, you wouldn't be cock-blocking would you? Trying to scare away competition? That's a black mark on you if true.
BAM.A form of white knighting if true.
Todd Cincy
03-26-22, 14:56
We all have different standards and red lines regarding age, looks, weight, price range, etc. I get that.
But is there anyone among us who is doing "online only" arrangements?
I can't even imagine how this would work.
Camshow sites have been around for 20 years. And back in the 1980's, there were the 1-900 lines. (As a high school kid in 1985, I once dialed a 1-900 line out of pure curiosity. I found it unsatisfying and boring. And I had a *lot* of fun trying to explain that one to my parents when it appeared on the family phone bill.).
I just can't imagine what any of these girls is providing that would enable them to make any real money with an "online arrangement". Am I missing something here?
Todd Cincy
03-26-22, 15:13
Anyone else notice how much older the girls are on Seeking lately? Seems like 60% or more are 30 or older and almost 90% are over 25. I understand why there are more older ones since it is being marketed as a dating site now, but where are all the younger girls? It seems like it's the same amount of girls showing green as always, but way older now. Before maybe 1 in 10 were 30 or older and half were under 25.Part of it is likely the way the site is being marketed. In the beginning, the tagline was, "find a sugar daddy for tuition." Now it's "start dating up". That is catnip to women over 30, who are starting to feel their biological clocks ticking. (Wait until they learn that the average SD is a married man twice their age, who wants to pay them $300 for ppm! Ha!
The Millennials (who were the original sugar babies of 2009-2014) are now entering early middle age. I suspect that some of the older ones on Seeking today are returnees. Also, the Millennials (the oldest of whom are now 40) were the original online generation. In 1999, Yahoo magazine ran an article about "camwhores", who were teen girls selling naughty pics online (and probably meeting for cash, too.) Well, an 18-year-old girl of 1999 is 41 in 2022!
I don't have kids. But I'm a GenXer (early 50's), and it seems that today's parents hover over their young adult children like hawks. They track their adult kids' whereabouts with iphone apps and whatnot. My best friend from high school has a 23-year-old daughter, and the girl's mother still tracks her location via a smartphone app. It's insane. For us, though, the upshot is probably that 18 to 23 year-old young women are subject to a lot more parental monitoring than was the case just a few years ago.
Finally, the lingering effects of COVID and the labor shortages. I think that will rebound, though, as most of the free COVID money is gone now, and inflation is providing an incentive for people to seek extra sources of income. (We may see a new crop of economically motivated providers and SBs before the end of 2022.).
In short: I have noticed it, too. And those of you who've read my prior posts know how I feel about "mature" providers and sugar babies: I have zero interest in them! But I believe the causes are multiple, and (hopefully) temporary. If I wanted older women I'd join Silver Singles!
Part of it is likely the way the site is being marketed. In the beginning, the tagline was, "find a sugar daddy for tuition." Now it's "start dating up". That is catnip to women over 30, who are starting to feel their biological clocks ticking. (Wait until they learn that the average SD is a married man twice their age, who wants to pay them $300 for ppm! Ha!
In short: I have noticed it, too. And those of you who've read my prior posts know how I feel about "mature" providers and sugar babies: I have zero interest in them! But I believe the causes are multiple, and (hopefully) temporary. If I wanted older women I'd join Silver Singles!
I think there is an element of "dating up" involved as you mentioned. If they are in good shape and have a fun attitude, I do not totally reject them. However, I treat them as Ashley Madison type candidates. I will hook up with them if they want but I never offer an allowance. Since they enroll thinking it is a dating app, a lot of them do not know there can be an allowance involved. I have two I see occasionally like that. There are different dynamics for the 35 and over contingent. They still want sex but have a hard time finding someone they like on the other dating apps. They think seeking offers a higher class pool of candidates. As long as they understand we are just dating and there is no sugar, no problem! Given what's available on the escort market, a few of these AM types are diamonds in the rough. And I don't have to go bar-hopping to find them. Just my 2 cents.
BAM.
Here are some problem profiles from the last few days:
ImpishBish: met for MnG. Not ready for FC, much better looking in person, ghosting me now. No sex SB.
https://members.seeking.com/member/469fd886-c675-4dde-a2cf-b2b028fda363
LusciousRunner: this is my second report on her: made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Shared the following: "I will only text I will never meet up with anyone".
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd ??
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd4 ??
Voiceofenigma: Scammer: age 38, pics much younger, few words in description. Has been on the site before: "My snap / KIK, Instagram is Pearl1Polish and you can text 702-329-6225. " Pearl traces to a guy named Andre. The number traces to a guy named Jack.
https://members.seeking.com/member/86d083fe-c6bf-4f0c-b4f4-b13c62d51303
BabEevelyn, 31, living in a battered women's shelter, gave me attitude when I attempted a joke, I suspect a sad story but I'm not prepared for the drama.
https://members.seeking.com/member/09ebdf8a-f474-49be-bcb4-299c05ca1868
Shybaby: Hot private pictures, agrees dtf and allowance by DM, went to text, voip, suddenly wants to know what I am seeking. Wants allowance to start at MnG and until she "get's comfortable. " Claims sexual trauma and bad experiences. I say RINSER! YMMV.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b9f1e294-3397-47e5-8215-cb873e2db4c7
Lavishl0 ve: Profile says Asian but pic says different. Description is that of a crypto scammer. Proceed with caution.
https://members.seeking.com/member/18317da0-bda8-478b-a135-05bc4a63d25e
Sunny: pretty sure another crypto scammer, no obvious tells but TGTBT. Husband hunter language.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4e162510-93ad-4344-8985-0422aa8a8eaa
WittyModel: Classic crypto scammer, Pic is Korean model: https://www.facebook.com/kimgnaaa/.
https://members.seeking.com/member/99534f6b-4ca5-4a24-8fe5-ef9fd35772dc
LunaStarr: joined 8-21 then left shortly later, back now: pregnant, jealous boyfriend, online only. Feels like a lot of drama to me.
https://members.seeking.com/member/819e20d8-1ba4-48ce-ad4c-0c157325ac9e
I welcome comments or feedback.
BAM.
Here some profiles that have been around for a while but without a lot of progress or reviews:
Bella: private pics show a bit of a butterface, travel nurse occasionally visiting Dayton but lives far east of Cinti, Was moving right along, moved to text, had a MnG agreed then ghosted, Still on the site but ignoring me. I have PII.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c27f288d-d575-486e-9ed8-b6b222379e24
Babiebirdie: since 4-18. On the site every day but ignoring me, I love her pix and description but no joy for me. Has anyone else met her?
https://members.seeking.com/member/60c67e26-306d-4a5b-94b9-21d46be62277
Hunny7354: Hot pictures, Her second profile. Does not respond to me. On the site a lot. Banning suggests either pic seller or maybe GPS but a bit too loose in her language. Anyone have anything to add?
https://members.seeking.com/member/31628087-fd8b-4d30-bdac-4f2156f1a0c9
MissVtoyou; on the site since 1-16, Profile pic is likely even older than that. I met her about five years ago. Admits to 47, Asking 500 ppm, GPS and not worth it. What is her incentive for being on the site. Are one of you actually doing her at that price?
https://members.seeking.com/member/23e9960c-4cc2-c53b-ec4b-f9f137bfb982
Collegegirl1618: since 1-19, on the site every day, hot pictures, no answer to multiple approaches. Is this some girl's research project? Has anyone had meaningful contact?
https://members.seeking.com/member/9972e3d1-13c4-4459-ac9f-5705715a4bee
Any comments or reviews?
BAM.
ChargersFan18
03-26-22, 20:59
Here are some problem profiles from the last few days:
ImpishBish: met for MnG. Not ready for FC, much better looking in person, ghosting me now. No sex SB.
https://members.seeking.com/member/469fd886-c675-4dde-a2cf-b2b028fda363
LusciousRunner: this is my second report on her: made two profiles when registering and one of them was immediately deleted. Shared the following: "I will only text I will never meet up with anyone".
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd ??
https://members.seeking.com/member/72bb2d68-be8a-48a6-9285-ff5b8181cfd4 ??
Voiceofenigma: Scammer: age 38, pics much younger, few words in description. Has been on the site before: "My snap / KIK, Instagram is Pearl1Polish and you can text 702-329-6225. " Pearl traces to a guy named Andre. The number traces to a guy named Jack.
https://members.seeking.com/member/86d083fe-c6bf-4f0c-b4f4-b13c62d51303
BabEevelyn, 31, living in a battered women's shelter, gave me attitude when I attempted a joke, I suspect a sad story but I'm not prepared for the drama.
https://members.seeking.com/member/09ebdf8a-f474-49be-bcb4-299c05ca1868
Shybaby: Hot private pictures, agrees dtf and allowance by DM, went to text, voip, suddenly wants to know what I am seeking. Wants allowance to start at MnG and until she "get's comfortable. " Claims sexual trauma and bad experiences. I say RINSER! YMMV.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b9f1e294-3397-47e5-8215-cb873e2db4c7
Lavishl0 ve: Profile says Asian but pic says different. Description is that of a crypto scammer. Proceed with caution.
https://members.seeking.com/member/18317da0-bda8-478b-a135-05bc4a63d25e
Sunny: pretty sure another crypto scammer, no obvious tells but TGTBT. Husband hunter language.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4e162510-93ad-4344-8985-0422aa8a8eaa
WittyModel: Classic crypto scammer, Pic is Korean model: https://www.facebook.com/kimgnaaa/.
https://members.seeking.com/member/99534f6b-4ca5-4a24-8fe5-ef9fd35772dc
LunaStarr: joined 8-21 then left shortly later, back now: pregnant, jealous boyfriend, online only. Feels like a lot of drama to me.
https://members.seeking.com/member/819e20d8-1ba4-48ce-ad4c-0c157325ac9e
I welcome comments or feedback.
BAM.I've been messaging girls for the last month. My experience is if i message 5 girls only 1 or two are "real". The others are content pic sellers. Some want to go straight to snapchat. I have message one that sent sexy pics. And videos and asked to meet, but later said it was that time of month. Another cute blonde with the name "Cincy-Fun_Today" anyone met her? She claims can host in Clifton. Is that a good or not good area? I read before where a certain area is to be avoided due uncle setups, I just can't remember which. Any help is appreciated. I was supposed to meet a girl from dayton area her name was Babby_99 or something, I became skeptical when she text me at 8 am asking if she could "see" me today. I saw she had two profiles. Also in her initial text she said she does ppm gave an amount and after a few messages she says " if you get a room I can give you a massage" She ended up deleting her profile. Idk may have dodged a bullet with that one. Pic was pretty 22 yo.
Part of it is likely the way the site is being marketed. In the beginning, the tagline was, "find a sugar daddy for tuition." Now it's "start dating up". That is catnip to women over 30, who are starting to feel their biological clocks ticking. (Wait until they learn that the average SD is a married man twice their age, who wants to pay them $300 for ppm! Ha!
The Millennials (who were the original sugar babies of 2009-2014) are now entering early middle age. I suspect that some of the older ones on Seeking today are returnees. Also, the Millennials (the oldest of whom are now 40) were the original online generation. In 1999, Yahoo magazine ran an article about "camwhores", who were teen girls selling naughty pics online (and probably meeting for cash, too.) Well, an 18-year-old girl of 1999 is 41 in 2022!
I don't have kids. But I'm a GenXer (early 50's), and it seems that today's parents hover over their young adult children like hawks. They track their adult kids' whereabouts with iphone apps and whatnot. My best friend from high school has a 23-year-old daughter, and the girl's mother still tracks her location via a smartphone app. It's insane. For us, though, the upshot is probably that 18 to 23 year-old young women are subject to a lot more parental monitoring than was the case just a few years ago.
Finally, the lingering effects of COVID and the labor shortages. I think that will rebound, though, as most of the free COVID money is gone now, and inflation is providing an incentive for people to seek extra sources of income. (We may see a new crop of economically motivated providers and SBs before the end of 2022.).
In short: I have noticed it, too. And those of you who've read my prior posts know how I feel about "mature" providers and sugar babies: I have zero interest in them! But I believe the causes are multiple, and (hopefully) temporary. If I wanted older women I'd join Silver Singles!I set my search too low to really see these mature babies. I feel like telling them they are too old to qualify as a SB. Who wants some wrinkled old lady LOL. Maybe a freebie that would be different, wine and dine one then BAM! But not on a PPM basis, worse than online only IMHO.
I think there is an element of "dating up" involved as you mentioned. If they are in good shape and have a fun attitude, I do not totally reject them. However, I treat them as Ashley Madison type candidates. I will hook up with them if they want but I never offer an allowance. Since they enroll thinking it is a dating app, a lot of them do not know there can be an allowance involved. I have two I see occasionally like that. There are different dynamics for the 35 and over contingent. They still want sex but have a hard time finding someone they like on the other dating apps. They think seeking offers a higher class pool of candidates. As long as they understand we are just dating and there is no sugar, no problem! Given what's available on the escort market, a few of these AM types are diamonds in the rough. And I don't have to go bar-hopping to find them. Just my 2 cents.
BAM.BAM gets it. And considering him and I have enjoyed a couple of the same babies years back, his take on the more mature SA market is 100%. I'll add that you can get the same almost free but much better than provider's, by willing to reach out to younger SA girls that don't look like models. The 23 to 32 crowd often have their own clean place, know how to take care of a man, also take care of a woman which turns into 3 somes, and are willing to do it all for dinner / club / concert / movie and a very small financial gift. They are so happy to get 100 or even less if you treat them to a nice day and great sex. You should have seen what a good bottle of vodka brought me yesterday from a sexy lady in her twenties. And I just got back on SA last week after 2 years gone.
Stay away from the girls that look like... way out of your league, and SA becomes easy. Most of them are either scammers or have ridiculous GPS. And most don't know how to take care of a guy. Selfish lovers. Has been my experience with the model types.
SA right now seems to be as good as when I started in 2017. They have found a way to filter some of the scammers. And as BAM said, the maturing of the young girls has matured to some hot easily available women.
I set my search too low to really see these mature babies. I feel like telling them they are too old to qualify as a SB. Who wants some wrinkled old lady LOL. Maybe a freebie that would be different, wine and dine one then BAM! But not on a PPM basis, worse than online only IMHO.The 50+ year old ladies are looking for 70+ Daddy's for a sugar relationship. And there are enough men on SA to qualify.
Otherwise those ladies are happy to traditionally date men their own age.
I've been messaging girls for the last month. My experience is if i message 5 girls only 1 or two are "real". The others are content pic sellers. Some want to go straight to snapchat. I have message one that sent sexy pics. And videos and asked to meet, but later said it was that time of month. Another cute blonde with the name "Cincy-Fun_Today" anyone met her? She claims can host in Clifton. Is that a good or not good area? I read before where a certain area is to be avoided due uncle setups, I just can't remember which. Any help is appreciated. I was supposed to meet a girl from dayton area her name was Babby_99 or something, I became skeptical when she text me at 8 am asking if she could "see" me today. I saw she had two profiles. Also in her initial text she said she does ppm gave an amount and after a few messages she says " if you get a room I can give you a massage" She ended up deleting her profile. Idk may have dodged a bullet with that one. Pic was pretty 22 yo.If you share links, I don't mind sharing my experiences with them. For example, cincy-fun-today. I recognize that name because it seems a bit TGTBT. Picture also look TGTBT. Regardless, I tried to engage with her and she completely ignores me. No face pic always risks it being someone I have met or talked with before and they know I am not a good fit. In such a case, I would rather they just block me. Regardless, you are making progress. If you get a number, DM me and I will look for her. Meanwhile, Clifton is GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe.) Sharonville, Montgomery County and Boone County are considered High Risk. That doesn't mean you cannot play there but it does mean taking extra precautions.
BAM.
WanderingAbout
03-27-22, 19:02
Kaybaybee580 300 ppm Passed as she is BBW.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/96664e0d2404fb6a
NataliaL985 asks 500 per meet. Passed. Contributing Seniors can request more info.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/67114615488ffb54
SecBen credit wasters. They message. You reply. They ghost. You lose credits.
Links only. Click to see pics and name.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/013cdbd4ae04d1b2
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/6c8c7e3099d697e5
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/b5763ced366aa788
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/f9af14718272c76b
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/758e48c5c8c72448
Littlesweetheart LOL.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f49f92d-8245-4a35-83f0-13537459bffb
https://thedirty.com/ohio/paige-hollmeyer-5/#post-2658507.
Kaybaybee580 300 ppm Passed as she is BBW.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/96664e0d2404fb6a
NataliaL985 asks 500 per meet. Passed. Contributing Seniors can request more info.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/67114615488ffb54
SecBen credit wasters. They message. You reply. They ghost. You lose credits.
Links only. Click to see pics and name.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/013cdbd4ae04d1b2
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/6c8c7e3099d697e5
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/b5763ced366aa788
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/f9af14718272c76b
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/758e48c5c8c72448
Littlesweetheart LOL.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6f49f92d-8245-4a35-83f0-13537459bffb
https://thedirty.com/ohio/paige-hollmeyer-5/#post-2658507.I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.
WanderingAbout
03-28-22, 07:48
I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.Very true.
I am now routinely requesting a video chat on Seeking. There are few excuses for saying No and, while not as convenient, it also works. Just not as good for initial screening.
BAM.
I wish SA offered the video idea it is very telling LOL.
Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.
The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.
The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?
BAM.
Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.
The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.
The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?
BAM.StunningDuchess went straight to ppm but can't host. She suggested a park or car play for 200. She is clear out in Moscow so hotel could even be chore. Running away. Fast.
When I said goodbye, she dropped her offer to 60. Not my thing.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c326db94-cf13-4bd1-bbf1-f4c5cb2ebff8
AlanDodson
03-28-22, 14:57
Not at all, I don't even have a SB account at the moment. I encourage all to pursue her if you want because she is even hotter in person. Just please take extra care, that's all I'm trying to say.
I have all of her social media (and there's lots.) There is zero indication of a boyfriend. The only pictures of males with her are her dog and her dad. She is exclusively hanging with other women. I have no dog in the fight since she already turned me down. However, you wouldn't be cock-blocking would you? Trying to scare away competition? That's a black mark on you if true..
JackOhLantern
03-29-22, 21:45
PrincessM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/24be5550-f3c5-44a5-b4e5-4eb6768b6f25
Wants to get to know each other for a couple of weeks, which entails her selling pics.
Magic8 Ball.
https://members.seeking.com/member/06452658-5c3d-47c0-81ec-467748111775
Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.
FitnessFreak.
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5f1a5f1-3c42-4725-82de-04e978fbe414
Was with her maybe a year ago a couple of times. I think someone reported that she's not much in terms of conversation / personality. I can confirm. But, she is super super fit and tight. I think we agreed on 400 if I'm not mistaken.
KindTemptress: Classic Crypto-scammer! Using stolen pics: https://twitter.com/BTBcareers/media refusing to video chat.
https://members.seeking.com/member/9529570e-75eb-43f7-a01a-45c8ef1e3e94
HonestModel: made an earlier profile which was immediately deleted. Made a new one with exact same pictures. Called me on my copy-paste approach and then wished me goodby, I suspect a repeat scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/46689d6c-ac79-41f1-8926-d2a8af71c70b
Jupiter-1988: classic crypto scammer, admits she lives overseas, want to switch to What'sApp.
https://members.seeking.com/member/36d89c30-b6d8-41ab-a422-178075c09ca3
SecretLover: taking me straight to Snap: xx. Kyliebaby, likely just a pic seller, no interest in a video chat on the site.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1f2d34aa-c534-4afa-9895-aca561bc7ad3
BrightNerd: SCAMMER! 37? Mixed? Age / pic mismatch, mixed / pic mismatch, no description.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4784bf63-6d2f-4e5e-88dd-113662c430af
HelpfulCharmer: crypto scammer, age, language.
https://members.seeking.com/member/19e61fdf-404a-4290-a634-9239a7ff8325
Comments?
BAM.
Someone asked me how risky were cops on Seeking. I thought I would share my answer here.
The cops sometimes get on Seeking but they can really only go after the girls. They set up in a hotel room trolling for John's. Using the escort sites. If bored they might send offers to girls at absurd levels. If the girls agree, they say come on over and give the hotel room. This actually happened to a GPS woman who was on Seeking for a while. Anyone remember her name? It was like aniska siska or some such. (Too lazy to look it up.) If the girl shows she is busted. They might make the same approach to men but most men on seeking aren't after pros and are unlikely to agree to go straight to a hotel room. Avoid anything like that and you are good.
The seeking site, for men, usually involves 1-1 meetings first. If you always ask for an in-person MnG, in a public place, before private time, you are safe. This should be your standard procedure in any case just to avoid the muggers and blackmailers. Cops need to make arrests in wholesale numbers. They cannot afford the time to set up singles. I am even safer because the minute a girl talks ppm, or any sex for money talk, I slowly back away. I want true amateurs. In any case, aside from trolling for pedos, are there any other reports of the cops on Seeking?
BAM.Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.
Vinnie Kramer
03-30-22, 14:59
Age is 16.
https://www.keatingfirmlaw.com/post/legal-age-of-consent
Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.
They will sometimes post profiles that claim 18 but the pics look much younger. I know that some people have been nailed but I do not have any links. Just avoid anyone who looks really young; it shouldn't actually need to be said. More often, these profiles will be scammers trying to extort you. I have had a few people try that with me but I never engage in behavior that might make me vulnerable. My experience after doing this for a while is that the HS girls stick out. One note though, do not trust the 'ID Verified' check marks. All the HS kids have fake ID's showing them as over 21.
BAM.
Can you elaborate on the trolling for pedos? There was a profile in Dayton who was 17 posing as 18 curious if it was uncle.
I had several new profiles to add to the list and thought a second post was warranted.
FeminineBelle: likely romance scammer, fuzzy pic, Using Sandee Westgate pictures, https://www.romancescam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56475&start=15;https://twitter.com/aliciarubialib;.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0a394129-439e-465f-84b9-b349653fea25
Megann025: How many of you guys remember a cute, ginger Megan from about six or seven years ago? She was a pro and a bit of a druggy. She was also a bit flaky. I almost saw her back then but got a tingle and cancelled. She is back now with a 5 year old. Her face is still cute but she looks quite a bit heavier. She used to be reasonable and I suspect still is but not really my thing. She was flattered I remembered her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d6277b6f-fffe-4a1f-85fd-710b2431fe00
Kendall: accepted 200-300 ppm but no details, switched to text, living in Dayton, agreed to MnG in Middletown then dropped that she is 6 mos pregnant, no BD in the picture.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e15c1a4f-2852-433e-ae96-51fc921a0ece
Amanda, 25, Dayton, since 6-21, was all set for MnG last June but she cancelled, Back now but unwilling to re-engage. No Marrieds. Her profile pics are old and she is a bit less attractive on her SM. PII available to contributing seniors.
https://members.seeking.com/member/276b5527-ab2b-4ba7-a959-ef07a7d479ea
CurlyBabyy, "Hiii!! I'm out of town on spring break until next weekend and was wondering if you're okay with starting online then meeting next weekend for fwb? "What could go wrong?? Ghosted me when I said; Sure! let's start with a video chat.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7e8c2ee0-c02f-423d-82b9-0e03beb07d14
HystericalDuchess: CATFISH! Using pics of Ft. Lauderdale Realtor with no obvious connection to Cinti. I have PII for the realtor. Poor English. Asked me to go to What'sApp. Refusing to video chat. She blocked me.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1a539f7d-f499-48be-bc60-3da817b5bdf4
BAM
I had several new profiles to add to the list and thought a second post was warranted. <snipped the intel>
BAMDude, do you ever take a time out to have a martini and stare off into space? LOL.
Cincyfunguy
03-30-22, 21:32
PrincessM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/24be5550-f3c5-44a5-b4e5-4eb6768b6f25
Wants to get to know each other for a couple of weeks, which entails her selling pics.
Magic8 Ball.
https://members.seeking.com/member/06452658-5c3d-47c0-81ec-467748111775
Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.
FitnessFreak.
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/a5f1a5f1-3c42-4725-82de-04e978fbe414
Was with her maybe a year ago a couple of times. I think someone reported that she's not much in terms of conversation / personality. I can confirm. But, she is super super fit and tight. I think we agreed on 400 if I'm not mistaken.Hey JackO, the link to Fitness Freak is to a message and not available. Do you have a profile link?
Tickle Jay
03-31-22, 05:10
Voiceofenigma first said Cincinnati, now shows up near Vegas.
https://members.seeking.com/member/86d083fe-c6bf-4f0c-b4f4-b13c62d51303
JackOhLantern
03-31-22, 06:31
Hey JackO, the link to Fitness Freak is to a message and not available. Do you have a profile link?Sorry about that!
https://members.seeking.com/member/003a91de-c7c9-4255-b92c-cf66ba27803f
I am more of a red wine drinker. Believe it or not, I usually watch Jeopardy at 7:30 and shut down all electronics afterwards. I spend a couple of hours or so reading and sipping some wine as I end my day. Yesterday, was a bit of an exception. I am currently reading a book titled "A Billion Wicked Thoughts." If you have any interest in human sexuality, and I assume most here do, you will find it fascinating. Lot's of counter-intuitive discoveries from mining the porn preferences revealed by search histories from around the world.
BAM.
Dude, do you ever take a time out to have a martini and stare off into space? LOL.
This one is very pretentious. Every time we would agree on a ppm she would increase it.
Magic8 Ball.
https://members.seeking.com/member/06452658-5c3d-47c0-81ec-467748111775
Wants an uber to me, and her rate is 550 - wayyyy too high.
She is a straight up pro. We chatted by text. She contacted me to say she had a room and wanted me to come over. She asked for 300 but accepted 200. I declined. She was also reviewed by Prat. He did a 3-way with her and her friend. As they were finished, she turned pissy and started demanding extra money, etc. According to him, it ended hostile. YMMV but I am not going near..I've had two good experiences with her recently. Service was spot on but she will pester the hell out of you for money days after. I simply say no!
https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e
Great service when she actually keeps the date. I have seen her about five times and she never shows up when scheduled and often times will not call to let you know she is running late or not coming. She will also pester you for advances. I have discontinued seeing her but might re-engage at a later date because when she does show up she performs well.
CreamPieGuy543
04-01-22, 22:05
It is interesting that SA in the before covid times, banned this. Whether or not it was actually enforced or not that's a different story but I would like to see them ban it again, although it's probably one of those "genie in a bottle" situations.
To answer your question I think it's more about volume. If they can get 60 bucks from 10 people in a week that's enough right there.
I do not do online only arrangements. I do not pay for "meet and greets" Aside maybe from buying food or a beer or something. Not sure how things are in the midwest but the bowl in the Seattle area is a complete mess right now.
We all have different standards and red lines regarding age, looks, weight, price range, etc. I get that.
But is there anyone among us who is doing "online only" arrangements?
I can't even imagine how this would work.
Camshow sites have been around for 20 years. And back in the 1980's, there were the 1-900 lines. (As a high school kid in 1985, I once dialed a 1-900 line out of pure curiosity. I found it unsatisfying and boring. And I had a *lot* of fun trying to explain that one to my parents when it appeared on the family phone bill.).
I just can't imagine what any of these girls is providing that would enable them to make any real money with an "online arrangement". Am I missing something here?
Here are the recent additions to my watch list:
Yuwillloveme21: since 6-17, Last seen around 11-19, went by kaykay, was a UTR, was willing to go direct to FC for low $, profile pix are verrrry old, butterface in texted pics. Had some attitude. I am not interested in getting an update. I will not re-engage but thought you all might want the background.
https://members.seeking.com/member/aa5b7a57-054e-439c-8fb5-ed9e1172874a
Sweetdelight: not exactly sure why but this one set off my spidey sense. Fuzzy pics, Boone County?, a bit too overtly dtf, taking me straight to snap, using stolen pictures of porn star: Lela Star. LEO??
https://members.seeking.com/member/227ca7b0-a333-484c-ac61-0ff85a8bcd9e
Ginia: on WYP, using GV number, bait-and-switch, hot pictures on the site, Thick pics by text. Close but not the same woman. No car, about an hour away in Sabina.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/okY13bKlJlGRRzPAneVE27Ma
Angel wings: Crypto-scammer? "For the purpose of getting married." Odd and likely not real. Changed her pictures overnight, TGTBT, refuses to video chat.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2cefb197-3f49-4c8f-9b0e-611827d587ab
SweetMusician: Classic Crypto-scammer. Stolen pic: https://www.misslola.com/products/shawna-camel.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1a96c72d-eb43-4a9f-9fc8-d7f35c5962aa
Waterbaby: "I'm looking for a bi weekly or weekly fwb arrangement but I'd ideally like to start online for a few days and explore my voyeurism kink more. How I did online with my last arrangement was I sent him pics, videos and FaceTimed him at night and danced for him for 140 then met up and started a weekly fwb arrangement and he helped me out every month with 800." I said I would love an arrangement like that. After we video chat for a few minutes. I also asked for her Paypal so I can send some money to show my seriousness. For some reason she ghosted me afterwards.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4c908ecb-32f6-4c8f-9e8a-652f4fe206fc
Lipslikeangelinaaa: Not new. Frequent profiles, often reviewed. I have saved notes for anyone curious. Total GPS rinser: in the past, asking variously 800 MnG, 2000 FC, 5000 overnight. Another person got a 3500 allowance request. She is hot. Probably shows up to find a whale then disappears. There ARE whales on the site. They surface, grab a hot chick they can use for a month or so and then they dive again until they need someone fresh.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2e2b23b9-a51f-4bde-940a-11080045f426
Queenme: Probably a real person but the picture is stolen: "You literally wrote me the same message 7 years ago. Likely true. She must have an eidetic memory. Careful what you say. Nice warning to me to start mixing up my messages. Here is where you find her profile pic.https://www.pinterest.com/chloetelesford/summer-vibes/.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a336794d-d65d-444f-9f15-dce75f7f9bbf
Misssexy101: ""Hey babe want to get together tonight?" "Did I scare you off?" UTR: I did not explore the value proposition.
https://members.seeking.com/member/aea47ea2-cd45-4e80-bd1a-015ea9e7580f
I welcome comments or feedback. I've decided that I am just going to immediately block the obvious scammers going forward. In the past, I would favorite them in order to keep track. I have also sometimes messaged them to explore their schemes and waste their time. I have recent experienced some retaliatory complaints on the site. I have been on the site for almost eight years without a complaint or problem before now. I suspect there are still idiots on this site sharing my posts with the targets. It's not worth the hassle. I usually have my profile hidden. If I never message them, they cannot see my profile and therefor cannot file a complaint. Any other suggestions?
BAM
JackOhLantern
04-03-22, 17:10
https://members.seeking.com/member/7c595d55-47c5-4ace-bf89-6de97bea9361
Asking a grand. Serious gps.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7c595d55-47c5-4ace-bf89-6de97bea9361
Asking a grand. Serious gps.Just curious: how did she serve up the request?
BAM.
JackOhLantern
04-03-22, 19:36
Just curious: how did she serve up the request?
BAM.We went to text and she said she was down for whatever and could host if the price was right. I started at 300 and she said that's way too low she normally gets 1 k. I seriously doubt that, especially in Springfield.
Weekends always tend to be slow for me but I still have time to screen a few:
Dmilam: "a natural born hustler," she is either a scammer or looking for online only - which is pretty much the same, she shared the following: "Me being a single mom of 3 kids, who's dad passed a couple months ago and me being held hostage a year ago I'm very cautious and time limited for a lot of things." So, 3 kids by age 24, held hostage (?) and lost her husband a few months ago but can still post super hot pictures. And she bites! Ghosted me when I suggested online was a losing proposition on Seeking.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d2655d14-5507-489b-9798-080f7fcd0b1d
BrilliantGorgeous, Says Tatiana, 34, TGTBT, stolen pics?, Not certain but 80% likely to be a crypto-scammer,*eventually admitted to living in NC, # was Philly area code.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5fe3d250-dad5-4cba-b4fa-568388adf0b1
IttyBitty: Is this a guy? Possibly, based on PII. Fake pic? Name is Connor. Wants 200 at the first meeting but willing to give oral at that time. Agreed to 100 and will drive to me. Lives past Urbana several hours away.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6eb6ebf3-de6a-40ec-9208-2c6c0a5c4087
EndearingModel, 34, Mixed, Classic Crypto-scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/dc770a2c-89af-4b92-865c-55c712b20125
Bbabygirlxoxo: claims 22, actually 18 and still in HS. Has attitude, and BF/GF. Hard to be sure.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a39b0e0c-003c-4b81-8fd9-c9438f280e09
BAM
Freckle Freak
04-04-22, 06:49
The two below are real and I have had multiple fun times with them.
Sarahbaby0416. She is curvy not fat. Dinner and then back to the hotel. This girl loves sex. Great DFK, nice natural tits, multiple positions, very vocal. I spent 4 hours with her MP, CIP and CIM all for $200. Cannot host at least when I saw her last. Not a pro.
https://members.seeking.com/member/89d20f00-cba2-405b-b25e-a66558e8ebec
Bethhxo. Curvy not fat. Huge natural tits very pretty. Very GFE, vocal, multiple positions, good kisser, BBFJ and CIP. Cannot host, $400 semi pro. She is needy texts me often for repeats.
https://members.seeking.com/member/569ab4ea-d329-41fd-b5c0-faed79a40a93
I have talked to these two and I believe them to be real. Both were down to meeting and I almost pulled the trigger. I may the next time I'm in town which is often.
Juicybarbie29. Visible pics are thinner, hidden pics are thicker. Decent communicator, was DTF for $300. Cannot host. Said she was GFE and good with just about anything. Said she loves to kiss and BBBJCIM was ok.
https://members.seeking.com/member/fa69ecdf-16da-4a8a-bd07-c4097aa6db51
Pleasuresallmine. Pics are accurate at least what she texted me. She want's Long Term but will meet for $400. She said she good with just about anything. Experienced SB not sure if a pro.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e4002c74-4939-4ce4-b09b-d8fddf3d92a2
Makeitsimplenshort. Scammer. Atlanta area code. Wanted gas money to meet me at a hotel. Would do a car date if she's real. I asked her why she needed gas money if we did a car date since I was driving. No response.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b27b0da4-de54-4be9-a4bc-111f8fe00ff9
Any info on these two?
Sweetbabytay.
https://members.seeking.com/member/23c46aaf-0904-4dc2-94c9-048bc103d6be
Auri.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0f2d72ca-8eb0-4027-9001-db2016cfd092
The two below are real and I have had multiple fun times with them.
Sarahbaby0416. She is curvy not fat. Dinner and then back to the hotel. This girl loves sex. Great DFK, nice natural tits, multiple positions, very vocal. I spent 4 hours with her MP, CIP and CIM all for $200. Cannot host at least when I saw her last. Not a pro.
https://members.seeking.com/member/89d20f00-cba2-405b-b25e-a66558e8ebec
Bethhxo. Curvy not fat. Huge natural tits very pretty. Very GFE, vocal, multiple positions, good kisser, BBFJ and CIP. Cannot host, $400 semi pro. She is needy texts me often for repeats.
https://members.seeking.com/member/569ab4ea-d329-41fd-b5c0-faed79a40a93
I have talked to these two and I believe them to be real. Both were down to meeting and I almost pulled the trigger. I may the next time I'm in town which is often.
Juicybarbie29. Visible pics are thinner, hidden pics are thicker. Decent communicator, was DTF for $300. Cannot host. Said she was GFE and good with just about anything. Said she loves to kiss and BBBJCIM was ok.
https://members.seeking.com/member/fa69ecdf-16da-4a8a-bd07-c4097aa6db51
Pleasuresallmine. Pics are accurate at least what she texted me. She want's Long Term but will meet for $400. She said she good with just about anything. Experienced SB not sure if a pro.I've been seeing Bethhxo also. Very good service but will pester you for money and additional meets often. She is reliable and shows up on time.
Just curious, do you ever worry about not using a condom with these girls?
The two below are real and I have had multiple fun times with them.
Sarahbaby0416. She is curvy not fat. Dinner and then back to the hotel. This girl loves sex. Great DFK, nice natural tits, multiple positions, very vocal. I spent 4 hours with her MP, CIP and CIM all for $200. Cannot host at least when I saw her last. Not a pro.
https://members.seeking.com/member/89d20f00-cba2-405b-b25e-a66558e8ebec
Bethhxo. Curvy not fat. Huge natural tits very pretty. Very GFE, vocal, multiple positions, good kisser, BBFJ and CIP. Cannot host, $400 semi pro. She is needy texts me often for repeats.
https://members.seeking.com/member/569ab4ea-d329-41fd-b5c0-faed79a40a93
Just curious, do you ever worry about not using a condom with these girls?I have seen Bethhxo on multiple occasions and always use cover as I know she is high volume.
JackOhLantern
04-04-22, 18:46
I have seen Bethhxo on multiple occasions and always use cover as I know she is high volume.Ditto LOL.
I have seen Bethhxo on multiple occasions and always use cover as I know she is high volume.How is she overall? Is she a mess or does she have it together? We've been texting and I'm seriously considering this one. For $. 4 how long does she hang out for? TIA.
How is she overall? Is she a mess or does she have it together? We've been texting and I'm seriously considering this one. For $. 4 how long does she hang out for? TIA.She doesn't rush and the service is good. I wouldn't do 4 tho. You can talk her down.
SouthernG71
04-04-22, 20:48
The two below are real and I have had multiple fun times with them.
Sarahbaby0416. She is curvy not fat. Dinner and then back to the hotel. This girl loves sex. Great DFK, nice natural tits, multiple positions, very vocal. I spent 4 hours with her MP, CIP and CIM all for $200. Cannot host at least when I saw her last. Not a pro.
https://members.seeking.com/member/89d20f00-cba2-405b-b25e-a66558e8ebec
Bethhxo. Curvy not fat. Huge natural tits very pretty. Very GFE, vocal, multiple positions, good kisser, BBFJ and CIP. Cannot host, $400 semi pro. She is needy texts me often for repeats.
https://members.seeking.com/member/569ab4ea-d329-41fd-b5c0-faed79a40a93
I have talked to these two and I believe them to be real. Both were down to meeting and I almost pulled the trigger. I may the next time I'm in town which is often.
Juicybarbie29. Visible pics are thinner, hidden pics are thicker. Decent communicator, was DTF for $300. Cannot host. Said she was GFE and good with just about anything. Said she loves to kiss and BBBJCIM was ok.
https://members.seeking.com/member/fa69ecdf-16da-4a8a-bd07-c4097aa6db51
Pleasuresallmine. Pics are accurate at least what she texted me. She want's Long Term but will meet for $400. She said she good with just about anything. Experienced SB not sure if a pro.Juicybarbie29 is a catfish! Met her last night. Her pics, if they're even her are 30 years old. She smelled like she bathed in an ashtray. Her pics vs in person are not accurate. I wouldn't have engaged with that for free.
Hello guys:
Hotmom273: Led with her number. Said yes to everything I suggested then asked that I cover a babysitter for her. Of course, I agreed but only after we had met and the babysitter was done. I cannot get her to respond now.
https://members.seeking.com/member/392d641a-f3ec-4df4-9e5f-13b4c9d46c35
Josla: Crypto-scammer. Wasn't sure at first but then she asked me to switch to What's App.
https://members.seeking.com/member/faaca588-b3b5-4ee0-bcc4-42220a294bdc
DreamyChickie, 27, classic crypto-scammer using pics that have been on the site at least twice before.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c0222279-6ba7-404b-aaa3-29d8f29f64ed
Mysterious Gambler: classic crypto-scammer, East Price Hill?
https://members.seeking.com/member/83c8e318-20f6-4d1e-9e7b-8ba9b34a3636
BAM.
SouthernG71
04-06-22, 15:29
https://members.seeking.com/member/b387dcfa-6a61-4ba8-b151-2dd43a76697e
Great service when she actually keeps the date. I have seen her about five times and she never shows up when scheduled and often times will not call to let you know she is running late or not coming. She will also pester you for advances. I have discontinued seeing her but might re-engage at a later date because when she does show up she performs well.What was the damage of her ppm?
What was the damage of her ppm?$$ but I won't offer that anymore.
What was the damage of her ppm?That should have said 4.
Here you go. I am immediately hiding more people now which may be contributing to a shorter list. However, I am also seeing a slight decline in overall activity. That happens from time-to-time.
Hot Mess Diva: 33/53, This one is 'can't miss.' Not a scammer but we seriously need someone to TOFTT and report back.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d98b7c39-cc71-429d-aa03-733b87e58e3d
Summer: TGTBT Scammer: "My name is Mina. I hope to find a gentleman who can accompany me for the rest of my life. What do you want to remind me of?" it goes downhill after that.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c0a0da11-b764-4486-b2ad-99d883744674
SultryLady: classic crypto-scammer, age-pic mismatch.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e7030678-3f0e-48b8-a1ab-4d01ac678a09
HumorousBeauty: in Columbus but approached me here in Cinti. Took me straight to text. Offered ppm at 200. Shared a picture of Bree Olsen. The sex worker: https://twitter.com/BreeOlson/status/881557343556784128/photo/1.
https://members.seeking.com/member/546143c4-8700-4eec-800a-5169b1dbfd1d
Happy Hunting!
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b062e6c1-f359-44a3-bdf4-ccfbe71c017d
Wants 500. Anyone met her?
https://members.seeking.com/member/b062e6c1-f359-44a3-bdf4-ccfbe71c017d
Wants 500. Anyone met her?I must be blocked. Or have blocked her. What's the name?
She quoted me 500 too. I'm starting to wonder if the new normal is now approaching 500. That seems to be the usual quote these days.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b062e6c1-f359-44a3-bdf4-ccfbe71c017d
Wants 500. Anyone met her?
Here you go. I am immediately hiding more people now which may be contributing to a shorter list. However, I am also seeing a slight decline in overall activity. That happens from time-to-time.
Hot Mess Diva: 33/53, This one is 'can't miss.' Not a scammer but we seriously need someone to TOFTT and report back.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d98b7c39-cc71-429d-aa03-733b87e58e3d
Summer: TGTBT Scammer: "My name is Mina. I hope to find a gentleman who can accompany me for the rest of my life. What do you want to remind me of?" it goes downhill after that.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c0a0da11-b764-4486-b2ad-99d883744674
SultryLady: classic crypto-scammer, age-pic mismatch.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e7030678-3f0e-48b8-a1ab-4d01ac678a09
HumorousBeauty: in Columbus but approached me here in Cinti. Took me straight to text. Offered ppm at 200. Shared a picture of Bree Olsen. The sex worker: https://twitter.com/BreeOlson/status/881557343556784128/photo/1.
https://members.seeking.com/member/546143c4-8700-4eec-800a-5169b1dbfd1d
Happy Hunting!
BAM.Number one 50 plus, the rest scammers.
SouthernG71
04-08-22, 09:36
$$ but I won't offer that anymore.It's $$ now that she's asking.
JackOhLantern
04-09-22, 09:43
HoneyOfKentucky.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1d0c09d1-4b5b-4626-b9c7-9942ef41ecb7
She's in NKY, but now it's showing up as Louisville so maybe she travels. Offers tantric massage. Not sure if there's a happy ending LOL.
https://rubmd.com/cincinnati-oh/69ee8572-431c-44cb-b90b-48f56d26e23e
Novembermay.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2cb54f16-df66-49df-b919-7bc5f8602bb5
We had a meet and greet set up, but she said she wasn't sure if she could meet with me because I wasn't chatting / messaging with her enough and getting to know her. I said that's what the meet and greet was for and I preferred to do that in person. Seems flakey.
Noella.
https://members.seeking.com/member/8dce9b8b-20ef-466e-90eb-d05e529ae460
Been texting with this one forever, and she always has an excuse for why she can't meet. Done chasing this one.
Has anyone had a dream with her yet?
https://members.seeking.com/member/a70c7bd0-ec2d-456c-9a46-53f7430195eb
JackOhLantern
04-09-22, 10:06
Sugarandspice87.
https://members.seeking.com/member/48d73ae2-da95-4937-a437-54d1b0b00415
We did a meet and greet, and she is very nice and very pretty. Unfortunately she lives in Urbana, which is about 1. 5 hours away from me and has limited availability. May be a good match for someone else, though.
JackOhLantern
04-09-22, 20:09
MiPetite.
https://members.seeking.com/member/83c41918-687c-4dfb-b045-99f97aaff9ab
Straight to snapchat or ig, went the online content route, when I said I wanted to meet in person she asked for an uber and half up front. Pass.
JackOhLantern
04-09-22, 20:12
https://members.seeking.com/member/3bfb706e-d990-4789-af79-626566ca98bf
About Me.
I, a quiet little girl, red face, eyes are not big, but smile like a curved crescent moon. Small mouth, flush bangs, often combed with a ponytail, can be spiritual.
Lolololololol.
JackOhLantern
04-09-22, 20:34
https://members.seeking.com/member/dd9217dd-0f7e-40ef-8ccf-f5284df12229
I've done this a few times before, I usually start with communicating through snap, a lot of guys like to pay $$ for some pics.
Some here may have been reported below but I will share again anyway.
Paylovie1: "I seek for NSA FWB SD ppm but I will love to start by sharing my nudes for just little $" Determined to sell pictures via cashapp, no video chat, no meeting, Voip # near Indianapolis.
https://members.seeking.com/member/ac3a2a6f-596b-4808-9af4-ef7fe0ab990f
NiceInluencer: classic crypto-scammer, bad English, etc.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3bfb706e-d990-4789-af79-626566ca98bf
Friendlyheiress, classic crypto-scammer, bad English, weird questions, no video chat, asked me to go to snap chat.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0ab9c875-ceb8-4a12-be2e-5a1b49dd3b80
SharpBelle: blocked me before I could copy a link to her profile. Asked that you agree to advance gas money to her in her first message. Blocked me as soon as I declined.
Isabella: made me a favorite without ever viewing my profile, wants to go to snap, refuses to videochat, one picture, sparse profile.
https://members.seeking.com/member/42d80fe6-f907-472e-8941-27f4fac16252
Nicole: Asked for $50 on WYP. Gave me a voip # from Indianapolis. Keeps trying to get money from me via cashapp prior to meeting can and ever meet.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/profile/VaoGNqxp5a4nY1PJLX4YE23b
MiPetite: led with her SC and IG. Hoodrat and attitude, not necessarily a scammer but has some risk factors.
https://members.seeking.com/member/83c41918-687c-4dfb-b045-99f97aaff9ab
BAM
IttyBitty: Is this a guy? Possibly, based on PII. Fake pic? Name is Connor. Wants 200 at the first meeting but willing to give oral at that time. Agreed to 100 and will drive to me. Lives past Urbana several hours away.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-2c6c0a5c4087
I actually know her. Have met several times. We have no intimate relationship but I know she is real. She is hot. Thin with small tits if that's your thing. It's definitely my thing. But very good looking. Looks way much better in person than that pic she posted. Very nice girl, but she is your typical pretty white girl who likes the thug black guys. Dime a dozen ya know. But you I don't think you'll have any issues hooking up with her. She's cool.
BarnesMike32
04-11-22, 11:26
My vanilla prepaid card no longer works for SA b / c it will no longer add your zip code to it (I think that is why it won't work). Can anyone suggest either a card that will work or another service (Adult Friend Finder? Ashley Madison?) that will accept a US prepaid card that is decent? Thank you!
Mike B.
WanderingAbout
04-11-22, 13:29
Profile is now deactivated.
IttyBitty: Is this a guy? Possibly, based on PII. Fake pic? Name is Connor. Wants 200 at the first meeting but willing to give oral at that time. Agreed to 100 and will drive to me. Lives past Urbana several hours away.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-2c6c0a5c4087
I actually know her. Have met several times. We have no intimate relationship but I know she is real. She is hot. Thin with small tits if that's your thing. It's definitely my thing. But very good looking. Looks way much better in person than that pic she posted. Very nice girl, but she is your typical pretty white girl who likes the thug black guys. Dime a dozen ya know. But you I don't think you'll have any issues hooking up with her. She's cool.
WanderingAbout
04-11-22, 19:28
Stunning profile picture (LOL wth lmao).
https://members.seeking.com/member/030f5f3c-8355-f88d-92f5-b4a63b49e638
I finally had a session with Feral and Fun a middle aged MILF. It was a non rushed two and a half hour experience unlike anything I've experienced with another young lady from the site. Everything was made available. She is active in the swinger lifestyle so use your imagination. I explored everything with her and she really got into it. Be aware: She is a squirter so make sure you have plenty of towels.
TroublePlay
04-13-22, 11:03
Netspend and it works for SA.
My vanilla prepaid card no longer works for SA b / c it will no longer add your zip code to it (I think that is why it won't work). Can anyone suggest either a card that will work or another service (Adult Friend Finder? Ashley Madison?) that will accept a US prepaid card that is decent? Thank you!
Mike B.
Traveller677
04-13-22, 15:08
Anyone else had a car date with this one? Had a good time but I think she got a new number. Hoping anyone has update on her if she's still in it.
https://members.seeking.com/member/db1375bc-d5dc-47f9-83b4-23e85455e3a8
Okay, so I've been banned from SA and not sure why but whatever. I tried again with a different email and as soon as I uploaded a picture I was banned immediately. Never mentioned exchanging anything for money. The first time I think I said something along the lines of don't ask me to send anything up front or something vague like that but I guess they took that as a violation. So now I'm thinking my pics were flagged they got some facial recognition program or something. Even uploaded different pics so idk. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Doing okay on SB but I know there's a lot more action on SA LOL.
Okay, so I've been banned from SA and not sure why but whatever. I tried again with a different email and as soon as I uploaded a picture I was banned immediately. Never mentioned exchanging anything for money. The first time I think I said something along the lines of don't ask me to send anything up front or something vague like that but I guess they took that as a violation. So now I'm thinking my pics were flagged they got some facial recognition program or something. Even uploaded different pics so idk. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Doing okay on SB but I know there's a lot more action on SA LOL.They could have flagged your system information; machine name / serial number, your router system info, etc.
Here are some recent suspicious profiles:
Cherryfromthetree: catfish? Using pictures of pornstar? https://hdporn.pics/user/cherryfromthetree; check hand tattoo.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5da7ae51-14c7-4bb1-9bb4-814e9a907cdd
Jennadontcare: Is this a high school chick or a foreign scammer?
https://members.seeking.com/member/d12c26f6-fd37-40d5-a356-8fb6b84ad97a
CuteLover: led with her number.
https://members.seeking.com/member/dc8e828c-e9ac-41b4-b903-f85ed97b2753
HumorousDame: classic crypto-scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/33f5ebb1-8f60-4fd5-9ecb-18b1477d3bd1
Creativeprincess, 23?, says Columbus was Cinti, UTR, repeat profile. She was on Seeking and USAG several years ago, I cannot find my notes on her but I recall she sent me some really hot private pictures. I never pulled the trigger because her overbite is a bit of a turnoff for me.
https://members.seeking.com/member/791e01bb-2e0e-4c06-85ac-f72e41a71848
Petitebabygirl: Could not get her to engage at first. When she finally answered, she declined my offer. Said she needed 3 K per month. When I wished her the best of luck she came back offering to sell me pictures and videos.
https://members.seeking.com/member/120e2c43-cbe8-4528-95cf-5a13b48b089b
Oxjbabyjxo: Been around before. Hangs with the Gala crowd. Agreed to my offer and gave her number, later ghosted. I have her PII for contributing seniors.
https://members.seeking.com/member/067b5e53-0daa-4c8c-936d-fb2ada381963
BAM.
TroublePlay
04-14-22, 14:02
I finally saw her earlier this week.
Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.
Kissing ok.
Great vocals.
Really gets into it.
Sweet sexy voice.
Large huge breasts.
Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.
Pretty girl, with long natural hair.
Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.
Drove a bit to meet me.
Brought a sexy outfit to play in.
Bad: Has gained weight since pics.
Is self conscious about weight gain and stretch marks.
Late.
Some smoke smell.
I will likely not repeat due to negatives, but glad I saw her.
How is she overall? Is she a mess or does she have it together? We've been texting and I'm seriously considering this one. For $. 4 how long does she hang out for? TIA.
I finally saw her earlier this week.
Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.
Kissing ok.
Great vocals.
Really gets into it.
Sweet sexy voice.
Large huge breasts.
Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.
Pretty girl, with long natural hair.
Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.
Drove a bit to meet me..Glad you had a good time. She will start texting for repeat dates or money. She will also swear up and down that you are the only one she is seeing now. That's what she told me Tuesday when I told her I couldn't meet this week. Just texted me again two hours ago wanting to meet today.
TroublePlay
04-14-22, 17:28
Do you have a link for this one?
I finally had a session with Feral and Fun a middle aged MILF. It was a non rushed two and a half hour experience unlike anything I've experienced with another young lady from the site. Everything was made available. She is active in the swinger lifestyle so use your imagination. I explored everything with her and she really got into it. Be aware: She is a squirter so make sure you have plenty of towels.
JackOhLantern
04-14-22, 19:27
Do you have a link for this one?https://members.seeking.com/member/a70c7bd0-ec2d-456c-9a46-53f7430195eb
Here are today's discoveries:
Lindseeh: shows login from the Bahamas. Could be nothing but also says: 'looking for something unique kinda".
https://members.seeking.com/member/27eb2d2a-a361-4777-8229-5ded545daf40
Highgoddess: into bdsm, has her own dungeon, looking for simps to worship her. Go ahead; I don't judge. Using a voip # from the Detroit area.
https://members.seeking.com/member/48fd0510-29ea-4350-9609-1a6e7bea24b6
StunningLady: 35/HOT!, age-pic mismatch, crypto-scammer language! Two year old stolen pictures of Carina Ibsen: https://www.instagram.com/carinaibsen/. Will the profile still be active when I post this?
https://members.seeking.com/member/5fd8050c-2084-43ac-91a3-f50c78cf56f8
Princess: cute chick but something is off. Pic is fuzzy and of a shorter girl than the 5'11" height given. Still testing.
https://members.seeking.com/member/180195f0-f26a-4c47-9e32-12666815a1e4
Lilpetitething: is the a repeat for MiPetite? I think it could be. Mipetite is gone for me. She was a hoodrat style rinser who led with her SC and IG if I recall correctly. In any case, she has engaged and says she is new. I may be wrong about this one.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f1f4adc9-5929-48e3-8734-a5ae008f52e8
ObscureHottie: age and fuzzy pic make me suspicious but the word salad profile clinches the deal: crypto-scammer!
https://members.seeking.com/member/3a512568-0697-489f-ad51-0fb741fc4243
Wildhottie: not a scammer per se but feels an awful lot like a rinser! This girl packs more attitude in a smaller space than most similar profiles. She claims to have experience on Seeking but I do not recognize her. Need to check the Columbus board to see if anyone knows her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/cda824b1-8b6a-4290-b2a8-9c8f04206d37
AlluringChick: hot pic but age 35 are a mismatch, profile is sparse but written like a crypto chick. Still testing this one. Profile deleted or did she block me? Profile slowly disappearing.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d056117c-56c8-43db-8037-f85d17d3ea03
MysteriousCutie: shows 21 on Seeking but 18 on SB. SB pictures look even younger. Be wary!
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/profile/30a187860f160642
https://members.seeking.com/member/83ac55bf-2a81-406c-94a2-baa56ebd0cce
BAM.
Bam Bam,
I notice you usually post about girls that have been on the site for a day or two. Do you find that your success rate is better in the first few days they are on the site or if you wait a week? I always wonder if they are more overwhelmed in the first few days or if that is the best time because they have no expectations?
Here are today's discoveries:
Lindseeh: shows login from the Bahamas. Could be nothing but also says: 'looking for something unique kinda".
https://members.seeking.com/member/27eb2d2a-a361-4777-8229-5ded545daf40
Tickle Jay
04-16-22, 05:24
She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.
I finally saw her earlier this week.
Good: Head game is spectacular, BBBJ, inclusive of some DT, CIM, YMMV.
Kissing ok.
Great vocals.
Really gets into it.
Sweet sexy voice.
Large huge breasts.
Played with herself to climax a couple of times, very hot.
Pretty girl, with long natural hair.
Pleasant personality and complimentary, sweet.
Drove a bit to meet me.
Brought a sexy outfit to play in.
Bad: Has gained weight since pics.
Is self conscious about weight gain and stretch marks.
Late.
Some smoke smell.
I will likely not repeat due to negatives, but glad I saw her.
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fd544012-7f08-4aa2-a159-cb8a5f716ddc
Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.
Bam Bam,
I notice you usually post about girls that have been on the site for a day or two. Do you find that your success rate is better in the first few days they are on the site or if you wait a week? I always wonder if they are more overwhelmed in the first few days or if that is the best time because they have no expectations?
I post suspicious profiles as soon as I get whiff of anything 'off.' The earlier people get a warning, the more value it has. However, I am sometimes wrong. Don't let my warnings scare you away. Test them yourself and just use a little extra caution.
If you can reach profiles really early, there is an improved chance of them actually reading your message. Especially if they are a PYT. These profiles get buried in a thousand DM's and they cannot read all of them. I see a lot of my messages go unread even if I reach out within a day or so of their arrival. In such a case, I usually wait until they disappear for a week or more and then re-approach when they return and the message deluge has diminished. If you have limited time to invest, it may also pay to wait a couple of weeks or more before sending a message. A lot of the UTR's and scammers get deleted by then and you do not waste your time on unwanted people.
Happy hunting!
BAM.
https://members.seeking.com/messages/inbox/fd544012-7f08-4aa2-a159-cb8a5f716ddc
Not in Cincinnati, but down in Louisville. Can't host. Willing to meet at a hotel right away if you can handle her GPS. Says she gets 200 for dinner. Which based on real pics she likes her food.Your link is to your message box. Here is the original:
https://members.seeking.com/member/5da7ae51-14c7-4bb1-9bb4-814e9a907cdd
It no longer works for me. Either I am blocked or she is gone!
BAM.
She's stopped responding to me on SA I was out of town last week and she wanted to meet. Really wanted to ride that at least once.I say try again. She just texted me yesterday asking for a meet.
Todd Cincy
04-16-22, 20:29
Either that, or just an outright scammer:
https://members.seeking.com/member/798e24db-9c2d-4158-b02c-c6d7f7be46d6
She's 36, and only interested in guys under 56. (Sorry, you 57 year old's need not apply!) But here is the best part:
"Please be aware I request a gift for our first meeting. If that's too much for you, please don't get in touch. Looking for a chivalrous man not a cheap chap. ".
I would almost prefer to think that this one is a man trying to scam using a fake profile, rather than believe that this case of GPS is for real.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.